Natural alternatives to fat grafting?

MaracasMogs

MaracasMogs

Iron
Joined
Jan 16, 2025
Posts
94
Reputation
78
i already have a pretty good hooding but idk how to make it better.
i suppose that no softmax could have effects that are similar to fat grafting (as in as efficient) but i hope new techniques dropped
please put them below
 
  • JFL
Reactions: zaebalsya, flatcheck213 and ey88
Volufiline :soy:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Skull Based Sage and MaracasMogs
landwhalemaxxing
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: MaracasMogs
i already have a pretty good hooding but idk how to make it better.
i suppose that no softmax could have effects that are similar to fat grafting (as in as efficient) but i hope new techniques dropped
please put them below
No way of getting natural fat grafts body, sorry.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MaracasMogs and Skull Based Sage
i have gained under eye support and overall fat around the eye after increasing weight
Yeah and you probably looked like a fat fuck:feelskek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Skull Based Sage
@Skull Based Sage retarded faggot jfling for great advice
 
So you’re saying it’s worth looking like a bloated incel just to get a slight increase in under-eye support from extra soft tissue?
its easy to lose fat anyway so its worth it
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: copercel123
its easy to lose fat anyway so its worth it
But if the whole point of gaining fat is to increase soft tissue for under eye support, how does it make sense to say it’s “easy to lose” afterward? The moment you cut and lose that fat, you lose the exact tissue volume you’re claiming is beneficial. You can’t have it both ways — either the fat stays and provides support (along with the bloated look), or you cut and lose both the fat and the supposed under eye benefit. That logic completely collapses under scrutiny.
 
But if the whole point of gaining fat is to increase soft tissue for under eye support, how does it make sense to say it’s “easy to lose” afterward? The moment you cut and lose that fat, you lose the exact tissue volume you’re claiming is beneficial. You can’t have it both ways — either the fat stays and provides support (along with the bloated look), or you cut and lose both the fat and the supposed under eye benefit. That logic completely collapses under scrutiny.
no? u lose under eye support mostly because of stress, fat will stay around the eye
 
  • JFL
Reactions: MaracasMogs and copercel123
no? u lose under eye support mostly because of stress, fat will stay around the eye
That’s not how facial fat distribution works:feelskek:. You don’t get to pick and choose which fat “stays” when you’re cutting. Periorbital fat is actually one of the first to diminish with overall facial fat loss, especially in lean or high cortisol individuals.
Stress can accelerate under eye hollowing via cortisol related collagen breakdown, but it’s not the main factor — it just worsens what’s already happening through volume loss (fat + bone + skin thinning).
 
  • +1
Reactions: MaracasMogs
i already have a pretty good hooding but idk how to make it better.
i suppose that no softmax could have effects that are similar to fat grafting (as in as efficient) but i hope new techniques dropped
please put them below
Implants
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: MaracasMogs
How would it even work?

You can't get fat on only one part of your face without surgery

Volufiline kinda works because it stimulates cells

Outside that there isn't much you can do
 
  • +1
Reactions: MaracasMogs
i already have a pretty good hooding but idk how to make it better.
i suppose that no softmax could have effects that are similar to fat grafting (as in as efficient) but i hope new techniques dropped
please put them below
1748717427012

Mirin hooding
 
  • JFL
Reactions: MaracasMogs

Similar threads

Acquiescence
Replies
24
Views
530
Acquiescence
Acquiescence
J
Replies
42
Views
943
Tigermoggerlol
Tigermoggerlol
browncurrycel
Replies
16
Views
577
99j
99j
Basedking
Replies
99
Views
992
Dickdazzler
Dickdazzler

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top