Natural bimax results

Acromegaly_Chad

Acromegaly_Chad

Offical Surgery Consultant
Joined
Apr 16, 2020
Posts
2,050
Reputation
5,180
After meticulously studying dozens of bimax cases I have finally figured out what really matters for an aesthetically pleasing result. It's not projection, forward growth or anteface. Many may now assume it's a combination with implants to compensate for midface hollowness - for the average, non deformed, non syndromatic class 1 patient this is not the case either.

Now let me tell you something, I have figured this out by combining the statements of Dr Zarrinbal, Dr Brusco, Dr Triaca, Dr Andreishchev, Dr Gorban, Dr. Augustopary and Dr. Alfaro. It's really something unheard of so far in the PSL community or only a few people have written about it.

It's truly a different approach, some friends have told me it has a profoundly disrupting potential, I'm basically Jeff Bezos of Looksmaxx. I truly believe in invention and a scientific discourse that prospers thanks to thesis and antithesis. After having studied hundreds of side profile shots and x rays I finally claim to have found the holy grail, to know when a lefort 1 is useful and HOW MUCH advancement is useful. It's not just a subjective assessment of myself but it's an objective measurement that can be applied to everyone.

Many a man hath fallen to the bimax meme. Thou shall not be forgotten, may god bring justice upon thee and thy chimpmaxxed maxilla. May god sent forth thy retribution and acromegaly_chad shall bring enlightement upon thee. Fellow recessedcel, lo thy saviour is here and hath maketh a new theory about looks, thou surgery shall not fail.

But let's start from the beginning. After all, we know that history as a science is originally intended to be an attempt to reconstruct the past in order to understand the future. My early theories were a little too new wave for my tastes, but when I brought forth my Chin Wing surgery approach, I really believe I came into my own, both scientifically and aesthetically. The whole theory has a clear, crisp vocabulary and a new sheen of consumate professionalism that really gives the statements a big boost. Some have compared me to Dr Sailer, but I think I have a far more sophisticated, cynical approach.

In 2021, I released THIS thread, my most accomplished thread. My undisputed masterpiece is "Natural bimax results", a thread so catchy, most people probably don't read it, but they should, because it is not just about the pleasures of cosmetic surgery and the importance of the maxilla, it is also a personal statement about me myself.

Having told you the secret of natural bimax results is a true belssing for me. I feel humbled and honored for this experience and plan on giving even further back to the community. First and foremost, I want to thank myself, for being such a generous genius, truly one of a kind. I will use this knowledge to the biggest benefit of the world and for myself when undergoing my surgery next year.

Ok, those who have made it until hear, congrats for having read through my shitposting. It's very simple to explain what I have discovered, lefort 1 on class 1 patients, without additional implants or fatgraftings to the midface, only look natural and good when the maxilla is optimized to the soft tissue forward growth, which is mainly given by the position where philtrum and nose connect. The maxilla should be advanced so much, that the philtrum has good support, it means that the lip and philtrum are relaxed and supported by the teeth, with no gap or only a small gap (<3mm). The nasolabial angle should be no less than 85°, and the philtrum mustn't have a convex shape. I have yet to see a bimax result that doesn't fulfill these 2 rules and looks good and natural, not chimpmaxxed.
It explains for example why Gandys side profile looks good with a flat philtrum/maxilla.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Agendum, ChristianChad, AlwaysHaveQuestions and 8 others
:bigbrain:thank god you researched this, im too low iq to even consider doing this but what is the conclusion?! :hnghn:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: ChristianChad, coolguy1, subhuman incel and 4 others
So what is your conclusion
 
  • +1
Reactions: ChristianChad, coolguy1, Deleted member 13994 and 1 other person
  • Love it
Reactions: JosephGarrot123
Read the last paragraph:ROFLMAO:
brutal. my maxilla and mandible is more forward than the rest of my face. However my philtrum is convex shape. Maybe its due to the vertically deficient maxilla? If I advance forward wouldnt it make my face look like a chimp? Keep in mind my forehead is recessed due to the deformity so when I get forehead implants My craniofacial profile will look more forward

Brachy 1
1626747168245
Dolicho 1
my cranial base is like the right but frontal bone is recessed towards the coronal suture
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: ChristianChad
brutal. my maxilla and mandible is more forward than the rest of my face. However my philtrum is convex shape. Maybe its due to the vertically deficient maxilla? If I advance forward wouldnt it make my face look like a chimp? Keep in mind my forehead is recessed due to the deformity so when I get forehead implants My craniofacial profile will look more forward

View attachment 1277804 View attachment 1277805View attachment 1277806 my cranial base is like the right but frontal bone is recessed towards the coronal suture
As I have only morphed myself and other caucasian people I would say my findings are only true for whites, I thought you are black aren't you? It's a little different with blacks and asians of course. would need to see pics man
 
  • +1
Reactions: subhuman incel and JosephGarrot123
As I have only morphed myself and other caucasian people I would say my findings are only true for whites, I thought you are black aren't you? It's a little different with blacks and asians of course. would need to see pics man
Not black but I have a new appointment for my skull scans, because my cranio appointment got cancelled I'm mixed
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: ChristianChad and Acromegaly_Chad
As I have only morphed myself and other caucasian people I would say my findings are only true for whites, I thought you are black aren't you? It's a little different with blacks and asians of course. would need to see pics man
I just realized that cranial base determines how much forward growth you can get. The better the cranial base the more forward growth you can achieve. Lifefuel honestly. Found it here https://lookism.net/threads/on-the-cranial-base.381027/
 
  • +1
Reactions: subhuman incel
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: ChristianChad, subhuman incel, Deleted member 13994 and 2 others
186237f4-6e4f-44b2-9651-72f9a17e59df-jpeg.1112843



This guy is NOT a PSL God. His maxilla is very far below average. It's extremely retruded and downswung, creating a horrible convex nose shape.

We need to stop idolizing this Gandy dude as the pinnacle of male aesthetics, because he clearly isn't. To put his recessed face into perspective, this is a good male side profile:

1619671499893-png.1112849



David Gandy is very obviously recessed.

Even this AVERAGE male profile looks better than Gandy's:

fuckass-png.1112852



Just admire the huge improvement I gave him with this morph:

f20cc203-668b-4a87-b8a3-e499b59cffff-jpeg.1112855



Here’s a split view so you can see just how far I had to pull his midface forwards (top = morph, bottom = original):

2d76002b-d162-4bdd-8400-95a56a7b9ed7-jpeg.1112856



Other way ’round (top = original, bottom = morph):

291a98fe-852c-47d4-af4a-e4d3353dca26-jpeg.1112863



Gandy cannot compare to other male models such as Jordan Barrett:

1619672368488-png.1112860


186237f4-6e4f-44b2-9651-72f9a17e59df-jpeg.1112843



If you think Gandy has a good side profile, you're coping hard!

Animated GIF:

webp-net-gifmaker-gif.1112862


webp-net-gifmaker-gif.1112862


webp-net-gifmaker-gif.1112862
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 16834, ChristianChad, AlwaysHaveQuestions and 3 others
186237f4-6e4f-44b2-9651-72f9a17e59df-jpeg.1112843



This guy is NOT a PSL God. His maxilla is very far below average. It's extremely retruded and downswung, creating a horrible convex nose shape.

We need to stop idolizing this Gandy dude as the pinnacle of male aesthetics, because he clearly isn't. To put his recessed face into perspective, this is a good male side profile:

1619671499893-png.1112849



David Gandy is very obviously recessed.

Even this AVERAGE male profile looks better than Gandy's:

fuckass-png.1112852



Just admire the huge improvement I gave him with this morph:

f20cc203-668b-4a87-b8a3-e499b59cffff-jpeg.1112855



Here’s a split view so you can see just how far I had to pull his midface forwards (top = morph, bottom = original):

2d76002b-d162-4bdd-8400-95a56a7b9ed7-jpeg.1112856



Other way ’round (top = original, bottom = morph):

291a98fe-852c-47d4-af4a-e4d3353dca26-jpeg.1112863



Gandy cannot compare to other male models such as Jordan Barrett:

1619672368488-png.1112860


186237f4-6e4f-44b2-9651-72f9a17e59df-jpeg.1112843



If you think Gandy has a good side profile, you're coping hard!

Animated GIF:

webp-net-gifmaker-gif.1112862


webp-net-gifmaker-gif.1112862


webp-net-gifmaker-gif.1112862
Just take a picture of him smiling and chin tucking theory.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: subhuman incel and StrangerDanger
in fact it's hard to tell if he just has a giant chin or a really well-positioned jaw. Looking only from the mouth up, he doesn't seem to have MUCH projection, altough he has a decent projection
I think larger skulls have higher chance of having a better cranial base. I don't think gandy has the best cranial base or a large skull like Hexum, he has a decent one
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Chadakin
in fact it's hard to tell if he just has a giant chin or a really well-positioned jaw. Looking only from the mouth up, he doesn't seem to have MUCH projection, altough he has a decent projection
His maxilla is well above average.
 
186237f4-6e4f-44b2-9651-72f9a17e59df-jpeg.1112843



This guy is NOT a PSL God. His maxilla is very far below average. It's extremely retruded and downswung, creating a horrible convex nose shape.

We need to stop idolizing this Gandy dude as the pinnacle of male aesthetics, because he clearly isn't. To put his recessed face into perspective, this is a good male side profile:

1619671499893-png.1112849



David Gandy is very obviously recessed.

Even this AVERAGE male profile looks better than Gandy's:

fuckass-png.1112852



Just admire the huge improvement I gave him with this morph:

f20cc203-668b-4a87-b8a3-e499b59cffff-jpeg.1112855



Here’s a split view so you can see just how far I had to pull his midface forwards (top = morph, bottom = original):

2d76002b-d162-4bdd-8400-95a56a7b9ed7-jpeg.1112856



Other way ’round (top = original, bottom = morph):

291a98fe-852c-47d4-af4a-e4d3353dca26-jpeg.1112863



Gandy cannot compare to other male models such as Jordan Barrett:

1619672368488-png.1112860


186237f4-6e4f-44b2-9651-72f9a17e59df-jpeg.1112843



If you think Gandy has a good side profile, you're coping hard!

Animated GIF:

webp-net-gifmaker-gif.1112862


webp-net-gifmaker-gif.1112862


webp-net-gifmaker-gif.1112862
1629419221041
:lul::lul::lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: StrangerDanger and Acromegaly_Chad
Have you got any pictures of chimp maxillias?
 

Similar threads

l3w3nte
Replies
1
Views
204
mhre
mhre
gr1ffiths
Replies
2
Views
53
gr1ffiths
gr1ffiths
asdvek
Replies
35
Views
563
6millionmaxx
6
asdvek
Replies
52
Views
3K
Giant Haystacks
Giant Haystacks

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top