pfl
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2023
- Posts
- 23,227
- Reputation
- 47,366
Theres a reason why us blacks are low dimorphism, short, small framed, and small skulled
Lets analyze this from a biological standpoint
The black guy has no orbital projection, weak browridge, horrible uee, nct, bad undereye
Now we compare it to the white guys eye area; its compact, very strong browridge, good undereyes, hooding, low set positively tilted eyebrows
What does this signal in nature? It signals that the black guy is not compatible for hunting, cant protect himself, and is seen as prey
While the white guys eye area signals genetic compatibility, dominance, being a good hunter, and being able to defend himself and others
Now compare the two mandibles of them, the black guy has a short, weak jaw, narrow bigonial width, no angularity, weak chin projection, downgrown narrow shaped jaw
While the white guy has a robust square chin, chin projection, wide jaw, square gonial angle, good jaw frontal angle, tall in height
This means biologically that the white man has a stronger bite force, higher testosterone levels, and good nutrition
While biologically the black guy will be seen as weak, non compatible as a mate, low bite force, and low testosterone
B-BUT YOUR CHERRYPICKING
We can compare phenotypes aswell to eliminate bias and see it from population averages
We can see yet again, the lower third is much more robust on the white man, same with the eye area
Low set brows, projected browridge, compact, positive orbital vector
While the black man has no browridge, weak low t jaw, recessed chin, low dimorphism in general
Height wise, white men are significantly taller than us
What this shows is that white men are subconsciously percieved as more dominant, more formidable in fights, more capable of protecting mates, leadership capable in groups, and access to resources
This means that in nature, white men would destroy blacks in combat
Reminder, us black boys are the prey, white MEN are the hunters
Lets analyze this from a biological standpoint
The black guy has no orbital projection, weak browridge, horrible uee, nct, bad undereye
Now we compare it to the white guys eye area; its compact, very strong browridge, good undereyes, hooding, low set positively tilted eyebrows
What does this signal in nature? It signals that the black guy is not compatible for hunting, cant protect himself, and is seen as prey
While the white guys eye area signals genetic compatibility, dominance, being a good hunter, and being able to defend himself and others
Now compare the two mandibles of them, the black guy has a short, weak jaw, narrow bigonial width, no angularity, weak chin projection, downgrown narrow shaped jaw
While the white guy has a robust square chin, chin projection, wide jaw, square gonial angle, good jaw frontal angle, tall in height
This means biologically that the white man has a stronger bite force, higher testosterone levels, and good nutrition
While biologically the black guy will be seen as weak, non compatible as a mate, low bite force, and low testosterone
B-BUT YOUR CHERRYPICKING
We can compare phenotypes aswell to eliminate bias and see it from population averages
We can see yet again, the lower third is much more robust on the white man, same with the eye area
Low set brows, projected browridge, compact, positive orbital vector
While the black man has no browridge, weak low t jaw, recessed chin, low dimorphism in general
Height wise, white men are significantly taller than us
What this shows is that white men are subconsciously percieved as more dominant, more formidable in fights, more capable of protecting mates, leadership capable in groups, and access to resources
This means that in nature, white men would destroy blacks in combat
Reminder, us black boys are the prey, white MEN are the hunters
