need help on measuments i will give 20 reacts on your page for the right ANSER

finn899

finn899

Peace out
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Posts
5,465
Reputation
6,335
1704830927713

i have an icd of 35 mm

1704830958723

when i take this measurement i have 33 mm
1704831330644


when i take this measurement and go the whole way accross i have 37 mm including the other eyelids

im really worried i have close set eyes do i?
 
send non distorted pic. Measure esr, and one eye apart
 

Attachments

  • DB1CAAF1-FB9B-4428-82C8-6433D408FFD9.jpeg
    DB1CAAF1-FB9B-4428-82C8-6433D408FFD9.jpeg
    74 KB · Views: 0
View attachment 2664510 heres the problem tho when i take this measurement and count the outer eyelids it is 37 mm is that normal or are my eyes too wide?
If ur whole pfl is 37mm and icd 35mm it means ur eyes are 0.945 eyes apart which is normal
 
  • +1
Reactions: finn899 and LooksOrDeath
If ur whole pfl is 37mm and icd 35mm it means ur eyes are 0.945 eyes apart which is normal
1704832056575
so just tell me this so i can forget and not be paranoid each measurement is exactly accurate over 20 times,if i measure from the medius canthis to where the red line is on the right in this photo that distance is 33 mm,if i inculude the eyelid after it like thiss
1704832122378
its 37 mm total and my ipd is 35 mm is that normal set or close?
 
View attachment 2664514 so just tell me this so i can forget and not be paranoid each measurement is exactly accurate over 20 times,if i measure from the medius canthis to where the red line is on the right in this photo that distance is 33 mm,if i inculude the eyelid after it like thissView attachment 2664515 its 37mm total and my ipd is 35 mm is that normal set or close?
U cant fucking read, that measurement is normal. The way ur doing it, but most important is eye separation ratio which is IPD/byzygomatic width. For example timothee chalamet has about 41.8% esr in this pic which are very close set.
 

Attachments

  • 5D7D8B9D-DDC1-4E25-8FE0-3897456F2C24.jpeg
    5D7D8B9D-DDC1-4E25-8FE0-3897456F2C24.jpeg
    84.8 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: finn899
U cant fucking read, that measurement is normal. The way ur doing it, but most important is eye separation ratio which is IPD/byzygomatic width. For example timothee chalamet has about 41.8% esr in this pic which are very close set.
and you just measure this by what percentage of the mid pupil to mid pupil distance takes up from zygo to zygo?
 
and you just measure this by what percentage of the mid pupil to mid pupil distance takes up from zygo to zygo?
Zygo to zygo yes if ur temples are wider tho u gotta take it there, basically widest point of the face. Like i took it on timothee
 
  • +1
Reactions: finn899
Anywhere from 44.3-47.7 is good. Exact ideal is 46%
 
  • +1
Reactions: finn899
On the closer side but ideal.
ok i did like 5 measurements on different pictures from back camera lengths to avoid distortion and every measurement was between 44-47,and somebody replied with 33-34 is ideal for males ipd so if i have 35 it cannot be close set
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19968
Doug pitt doesnt have mild hypotolerisom or whatever . His esr is basically 0.39-0.4 which is marko jaric tier
1704834139922
but its scary bc he has brads nose too and him and brad are mainly seperated from mms of eye spacing
 
View attachment 2664583 but its scary bc he has brads nose too and him and brad are mainly seperated from mms of eye spacing
Its not only that but doug pitt is an outlier. He legit has 0.385 esr on a pic i measured rn. Theyre too close like no one basically has that. Timothee has 0.42 they look close but not as noticeable, or someone like theo james 0.41. Wider set eyes though is gandy ( 0.47 something)
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top