Need help!! (Peptides)

C

chinkjutter2

Iron
Joined
Nov 14, 2025
Posts
11
Reputation
15
Hi, I’m 16 years old and I’ve been thinking about taking Peptides (Reta, HGH, test*). I’m 6’1 189lbs (86kg) not really muscular, around 26% BF and I started going to the gym about 6 months ago with breaks due to injuries.

I already reached my theoretical genetic height limit so I don’t think hopping on Reta and doing calorie deficit will be bad to my current state. (in terms of growing. And if you think otherwise please share your opinion!)


Basically I’ve put together 2 scenarios that I could follow:

The first one being: that I take only Reta, to slim out and try to be a normal teen (as in not fat), as I can’t really stand being a fat chud anymore.

And the second one being: I take HgH + test to grow some more muscle (as I’ve read that people who don’t have a lot of muscle mass and take Reta end up looking super slender. Idk if it’s true), and then later take reta to cut out excess fat. To then be a normal human being.


The first one would be faster as I wouldn’t need to gather more muscle mass, but the second one would make the end product better (I think?)(frame).

Seeing that having more muscle would be more “attractive” to misc. but being fat really nerfs your facial features, what would you guys say is the better choice here?
Should my priority be my face (excess fat) or to build my body so in my 20s I look better, but, fat rn? mind that I’ll do this to get girls and just be a normal person.

Ty for reading
 
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot
hop on reta rn, hgh wouldnt hurt aswell in moderate doses. reta wont cause muscle loss if you maintain a high protein diet

lean is law
 
  • +1
Reactions: chinkjutter2
Get on test and reta and that's it. Add GH if you're a rich bitch, dose at 3-6 IU per day year round to get all the benefits with no sides. Cut with reta and train hard as shit to get muscle. Don't starve yourself tho, just eat smart
 
  • +1
Reactions: chinkjutter2
hop on reta
Hi, I’m 16 years old and I’ve been thinking about taking Peptides (Reta, HGH, test*). I’m 6’1 189lbs (86kg) not really muscular, around 26% BF and I started going to the gym about 6 months ago with breaks due to injuries.

I already reached my theoretical genetic height limit so I don’t think hopping on Reta and doing calorie deficit will be bad to my current state. (in terms of growing. And if you think otherwise please share your opinion!)


Basically I’ve put together 2 scenarios that I could follow:

The first one being: that I take only Reta, to slim out and try to be a normal teen (as in not fat), as I can’t really stand being a fat chud anymore.

And the second one being: I take HgH + test to grow some more muscle (as I’ve read that people who don’t have a lot of muscle mass and take Reta end up looking super slender. Idk if it’s true), and then later take reta to cut out excess fat. To then be a normal human being.


The first one would be faster as I wouldn’t need to gather more muscle mass, but the second one would make the end product better (I think?)(frame).

Seeing that having more muscle would be more “attractive” to misc. but being fat really nerfs your facial features, what would you guys say is the better choice here?
Should my priority be my face (excess fat) or to build my body so in my 20s I look better, but, fat rn? mind that I’ll do this to get girls and just be a normal person.

Ty for reading
 
  • +1
Reactions: chinkjutter2
Yeah seems like a good idea, gh is low roi moneywise at first cycle dosages tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: chinkjutter2

Similar threads

U
  • Question
Serious Need some help
Replies
7
Views
53
UrFavNarcis
U
L
Replies
23
Views
81
Aldi
Aldi
N
Replies
3
Views
69
Maxilla Slayer
Maxilla Slayer
gabonwii
Replies
3
Views
33
idontmogu
idontmogu
andtheniwalkin
Replies
5
Views
157
laurent cassius
laurent cassius

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top