NEED INFORMATION TO CREATE A MATHEMATICAL HEIGHT-PSL MODEL (GTFIH, INFO NEEDED)

[protomogger9873]

I’m trying to develop another mathematical model.

My old one described the theoretical PSL addition gymcelling could grant you based off pre-existing variables like height, softmaxxes, face, etc.
Link to gym-maxxing PSL mathematical model:
https://looksmax.org/threads/psl-ma...-gym-maxxing-gtfih-smart-people-only.1438420/

After AP English Lang exams tomorrow, I’ll be done with APs.

I’ll try to develop and create a new model to approximate the PSL difference “x” inches of height will add if you try to heightmaxx (through frauding, hgh/AIs, lifts, leg-lengthening, etc.)

But to get started, I have a couple questions I need to get from .org as a whole.

A.) What is the single BEST and ideal height? It must be an exact figure, not a range.

B.) Is there any difference between height from “natural “ sources that actually grow bone like hgh/AIs vs height from lifts/shoes?

C.) At what threshold (T) does increasing height decrease PSL? Is there an upper limit?

D.) Do you guys think height experiences the law of diminishing returns or do you think height has a direct linear relationship with PSL up until that threshold?

If you guys could give me answers for the above, I’d appreciate it a lot. I think I can create a BOTB worthy thread by quantifying the objective possible PSL improvement you can get from your baseline height.

 

[protomogger9873]

Bump

 

[protomogger9873]

Any info would be helpful i think, i want to make this as accurate as i can for you guys

 

[dookielooksmaxxer]

A.) What is the single BEST and ideal height? It must be an exact figure, not a range.

B.) Is there any difference between height from “natural “ sources that actually grow bone like hgh/AIs vs height from lifts/shoes?

C.) At what threshold (T) does increasing height decrease PSL? Is there an upper limit?

1. 6'3

2. yea frauding could be caught and sometimes (when your on the beach) its hard to fraud. (idk if ts answered that question)

3. after 6'5 I think you just start to look anorexic and weird

 

[protomogger9873]

1. 6'3

2. yea frauding could be caught and sometimes (when your on the beach) its hard to fraud. (idk if ts answered that question)

3. after 6'5 I think you just start to look anorexic and weird

So just to clarify for B, NON-BONE height should be weighted less than bone height?

OR, I had an idea. Should i weigh it as heavily as bone growth up until a threshold (e.g 3 inches)? Because frauding is kind of indistinguishable up until you go over 3 inches. After that, its a major looksmin.
But what do you think? Is that threshold idea for frauding cope or should the frauding threshold be adjusted (i.e +- 1 inch)?

 

[dookielooksmaxxer]

So just to clarify for B, NON-BONE height should be weighted less than bone height?

yes

OR, I had an idea. Should i weigh it as heavily as bone growth up until a threshold (e.g 3 inches)? Because frauding is kind of indistinguishable up until you go over 3 inches. After that, its a major looksmin.
But what do you think? Is that threshold idea for frauding cope or should the frauding threshold be adjusted (i.e +- 1 inch)?

eh I'd just weigh it less, there are other instances where you may be called out for frauding.

 

[protomogger9873]

yes

eh I'd just weigh it less, there are other instances where you may be called out for frauding.

Ok thanks for input.

 

[Zeekie]

Are you autistic by any chance? Anyway...

A) The ideal male height is 6'0"/182cm. Although it depends on context, as far as I'm aware the current research shows a strong preference for men at a height of 5'11"/180cm in one-on-one settings, however in online dating contexts 6'0" consistently receives more female attention. This is probably purely psychological and social, since the deviations from 5'11" to 6'0" is basically none, but accounting for the fact that women prefer men at 5'11" in a one-on-one setting, and that 6'0" is preferred for online dating, it's pretty simple to deduce that objectively speaking 6'0" is best.

B) No, there's no difference unless you're wearing very, very large shoe lifts where it becomes pretty clear you're using them. Otherwise, being a certain height and appearing a certain height is essentially the same in most settings.

C) Anything over 6'5" likely starts to become unappealing because you seem more intimidating. This is an opinion, I don't know of any data to actually validate this, though.

D) I think there's an almost linear relationship, until the 5'11" mark, where there is a huge bump in PSL, then flat lines at 6'0"-6'2", bumps again at 6'3"-6'4" and then starts to decrease. Again, just an opinion, I don't know of any data to validate this.

 

[kazama]

A.) What is the single BEST and ideal height? It must be an exact figure, not a range.

195cm
More than that Idk might make u an ogre, although it would be really nice to have 230 with mtn jfl
For some reason I didnt understand the rest

 

[kazama]

Again, just an opinion, I don't know of any data to validate this.

and its not necessary, its more normal for someone to be genetically 6'3 instead of 6'7
Someone being taller than 195cm can already escape genetics and lead to some disorder
Ofc, not everyone bc above 195 is practically 1% of the world