Negative Orbital Vector is Not as Bad as We Think

[Deleted member 5349]

Many people here are constantly complaining about dark circles under their eyes and how they feel it is a complete death sentence for them. Obviously you would look better with a positive orbital vector, no doubt about it, but zygomatic protrusion is far more important in aesthetics. Many many high psl insividuals have honestly, quite hollow under eyes, however, it does not falio them as they all have great zygomatic support around the eye, giving the eye a well supported look. Even incel wiki states that “bulging eyes are ok if the bone structure around the eye is good. One could have high, forward projecting cheekbones, but still bulging eyes.” Good zygos+good undereye support (Jordan Barrett) = top tier. Good zygos+bad under eye support (David Gandy) = doesn’t falio you. Bad zygos+good undereye support (Brad Pitt) = doesn’t falio you. Bad Zygos+bad undereyes (average incel)= it’s over.

 

[Aesthetics_III]

You cannot have bulging eyes and have a good eye area

All of those eyes you have posted are deep set, not bulging.


But yes, NOV hardly matters

 

[Deleted member 1180]

Many people here are constantly complaining about dark circles under their eyes and how they feel it is a complete death sentence for them. Obviously you would look better with a positive orbital vector, no doubt about it, but zygomatic protrusion is far more important in aesthetics. Many many high psl insividuals have honestly, quite hollow under eyes, however, it does not falio them as they all have great zygomatic support around the eye, giving the eye a well supported look. Even incel wiki states that “bulging eyes are ok if the bone structure around the eye is good. One could have high, forward projecting cheekbones, but still bulging eyes.” Good zygos+good undereye support (Jordan Barrett) = top tier. Good zygos+bad under eye support (David Gandy) = doesn’t falio you. Bad zygos+good undereye support (Brad Pitt) = doesn’t falio you. Bad Zygos+bad undereyes (average incel)= it’s over.

Who's that guy with the Tats i think i know him

 

[her]

Who's that guy with the Tats i think i know him

Stephen James.

 

[Deleted member 1180]

Stephen James.

yh thought so he really fucked his body up with that many tats

 

[Deleted member 4053]

You all posted people with well-developed and pronounced bone structures most of them don't even have a negative orbital vector


Orbital vector is not really an issue...it is usually what causes it:
shitty ass bones

 

[Deleted member 6873]

Dumb question, but could a NOV be the reason for my Dark Circles?

 

[Donc0ck]

Dumb question, but could a NOV be the reason for my Dark Circles?

Yep

 

[Deleted member 6873]

Yep

What surgery/fillers could be used to fix it?

 

[Donc0ck]

What surgery/fillers could be used to fix it?

Infraorbital rim implant, tear through filler

 

[justadude]

negative orbital what the fuck ever should be your last concern. lets be honest, ur not subhuman because of that

 

[Donc0ck]

negative orbital what the fuck ever should be your last concern. lets be honest, ur not subhuman because of that

I had the filler done and it legit changed my under eye area from "never slept a day in my live" to quite decent. It does not change the color though..

 

[Lawyer]

I had the filler done and it legit changed my under eye area from "never slept a day in my live" to quite decent.

Do you have before and after pics? If so, I'd like to see them if you don't mind, I have a negative orbital vector as well.