Nero Angelo today has again rated me 6.87 which is low 7, low chadlite. However ratings given to me by 20 .org members via DMs are as follows:
LTN(4): 2 people
High LTN(4.5): 3 people
Low MTN(4.75): 3 people
MTN(5): 3 people
High MTN(5.5): 6 people
Low HTN(5.75): 1 person
HTN(6): 2 people
Above HTN(6+): Nobody as expected.
MEAN: 5.075 (MTN), however i believe that people rating me below low MTN/high LTN are not accurate since they mentioned i have inferior frame and neck, both of which are beyond facerating,but instead SMVrating.
According to data cumulated on internet and my personal experience, i created a second degree polynomial function using the least square method to convert Nero Angelo's rating to .org, which i think is the most accurate facerating. F(x)=-0.00034 x^2+0.8961x-0.9943, where x is the rating by nero, F(x) is the converted rating to here .org.
F(4)=2.584, 4 is the lowest rating nero gives, indicating you're a truecel (below 3) here in .org. ( LOW TIER SUBHUMAN)
F(5)=3.477, 5 is pure average according nero, an invisible everyday guy while this rating here in .org is STRONG SUBHUMAN
F(6)= 4.370, 6 is above average guy for nero whereas here is LTN-high LTN
F(6.87)=5.145 (Slightly above mid MTN) , which is my actual face rating.
F(7)= 5.261( Def above mid MTN, not yet high MTN) @RealFunkyFlamingo this is your real rating.
F(7.25)= nearly 5.5 here, HIGH MTN.
F(8)=6.152 (HTN), If nero rates you 8, you're probably slightly above HTN.
F(9)=7.043 (CL), 9 is the highest rating that Nero Angelo gives, so 9 is chadlite here in .org.
(I sent nero all photos i've shared here in my threads so far, he did the analysis for 2 photos which he thinks is the best ones; which i disagree tho)
LTN(4): 2 people
High LTN(4.5): 3 people
Low MTN(4.75): 3 people
MTN(5): 3 people
High MTN(5.5): 6 people
Low HTN(5.75): 1 person
HTN(6): 2 people
Above HTN(6+): Nobody as expected.
MEAN: 5.075 (MTN), however i believe that people rating me below low MTN/high LTN are not accurate since they mentioned i have inferior frame and neck, both of which are beyond facerating,but instead SMVrating.
According to data cumulated on internet and my personal experience, i created a second degree polynomial function using the least square method to convert Nero Angelo's rating to .org, which i think is the most accurate facerating. F(x)=-0.00034 x^2+0.8961x-0.9943, where x is the rating by nero, F(x) is the converted rating to here .org.
F(4)=2.584, 4 is the lowest rating nero gives, indicating you're a truecel (below 3) here in .org. ( LOW TIER SUBHUMAN)
F(5)=3.477, 5 is pure average according nero, an invisible everyday guy while this rating here in .org is STRONG SUBHUMAN
F(6)= 4.370, 6 is above average guy for nero whereas here is LTN-high LTN
F(6.87)=5.145 (Slightly above mid MTN) , which is my actual face rating.
F(7)= 5.261( Def above mid MTN, not yet high MTN) @RealFunkyFlamingo this is your real rating.
F(7.25)= nearly 5.5 here, HIGH MTN.
F(8)=6.152 (HTN), If nero rates you 8, you're probably slightly above HTN.
F(9)=7.043 (CL), 9 is the highest rating that Nero Angelo gives, so 9 is chadlite here in .org.
(I sent nero all photos i've shared here in my threads so far, he did the analysis for 2 photos which he thinks is the best ones; which i disagree tho)
Last edited:
