never have a oneitis. i had like 3 oneitises in my life. it all went to nowhere i just lost time and energy and wasted thoughts thinking about them

[_MVP_]

never even talk to a foid, never start conversations with a foid

talk least possible irl

never ever approach them

i was an idiot thinking about them... wasted thoughts and mental energy.

no oneitis ever anymore. never think about civilian foids

 

[_MVP_]

like kanye west said "if a foid is not fucking with me, we are not friends"

 

[Deleted member 130915]

Women can only cause pain and misery

 

[sub5outsider]

thats too much stress and energy for nothing

 

[_MVP_]

never flirt with a civilian (non-escort/non-hooker) foid

if a foid is nice with you, shows you iois, it means nothing. all my oneitises shown iois and betrayed me in the end.

my last oneitis played games with me, shown iois and then turned cold rinse repeat

im not playing the game ever again

even if a foid is nice to me, i will never trust her, never approach her,


PinV is the only ioi, in order for me to fuck a civilian foid she would literally have to approach ME.

watch this, im as serious as Batista.

 

[_MVP_]

the only foids i will interact with are my mother, sister and hookers / escorts

civilian foids are a nono

never flirt with civilian foids, dont show them iois, ignore them as much as possible

 

[wollet2]

theres a phrase in my native language that sounds better than in english but it means that after trying comes apathy

 

[wollet2]

if youre apathetic it might mean that you have tried a lot but it lead nowhere

 

[_MVP_]

don't be a sadkunt like that idiot @TheVoidInside who always posts about his oneitis

 

[paladincel_]

the only foids i will interact with are my mother, sister and hookers / escorts

civilian foids are a nono

never flirt with civilian foids, dont show them iois, ignore them as much as possible

Civilian foid = producer of desiring-machines. Not their end. This is why they can't have sex with you, ever. Ignore them. If they grope your arm muscles just ignore them, if they add you on discord just ignore them that don't even go there anyway.

 

[_MVP_]

Civilian foid = producer of desiring-machines. Not their end. This is why they can't have sex with you, ever. Ignore them. If they grope your arm muscles just ignore them, if they add you on discord just ignore them that don't even go there anyway.

Du:​

what does this mean "woman = producer of desiring-machines. Not their end"

ChatGPT:​

The phrase "woman = producer of desiring-machines. Not their end" is cryptic and seems influenced by Deleuze and Guattari's philosophical work, particularly Anti-Oedipus (1972), where they introduce the concept of desiring-machines. Here's a breakdown of the possible meaning:

---

1. "Desiring-machines"​

In Anti-Oedipus, Deleuze and Guattari describe people, bodies, and systems as desiring-machines — entities that produce and circulate desire, not in the Freudian "lack-based" sense but as a positive, productive force. Everything in life, from the libido to society to machines, is seen as a network of flows and connections of desire.

---

2. "Woman = producer of desiring-machines"​

This part suggests:

• A woman is not merely the object of desire, as traditionally framed in patriarchal psychoanalysis.
• Instead, she is a creator, an origin point, or a productive force that gives rise to desiring-machines (e.g., children, relationships, art, systems of desire, etc.).
• This resists the idea of woman as merely passive or an endpoint of male desire.

---

3. "Not their end"​

This clarifies that:

• The woman is not the final goal of desiring-machines.
• She is not the terminal object of desire, but rather a participant in the network, a producer, part of the process rather than just the object of it.

---

In essence:​

A woman is not the ultimate target of desire (as in "men desire women") but is herself a generative force that produces desire, movement, connection — she is part of the system of desire, not just its endpoint.

---

TL;DR:​

It flips the traditional view — instead of woman being the "end goal" of desire (like an object), she is a generator of desire, part of its dynamic production.
Let me know if you'd like a simpler analogy or how this applies to feminism, psychoanalysis, or philosophy.
4o

Du:​

simpler analogy please

ChatGPT:​

Sure! Here's a simple analogy to explain:

---

Imagine a factory line:​

• Desiring-machines are like machines on a conveyor belt — always working, producing, moving.
• Traditional thinking (like old-school psychoanalysis) might say:
  

  "All these machines are working just to reach the woman at the end of the line. She's the goal."

• But this quote says:
  

  No — woman is not the end of the line.
  She's one of the machines on the line — producing, creating, driving desire forward, just like the others.

---

Even simpler:​

• Instead of saying "a woman is the destination of desire" (like a place you're driving to),
• It says, "a woman is the engine in the car — part of what makes desire go."

---

Let me know if you'd like it related to everyday life or relationships too.