New 2026 study on clavicle growth, over for framecels

Neonjfl

Neonjfl

Botched by God
Joined
Feb 5, 2026
Posts
24
Reputation
10
DISCLAIMER: I USED CHATGPT FOR FORMATTING AND GRAMMAR (ESL)

I've seen a lot of conflicting claims on here about when clavicles actually stop growing.

A new 2026 study gives us some useful data on this.

The paper is:


The researchers analyzed chest X-rays from an Italian population aged 10–30 years. They initially had 743 radiographs and, after exclusions, ended up with:
  • 666 subjects
  • 449 males
  • 217 females
They measured actual clavicle length and also classified the medial clavicular epiphysis according to its stage of ossification.

Male clavicle length by age​

This is probably the most relevant part for framemaxxing:

Age
Mean male clavicle length​
10–12
14.1 ± 1.0 cm
13–15
15.6 ± 0.9 cm
16–18
16.8 ± 0.8 cm
19–21
17.0 ± 0.7 cm
22–25
17.1 ± 0.6 cm
26–30
17.1 ± 0.5 cm

So the population averages were:

16–18 → 19–21: +2 mm

19–21 → 22–25: +1 mm

22–25 → 26–30: +0 mm


The obvious takeaway is that the vast majority of clavicular length growth has already happened by the late teens.

The researchers themselves describe clavicle length as reaching a plateau after adolescence, with male values stabilizing at around 17 cm.

They also looked at medial clavicular epiphysis ossification​

Mean ages in males were:

Stage 1: 13.8 years
Stage 2: 15.8 years
Stage 3: 17.9 years
Stage 4: 20.8 years
Stage 5: 24.6 years

So in males the clavicles are often still going through epiphyseal maturation well into the mid-20s (water) even though their actual longitudinal growth has already slowed to almost nothing.

Study limitations

1. The study was cross-sectional

It compared different people in each age group instead of following the same people over time. That's important because natural variation in clavicle size is huge. For example, males aged 19–21 had an SD of 0.7 cm, meaning individual differences between people are much larger than the 1 mm difference between the 19–21 and 22–25 group averages.

2. The age brackets are broad​

The groups were 19–21 and 22–25, so the study doesn't give year-by-year growth values from ages 19 to 25.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Thatsall101 and sha
Absolute water
 
water statement but good formating
 
  • +1
Reactions: Neonjfl

Similar threads

couldbeenapimp
Replies
6
Views
101
GymAesthetics
GymAesthetics
Renophobeadoobe
Replies
2
Views
76
pinterest
pinterest
J
Replies
11
Views
93
KG4
KG4
vlurrent
Replies
11
Views
171
LuAten
LuAten
manletbut6foot
Replies
33
Views
257
Trueeeeeehltn
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top