Niggas, I need a BOTB guide thread on how to argue with a user online on any forum and platform.

[Deleted member 351479]

I need a guide thread on how to argue with a user online, on any forum and platform. What I noticed is that it is easier to argue with a user on .org than on Discord and Youtube.
I need to fix my mistakes to not reveal my weakness for someone to use it against me, and I need to know many tactics that they use to argue and how to counter it.
Also I need some IQmaxxing supplement to boost my memory and to rewire my brain chemistry to counterattack arguments made by some user who disagree with me.
Winning an argument with someone is something that I WON'T achieve (maybe until now), even in a million years, because of the fact that I have less knowledge about how to argue with someone due to .org users gatekeeping the knowledge and tactics on making arguments.
Winning on a hardest mission in some videogames (such as End of a Line in GTA San Andreas) is easy compared to actually winning a fight online in my experience.

@topology @Verdam @serg @Applejack @HtnceI
​

 

[Deleted member 351479]

@Gengar’s Ghost​

 

[Deleted member 351479]

@greycel @illusion @134applesauce456 @Sycophant @luuk​

 

[Deleted member 351479]

@Prøphet @Algernon​

 

[kisslessvirgin]

its kinda like a fight

you can learn a few things

but it reminds me of that quote "everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face"

its far too circumstantial

 

[LTG]

just make no mistakes and amplify theirs

 

[Deleted member 351479]

its kinda like a fight

you can learn a few things

but it reminds me of that quote "everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face"

its far too circumstantial

Good answer, but it seems that some smart bois on .org are gatekeeping the tactics and techniques used to win an argument.

 

[Deleted member 351479]

just make no mistakes and amplify theirs

I need to study @topology and @greycel techniques on how they debate​

 

[kisslessvirgin]

Good answer, but it seems that some smart bois on .org are gatekeeping the tactics and techniques used to win an argument.

you gotta make the other person look stupid

maybe try reading some old threads and identify similarities between threads by smart people

 

[Trevor Wonter]

use every fallacy known to man until they are drained

 

[Deleted member 351479]

you gotta make the other person look stupid

maybe try reading some old threads and identify similarities between threads by smart people

This forum is way darker than you can imagine

Jfl if you think worse that can happen in this forum is misinformation about surgery where one ends up getting botched. You can find real black magic shit here and procedure to do it . Real fucking Satanism about how to contact Satan and shit using black magic . Witchcraft Links to suicide...

looksmax.org

I actuall read this beef between Jason and Gengar,
I side with gengar on this one but he did not tried his best to argue with jason​

 

[LTG]

I need to study @topology and @greycel techniques on how they debate​

topology just brags the entire time and ignores the person hes arguing with, iver never seen graycel argue tbh i didnt know he existed

 

[iblamexyz]

I need a guide thread on how to argue with a user online, on any forum and platform. What I noticed is that it is easier to argue with a user on .org than on Discord and Youtube.
I need to fix my mistakes to not reveal my weakness for someone to use it against me, and I need to know many tactics that they use to argue and how to counter it.
Also I need some IQmaxxing supplement to boost my memory and to rewire my brain chemistry to counterattack arguments made by some user who disagree with me.
Winning an argument with someone is something that I WON'T achieve (maybe until now), even in a million years, because of the fact that I have less knowledge about how to argue with someone due to .org users gatekeeping the knowledge and tactics on making arguments.
Winning on a hardest mission in some videogames (such as End of a Line in GTA San Andreas) is easy compared to actually winning a fight online in my experience.

@topology @Verdam @serg @Applejack @HtnceI
View attachment 4989493​

yes let me send you a ''botb'' thread on how to be annoying shit on a forum about Looksmaxxing

 

[kisslessvirgin]

This forum is way darker than you can imagine

Jfl if you think worse that can happen in this forum is misinformation about surgery where one ends up getting botched. You can find real black magic shit here and procedure to do it . Real fucking Satanism about how to contact Satan and shit using black magic . Witchcraft Links to suicide...

looksmax.org

I actuall read this beef between Jason and Gengar,
I side with gengar on this one but he did not tried his best to argue with jason​

jason got more reps doe

 

[Deleted member 351479]

jason got more reps doe

Exactly, i still side with gengar tho.​

 

[Deleted member 351479]

yes let me send you a ''botb'' thread on how to win an argument on a forum about Looksmaxxing

Fixed​

 

[robotchicken]

use every fallacy known to man until they are drained

even better

ad hominem the shit out of them and then stop responding

dont block tho because its seen as a win from them but just mute them or smth and they will go crazy

ex: “nigga you have a ged you shouldnt even be able to vote” and dont say a single thing back

 

[Deleted member 351479]

even better

ad hominem the shit out of them and then stop responding

dont block tho because its seen as a win from them but just mute them or smth and they will go crazy

ex: “nigga you have a ged you shouldnt even be able to vote” and dont say a single thing back

Good advice brotha, high IQ​

 

[kisslessvirgin]

Exactly, i still side with gengar tho.​

thats the thing

you thought genge won

but the public opinion was in jv's favor

makes you think

 

[Trevor Wonter]

even better

ad hominem the shit out of them and then stop responding

dont block tho because its seen as a win from them but just mute them or smth and they will go crazy

ex: “nigga you have a ged you shouldnt even be able to vote” and dont say a single thing back

im getting my ged

 

[robotchicken]

im getting my ged

love it anyways i was just using an example

 

[Deleted member 351479]

thats the thing

you thought genge won

but the public opinion was in jv's favor

makes you think

The masses are always retarded from day one, I dont value public opinion, this is why I look for intelligent users like @Gmogger that actually presents the truth unlike that one guy who says something for the acceptance of others​

 

[kisslessvirgin]

The masses are always retarded from day one, I dont value public opinion, this is why I look for intelligent users like @Gmogger that actually presents the truth unlike that one guy who says something for the acceptance of others​

true but in the realm of online arguments, which this thread pertains to, playing the field is what works

 

[Deleted member 351479]

you thought genge won

I did not say this, I am certain that genge lose the fight because he is careless about arguing with jv, also reps are overrated in 2026 now that everyone repfarms, I care more about username color than reps​

 

[WhateverItTakes1]

you gotta be intellectually dishonest

and also what the other guy said: abuse fallacies since most people can't explain or identify them

 

[Deleted member 351479]

true but in the realm of online arguments, which this thread pertains to, playing the field is what works

This is interesting, do you think arguing with someone in my thread gives better result compared to arguing with user on his thread or a thread in favour of him?
Also if reps actually matter then does it help to tag my allies, but then the enemy will call out and use it for my argument tho, i am wondering​

 

[kisslessvirgin]

This is interesting, do you think arguing with someone in my thread gives better result compared to arguing with user on his thread or a thread in favour of him?
Also if reps actually matter then does it help to tag my allies, but then the enemy will call out and use it for my argument tho, i am wondering​

it depends on the opinion of the first few responses and the people who first reply

even if someone posts something dumb, but the first few agree with him the rest of the posters have a bias

same result if someone with 4UM CLOUT agrees or disagrees with you, most people are easily influenced

tagging your allies to dogpile the other person always works, even if you are in the wrong. it all depends on how people perceive it

if you can make the other person look dumb or make it appear their pov if unpopular you basically win the argument.

 

[Deleted member 351479]

it depends on the opinion of the first few responses and the people who first reply

even if someone posts something dumb, but the first few agree with him the rest of the posters have a bias

same result if someone with 4UM CLOUT agrees or disagrees with you, most people are easily influenced

tagging your allies to dogpile the other person always works, even if you are in the wrong. it all depends on how people perceive it

if you can make the other person look dumb or make it appear their pov if unpopular you basically win the argument.

Thanks bhai​

 

[Deleted member 351479]

tagging your allies to dogpile the other person always works, even if you are in the wrong. it all depends on how people perceive it

My only problem is that, how long can they be active? I mean I use this forum on a different timezone and they might not be available while im active​

 

[kisslessvirgin]

My only problem is that, how long can they be active? I mean I use this forum on a different timezone and they might not be available while im active​

hard to coordinate

tag some other acquaintance i suppose

worst thing is if you tag someone they don't even argue for you

atp you are better off talking by yourself

 

[Deleted member 351479]

hard to coordinate

tag some other acquaintance i suppose

worst thing is if you tag someone they don't even argue for you

atp you are better off talking by yourself

Will consider this, thanks brotha​

 

[Algernon]

I need a guide thread on how to argue with a user online, on any forum and platform. What I noticed is that it is easier to argue with a user on .org than on Discord and Youtube.​

i think on discord or youtube people are much more normal then a .org and despite them thinking they have an open mind to changing their opinion in an argument, they never will, in fact they will knowingly use loopholes in logic to defend an argument they believe in morally but not logically

also, why do you argue on youtube/discord though? is it usually race related

I need to fix my mistakes to not reveal my weakness for someone to use it against me, and I need to know many tactics that they use to argue and how to counter it.
Also I need some IQmaxxing supplement to boost my memory and to rewire my brain chemistry to counterattack arguments made by some user who disagree with me.​

(this whole response to this might seem kind of obvious)

in an argument someone makes a claim, then you either make a seperate claim (this has to be stronger, or more claims then the first to outweigh it), and/or disprove their claim

usually when i go in an argument i just read through their text quickly, try and disprove it, then i reread the full thing and reread mine

Winning an argument with someone is something that I WON'T achieve (maybe until now), even in a million years, because of the fact that I have less knowledge about how to argue with someone due to .org users gatekeeping the knowledge and tactics on making arguments.​

i think winning an argument isn't 100% possible against everyone since some are resistant to change

the main goal for me isn't to convince the person im arguing with (online), it is to make a strong argument against them so the people reading are convinced, or make them stop arguing back and reach a resolution

 

[topology]

I need a guide thread on how to argue with a user online, on any forum and platform. What I noticed is that it is easier to argue with a user on .org than on Discord and Youtube.
I need to fix my mistakes to not reveal my weakness for someone to use it against me, and I need to know many tactics that they use to argue and how to counter it.
Also I need some IQmaxxing supplement to boost my memory and to rewire my brain chemistry to counterattack arguments made by some user who disagree with me.
Winning an argument with someone is something that I WON'T achieve (maybe until now), even in a million years, because of the fact that I have less knowledge about how to argue with someone due to .org users gatekeeping the knowledge and tactics on making arguments.
Winning on a hardest mission in some videogames (such as End of a Line in GTA San Andreas) is easy compared to actually winning a fight online in my experience.

@topology @Verdam @serg @Applejack @HtnceI
View attachment 4989493​

The main reason I win arguments is because I hold correct positions. It's mostly that. You learn the actual arguments along the way with time.