Nigger gets attacked for liking JBs

GabachoCopium

GabachoCopium

#freediddy
Joined
May 3, 2023
Posts
16,470
Reputation
26,380


0E39F5D7 D603 490B ADA2 2FA007097815
5144DA5F D76A 4986 9127 F179C6F29F27
AB1BED92 9AAD 4A46 BC86 9AA90AF1234C
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Lmao and Ryldoo IS COPING
His lips JFL
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Lmao and GabachoCopium
As long as it’s legal he should be fine innit
 
  • +1
Reactions: klip11, Lonenely sigma, Lmao and 4 others
We have all been 16 and 17, and we definitely weren’t children at that age. Normies that say that are weird and deluded and feel a need to infantilize grown teenagers and young adults
 
  • +1
Reactions: p0lishsubhuman, IhateDentists, klip11 and 11 others
"A 15 or 16 year old CHILD :soy:"

Why are soycucks so delusional? Underage by law =/= prepubescent. No one is gonna convince a normal person that a 16 year old teenager is the same as a 5 year old child. :feelskek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: williamper, Deleted member 28610, klip11 and 6 others
S P O O K
 
  • +1
Reactions: klip11, Ryldoo IS COPING, Gengar and 1 other person
JFL at those faggots in the comments.

"Nah bruh 16 year olds are just baby children you need jail fr fr blud"
21575 SoyBooru
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: p0lishsubhuman, klip11, Lmao and 9 others
TUSSELEIF said:
We have all been 16 and 17, and we definitely weren’t children at that age. Normies that say that are weird and deluded and feel a need to infantilize grown teenagers and young adults
Click to expand...
You weren’t as mature as you are now tho, were you?
 
  • +1
Reactions: TUSSELEIF
Why do i think all his haters look like that?
1693179018977
1693179026176
1693179031965
1693179065464
1693179078119
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: p0lishsubhuman, Lmao, Deleted member 31942 and 6 others
Pendejo said:
You weren’t as mature as you are now tho, were you?
Click to expand...
Then people under 25 are all "children" because their brains aren't fully developed. If you think 18 is ok but 17 isn't and you're still using the "not mature" card then it just goes to show you're using an arbitrary number instead of using a solid argument. Still, regardless of your answer, a 23 year old is not a "child" simply because they're not as mature compared to a fully-developed 25 year old.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lmao, Deleted member 20370, Ryldoo IS COPING and 3 others
  • +1
Reactions: Jamaldickjavontus, Deleted member 20370 and Ryldoo IS COPING
TRUE_CEL said:
Then people under 25 are all "children" because their brains aren't fully developed. If you think 18 is ok but 17 isn't and you're still using the "not mature" card then it just goes to show you're using an arbitrary number instead of using a solid argument. Still, regardless of your answer, a 23 year old is not a "child" simply because they're not as mature compared to a fully-developed 25 year old.
Click to expand...
You are just arguing semantics, boring, mental development is not linear.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 32486
Pendejo said:
You are just arguing semantics, boring, mental development is not linear.
Click to expand...
Not arguing semantics, do you even know what that means? Clearly not, since you think "not being mature enough" = "child."
 
  • +1
Reactions: GabachoCopium
TRUE_CEL said:
Not arguing semantics, do you even know what that means? Clearly not, since you think "not being mature enough" = "child."
Click to expand...
I don’t, I literally never stated that.
 
Pendejo said:
I don’t, I literally never stated that.
Click to expand...
You seemed to imply it. Then why bother questioning if that person was mature enough? Seemed like you wanted to imply that 16/17 year olds are children.
 
TRUE_CEL said:
You seemed to imply it. Then why bother questioning if that person was mature enough? Seemed like you wanted to imply that 16/17 year olds are children.
Click to expand...
No, I was implying that despite them not being children they are still not as mature as a grown ass adult.
 
TRUE_CEL said:
Then people under 25 are all "children" because their brains aren't fully developed. If you think 18 is ok but 17 isn't and you're still using the "not mature" card then it just goes to show you're using an arbitrary number instead of using a solid argument. Still, regardless of your answer, a 23 year old is not a "child" simply because they're not as mature compared to a fully-developed 25 year old.
Click to expand...
Age of consent is pretty arbitrary, but a line must be drawn somewhere. There's no good reason for a 20 something year old to be dating a 15 year old and so on. Yeah, a 15 year old isn't a kid, but they're not an adult either. Only a maladjusted teenager/whore dates adults (ones out of their age range, I don't mean a 16 year old dating a 19 year old).
 
Pendejo said:
No, I was implying that despite them not being children they are still not as mature as a grown ass adult.
Click to expand...
Ok and? The argument was that they're supposedly "children." We argued otherwise, then you butted in.

Also, it's all relative anyway. In other countries, 15 year olds are carrying the household because of hardships. Let me tell you, they are far more mature than some 22 year old basement-dweller living in his mommy's house.
 
"14 year olds are just innocent precious kiderinos bro!"
Meanwhile 17 year old Chad is spitting on her face and brutally fucking her and making her swallow his cum after they met on Yubo.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Joe Rogancel, Lmao, Trilogy and 2 others
looksmaxxer2 said:
Age of consent is pretty arbitrary, but a line must be drawn somewhere. There's no good reason for a 20 something year old to be dating a 15 year old and so on. Yeah, a 15 year old isn't a kid, but they're not an adult either. Only a maladjusted teenager/whore dates adults (ones out of their age range, I don't mean a 16 year old dating a 19 year old).
Click to expand...
This whole debate about age gaps is a recent thing. I'm not gonna call someone a "pedo" or a "groomer" if they're 20 and dating a 15 year old. It can get so ridiculous that even a 26 year old dating a 19 year old is considered a "pedo"/"groomer." You seem to be less extreme in that, but it's still extreme to think a 15 year old can't date a 20 year old. Also, most women are hypocrites. They admit they'd be fine if the woman is older but not if the man is older and cite "power imbalance" as a reason. Which is dumb AF. If you think it's bad, the gender shouldn't matter. That's another reason why I can't take age cucks seriously.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ryldoo IS COPING
IAMNOTANINCEL said:
"14 year olds are just innocent precious kiderinos bro!"
Meanwhile 17 year old Chad is spitting on her face and brutally fucking her and making her swallow his cum after they met on Yubo.
Click to expand...
Majority of teenage girls date their age, in my HS experience only the noticeably low income whores did this.
 
looksmaxxer2 said:
Majority of teenage girls date their age, in my HS experience only the noticeably low income whores did this.
Click to expand...
When i was in 7th grade (12 yrs old) another girl, who was also 12 was dating a 29 year old dude.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Gengar
TRUE_CEL said:
This whole debate about age gaps is a recent thing. I'm not gonna call someone a "pedo" or a "groomer" if they're 20 and dating a 15 year old. It can get so ridiculous that even a 26 year old dating a 19 year old is considered a "pedo"/"groomer." You seem to be less extreme in that, but it's still extreme to think a 15 year old can't date a 20 year old. Also, most women are hypocrites. They admit they'd be fine if the woman is older but not if the man is older and cite "power imbalance" as a reason. Which is dumb AF. If you think it's bad, the gender shouldn't matter. That's another reason why I can't take age cucks seriously.
Click to expand...
It can work, but typically the relationships are dubious, because the older one will see the younger one as easy if they're unsuccessful with their own peers. I assume you aren't American, so I don't know how true this is in your country, but for the most part people (especially those who're younger) will stick to people very close in age, and when they're still in high school/middle school, they're gonna almost exclusively interact with people under 18. Usually relations with those who are older is a result of social emotional dysfunction.
 
IAMNOTANINCEL said:
When i was in 7th grade (12 yrs old) another girl, who was also 12 was dating a 29 year old dude.
Click to expand...
Oh, anecdotally one person you knew did this, I suppose all teenage girls have sex with older men.
 
looksmaxxer2 said:
It can work, but typically the relationships are dubious, because the older one will see the younger one as easy if they're unsuccessful with their own peers. I assume you aren't American, so I don't know how true this is in your country, but for the most part people (especially those who're younger) will stick to people very close in age, and when they're still in high school/middle school, they're gonna almost exclusively interact with people under 18. Usually relations with those who are older is a result of social emotional dysfunction.
Click to expand...
Correct, I'm not American. I'm European. Well, not really, but you get my point. When I was 14, one of my then-friends (female) was dating a 28 year old. When I was 15 or 16, girls from my class were dating college-aged guys. So I never thought it as weird since no one else thought it was weird either. Most people, at worst, will think "Can't get anyone your own age?" But they won't make a problem out of it, going as far as to call them a "groomer" or a "pedophile" or anything. Besides, these words have lost their meanings since they are thrown around so liberally. Most people do indeed date within their own age range but there's some others that don't and no one thinks it's weird. Although things in Europe are changing and the public opinion is swaying somewhat, thanks to social media influence, I think. In my ancestral country, however, they raised the age of marriage (there's no age of consent as we do not believe in dating, nor do I) from 16 to 18, but that is due to outside influence, which is what I find problematic. I wouldn't have a problem with it if it was our own collective decision, but having outsiders tell us what to do is infuriating. Though I'd blame it on corrupt politicians who wanted to make a quick buck by accepting donations from such foreign lobbyists.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 32486
Pendejo said:
You weren’t as mature as you are now tho, were you?
Click to expand...
No but calling them children just diminishes the definition of the word. At 16-17 your personality is largely set in stone
 
  • +1
Reactions: klip11, Ryldoo IS COPING and Gengar
Bro is fighting a losing battle. He is trying to reason with unreasonable people.

Also normies will pick up on his autism and sub-par looks so he could be right all day it doesn’t matter.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Joe Rogancel, klip11 and GabachoCopium
TUSSELEIF said:
No but calling them children just diminishes the definition of the word. At 16-17 your personality is largely set in stone
Click to expand...
At 25 I let a 17 year old foid give me a BJ. What does that mean?
 
i see 16 year old girls show their ass on insta, why is it bad if i sexualize them if they did it themselves already?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

asdvek
Discussion Liking ass is higher T, I don't like tits
Replies
25
Views
254
zerotohero
zerotohero
Bitchwhipper2
Discussion Micromogging is way worse
Replies
5
Views
71
Bitchwhipper2
Bitchwhipper2
N
Jbs next to me rage fuel
Replies
1
Views
44
ineonx
ineonx
3links2
whats a nigger gotta do
Replies
1
Views
22
3links2
3links2
IncelJihadist
Discussion The jews will win
Replies
15
Views
114
yeeyeeslayer
yeeyeeslayer

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top