Nigger SMV still subpar tier, total Black esvisceration, #niggerdeath2026

[Giornoblaze]

ratio is useless, what matters is the raw numbers and how many mixed race kids are coming out jfl, who gives a fuck if muh heckin we have less kids, but look at our ratio dude but even if we went with the ratio, black men make up 7 percent of the population and barely 3 percent of all white women births are to black men? thats stll massive underrepresentation and in terms of raw numbers, they dont even crack 500k while white births number in the double digit millions, how exactly is this muh "we breeding all the snowbunnies and shiiet" yall niggers were asking for?

but again white men x hispanic women have the most kids in terms of pure population

View attachment 4803142

?

 

[Giornoblaze]

Ratio matter what the fuck r u talking about.
Hispanic population in America ~ 19%
BIack population in Ameria ~ 12%
19 / 12 ~ 1.58
1.58 multiplier
490k * 1.58 ~ 774,200
774,200 > 713,400
You see it's larger? So BIacks, if on the same population as Hispanics, would have more in America.

Ratios matter, stop coping. Although asian Americans account for less than 4% of America, their Oxford study means they have the most common inter racial marriages with white .
Stop coping.
@TheGreatWhite Cope

 

[Giornoblaze]

@lastofus123

 

[Giornoblaze]

These white faggots Iike saying about capita/ ratio matter so much and 13/50 of crimes yet when it comes to this...

 

[lastofus123]

Ratio matter what the fuck r u talking about.
Hispanic population in America ~ 19%
BIack population in Ameria ~ 12%
19 / 12 ~ 1.58
1.58 multiplier
490k * 1.58 ~ 774,200
774,200 > 713,400
You see it's larger? So BIacks, if on the same population as Hispanics, would have more in America.

No? Thats not this works you utter goofy retard, This would imply that birth rates scale perfectly linearly with population size, which isn’t how real demographics work, birth rates are already measured per capita, so multiplying totals by population ratios ignores the actual rates and doesn’t prove anything.

Also that stat i used was total births over a decade, theres no point in scaling the black population to this unless its as a percentage of the population to the births in which case, its 7 percent of black males to 2.88 percent of all births to white women while 80 percent of white women have kids with white men, how is ratio going to help you here? If anything it destroys your argument

What are you even trying to argue rn, just shut up if you have genuinely nothing to say

Ratios matter, stop coping. Although asian Americans account for less than 4% of America, their Oxford study means they have the most common inter racial marriages with white men.
Stop coping.

? Your confusing my argument, your butt buddy was talking about how so many white women were burning the coal and having kids, but when you check they dont even make up anywhere close to 5 percent of the births, how exactly is this a win to yall?

 

[Giornoblaze]

No? Thats not this works you utter goofy retard, This would imply that birth rates scale perfectly linearly with population size, which isn’t how real demographics work, birth rates are already measured per capita, so multiplying totals by population ratios ignores the actual rates and doesn’t prove anything.

Jfl what the fuck are you talking about?
They showed the raw numbers in America, they don't account for the population of each race.
You are coping.

Also that stat i used was total births over a decade, theres no point in scaling the black population to this unless its as a percentage of the population to the births in which case, its 7 percent of black males to 2.88 percent of all births to white women while 80 percent of white women have kids with white men, how is ratio going to help you here? If anything it destroys your argument

Literally, what? It's not even 7* bc lots of bIks are in jail lmfao. It's probably Iess it's like 5-6*.
Compared to white Hispanic which is like 10*.
We aren't talking about white men here, we are talking about white Hispanic (same thing tho).
So BIacks are cucking white Hispanic men because their ratios are higher.

What are you even trying to argue rn, just shut up if you have genuinely nothing to say

You know exactly what the argument is if you have an iq over 90. Lol this is like basic 3rd grade stuff.

? Your confusing my argument, your butt buddy was talking about how so many white women were burning the coal and having kids, but when you check they dont even make up anywhere close to 5 percent of the births, how exactly is this a win to yall?

BIk men have the highest amount if u scaIe it by ratios tho.
It shows outside of white men, BIacks have the highest

 

[Giornoblaze]

Why did he run away @TheGreatWhite Cope

 

[Giornoblaze]

Nigger dipped JFL

 

[lastofus123]

.

 

[lastofus123]

@Giornoblaze I deleted my previous response, this is my counterargument

theres no point talking about ratios in this stat because you’re dividing an 8 year conditional birth percentage by a static population share which makes it that’s mathematically inconsistent, so the ratio doesn’t mean anything because you’re dividing a time-based conditional percentage by a static population share, the denominators don’t match

 

[Giornoblaze]

theres one with a percenatage right next to it as well here

View attachment 4803258

2.88 percent and when we compare it to the 6 or 7 percent which is black men, it is a negative ratio still which makes them very underrepresented, your just assuming that if you lineraly scale that somehow demographics will change, but thats literally not how this shit works

View attachment 4803316
thats basically 1.8 percent of all black men so 98 percent of them arent even in jail and if we do the percentage reduction formula, they would still be above 6 percent of the population, jfl at this cope

False, raw data shows more White women have children with Hispanic men than Black men (4.22% vs 3.06%), so your own premise doesn’t even hold and your ratio only ‘looks higher’ because you’re dividing by different population sizes which isnt even a real world outcome.

@Giornoblaze I deleted my previous response, this is my counterargument

theres no point talking about ratios in this stat because you’re dividing an 8 year conditional birth percentage by a static population share which makes it that’s mathematically inconsistent, so the ratio doesn’t mean anything because you’re dividing a time-based conditional percentage by a static population share, the denominators don’t match

View attachment 4803357

I just accidently deleted my response..

 

[Giornoblaze]

@Giornoblaze I deleted my previous response, this is my counterargument

theres no point talking about ratios in this stat because you’re dividing an 8 year conditional birth percentage by a static population share which makes it that’s mathematically inconsistent, so the ratio doesn’t mean anything because you’re dividing a time-based conditional percentage by a static population share, the denominators don’t match

View attachment 4803357

.

 

[Giornoblaze]

.

 

[lastofus123]

Huh?
You can argue that, but that could perhaps be used if the ratios weren't as large as this
Like white Hispanic to BIacks is what? ScaIes for ratio
790 k > 713k
Thats a fuck ton.
And you can't prove that BIacks will go higher or lower than this, which is why it's called an estimation / ratio.
Basic 3rd grade math.
Also increasing the population of a race, usually increasing the smv.
If Hispanics had the same population as BIacks they probably wouldn't even scrape 400k...

again, this proportionality means absolutely nothing because again, your hinging on the assumption that births scale linearly with population, which isn’t how this data works. These are conditional percentages based on births to White women, not total outputs that just increase when you add more people. If scaling were linear, all groups would follow the same pattern, but they clearly don’t. So saying ‘if Blacks had the same population they’d have more’ is just an assumption, not something supported by the data.

You can take another race if u want and scaIe it to Hispanics and u would see they wouldn't touch BIacks.

No, again that only works if you assume linear scaling, which the data clearly doesn’t follow. These are conditional birth shares, not outputs that increase proportionally with population, so ‘scaling’ like that is just making up numbers.

 

[Giornoblaze]

again, this proportionality means absolutely nothing because again, your hinging on the assumption that births scale linearly with population, which isn’t how this data works. These are conditional percentages based on births to White women, not total outputs that just increase when you add more people. If scaling were linear, all groups would follow the same pattern, but they clearly don’t. So saying ‘if Blacks had the same population they’d have more’ is just an assumption, not something supported by the data.

No, again that only works if you assume linear scaling, which the data clearly doesn’t follow. These are conditional birth shares, not outputs that increase proportionally with population, so ‘scaling’ like that is just making up numbers.

.

 

[lastofus123]

Ur rambling.
Scientists make predictions of what populations Iook like aII the time in pIace like India China etc, using previous data.
Im tired tho so this is where the discussion staps

thats not what your doing you utter retard, they model rates, structure, and context. You’re assuming linear scaling with no evidence and assuming everything else stays the same which is NOT how demographic modeling works.

 

[Giornoblaze]

thats not what your doing you utter retard, they model rates, structure, and context. You’re assuming linear scaling with no evidence and assuming everything else stays the same which is NOT how demographic modeling works.

.

 

[Giornoblaze]

thats not what your doing you utter retard, they model rates, structure, and context. You’re assuming linear scaling with no evidence and assuming everything else stays the same which is NOT how demographic modeling works.

.

 

[lastofus123]

Jfl if u actually beIieve that adding 20 million more BIk AMERICANS( so it can match Hispanics)
WOULDN'T HAVE A DENT IN THAT 490K
U fucking faggot
don talking with u

you utter retard, again You’re assuming more population = more outcomes at the same rate, but these are conditional birth shares, they depend on behavior and pairing patterns, not just headcount.

ill explain it to you like you have 60 iq,

Adding 20 million people doesn’t automatically increase those births proportionally because they depend on demographics like age, location, and pairing patterns, not just total population size.

 

[Giornoblaze]

you utter retard, again You’re assuming more population = more outcomes at the same rate, but these are conditional birth shares, they depend on behavior and pairing patterns, not just headcount.

ill explain it to you like you have 60 iq,

Adding 20 million people doesn’t automatically increase those births proportionally because they depend on demographics like age, location, and pairing patterns, not just total population size.

.

 

[Giornoblaze]

you utter retard, again You’re assuming more population = more outcomes at the same rate, but these are conditional birth shares, they depend on behavior and pairing patterns, not just headcount.

ill explain it to you like you have 60 iq,

Adding 20 million people doesn’t automatically increase those births proportionally because they depend on demographics like age, location, and pairing patterns, not just total population size.

.

 

[lastofus123]

Which is why it's an estimation.
Anyways did say that it could be higher or lower, who knows.
But to argue that it wouldn't change is ridiculous.
A bigger breakdown is needed of age, but it would be dishonest to say it wouldn't go up.
That would mean that AII the bIacks would have to stay in like aII bIk places like atlanta or near the south.

i aint saying its not, but these estimations mean jack fucking shit because you’re scaling population without scaling the actual conditions that produce those births, again your just adding numbers that dont exist and no just adding 20 million young black men means nothing because the total black population doesnt have enough people to make that much for the next 50 years and thats not even accounting for black tfr currently so its not even a realistic scenario

black tfr is fucking atrocious, yall have worser tfr than whites currently so honestly the scaling wouldnt even go up as much as you think it would

 

[Giornoblaze]

i aint saying its not, but these estimations mean jack fucking shit because you’re scaling population without scaling the actual conditions that produce those births, again your just adding numbers that dont exist and no just adding 20 million young black men means nothing because the total black population doesnt have enough people to make that much for the next 50 years and thats not even accounting for black tfr currently so its not even a realistic scenario

black tfr is fucking atrocious, yall have worser tfr than whites currently so honestly the scaling wouldnt even go up as much as you think it would

.

 

[Giornoblaze]

.

 

[joao23]

i aint saying its not, but these estimations mean jack fucking shit because you’re scaling population without scaling the actual conditions that produce those births, again your just adding numbers that dont exist and no just adding 20 million young black men means nothing because the total black population doesnt have enough people to make that much for the next 50 years and thats not even accounting for black tfr currently so its not even a realistic scenario

black tfr is fucking atrocious, yall have worser tfr than whites currently so honestly the scaling wouldnt even go up as much as you think it would

11, just more 8 now

 

[TheGreatWhite Cope]

Why are these faggots coping so hard about this. Yes we know white women birth the greatest chuck of mixed race babies to black fathers, we don't have to keep being reminded

 

[gioscottist]

I'm going to expose all the coping mechanisms that white women are traitors, that white men are losing, etc. I'm not like many cowards here who refuse to do things like this, and today I'm here again to deliver this bitter, fat, heavy, and even depressing pill (for niggers). Let's go, I redid the experiment again, Tyrone vs. Chadlite on the Hinge, and here are the results. I used this black model:
View attachment 4788626
He is undeniably a Tyrone and a model, so KYS to anyone who comes with any coping mechanisms, these were the results he obtained in 1 week and 1 day:
View attachment 4788625
Depressing, isn't it? I did this experiment in Stockholm and Copenhagen, cities where the majority of women are precisely white, and I only matched with the woman who immediately ghosted me. Now, what about Chadlite? What did he do? Let's see, But Suifuel warning, not just for ethnics, even I wanted to kill myself watching this crap.
View attachment 4788634
He gets over 170 in the same period without using boosting, verification, or any of that crap.

Some foids who he matched
View attachment 4788648View attachment 4788649View attachment 4788650View attachment 4788651View attachment 4788654View attachment 4788655
Many of them was hot and have even some models on this shit, he pulled literal models, not even only this, he pulled leftfists lesbians with a nazi symbol on his bio
View attachment 4788666View attachment 4788671
Like this one, but some of them wanting traveling with the guy even though I don't know him

View attachment 4788675
This one is a stacylite btw, not Only this, some likes was directly inviting him to sex
View attachment 4788679
This one wanted his dick so hard
View attachment 4788681
He literally had no game, absolutly suifuel
View attachment 4788685View attachment 4788686
View attachment 4788686View attachment 4788688View attachment 4788689View attachment 4788690View attachment 4788691View attachment 4788692View attachment 4788693
This one was so hot boydwise and have a big ass the dream of PAWG
View attachment 4788701
I can't post more pics because the limit, but i have much more of this, unfortunaly can't post, but If you still believing Blacks come close SMV of Whites you're a deluded bluepill, life starts at White + HHTN + 6'0, Slayer starter pack

I think another blackpill here is how common gl white women really are, it's not like the white cl is matching with top tier stacies only, they are just casually that attractive
Meanwhile try that in a brown backwards shithole and you'll get depressed despite getting a similar amount of matches

 

[Ted Bundy]

I'm going to expose all the coping mechanisms that white women are traitors, that white men are losing, etc. I'm not like many cowards here who refuse to do things like this, and today I'm here again to deliver this bitter, fat, heavy, and even depressing pill (for niggers). Let's go, I redid the experiment again, Tyrone vs. Chadlite on the Hinge, and here are the results. I used this black model:
View attachment 4788626
He is undeniably a Tyrone and a model, so KYS to anyone who comes with any coping mechanisms, these were the results he obtained in 1 week and 1 day:
View attachment 4788625
Depressing, isn't it? I did this experiment in Stockholm and Copenhagen, cities where the majority of women are precisely white, and I only matched with the woman who immediately ghosted me. Now, what about Chadlite? What did he do? Let's see, But Suifuel warning, not just for ethnics, even I wanted to kill myself watching this crap.
View attachment 4788634
He gets over 170 in the same period without using boosting, verification, or any of that crap.

Some foids who he matched
View attachment 4788648View attachment 4788649View attachment 4788650View attachment 4788651View attachment 4788654View attachment 4788655
Many of them was hot and have even some models on this shit, he pulled literal models, not even only this, he pulled leftfists lesbians with a nazi symbol on his bio
View attachment 4788666View attachment 4788671
Like this one, but some of them wanting traveling with the guy even though I don't know him

View attachment 4788675
This one is a stacylite btw, not Only this, some likes was directly inviting him to sex
View attachment 4788679
This one wanted his dick so hard
View attachment 4788681
He literally had no game, absolutly suifuel
View attachment 4788685View attachment 4788686
View attachment 4788686View attachment 4788688View attachment 4788689View attachment 4788690View attachment 4788691View attachment 4788692View attachment 4788693
This one was so hot boydwise and have a big ass the dream of PAWG
View attachment 4788701
I can't post more pics because the limit, but i have much more of this, unfortunaly can't post, but If you still believing Blacks come close SMV of Whites you're a deluded bluepill, life starts at White + HHTN + 6'0, Slayer starter pack

he isnt tyrone shut up


also you are indian

 

[ZenithZXV]

Why are these faggots coping so hard about this. Yes we know white women birth the greatest chuck of mixed race babies to black fathers, we don't have to keep being reminded

How monkeys think of themselves posting a horse crap text with no substance​

 

[ZenithZXV]

.

You finished brah

 

[ZenithZXV]

@TheGreatBlack Chimpanzee