niggers always fuck everything up

[Manu le coq]

bruh didn't they build this?
View attachment 2106288

Yeah i reckon you that,

 

[allahcel]

I’m black myself and i kinda agree blacks are inferior when it comes to intelligence but i think that has to do with climate.

The climate in Africa is perfect for human life. It’s warm lots of rain and forest and fruits and plants and animals to hunt.

they didn’t have to struggle that much for survival.

Basically they could spend all day chilling hunting and growing farms.

 

[bedes]

Cope, asians men would kill their families to live this cortisol free

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

btw find me an ethnic with this sort of bone structure, she's more angular than 99% of this forum (because you guys are ethnics)

You’re an absolute fucking dumbass for comparing anybody with Lima, there’s no cumskin in earth who even moggs Lima either so what’s your point? Lima is the living incarnation of Aphrodite

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

I’m black myself and i kinda agree blacks are inferior when it comes to intelligence but i think that has to do with climate.

The climate in Africa is perfect for human life. It’s warm lots of rain and forest and fruits and plants and animals to hunt.

they didn’t have to struggle that much for survival.

Basically they could spend all day chilling hunting and growing farms.

No it’s not you fucking idiot. Africa is literally one of the most infertile continents on earth with only Australia beating Africa in this regard.

Only southern tip and Egypt are fertile the rest of the place is a hell hole to farm in. The animals in africa make life 10x harder than anywhere else just look up the deadliest animals most are from that shithoke and then you have mosquito and malaria. Africa is also segmented with extreme biomes deserts and jungle with a few temperate places like Cape Town which are perfect for life and Ethiopian highlands.

TLDR: niggas have low iq (still debatable) due to africa being so harsh the netives had to evolve to survive rather than rest to produce anything like Eurasians who could relax

 

[Deleted member 23775]

Tunisia have deported a lot of niggers can of the bigger invasion of their country

Same will happen with other North African countries

 

[Gengar]

Mali, Songhai, Zulu, Kongo, Egypt were all kingdoms

Mali was an empire. And Islamic one, by the way. @Manu le coq

 

[Gengar]

You’re an absolute fucking dumbass for comparing anybody with Lima, there’s no cumskin in earth who even moggs Lima either so what’s your point? Lima is the living incarnation of Aphrodite

She’s overrated man don’t simp.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

She’s overrated man don’t simp.

She’s the only woman I’d simp for don’t speak about weeen Lima like that nobody Moggs her nobody ever has since the dawn of man and nobody ever will

 

[thereallegend]

Mali was an empire. And Islamic one, by the way. @Manu le coq

correct

 

[Gengar]

She’s the only woman I’d simp for don’t speak about weeen Lima like that nobody Moggs her nobody ever has since the dawn of man and nobody ever will

 

[Gengar]

correct

Very based. The emperor seemed like a very pious man. And was the richest man in mankind probably. He gave away a lot of gold in true Islamic spirit, he would build mosques everywhere he went and would always decorate his subjects or army and animals with gold and made them carry it in bags as well. Mirin hard.

 

[thereallegend]

Very based. The emperor seemed like a very pious man. And was the richest man in mankind probably. He gave away a lot of gold in true Islamic spirit, he would build mosques everywhere he went and would always decorate his subjects or army and animals with gold and made them carry it in bags as well. Mirin hard.

long live mansa musa

 

[bishōnenmaxxer]

unable to build a society for themselves.

You didn't build shit. You're rotting on here along with all your SFcel friends.

JFL post your great civilization building achievements, I want to know where this delusional LARP of you contributing anything meaningful to humanity comes from.

Hope you're non-white as it makes the comedy of you claiming your superiority in a language that isn't yours even funnier.

 

[Gengar]

long live mansa musa

May Allah SWT elevate him to the highest ranks of Jannah. Ameen.

 

[Deleted member 23100]

You’re an absolute fucking dumbass for comparing anybody with Lima, there’s no cumskin in earth who even moggs Lima either so what’s your point?

that isn't a way to start your reply when you could barely interpret the question you sub80iq butthurt seething ethnicnigger. I am talking about craniofacial structure and phenotypical patterns, you might not know it but there's specific racial matches (not referring to subraces either) to different types of structures. I didn't ask for someone who fogs (not 'mogs,' retarded newfag) or a 'clone' of her either. in motion at her age she does look a variation of Megan Fox. the fact she tans herself or was constantly tanned as JB doesn't really distract that she isn't ethnic at all

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

that isn't a way to start your reply when you could barely interpret the question you sub80iq butthurt seething ethnicnigger. I am talking about craniofacial structure and phenotypical patterns, you might not know it but there's specific racial matches (not referring to subraces either) to different types of structures. I didn't ask for someone who fogs (not 'mogs,' retarded newfag) or a 'clone' of her either. in motion at her age she does look a variation of Megan Fox. the fact she tans herself or was constantly tanned as JB doesn't really distract that she isn't ethnic at all

She Pheno moggs evey white woman and looks moggs all of them as well you dumb bitch keep using the hottest woman on earth to ever exist to make your point you retarded bitch

Yeah Lima is white that’s common sense but she is mixed gentically and I’m 100% sure that’s why she came out so hot. Tyler Maher is also mixed gentically despite being white and so is Sean Opry all of which are white bit have admixture that’s why they are moggers

 

[Deleted member 25663]

No it’s not you fucking idiot. Africa is literally one of the most infertile continents on earth with only Australia beating Africa in this regard.

Only southern tip and Egypt are fertile the rest of the place is a hell hole to farm in. The animals in africa make life 10x harder than anywhere else just look up the deadliest animals most are from that shithoke and then you have mosquito and malaria. Africa is also segmented with extreme biomes deserts and jungle with a few temperate places like Cape Town which are perfect for life and Ethiopian highlands.

TLDR: niggas have low iq (still debatable) due to africa being so harsh the netives had to evolve to survive rather than rest to produce anything like Eurasians who could relax

That’s completely untrue, and pretty much every single anthropologist and historian agrees with me. IQ of a race almost DIRECTLY correlates with how difficult the environment is to survive in, and Africa was the easiest one to survive in and where us Homo sapiens had already evolved to survive in naturally from millions of years of being apes. As the environment got harder to survive in and they had to be more intelligent to survive, the races got smarter through natural selection and therefore developed intelligence to advance civilization and kill predators and prey (despite common belief, the vast majority of Africans had a much more plant dominant and less meat dominant diet than other races and fought large animals a lot less). It’s much better to be intelligent enough to develop an effective weapon to be able to easily kill a large deadly animal than be fast or athletic enough to be able to run from it, which doesn’t always work.

Evolution of Race Differences in Intelligence - IQ and Human Intelligence

Evolution of race differences in intelligence

human-intelligence.org

Africa only seems difficult to survive in because they didn’t develop the intelligence to make advancements and make it easier for them to survive like other races did. Early humans found it much more difficult to survive in Europe or North Asia (where modern East Asians come from, which is why they’re smarter than Southeast Asians) for example, or even North Africa and South Asia, which is why intelligence was so heavily selected for. Intelligence doesn’t always lead to civilizations and advancements for a race though, you also do need a good environment and population. Eskimos are still shit for example.

Given optimal conditions, high intelligence developed from hard to live in environments utterly dominates, as seen in how quick the Nordics and Germanics rose up to the top of the world after raiding and colonizing and acquiring resources to modernize and industrialize despite being viewed as inferior backwater savages, being cucked and enslaved by Middle Easterners and Mediterraneans, and living in Scandinavian mud huts for thousands of years. Also seen in how quick the Mongolians rose up and beat technologically superior armies that outnumbered them ten to one merely with superior war tactics despite being uncivilized nomadic barbarians living in mud huts, becoming the most successful conquerors of all time with the biggest contiguous empire and the highest percentage death count in the history of the world. With high IQ, all you need is enough population and good conditions as seen in how East Asian counties rose up so quick while South American and African countries didn’t despite many being richer than East Asian countries in the 1900s. This is also evident in how when given a level playing field, East Asians are quickly and completely surpassing Europeans in economy, technology, innovations, and advancements.

bruh didn't they build this?
View attachment 2106288

Ancient Egyptians were North African Caucasoids, which are completely different to sub-Saharan Negroids. Closest to MENA and Mediterraneans, who aren’t white but are Caucasoid. Modern Egyptians actually have MORE sub-Saharan admixture than Ancient Egyptians.

DNA discovery reveals genetic history of ancient Egyptians | CNN

Scientists analyzing mummy DNA find that the closest ancient relations were from the Near East and Europe.

www.cnn.com

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

That’s completely untrue, and pretty much every single anthropologist and historian agrees with me. IQ of a race almost DIRECTLY correlates with how difficult the environment is to survive in, and Africa was the easiest one to survive in and where us Homo sapiens had already evolved to survive in naturally from millions of years of being apes. As the environment got harder to survive in and they had to be more intelligent to survive, the races got smarter through natural selection and therefore developed intelligence to advance civilization and kill predators and prey (despite common belief, the vast majority of Africans had a much more plant dominant and less meat dominant diet than other races and fought large animals a lot less).

Evolution of Race Differences in Intelligence - IQ and Human Intelligence

Evolution of race differences in intelligence

human-intelligence.org

Africa only seems difficult to survive in because they didn’t develop the intelligence to make advancements and make it easier for them to survive like other races did. Early humans found it much more difficult to survive in Europe or North Asia (where modern East Asians come from, which is why they’re smarter than Southeast Asians) for example, or even North Africa and South Asia, which is why intelligence was so heavily selected for. Intelligence doesn’t always lead to civilizations and advancements for a race though, you also do need a good environment and population. Eskimos are still shit for example. Given optimal conditions, high intelligence developed from hard to live in environments utterly dominates, as seen in how quick the Nordics and Germanics rose up to the top of the world after raiding and colonizing and acquiring resources to modernize and industrialize despite being viewed as inferior backwater savages and living in Scandinavian mud huts for thousands of years. Also seen in how quick the Mongolians rose up and beat technologically superior armies that outnumbered them ten to one merely with superior war tactics despite being uncivilized nomadic barbarians living in mud huts, becoming the most successful conquerors of all time with the biggest contiguous empire and the highest percentage death count in the history of the world. With high IQ, all you need is enough population and good conditions as seen in how East Asian counties rose up so quick while South American and African countries didn’t despite many being richer than East Asian countries in the 1900s.



Ancient Egyptians were North African Caucasoids, which are completely different to sub-Saharan Negroids. Closest to MENA and Mediterraneans, who aren’t white but are Caucasoid. Modern Egyptians actually have MORE sub-Saharan admixture than Ancient Egyptians.

DNA discovery reveals genetic history of ancient Egyptians | CNN

Scientists analyzing mummy DNA find that the closest ancient relations were from the Near East and Europe.

www.cnn.com

And yet africa has more negatives in survivability than eurasia this is s fact even tier zoo even states that Africa is the nightmare VET PVP area of earth for any living creature.

In terms of survivability in order of difficulty

Africa,
Australia,
South America,
Asia,
North America,
Europe.

Nowhere on earth earth for Antarctica is as hard to live in than Africa Even Australia is EZ mode. If real life was WOW then you’d have to be end game to even enter the African zone, there’s a reason why most OP cancerous creatures come from that place it’s literally the hardest place to survive and the humans who live there had to evolve to be more hardy and resistant to all ailments in the expense of IQ

 

[Manu le coq]

And yet africa has more negatives in survivability than eurasia this is s fact even tier zoo even states that Africa is the nightmare VET PVP area of earth for any living creature.

In terms of survivability in order of difficulty

Africa,
Australia,
South America,
Asia,
North America,
Europe.

Nowhere on earth earth for Antarctica is as hard to live in than Africa Even Australia is EZ mode. If real life was WOW then you’d have to be end game to even enter the African zone, there’s a reason why most OP cancerous creatures come from that place it’s literally the hardest place to survive and the humans who live there had to evolve to be more hardy and resistant to all ailments in the expense of IQ

That’s why black demonstrate more masculine personality dark triad traits, are physically stronger, higher level of testosterone than any race.

 

[anactualdude]

I KNOW

but what the point right?

It's cool to fuck some snowbunnies SOMEtimes, but bro look at the state of my people
they are fucking lazy uneducated, whinning race of slaves.
women are filled with aids and have the worst attitude of all the races of females while at the same time being the most obese and unnatractive physically.
men are the worst bcs they were supposed to protect and expand during history but they didn't.

In the 40s China and japan were as rich as most coutnry of africa, if not poorer.
Now african are poor as fuck, while they litterally live in the richest continent of the world, they have the most oil ressources, diamonds, and plenty of other ressources. YET THEY fucked around and turned into POOR dictatorship, where 1% of the people possess 95% of ressources, and the corrupted gouv give everytihng for free to europeans.

while japan and china have thrived and became extremely rich,
that's how mentally and intellectually the gook is superior to the nigger. niggers don't feel any kind of companionship for each other, they don't have patriotism, while a japanese (the previous one not today) would be ready to die for his country

there are two sects of blacks my friend. two utterly different species. Normal blacks and ghetto blacks. You and I (and everyone) despise the ghetto blacks. But if you think normal blacks are in any way stunted or disadvantaged you’re a fucking retard. I have two black friends making 7 figures per year. My sales closer makes between 6 and 7. He’s mixed like me. Normal blacks are programmers, engineers, doctor, etc etc. You hate yourself, that’s fine lol. But it’s the reason why you’re a broke, dumb rotting incel with no pussy and no future

 

[Deleted member 25663]

And yet africa has more negatives in survivability than eurasia this is s fact even tier zoo even states that Africa is the nightmare VET PVP area of earth for any living creature.

In terms of survivability in order of difficulty

Africa,
Australia,
South America,
Asia,
North America,
Europe.

Nowhere on earth earth for Antarctica is as hard to live in than Africa Even Australia is EZ mode. If real life was WOW then you’d have to be end game to even enter the African zone, there’s a reason why most OP cancerous creatures come from that place it’s literally the hardest place to survive and the humans who live there had to evolve to be more hardy and resistant to all ailments in the expense of IQ

Read the link, every modern anthropologist, geneticist, and historian agrees that it’s COMPLETELY the other way around lmao. The humans who lived in Africa didn’t have to develop IQ to survive unlike the humans in other places. Cold environments were much harder to survive in than hot environments and also much more difficult to develop civilizations in, as evidenced by how early civilizations were all in North Africa and the Middle East/West Asia and Southern Europe, besides China because they’re just that intelligent. Even North Africa was far more difficult to survive in than sub-Saharan Africa, and it paled in comparison to North Asia for example. Sub-Saharan Africa was/is only difficult to survive in because the humans there didn’t develop the intelligence to advance and make it much easier for themselves like the humans elsewhere.

“During the past 200,000 years, the ancestors of Africans have continued to inhabit tropical and subtropical environments in sub-Saharan Africa. This environment was not very demanding from a cognitive point of view because primates adapted to this kind of environment 60 million years ago. Homo erectus was a great eater of plants, and he supplemented his meals by using the carcasses of animals killed by lions, leopards and cheetahs. Most Africans lived as hunter-gatherers, much like the hunter-gatherer populations of today’s tropical and subtropical regions. Their diet consists largely of year-round plants, insects and eggs, with occasional meat supplements obtained through hunting.
The immediate availability of edible plants, insects and eggs all year long means that Africans in the tropics and subtropics have not had to hunt animals for food. In 1966 a conference of anthropologists was held in which a consensus was reached that “meat was of little nutritional importance in the African diet (Standford and Bunn, 2001, p.4). In 1999 a similar conference was held in which a consensus was reached that “the diet of the first hominids was originally plant-like, identical to that of the tropical and subtropical populations” (Standford and Bunn, 2001, p.356). As a result, Africans did not have selective pressure to develop the necessary intelligence for hunting methods, tools and weapons to kill large mammals.
Moreover, the temperature in Equatorial Africa varies annually between 17 ° C and 32 ° C, so Africans have not met the cognitive demands of the manufacture of clothing or tents, the establishment and maintenance of fires or the preparation and storage of food for future consumption. It was relatively easy to keep babies, children and young children alive because it was not necessary to make them clothes, and at a relatively young age they were able to get food from them.”

“The first groups to migrate out of sub-Saharan Africa colonized North Africa and Southwest Asia 100 to 90 thousand years ago. Between -90 thousand and -60 thousand years ago, they colonized the whole of Southeast Asia. At this level they were isolated from the Africans by the distance and by the Sahara desert and thus evolved into a race apart: North African and South Asian (MENA in English for Middle-Easterners and North-Africans). They encountered a temperature similar to that found today in these regions, with the coldest winters at 13 ° C. 70 thousand years ago the first ice age occurred in the northern hemisphere and lasted until 50 thousand years ago. This period was followed by a warmer period ranging from -50 thousand years to -28 thousand years, followed by a second and more severe ice age (the main ice age) which stretched from -28 thousand years ago to -10 thousand years, then the temperatures went back to those we know (Roberts, 1989, Foley, 1987). During the main ice age, winter temperatures in North Africa, Eurasia and North America dropped to 5 ° C (Roberts, 1989). The coldest winters in North Africa and South Asia were 7 ° C.
Surviving during the cold ages required solving a series of problems requiring cognition, which exerted a selective pressure for greater intelligence than what was required in tropical and subtropical Africa.
The plants are no longer present in winter and spring, and are not abundant in summer and autumn. Insects and reptiles are no longer available because they hibernate in temperate climates. The main source of food became large mammals such as antelopes, deer, horses and wild boars that men had to kill to obtain food. It must have been difficult to kill these large mammals in the grasslands that covered most of the northern hemisphere during the last ice age because there is good visibility of several thousand meters and herbivores have learned to be wary of predators approaching. Fighting in open meadows is more difficult than in tropical or sub-tropical woodlands, where there are many corners where hunters can hide. Humans from Equatorial Africa were largely herbivorous and were not adapted to fight large mammals, so they had to present new cognitive problems for them. Large herbivores know how to run fast and are virtually impossible to catch just running after them. The only way to kill these animals was to use natural traps in which animals could be led and then killed. One of the most frequently exploited natural traps was the narrow ravines into which animals could be brought and fell. There, members of the troop waited in ambush. Another method used was the cliffs beyond which a group of men could bring a troop of herbivores, some of them fell from the edge and could be killed or wounded enough for the other members of the troop to complete. Archaeological research has shown that such traps were used by early humans in Eurasia (Geist 1978, Mellars 1999). The development of such cooperative strategies to kill and catch large herbivores has required increased cognitive skills and levels of cooperation.
It has been shown that in hunter-gatherer populations, the proportion of food obtained by hunting and that obtained by gathering varies according to latitude. Humans in tropical and subtropical areas are mainly gatherers, while men living in temperate environments practice more hunting, men in the Arctic and subarctic areas get their food mainly through hunting and fishing, forced that they are getting food in this way since plants were not available, except for berries and nuts in summer and autumn (Lee, 1968). When men migrated to the temperate regions of North Africa and South Asia, many of those with a weak Q.I did not survive the cold winters, this increased the average Q.I of the survivors to 84.
-Secondly: The effective hunting of large mammals requires the manufacture of various tools based on stones, wood and bone to make weapons and cut carcasses. Some of these animals were to be slaughtered by weapons and spikes made of stone, which requires prior preparation and usually the establishment of a point of stone attached to the end of a stick. Once the large herbivore fell, it still needed to be cut into transportable parts to the camp for women and children. These animals had hard skin and thick ligaments difficult to cut, so men had to design a variety of tools. In a subarctic environment the animals that were killed cooled very quickly and became impossible to cut, so the hunters had to have good tools to cut quickly, before the carcass became solid. Men in cold environments needed more tools of different types and higher complexity compared to men in tropical and subtropical regions. This has been shown by Torrence (1983), who has demonstrated an association between latitude and the number and complexity of tools used by contemporary hunter-gatherers. He found that hunter-gatherers in tropical and subtropical environments like the Amazon and New Guinea typically had between 10 and 20 tools while those in the colder latitudes of Siberia, Alaska and Greenland had between 25 and 20 tools. and 60 different tools. In addition, men in more northern environments make tools more complex, requiring the assembly of different pieces, such as a stone arrowhead or bone at the end of a wood.”

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Read the link, every modern anthropologist, geneticist, and historian agrees that it’s COMPLETELY the other way around lmao. The humans who lived in Africa didn’t have to develop IQ to survive unlike the humans in other places. Cold environments were much harder to survive in than hot environments and also much more difficult to develop civilizations in, as evidenced by how early civilizations were all in North Africa and the Middle East/West Asia and Southern Europe, besides China because they’re just that intelligent. Even North Africa was far more difficult to survive in than sub-Saharan Africa, and it paled in comparison to North Asia for example. Sub-Saharan Africa was/is only difficult to survive in because the humans there didn’t develop the intelligence to advance and make it much easier for themselves like the humans elsewhere.

“During the past 200,000 years, the ancestors of Africans have continued to inhabit tropical and subtropical environments in sub-Saharan Africa. This environment was not very demanding from a cognitive point of view because primates adapted to this kind of environment 60 million years ago. Homo erectus was a great eater of plants, and he supplemented his meals by using the carcasses of animals killed by lions, leopards and cheetahs. Most Africans lived as hunter-gatherers, much like the hunter-gatherer populations of today’s tropical and subtropical regions. Their diet consists largely of year-round plants, insects and eggs, with occasional meat supplements obtained through hunting.
The immediate availability of edible plants, insects and eggs all year long means that Africans in the tropics and subtropics have not had to hunt animals for food. In 1966 a conference of anthropologists was held in which a consensus was reached that “meat was of little nutritional importance in the African diet (Standford and Bunn, 2001, p.4). In 1999 a similar conference was held in which a consensus was reached that “the diet of the first hominids was originally plant-like, identical to that of the tropical and subtropical populations” (Standford and Bunn, 2001, p.356). As a result, Africans did not have selective pressure to develop the necessary intelligence for hunting methods, tools and weapons to kill large mammals.
Moreover, the temperature in Equatorial Africa varies annually between 17 ° C and 32 ° C, so Africans have not met the cognitive demands of the manufacture of clothing or tents, the establishment and maintenance of fires or the preparation and storage of food for future consumption. It was relatively easy to keep babies, children and young children alive because it was not necessary to make them clothes, and at a relatively young age they were able to get food from them.”

“The first groups to migrate out of sub-Saharan Africa colonized North Africa and Southwest Asia 100 to 90 thousand years ago. Between -90 thousand and -60 thousand years ago, they colonized the whole of Southeast Asia. At this level they were isolated from the Africans by the distance and by the Sahara desert and thus evolved into a race apart: North African and South Asian (MENA in English for Middle-Easterners and North-Africans). They encountered a temperature similar to that found today in these regions, with the coldest winters at 13 ° C. 70 thousand years ago the first ice age occurred in the northern hemisphere and lasted until 50 thousand years ago. This period was followed by a warmer period ranging from -50 thousand years to -28 thousand years, followed by a second and more severe ice age (the main ice age) which stretched from -28 thousand years ago to -10 thousand years, then the temperatures went back to those we know (Roberts, 1989, Foley, 1987). During the main ice age, winter temperatures in North Africa, Eurasia and North America dropped to 5 ° C (Roberts, 1989). The coldest winters in North Africa and South Asia were 7 ° C.
Surviving during the cold ages required solving a series of problems requiring cognition, which exerted a selective pressure for greater intelligence than what was required in tropical and subtropical Africa.
The plants are no longer present in winter and spring, and are not abundant in summer and autumn. Insects and reptiles are no longer available because they hibernate in temperate climates. The main source of food became large mammals such as antelopes, deer, horses and wild boars that men had to kill to obtain food. It must have been difficult to kill these large mammals in the grasslands that covered most of the northern hemisphere during the last ice age because there is good visibility of several thousand meters and herbivores have learned to be wary of predators approaching. Fighting in open meadows is more difficult than in tropical or sub-tropical woodlands, where there are many corners where hunters can hide. Humans from Equatorial Africa were largely herbivorous and were not adapted to fight large mammals, so they had to present new cognitive problems for them. Large herbivores know how to run fast and are virtually impossible to catch just running after them. The only way to kill these animals was to use natural traps in which animals could be led and then killed. One of the most frequently exploited natural traps was the narrow ravines into which animals could be brought and fell. There, members of the troop waited in ambush. Another method used was the cliffs beyond which a group of men could bring a troop of herbivores, some of them fell from the edge and could be killed or wounded enough for the other members of the troop to complete. Archaeological research has shown that such traps were used by early humans in Eurasia (Geist 1978, Mellars 1999). The development of such cooperative strategies to kill and catch large herbivores has required increased cognitive skills and levels of cooperation.
It has been shown that in hunter-gatherer populations, the proportion of food obtained by hunting and that obtained by gathering varies according to latitude. Humans in tropical and subtropical areas are mainly gatherers, while men living in temperate environments practice more hunting, men in the Arctic and subarctic areas get their food mainly through hunting and fishing, forced that they are getting food in this way since plants were not available, except for berries and nuts in summer and autumn (Lee, 1968). When men migrated to the temperate regions of North Africa and South Asia, many of those with a weak Q.I did not survive the cold winters, this increased the average Q.I of the survivors to 84.
-Secondly: The effective hunting of large mammals requires the manufacture of various tools based on stones, wood and bone to make weapons and cut carcasses. Some of these animals were to be slaughtered by weapons and spikes made of stone, which requires prior preparation and usually the establishment of a point of stone attached to the end of a stick. Once the large herbivore fell, it still needed to be cut into transportable parts to the camp for women and children. These animals had hard skin and thick ligaments difficult to cut, so men had to design a variety of tools. In a subarctic environment the animals that were killed cooled very quickly and became impossible to cut, so the hunters had to have good tools to cut quickly, before the carcass became solid. Men in cold environments needed more tools of different types and higher complexity compared to men in tropical and subtropical regions. This has been shown by Torrence (1983), who has demonstrated an association between latitude and the number and complexity of tools used by contemporary hunter-gatherers. He found that hunter-gatherers in tropical and subtropical environments like the Amazon and New Guinea typically had between 10 and 20 tools while those in the colder latitudes of Siberia, Alaska and Greenland had between 25 and 20 tools. and 60 different tools. In addition, men in more northern environments make tools more complex, requiring the assembly of different pieces, such as a stone arrowhead or bone at the end of a wood.”

Brah I’m not reading all of that.

But needless to say you’re wrong and it’s clear we ain’t gonna agree on this so ima Leah this debate here. Im correct snd you’re incorrect cheers for at least trying but your points are all wrong

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

That’s why black demonstrate more masculine personality dark triad traits, are physically stronger, higher level of testosterone than any race.

Yep you have to be high T to survive in africa cos the place is so harsh. Eurasians have no idea how easy their ancestors had it, ours had to survive in literal hell whislt theirs survived in paradise I envy them Eurasians

 

[Deleted member 27014]

bruh didn't they build this?
View attachment 2106288

Fuck no, egyptians werent black. They had some black slaves and allies but that’s all

 

[Deleted member 25663]

Brah I’m not reading all of that.

But needless to say you’re wrong and it’s clear we ain’t gonna agree on this so ima Leah this debate here. Im correct snd you’re incorrect cheers for at least trying but your points are all wrong

One random’s claim vs the evidence of every single anthropologist, geneticist, and historian. You are 100% incorrect and we both know it lmao. Africans only have it harder today because they didn’t develop advancements/civilization to make it easier for themselves. Before humans developed civilizations, other races had it much harder

 

[PURE ARYAN GENETICS]

i have heard that they are homoerectus

well abos certainly aren't human

 

[Manu le coq]

there are two sects of blacks my friend. two utterly different species. Normal blacks and ghetto blacks. You and I (and everyone) despise the ghetto blacks. But if you think normal blacks are in any way stunted or disadvantaged you’re a fucking retard. I have two black friends making 7 figures per year. My sales closer makes between 6 and 7. He’s mixed like me. Normal blacks are programmers, engineers, doctor, etc etc. You hate yourself, that’s fine lol. But it’s the reason why you’re a broke, dumb rotting incel with no pussy and no future

I get plenty of pussy i swear,
But i’m broke tho

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

One random’s claim vs the evidence of every single anthropologist, geneticist, and historian. You are 100% incorrect and we both know it lmao. Africans only have it harder today because they didn’t develop advancements/civilization to make it easier for themselves. Before humans developed civilizations, other races had it much harder

Geography, history and climates prove you wrong but once again we are NEVR going to see eye to eye on this debate so why bother carrying it on?

Just accept you’re wrong or accept we cannot agree and move on. But never reply to me regarding this topic again cos I ain’t got time for going around in circles about the same shit

 

[Deleted member 25119]

ur acting like niggas have a choice tho?? we literally are still colonized bro, just not as blatant as the past

It because the dictators in Africa are money hungry

 

[Deleted member 25119]

I’m black myself and i kinda agree blacks are inferior when it comes to intelligence but i think that has to do with climate.

The climate in Africa is perfect for human life. It’s warm lots of rain and forest and fruits and plants and animals to hunt.

they didn’t have to struggle that much for survival.

Basically they could spend all day chilling hunting and growing farms.

Self hating nigger

 

[Deleted member 25119]

Read the link, every modern anthropologist, geneticist, and historian agrees that it’s COMPLETELY the other way around lmao. The humans who lived in Africa didn’t have to develop IQ to survive unlike the humans in other places. Cold environments were much harder to survive in than hot environments and also much more difficult to develop civilizations in, as evidenced by how early civilizations were all in North Africa and the Middle East/West Asia and Southern Europe, besides China because they’re just that intelligent. Even North Africa was far more difficult to survive in than sub-Saharan Africa, and it paled in comparison to North Asia for example. Sub-Saharan Africa was/is only difficult to survive in because the humans there didn’t develop the intelligence to advance and make it much easier for themselves like the humans elsewhere.

“During the past 200,000 years, the ancestors of Africans have continued to inhabit tropical and subtropical environments in sub-Saharan Africa. This environment was not very demanding from a cognitive point of view because primates adapted to this kind of environment 60 million years ago. Homo erectus was a great eater of plants, and he supplemented his meals by using the carcasses of animals killed by lions, leopards and cheetahs. Most Africans lived as hunter-gatherers, much like the hunter-gatherer populations of today’s tropical and subtropical regions. Their diet consists largely of year-round plants, insects and eggs, with occasional meat supplements obtained through hunting.
The immediate availability of edible plants, insects and eggs all year long means that Africans in the tropics and subtropics have not had to hunt animals for food. In 1966 a conference of anthropologists was held in which a consensus was reached that “meat was of little nutritional importance in the African diet (Standford and Bunn, 2001, p.4). In 1999 a similar conference was held in which a consensus was reached that “the diet of the first hominids was originally plant-like, identical to that of the tropical and subtropical populations” (Standford and Bunn, 2001, p.356). As a result, Africans did not have selective pressure to develop the necessary intelligence for hunting methods, tools and weapons to kill large mammals.
Moreover, the temperature in Equatorial Africa varies annually between 17 ° C and 32 ° C, so Africans have not met the cognitive demands of the manufacture of clothing or tents, the establishment and maintenance of fires or the preparation and storage of food for future consumption. It was relatively easy to keep babies, children and young children alive because it was not necessary to make them clothes, and at a relatively young age they were able to get food from them.”

“The first groups to migrate out of sub-Saharan Africa colonized North Africa and Southwest Asia 100 to 90 thousand years ago. Between -90 thousand and -60 thousand years ago, they colonized the whole of Southeast Asia. At this level they were isolated from the Africans by the distance and by the Sahara desert and thus evolved into a race apart: North African and South Asian (MENA in English for Middle-Easterners and North-Africans). They encountered a temperature similar to that found today in these regions, with the coldest winters at 13 ° C. 70 thousand years ago the first ice age occurred in the northern hemisphere and lasted until 50 thousand years ago. This period was followed by a warmer period ranging from -50 thousand years to -28 thousand years, followed by a second and more severe ice age (the main ice age) which stretched from -28 thousand years ago to -10 thousand years, then the temperatures went back to those we know (Roberts, 1989, Foley, 1987). During the main ice age, winter temperatures in North Africa, Eurasia and North America dropped to 5 ° C (Roberts, 1989). The coldest winters in North Africa and South Asia were 7 ° C.
Surviving during the cold ages required solving a series of problems requiring cognition, which exerted a selective pressure for greater intelligence than what was required in tropical and subtropical Africa.
The plants are no longer present in winter and spring, and are not abundant in summer and autumn. Insects and reptiles are no longer available because they hibernate in temperate climates. The main source of food became large mammals such as antelopes, deer, horses and wild boars that men had to kill to obtain food. It must have been difficult to kill these large mammals in the grasslands that covered most of the northern hemisphere during the last ice age because there is good visibility of several thousand meters and herbivores have learned to be wary of predators approaching. Fighting in open meadows is more difficult than in tropical or sub-tropical woodlands, where there are many corners where hunters can hide. Humans from Equatorial Africa were largely herbivorous and were not adapted to fight large mammals, so they had to present new cognitive problems for them. Large herbivores know how to run fast and are virtually impossible to catch just running after them. The only way to kill these animals was to use natural traps in which animals could be led and then killed. One of the most frequently exploited natural traps was the narrow ravines into which animals could be brought and fell. There, members of the troop waited in ambush. Another method used was the cliffs beyond which a group of men could bring a troop of herbivores, some of them fell from the edge and could be killed or wounded enough for the other members of the troop to complete. Archaeological research has shown that such traps were used by early humans in Eurasia (Geist 1978, Mellars 1999). The development of such cooperative strategies to kill and catch large herbivores has required increased cognitive skills and levels of cooperation.
It has been shown that in hunter-gatherer populations, the proportion of food obtained by hunting and that obtained by gathering varies according to latitude. Humans in tropical and subtropical areas are mainly gatherers, while men living in temperate environments practice more hunting, men in the Arctic and subarctic areas get their food mainly through hunting and fishing, forced that they are getting food in this way since plants were not available, except for berries and nuts in summer and autumn (Lee, 1968). When men migrated to the temperate regions of North Africa and South Asia, many of those with a weak Q.I did not survive the cold winters, this increased the average Q.I of the survivors to 84.
-Secondly: The effective hunting of large mammals requires the manufacture of various tools based on stones, wood and bone to make weapons and cut carcasses. Some of these animals were to be slaughtered by weapons and spikes made of stone, which requires prior preparation and usually the establishment of a point of stone attached to the end of a stick. Once the large herbivore fell, it still needed to be cut into transportable parts to the camp for women and children. These animals had hard skin and thick ligaments difficult to cut, so men had to design a variety of tools. In a subarctic environment the animals that were killed cooled very quickly and became impossible to cut, so the hunters had to have good tools to cut quickly, before the carcass became solid. Men in cold environments needed more tools of different types and higher complexity compared to men in tropical and subtropical regions. This has been shown by Torrence (1983), who has demonstrated an association between latitude and the number and complexity of tools used by contemporary hunter-gatherers. He found that hunter-gatherers in tropical and subtropical environments like the Amazon and New Guinea typically had between 10 and 20 tools while those in the colder latitudes of Siberia, Alaska and Greenland had between 25 and 20 tools. and 60 different tools. In addition, men in more northern environments make tools more complex, requiring the assembly of different pieces, such as a stone arrowhead or bone at the end of a wood.”

Nigga you be writing these big ass essay like people going to read all that

 

[Manu le coq]

I’m black myself and i kinda agree blacks are inferior when it comes to intelligence but i think that has to do with climate.

The climate in Africa is perfect for human life. It’s warm lots of rain and forest and fruits and plants and animals to hunt.

they didn’t have to struggle that much for survival.

Basically they could spend all day chilling hunting and growing farms.

That’s why your low iq nigger self, kept on believing in Islam, while i proved you how much it was an human made production, and i told you that muslim envaded raped slaughtered decimated and castrated our ancestors, arab didn’t considers us human. Yet you keep sucking on your fake prophet dick

 

[Manu le coq]

Btw this thread is troll, i love black race

 

[Manu le coq]

And black women are the most attractive to me

 

[Jigen]

unable to build a society for themselves.
ALL ethnicitty without exception have happened to build something,
europeans have france/UK/us
asians have japan/china/TAIWAN
arabs have qatar/arabia saoudites
Latinos have ARgentina/Chile

Niggers have nothing, because they are too primal and low iq to build a society,
if you gave niggers in Africa money and power and all the tools necessary to uprise, they would still fuck everything up, they don't have the ability to see in the long run, the discipline, to do so. IT WOuld still turn into a nightmare and a hell of a place. they will fuck everything up lose all the money and get invaded by the europeans or asian again;


NIGGers are primal and the closer human specy to the animal. violent, unintelligent,

the only tangible moment in history niggers build a society was during slavery in USA, because THEY WERE FORCED TO DO SO, if there were no white in there, they would have just done nothing of the day but sleep, killed each other of, and turned USA into a poor dictatorship and get invaded again by another nation like china or arabs.

"muh muh bu bu bu we have bbc and we are strong physically"
Retarded race of slaves and low iq field farmer piss of shit, none of this will ever compensate for your unability to build a society, wtf does it matter in a society of lifting a little bit more weight? real men build a future for their children, expand trough their knoweldges and culture, wich you are unable to do.

I trully dispise from the bottom of my heart every single one of you, I wish I wasn't born a nigger, even if I was indian I would feel more pride in my race.

Go read a book.

 

[Deleted member 25119]

And yet africa has more negatives in survivability than eurasia this is s fact even tier zoo even states that Africa is the nightmare VET PVP area of earth for any living creature.

In terms of survivability in order of difficulty

Africa,
Australia,
South America,
Asia,
North America,
Europe.

Nowhere on earth earth for Antarctica is as hard to live in than Africa Even Australia is EZ mode. If real life was WOW then you’d have to be end game to even enter the African zone, there’s a reason why most OP cancerous creatures come from that place it’s literally the hardest place to survive and the humans who live there had to evolve to be more hardy and resistant to all ailments in the expense of IQ

Idk man

I been to Africa multiple times and it not the hardest place to live

Most of the locals are pretty happy even though they don’t got a lot of money and there no gangs there so it mostly safe

The only problem with Africa is the leaders are holding them backs. Most of the leader are dictators and they are extremely money hungry.

The hardest places to live my opinion is Haiti

 

[Deleted member 25663]

Geography, history and climates prove you wrong but once again we are NEVR going to see eye to eye on this debate so why bother carrying it on?

Just accept you’re wrong or accept we cannot agree and move on. But never reply to me regarding this topic again cos I ain’t got time for going around in circles about the same shit

Geography, history, and climates prove YOU wrong lmao. You’re showing zero evidence and assume people will go off your word. Sub-Saharan Africa is the most tropical and subtropical of all regions listed, and those are the easiest climates to live in by far compared to other environments where they had to develop intelligence to survive. Every single valid source agrees with me. I’m 100% correct but sure, let’s just move on.

Evolution of Race Differences in Intelligence - IQ and Human Intelligence

Evolution of race differences in intelligence

human-intelligence.org

Nigga you be writing these big ass essay like people going to read all that

Everything in the quote is copy pasted from the link I posted dumbass nigga

 

[Deleted member 25119]

No it’s not you fucking idiot. Africa is literally one of the most infertile continents on earth with only Australia beating Africa in this regard.

Only southern tip and Egypt are fertile the rest of the place is a hell hole to farm in. The animals in africa make life 10x harder than anywhere else just look up the deadliest animals most are from that shithoke and then you have mosquito and malaria. Africa is also segmented with extreme biomes deserts and jungle with a few temperate places like Cape Town which are perfect for life and Ethiopian highlands.

TLDR: niggas have low iq (still debatable) due to africa being so harsh the netives had to evolve to survive rather than rest to produce anything like Eurasians who could relax

There are several African countries that have experienced significant economic growth in recent years. Here is a list of some of them:

1. Ethiopia
2. Ghana
3. Ivory Coast
4. Kenya
5. Mauritius
6. Rwanda
7. Senegal
8. Tanzania
9. Uganda

 

[Deleted member 25119]

Geography, history, and climates prove YOU wrong lmao. You’re showing zero evidence and assume people will go off your word. Sub-Saharan Africa is the most tropical and subtropical of all regions listed, and those are the easiest climates to live in by far compared to other environments where they had to develop intelligence to survive. Every single valid source agrees with me. I’m 100% correct but sure, let’s just move on.

Evolution of Race Differences in Intelligence - IQ and Human Intelligence

Evolution of race differences in intelligence

human-intelligence.org

Everything in the quote is copy pasted from the link I posted dumbass nigga

Still ain’t reading that shit

 

[Gengar]

She Pheno moggs evey white woman and looks moggs all of them as well you dumb bitch keep using the hottest woman on earth to ever exist to make your point you retarded bitch

Yeah Lima is white that’s common sense but she is mixed gentically and I’m 100% sure that’s why she came out so hot. Tyler Maher is also mixed gentically despite being white and so is Sean Opry all of which are white bit have admixture that’s why they are moggers

I have seen white girls with better phenotypes here. Plus Lima looks like a tranny to me.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Still ain’t reading that shit

Lol that’s what I said and tbh I have debated @chinksupremacy over this shit before so I already know what he’s gonna type lol

 

[Deleted member 22924]

are you not from belgium like me faggot if you are born in belgium you are a european g

 

[Deleted member 25119]

Mali was an empire. And Islamic one, by the way. @Manu le coq

Islamic or not they was mainly African

 

[Manu le coq]

are you not from belgium like me faggot if you are born in belgium you are a european g

born and raise in belgium, african from the blood and heart

Leopold this motherfucker tortured and exploited my people, it make me want to cry? i HATE THIS MOTHERFUCKER MORE THAN ISLAM AND MAHOMET

 

[Deleted member 22924]

born and raise in belgium, african from the blood and heart

Leopold this motherfucker tortured and exploited my people, it make me want to cry? i HATE THIS MOTHERFUCKER MORE THAN ISLAM AND MAHOMET

leopold i a faggot from wallonië nothing tho do with flanders didnt now it was still that deep most of my friends are Congolese and they don't give a shit i think

 

[Deleted member 24507]

It because the dictators in Africa are money hungry

No, it’s because Hamite (so-called African) men are dumb and don’t know how to run countries correctly.

 

[Deleted member 25119]

No, it’s because Hamite (so-called African) men are dumb and don’t know how to run countries correctly.

Not all tho but mostly

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

But they wuz kangz n vikingz n jezuz n native to america n shiet

 

[Deleted member 24507]

Not all tho but mostly

The only country that has some economic growth is Nigeria but even then it’s still poorly ran and still poverty stricken.

Nigeria GDP Annual Growth Rate

The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in Nigeria expanded 3.84 percent in the fourth quarter of 2024 over the same quarter of the previous year. This page provides - Nigeria GDP Annual Growth Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

tradingeconomics.com