NO BS Super Detailed Autist Variation - Ideal Facial Ratios from Charles O.

[dogeater]

I found this Video online with the most autist angles that you have never heard of, it's tested and very accurate and no BS
You can Input all the ratios into a docs (do put the percentage) and plug it into chat gpt (i used the looksmaxxing gpt bot but i dont think it makes a difference if you use the general ai)

and if you're too lazy to do that these are all the side profile measurements he used so you can plug it in right away
Edit: I also found this post from him with even more autism about Facial Harmony: https://1drv.ms/w/s!ArBMTcc9T_FHjwxFs.
Ignore the first 2 links just measure it with chatgpt. Just use the Facial Analysis Formula

All the power to the guy who made it, Charles O.

(this is only side profile measurements, you have to copy the rest from the video and input manually from the video)
(8%) Gonial Angle: Less than 125
(3%) Nasofrontal: 106-129
(2.5%) Mandibular Plane Angle:15-22
(2%) Ramus to Mandible Ratio: Ramus = 0.59 - 0.77 times the length of Mandible
(2%) Facial Convexity: 168-176
(2%) Submental Cervical Angle: 90-95, (1.832% if 90-110)
(1.8%) Nasofacial Angle: 30-36 (1.65% if 36-40)
(1.5%) Orbital Vector: Just check if the orbital protrudes enough to cause any sort of dent.
(1.5%) Total Facial Convexity: 137.5-148.5
(1.5%) Mentolabial Angle: 107-118 (0.91.6% if 119-140)
(1%) Nasal Projection: 0.55-0.68 (0.91.6% if 0.68-0.70)
(1%) Nasal Width to Height: 0.62-0.88
(1%) Nasomental Angle: 125-132 (0.91.6% if 120-124)
(0.8%) Brow Ridge Inclination Angle: Mean slope angle of 18.5
(0.8%) Nasal Tip Angle: 0.8%
(No count) Lower Lip to Submental Plane Angle: 90-110
(No count) Sushners S2 Line:
(No Count) UL = Upper Lip, LL = Lower Lip
10.3 UL / 7.8 LL
Class 1 - 11.81 UL / 9.04 LL
Class 2 - 13.75 UL / 8.70 LL
Class 3 - 10.42 UL /11.42 LL
(No Count) Merifield Z Angle: 75-78, ok if 79-80

Lines:
(1%) Perfect Gonion to Mouth Relationship
(1%) Perfect Recession relative to the Frankfurt Plane
(1%) Perfect Ricketts Line
(1%) Perfect Holdaway Line
(1%) Perfect Steiner S Line
(1%) Perfect Burstone Line

 

[dogeater]

I found this Video online with the most autist angles that you have never heard of, it's tested and very accurate and no BS
You can Input all the ratios into a docs (do put the percentage) and plug it into chat gpt (i used the looksmaxxing gpt bot but i dont think it makes a difference if you use the general ai)

and if you're too lazy to do that these are all the side profile measurements he used so you can plug it in right away
Edit: I also found this post from him with even more autism about Facial Harmony: https://1drv.ms/w/s!ArBMTcc9T_FHjwxFs.
Ignore the first 2 links just measure it with chatgpt. Just use the Facial Analysis Formula

All the power to the guy who made it, Charles O.

(this is only side profile measurements, you have to copy the rest from the video and input manually from the video)
(8%) Gonial Angle: Less than 125
(3%) Nasofrontal: 106-129
(2.5%) Mandibular Plane Angle:15-22
(2%) Ramus to Mandible Ratio: Ramus = 0.59 - 0.77 times the length of Mandible
(2%) Facial Convexity: 168-176
(2%) Submental Cervical Angle: 90-95, (1.832% if 90-110)
(1.8%) Nasofacial Angle: 30-36 (1.65% if 36-40)
(1.5%) Orbital Vector: Just check if the orbital protrudes enough to cause any sort of dent.
(1.5%) Total Facial Convexity: 137.5-148.5
(1.5%) Mentolabial Angle: 107-118 (0.91.6% if 119-140)
(1%) Nasal Projection: 0.55-0.68 (0.91.6% if 0.68-0.70)
(1%) Nasal Width to Height: 0.62-0.88
(1%) Nasomental Angle: 125-132 (0.91.6% if 120-124)
(0.8%) Brow Ridge Inclination Angle: Mean slope angle of 18.5
(0.8%) Nasal Tip Angle: 0.8%
(No count) Lower Lip to Submental Plane Angle: 90-110
(No count) Sushners S2 Line:
(No Count) UL = Upper Lip, LL = Lower Lip
10.3 UL / 7.8 LL
Class 1 - 11.81 UL / 9.04 LL
Class 2 - 13.75 UL / 8.70 LL
Class 3 - 10.42 UL /11.42 LL
(No Count) Merifield Z Angle: 75-78, ok if 79-80

Lines:
(1%) Perfect Gonion to Mouth Relationship
(1%) Perfect Recession relative to the Frankfurt Plane
(1%) Perfect Ricketts Line
(1%) Perfect Holdaway Line
(1%) Perfect Steiner S Line
(1%) Perfect Burstone Line

also when you dont account for harmony (i havent tested his harmony sheet yet) it can be inaccurate. elias de poot got hella low objectively when I put it into chatgpt

 

[dogeater]

bump because I need more dopamine from the reactions I get from piggybacking over someone elses work