cytoplasm
Brofessor Emeritus
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2022
- Posts
- 24,624
- Reputation
- 36,101
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
This is you level of intelligence in 1180 replies you aren’t able lol
if everyone who tries to explain it to you fails at making you understand it, maybe means you are the problemThis is you level of intelligence in 1180 replies you aren’t able lol
because they say "features compliments each other" this messes with my brain.if everyone who tries to explain it to you fails at making you understand it, maybe means you are the problem
I just had you on ignore after you told me to kill myself.because they say "features compliments each other" this messes with my brain.
could you explain it to me in dm for once and forever and we'll finish it. but I don't know why you don't answer me anymore
Wait you got 2 warnings??? Jfl
I apologized because you had been ignoring me for 5 days and this word escaped me, believe me.I just had you on ignore after you told me to kill myself.
I don't want to because it will end up the same way as before, the supposedly definitive answer will turn into another 5 pages of thread
What's the secret of opry harmony though? Let's make this thread the official Explaining Psl Gods HarmonyI apologized because you had been ignoring me for 5 days and this word escaped me, believe me.
I swear if you write me a detailed page we won't go further no more than one page
By now forget about me ok? I'm not in a situation to do itI apologized because you had been ignoring me for 5 days and this word escaped me, believe me.
I swear if you write me a detailed page we won't go further no more than one page
Why ? PleaseBy now forget about me ok? I'm not in a situation to do it
I promised you I won't bother you anymoreBy now forget about me ok? I'm not in a situation to do it
I wait you when you are stable but at least answer me in dm lookBy now forget about me ok? I'm not in a situation to do it
They gave you a warning. That is gay as hell.Wait you got 2 warnings??? Jfl
I only got one when we pretended to be Nazis
Just understand since all are retardedThe guy even had a convo with me that turned way too long, with him being unsatisfied at the end. What he's doing to users here is borderline repeated harassment.
the explanation of @Debetro makes sense, in fact, for a period I didn't post anymore,but I still have doubts about what? I promised that if he clarifies this, I won't do anything moreThe guy even had a convo with me that turned way too long, with him being unsatisfied at the end. What he's doing to users here is borderline repeated harassment.
OK Wilmathe explanation of @Debetro makes sense, in fact, for a period I didn't post anymore,but I still have doubts about what? I promised that if he clarifies this, I won't do anything more
You ask at him?OK Wilma
You are obviously a not true .org member if you always behave how the Jew admins want you toThey gave you a warning. That is gay as hell.
glad he’s gone imagine obsessing so hard over a single man
Damn this guy is such a whore, he hit on the whole forum
I'll miss him. He manages to get tens of replies to every thread he makes even if it's the same every single timeglad he’s gone imagine obsessing so hard over a single man
obviously if everyone says something different my brain dies? talk to him @Debetro and you will see that he will tell you something totally different from what you say about chicoDude is unable to grasp a simple concept after multiple months and thousands replies of direct feedback
Legit 40 iq, never seen someone being unable to comprehend something this slow
I think we kind of made a point in other thread where we both agreeobviously if everyone says something different my brain dies? talk to him @Debetro and you will see that he will tell you something totally different from what you say about chico
SendI think we kind of made a point in other thread where we both agree
and can I ask you the favor of sending me the DM a summary and we'll finish it?I think we kind of made a point in other thread where we both agree
Please wait till I make the move and PM you, ok? Otherwise you will just catch me in not at all good circunstances for talkingand can I ask you the favor of sending me the DM a summary and we'll finish it?
I will make just a stable opinion
For him chico doesn’t have so good features broYou already seen it
Matt Bomer realistic rating
looksmax.org
Ok I wait you no problemPlease wait till I make the move and PM you, ok? Otherwise you will just catch me in not at all good circunstances for talking
Take into account that Chico being the best looking is not an universal fact, some people like you consider so but not all, it's not entirely objective. And in PM I think I mentioned that Chico doesn't have any top #1 feature, but since they are in general all good / very good with a lack of any big failo, he's good lookingFor him chico doesn’t have so good features bro
Ok I wait you no problem
yes but every time i show you someone you say that chico is better because its features are better like face shapeTake into account that Chico being the best looking is not an universal fact, some people like you consider so but not all, it's not entirely objective. And in PM I think I mentioned that Chico doesn't have any top #1 feature, but since they are in general all good / very good with a lack of any big failo, he's good looking
Good question, not 100% objective, but in the case of the tiktokers you posted before, it can be agreed by most that Chico and his features are better looking than them. When discussing two very good looking people, then the objectivity reduces and makes it harder to make a stable claim between the different sides.yes but every time i show you someone you say that chico is better because its features are better like face shape
eye area etc
is this objective ?
Of course, one feature is better than another.Good question, not 100% objective, but in the case of the tiktokers you posted before, it can be agreed by most that Chico and his features are better looking than them. When discussing two very good looking people, then the objectivity reduces and makes it harder to make a stable claim between the different sides.
William can I ask honestly why you care so much? Are you trying to hardmax and look like him?Of course, one feature is better than another.
beauty is not subjective I think that when you talk about chico it is all objective that it has bilogically better features. anyway we will talk about it in PM
Hi man if you want I’m onGood question, not 100% objective, but in the case of the tiktokers you posted before, it can be agreed by most that Chico and his features are better looking than them. When discussing two very good looking people, then the objectivity reduces and makes it harder to make a stable claim between the different sides.