No such thing as "European" or "Middle Eastern" genetics.

[GigaBautista]

1. "Europeans" CAN and in many cases ARE closer to "Middle Easterners" than to "other Europeans".

2. "Middle Easterners" CAN and in many cases, ARE closer to "Europeans" than to "other Middle Easterners".

3. What about so-called "Middle Eastern" and "European" populations with substantial amounts of "both ancestries"? Armenians, Greeks, Italians, Azerbaijanis, Turks, Albanians, Kurds and so forth? Where do they lie?

4. Related to 1 and 2, genetic nearness is determined by drift, bottlenecks (or lack thereof), population sizes and admixture alone plays only some part. This is why (many) Finns are NOT closer to Germans than Germans are to Turks. This is why Lebanese are NOT closer to Druze than to Sicilians. Finns and Druze may have "predominantly European/Levantine ancestries respectively" but drift, endogamy, population sizes, founder effects and bottlenecks meant their alleles changed and became distinctive regardless of admixture.

 

[aidenltn17]

I’m mixed euro and middle eastern

 

[pfl]

Is this @thestonerone

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

1. "Europeans" CAN and in many cases ARE closer to "Middle Easterners" than to "other Europeans".

2. "Middle Easterners" CAN and in many cases, ARE closer to "Europeans" than to "other Middle Easterners".

3. What about so-called "Middle Eastern" and "European" populations with substantial amounts of "both ancestries"? Armenians, Greeks, Italians, Azerbaijanis, Turks, Albanians, Kurds and so forth? Where do they lie?

4. Related to 1 and 2, genetic nearness is determined by drift, bottlenecks (or lack thereof), population sizes and admixture alone plays only some part. This is why (many) Finns are NOT closer to Germans than Germans are to Turks. This is why Lebanese are NOT closer to Druze than to Sicilians. Finns and Druze may have "predominantly European/Levantine ancestries respectively" but drift, endogamy, population sizes, founder effects and bottlenecks meant their alleles changed and became distinctive regardless of admixture.

Massive cope.

Europeans are white

Menas are brown

Nothing more too it. Sure they are related, ok and? MENAS are also related to SSA yet I don’t see idiots making threads about that.

MENAS have their own unique genetic profile and vice versa they ain’t the same stop these cringe gay threads

 

[GigaBautista]

Massive cope.

Europeans are white

Menas are brown

Nothing more too it. Sure they are related, ok and? MENAS are also related to SSA yet I don’t see idiots making threads about that.

MENAS have their own unique genetic profile and vice versa they ain’t the same stop these cringe gay threads

1. "Europe", "Middle East" and "North Africa" are social constructs that are malleable and ill-defined.

2. This is the actual average for skin colour throughout the world. "Europe" has variance and cannot be reduced to a "white" or "non-white" category. Neither can the so-called "Middle East". This "white" or "non-white" essentialist nonsense is Anglosphere crap; most countries do not take statistics on "race". Labelling peoples as "white" or "non-white" is Anglosphere, orientalist crap. Britain may do it, but it is WRONG.

3. Genetic changes are gradual and genetics. They don't care about social constructs like the "Middle East" or "Europe" or "North Africa".

4. "Sub-Saharan Africans" are "also close to MENA" is misleading insofar all humans are humans, but so-called "Middle Easterners" and so-called "Europeans" form a genetic cluster in global terms and share DIRECT ANCESTRY NOT JUST BECAUSE ALL HUMANS ARE CLOSE.

5. Stop speaking without knowledge. When I showed you evidence that Ashkenazi Jews were not specifically near Eastern Europeans and refuted you, instead of submitting, you dismissed the overwhelming genetic evidence. I'll stop posting when you submit to the evidence.

If you want to be taken seriously, act seriously and do BASIC RESEARCH.

 

[tightmason]

1. "Europeans" CAN and in many cases ARE closer to "Middle Easterners" than to "other Europeans".

2. "Middle Easterners" CAN and in many cases, ARE closer to "Europeans" than to "other Middle Easterners".

3. What about so-called "Middle Eastern" and "European" populations with substantial amounts of "both ancestries"? Armenians, Greeks, Italians, Azerbaijanis, Turks, Albanians, Kurds and so forth? Where do they lie?

4. Related to 1 and 2, genetic nearness is determined by drift, bottlenecks (or lack thereof), population sizes and admixture alone plays only some part. This is why (many) Finns are NOT closer to Germans than Germans are to Turks. This is why Lebanese are NOT closer to Druze than to Sicilians. Finns and Druze may have "predominantly European/Levantine ancestries respectively" but drift, endogamy, population sizes, founder effects and bottlenecks meant their alleles changed and became distinctive regardless of admixture.

WE ARE THE SAME SAAAAAAAAAAAAAR

 

[GigaBautista]

View attachment 4416017 WE ARE THE SAME SAAAAAAAAAAAAAR

All you is post ad-hominems. Instead of actually improving your brain and submitting to the evidence, all you do is post "edgy memes" as if that helps your case.

 

[tightmason]

All you is post ad-hominems. Instead of actually improving your brain and submitting to the evidence, all you do is post "edgy memes" as if that helps your case.

"race doesnt exist we are the same"

 

[GigaBautista]

View attachment 4416019 "race doesnt exist we are the same"

Thank you for proving my point.

 

[Nectar]

This thread is just pure dumb

 

[tightmason]

This thread is just pure dumb

OP in a nutshell

 

[Nectar]

OP in a nutshell View attachment 4416024

Same sub race btw:

 

[tightmason]

Same sub race btw:

View attachment 4416027View attachment 4416028

we wuz saaaar we wuz

 

[Shrek2OnDvD]

don’t you dare tell me i come from a pig munching cave dwelling kafir albino astaghfirullah @PrinceLuenLeoncur

 

[newcel2025]

1. "Europeans" CAN and in many cases ARE closer to "Middle Easterners" than to "other Europeans".

2. "Middle Easterners" CAN and in many cases, ARE closer to "Europeans" than to "other Middle Easterners".

3. What about so-called "Middle Eastern" and "European" populations with substantial amounts of "both ancestries"? Armenians, Greeks, Italians, Azerbaijanis, Turks, Albanians, Kurds and so forth? Where do they lie?

4. Related to 1 and 2, genetic nearness is determined by drift, bottlenecks (or lack thereof), population sizes and admixture alone plays only some part. This is why (many) Finns are NOT closer to Germans than Germans are to Turks. This is why Lebanese are NOT closer to Druze than to Sicilians. Finns and Druze may have "predominantly European/Levantine ancestries respectively" but drift, endogamy, population sizes, founder effects and bottlenecks meant their alleles changed and became distinctive regardless of admixture.

You sounded a little schizo at first but yeah I kinda agree

 

[Hernan]

This thread is just pure dumb

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

View attachment 4416019 "race doesnt exist we are the same"

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

don’t you dare tell me i come from a pig munching cave dwelling kafir albino astaghfirullah @PrinceLuenLeoncur