untermensch faggot
Iron
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2026
- Posts
- 219
- Reputation
- 430
For whatever strange reason everyone on this forum seems to almost unanimously agree that the Nordic race is superior over others, even though they've done basically nothing to earn that title. This can perhaps be attributed to the fact that most of you are ethnic and have literally never layed your eyes upon a white person in your life, evidenced by how you rate ever chubby LTB with blonde hair and blue eyes as a stacy. But before I go into any specifics let me clarify what I mean by "Nordic".
Below this are three men: William Z. Ripley, Madison Grant, and Houston Stewart Chamberlain. These men were perhaps some of the earliest Nordicist thinkers, and without a doubt the most influential of all. They believed that there was once a supreme "Nordic" race which had at one point inhabited and led all the greatest civilizations of Eurasia and North Africa (with some even more insane theories besides this extending to extreme lengths, for example there are even claims that the "original" founders of Native American societies were of Nordic origin), and that these civilizations were destroyed over time through race mixing.
Most Nordicists today generally follow their same line of thinking, Madison Grant was even supposedly an inspiration for Adolf Hitler (calling Grant's 1916 book "The Passing of the Great Race" his "Bible").
It was their belief that the the Danes, southern Swedes and Norwegians, Frisians, and Icelanders alongside those who resided in the northernmost regions of Germany (Old Saxony and Prussia) as well as certain northern parts of England and the lowlands of Scotland made up the purest body of Nordic people on the face of the Earth, the rest of Europe consisting of diluted Alpinid or Mediterranean types who were the result of race mixing.
For the most part, this lines up fairly well with what we know today (reference below). Except we today know that the English are not primarily of Germanic stock, but rather a mix between Germanic and earlier Bell Beaker settlers with small Anatolian Farmer DNA from the earliest days of England (as all Europeans do). Although the exact percentages vary by region, with as much as fifty to sixty percent Germanic in areas such as Yorkshire and East Anglia and as little as ten to thirty percent in further western regions such as Cornwall and Devon. Thus, the English could not be considered a "pure" Germanic type. So when I am referring to "Nordic" people, I am referring to the aforementioned groups exclusively.
Let's address the first cope. No ancient civilizations ever came from the Germanics. Modern studies generally show that the DNA of the ancient populations of the Mediterranean generally cluster closest with those of today.
The Romans and Greeks made the distinction between themselves and the Barbaric northern Germanic and Gaulish people noting features like light hair and light eyes that were generally uncommon in the south and considered as undesirable traits in Rome, and describing the Africans to the south as dark skinned with them somewhere in between. Artistic depictions of ancient Mediterraneans reflect the same: dark curly or wavy hair, tanned skin, thick black eyebrows and dark eyes, large and sometimes slightly aquiline noses. Very similar to what we see today...
The real ancestors of their people were the uncivilized people who toppled the Roman Empire and sent Europe into one thousand years of chaos and loss of knowledge which was only again reversed by southern Europeans.
While the people of the Mediterranean did this:
And the Celts:
And even non Europeans...
...I don't even have to say anything
Hitler once said in regards to the subject:
"Why do we call the whole world's attention to the fact that we have no past? It isn't enough that the Romans were erecting great buildings when our forefathers were still living in mud huts; now Himmler is starting to dig up these villages of mud huts and enthusing over every potsherd and stone axe he finds. All we prove by that is that we were still throwing stone hatchets and crouching around open fires when Greece and Rome had already reached the highest stage of culture. We really should do our best to keep quiet about this past. Instead Himmler makes a great fuss about it all. The present-day Romans must be having a laugh at these relegations."
This persisted into the Medieval era, with the Scandinavians basically making zero progress over that millenia until they were literally force civilized by Catholic missionaries. They pillaged European villages and cities for hundreds of years while raping and killing innocent men and women (and even children) regularly while stealing their most valuable possessions and sacred items, insulting their religion and people. Nordics take a great level of pride in their viking heritage while insulting violent ethnics for doing the same exact thing as they did (see images below).
The Holy Roman Empire was a bit more civilized than their northern brothers, however still extremely unstable and politically corrupt/fragmented. Their power was decentralized with the country split into hundreds of smaller states making economic growth basically impossible. Religious and political conflict and violence was common here. In fact, there wasn't a unified German state until 1871 after the rest of Europe had already united into their own states and were flourishing. Even the areas which dominated the Holy Roman Empire were mostly in the south, not the north (Rhineland, Bavaria, and later Austria).
Meanwhile in the rest of Europe: the Byzantines and Italians were forming powerhouses of trade and still continued to advance technologically and culturally through the Medieval era despite the fact progress had stagnated in most of the world. The same for the English, French, Spaniards, Balkaners, and even Russians (yes, the Slavs were more advanced than the Nords)...
However, some may say that this is all irrelevant as it's in the past and that only the contemporary achievements matter, of which the Nordics have many. Or do they? They never had a successful colonial empire. All of their efforts at colonization in North America, Asia, or Africa were failures as they were either easily overtaken by other European powers or they were forced to give them up after economic strain, maintaining them for less than even a decade in some cases and gaining no profits from them.
Meanwhile...
The majority of scientific, technological, and cultural advancements in Europe in the modern era can also mostly be owed to southern and western Europeans. The greatest European thinkers and some of its greatest writers came from Italy, France, and England during the Renaissance and Enlightenment (think Dante, Machiavelli, Kant, Voltaire, Rousseau, Locke, Shakespeare, Dickens, as well as more recent British and American works being the influence behind most modern classics... you could really go on and on with this list). The British Empire and the rest of the Anglosphere have the most inventions out of all people in this world, and the most nobel prizes. After all the Industrial Revolution first began in their home countries. The Internet, the steam engine, the television, the airplane, the radio... again, you could really keep going on forever about this kind of thing.
Could any of this really be said of the Scandinavians? Can you think of anything? No, they are a backwards people whos greatest accomplishments come from superior groups of people. That's why they came up with the ideology of Nordicism to cope with their inferiority.
I must give some credit to the Germans in this regard for all their technological advancements in a short period of time. However, the majority of these advancements came from the Rhineland or other western/southern regions of Germany, not the north... areas which were considered by Nordicist thinkers to be more "diluted", populated mostly by swarthier, shorter, inferior Alpinid types. So the most developed and industrialized regions of Germany outside of maybe Berlin would not fit their ideal.
So, looking aside from the fact that they are literally useless barbarians with zero accomplishments. They are also extraordinarily ugly on top of that, saved only by their height. Let's take a look at what the average Scandinavian looks like:
And in addition to their extremely subhuman faces, they are also the least NT race which even further adds to their repulsiveness to women, with Sweden and Iceland leading in Autism rates amongst adults in Europe and also for general mental illness. There's a reason that all Scandinavians and Germans are stereotyped as cold, socially inept, and introverted. There is a reason your birth rates are going into the gutter. There is a reason that within a generation you will be replaced by immigrants.
I honestly think it's over if you're Nordic in 2026, I see no future for them. Agree or disagree?
What do you Nordicist copers think? @pfl @joao23 @whiteegyptian @ltnbrownacnecel @FlotPSL @Nectar @theonewhocantascend
Below this are three men: William Z. Ripley, Madison Grant, and Houston Stewart Chamberlain. These men were perhaps some of the earliest Nordicist thinkers, and without a doubt the most influential of all. They believed that there was once a supreme "Nordic" race which had at one point inhabited and led all the greatest civilizations of Eurasia and North Africa (with some even more insane theories besides this extending to extreme lengths, for example there are even claims that the "original" founders of Native American societies were of Nordic origin), and that these civilizations were destroyed over time through race mixing.
Most Nordicists today generally follow their same line of thinking, Madison Grant was even supposedly an inspiration for Adolf Hitler (calling Grant's 1916 book "The Passing of the Great Race" his "Bible").
It was their belief that the the Danes, southern Swedes and Norwegians, Frisians, and Icelanders alongside those who resided in the northernmost regions of Germany (Old Saxony and Prussia) as well as certain northern parts of England and the lowlands of Scotland made up the purest body of Nordic people on the face of the Earth, the rest of Europe consisting of diluted Alpinid or Mediterranean types who were the result of race mixing.
For the most part, this lines up fairly well with what we know today (reference below). Except we today know that the English are not primarily of Germanic stock, but rather a mix between Germanic and earlier Bell Beaker settlers with small Anatolian Farmer DNA from the earliest days of England (as all Europeans do). Although the exact percentages vary by region, with as much as fifty to sixty percent Germanic in areas such as Yorkshire and East Anglia and as little as ten to thirty percent in further western regions such as Cornwall and Devon. Thus, the English could not be considered a "pure" Germanic type. So when I am referring to "Nordic" people, I am referring to the aforementioned groups exclusively.
Let's address the first cope. No ancient civilizations ever came from the Germanics. Modern studies generally show that the DNA of the ancient populations of the Mediterranean generally cluster closest with those of today.
The Romans and Greeks made the distinction between themselves and the Barbaric northern Germanic and Gaulish people noting features like light hair and light eyes that were generally uncommon in the south and considered as undesirable traits in Rome, and describing the Africans to the south as dark skinned with them somewhere in between. Artistic depictions of ancient Mediterraneans reflect the same: dark curly or wavy hair, tanned skin, thick black eyebrows and dark eyes, large and sometimes slightly aquiline noses. Very similar to what we see today...
The real ancestors of their people were the uncivilized people who toppled the Roman Empire and sent Europe into one thousand years of chaos and loss of knowledge which was only again reversed by southern Europeans.
While the people of the Mediterranean did this:
And the Celts:
And even non Europeans...
...I don't even have to say anything
Hitler once said in regards to the subject:
"Why do we call the whole world's attention to the fact that we have no past? It isn't enough that the Romans were erecting great buildings when our forefathers were still living in mud huts; now Himmler is starting to dig up these villages of mud huts and enthusing over every potsherd and stone axe he finds. All we prove by that is that we were still throwing stone hatchets and crouching around open fires when Greece and Rome had already reached the highest stage of culture. We really should do our best to keep quiet about this past. Instead Himmler makes a great fuss about it all. The present-day Romans must be having a laugh at these relegations."
This persisted into the Medieval era, with the Scandinavians basically making zero progress over that millenia until they were literally force civilized by Catholic missionaries. They pillaged European villages and cities for hundreds of years while raping and killing innocent men and women (and even children) regularly while stealing their most valuable possessions and sacred items, insulting their religion and people. Nordics take a great level of pride in their viking heritage while insulting violent ethnics for doing the same exact thing as they did (see images below).
The Holy Roman Empire was a bit more civilized than their northern brothers, however still extremely unstable and politically corrupt/fragmented. Their power was decentralized with the country split into hundreds of smaller states making economic growth basically impossible. Religious and political conflict and violence was common here. In fact, there wasn't a unified German state until 1871 after the rest of Europe had already united into their own states and were flourishing. Even the areas which dominated the Holy Roman Empire were mostly in the south, not the north (Rhineland, Bavaria, and later Austria).
Meanwhile in the rest of Europe: the Byzantines and Italians were forming powerhouses of trade and still continued to advance technologically and culturally through the Medieval era despite the fact progress had stagnated in most of the world. The same for the English, French, Spaniards, Balkaners, and even Russians (yes, the Slavs were more advanced than the Nords)...
However, some may say that this is all irrelevant as it's in the past and that only the contemporary achievements matter, of which the Nordics have many. Or do they? They never had a successful colonial empire. All of their efforts at colonization in North America, Asia, or Africa were failures as they were either easily overtaken by other European powers or they were forced to give them up after economic strain, maintaining them for less than even a decade in some cases and gaining no profits from them.
Meanwhile...
The majority of scientific, technological, and cultural advancements in Europe in the modern era can also mostly be owed to southern and western Europeans. The greatest European thinkers and some of its greatest writers came from Italy, France, and England during the Renaissance and Enlightenment (think Dante, Machiavelli, Kant, Voltaire, Rousseau, Locke, Shakespeare, Dickens, as well as more recent British and American works being the influence behind most modern classics... you could really go on and on with this list). The British Empire and the rest of the Anglosphere have the most inventions out of all people in this world, and the most nobel prizes. After all the Industrial Revolution first began in their home countries. The Internet, the steam engine, the television, the airplane, the radio... again, you could really keep going on forever about this kind of thing.
Could any of this really be said of the Scandinavians? Can you think of anything? No, they are a backwards people whos greatest accomplishments come from superior groups of people. That's why they came up with the ideology of Nordicism to cope with their inferiority.
I must give some credit to the Germans in this regard for all their technological advancements in a short period of time. However, the majority of these advancements came from the Rhineland or other western/southern regions of Germany, not the north... areas which were considered by Nordicist thinkers to be more "diluted", populated mostly by swarthier, shorter, inferior Alpinid types. So the most developed and industrialized regions of Germany outside of maybe Berlin would not fit their ideal.
So, looking aside from the fact that they are literally useless barbarians with zero accomplishments. They are also extraordinarily ugly on top of that, saved only by their height. Let's take a look at what the average Scandinavian looks like:
- Narrow skull
- Sloped chin
- Boneless
- Nonexistent eyebrows and lips
- Yellow skin
- Either soulless beady eyes or bulging bug eyes, no in between, do not even look human
- Clear Asiatic influence
And in addition to their extremely subhuman faces, they are also the least NT race which even further adds to their repulsiveness to women, with Sweden and Iceland leading in Autism rates amongst adults in Europe and also for general mental illness. There's a reason that all Scandinavians and Germans are stereotyped as cold, socially inept, and introverted. There is a reason your birth rates are going into the gutter. There is a reason that within a generation you will be replaced by immigrants.
I honestly think it's over if you're Nordic in 2026, I see no future for them. Agree or disagree?
What do you Nordicist copers think? @pfl @joao23 @whiteegyptian @ltnbrownacnecel @FlotPSL @Nectar @theonewhocantascend
