Deleted member 20216
he/him but I support LGBTQQIP2SAA++ community
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2022
- Posts
- 904
- Reputation
- 2,233
NORMIE ≠ AVERAGE
There is a false consensus effect at play on this forum where users overrate normies and what it means to be good looking. Most of us living in Western countries have skewed perceptions and look at stats like the average height and believe this to be end all be all. Truth is there is an aging crisis, and due to female hypergamy rising, what it means to be average has been on the rise. Men are taller, there's more wealth divide and there is infinite exposure to Chads.
So piratemogger how does this equate to looks theory? Well, lets for example look at the aging crisis and population distribution in Western Europe,
As you see the vast majority of inhabitants are middle aged. "Average" in statistics refers to male adult and encompasses all age groups above 18, and in a predominantly middle aged country its easy for youngcel to beat average. The US and Morocco both have avg height of 5"9, but all of us still know that US men mog morrocan men height wise. This is because developing countries have crazy birth rates and young people dominate statistics, the average US citizen is 10 years older than morroccan so the stats are in moroccans odds.
The goal of looskmaxxing should be to mog your own age group not the "muh average" cope. Hypergamy is rising and women have more availability to Chad now more than ever. In the past face could save you, height didn't matter. If a woman met a Chadlet she would procreate with him because face is more important than height. But now in a couple swipes, she can find a 6"0 Chad who looks just as good. You see the problem now, everything has to be maxxed. Its become a character builder, 1 or 2 halos are needed at minimum.
The truth is the dating market should be treated like a real one. There is more exposure to good looking people than ever right now as we speak and in media you only see best of best. Women are programmed since young to believe they are deserving of a Chad, all those Disney movies where you see a handsome protagonist and an ugly villian, they are intentional. Why would a woman want a manlet or broke boy when she has taller, richer options? You see height, frame, money; all of these used to be halos and now they have become requirements.
If you want a foid to commit to LTR with you indefinitely you need to be:
6 feet - LL
6 inches - jelq
6 pack - gym
6 figure salary - subjective, but I would just wageslave until promotion
6/10 face - surgeries + softmaxx
REMINDER IN THE UK, 6" + RTT IS NORMIE. ANYTHING BELOW IS SUBHUMAN
But jew statistics will tell you "muh 40% of people are obese its fine", or "muh 300ng/dl of T is healthy"
There is a false consensus effect at play on this forum where users overrate normies and what it means to be good looking. Most of us living in Western countries have skewed perceptions and look at stats like the average height and believe this to be end all be all. Truth is there is an aging crisis, and due to female hypergamy rising, what it means to be average has been on the rise. Men are taller, there's more wealth divide and there is infinite exposure to Chads.
So piratemogger how does this equate to looks theory? Well, lets for example look at the aging crisis and population distribution in Western Europe,
As you see the vast majority of inhabitants are middle aged. "Average" in statistics refers to male adult and encompasses all age groups above 18, and in a predominantly middle aged country its easy for youngcel to beat average. The US and Morocco both have avg height of 5"9, but all of us still know that US men mog morrocan men height wise. This is because developing countries have crazy birth rates and young people dominate statistics, the average US citizen is 10 years older than morroccan so the stats are in moroccans odds.
The goal of looskmaxxing should be to mog your own age group not the "muh average" cope. Hypergamy is rising and women have more availability to Chad now more than ever. In the past face could save you, height didn't matter. If a woman met a Chadlet she would procreate with him because face is more important than height. But now in a couple swipes, she can find a 6"0 Chad who looks just as good. You see the problem now, everything has to be maxxed. Its become a character builder, 1 or 2 halos are needed at minimum.
The truth is the dating market should be treated like a real one. There is more exposure to good looking people than ever right now as we speak and in media you only see best of best. Women are programmed since young to believe they are deserving of a Chad, all those Disney movies where you see a handsome protagonist and an ugly villian, they are intentional. Why would a woman want a manlet or broke boy when she has taller, richer options? You see height, frame, money; all of these used to be halos and now they have become requirements.
If you want a foid to commit to LTR with you indefinitely you need to be:
6 feet - LL
6 inches - jelq
6 pack - gym
6 figure salary - subjective, but I would just wageslave until promotion
6/10 face - surgeries + softmaxx
REMINDER IN THE UK, 6" + RTT IS NORMIE. ANYTHING BELOW IS SUBHUMAN
But jew statistics will tell you "muh 40% of people are obese its fine", or "muh 300ng/dl of T is healthy"
