Northern Europeans are very overrated.

Didn't read but Meagan Fox is clearly Northern European
 
Sudan in 50 B.C.
NubianMeroePyramids30sep2005%282%29.jpg

267706077_2100843966786175_1276966771701242920_n.jpg


The Britons in 50 B.C.

iron-age-roundhouse-sheila-terry.jpg
Anglo saxons in 20th century
Apollo11

Sudanese in 20th century
Sudan village life M3N8GT

Over for history copers. No one gives a fuck about what happened 2000 years ago lol. It doesn't matter.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23391 and GetShrekt
The smartest thing you have ever said in your entire life. Yes Lima is a walking demigod in human form i love her and she loves you and all of us equally LIMA has the power bestowed unto her by Jesus and god to bless us with he presence and Beauty. The truth is Lima isn’t Of any race she is simply LIMA
I saw a fat ugly bitch with Lima's phenotype. She's not that uncommon. Just have a wide moon face and black hair and blue eyes.

MCZoYXNoPTU3YTVmOTY1ZmE1NWNkYmQxZTYxOGE2MDBjZjA4NGQ3thumb
ah hahahah!
 
  • Love it
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur, PubertyMaxxer and Baldingman1998
  • JFL
Reactions: GetShrekt
Yeah, Americans are mostly from England especially during the 60s. I guess there are also a bunch of Germans too.
They were way different from Anglos by then, more like some Euro giga mutt mix.

Anglos on the 70s were getting cucked by some Jamaicans and buying Enoch Powell mixtapes
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17791
They were way different from Anglos by then, more like some Euro giga mutt mix.

Anglos on the 70s were getting cucked by some Jamaicans and buying Enoch Powell mixtapes
hmm. no
 
All of Scandinavia was covered with a huge slab of permanent ice so the stone age was delayed in that region and for a long ass time afterwards the climate was dog shit.
It's not like niggers and arabs who could fall asleep under a palm tree and eat dates.

As in regards to attractiveness need i link the data from beautifulpeople.com where Swedes dominate completely?

So much insane jealousy from shitskins towards the Nordic countries. "Much dark features is dom and manly" They're not and neither are an of you.
 
All of Scandinavia was covered with a huge slab of permanent ice so the stone age was delayed in that region and for a long ass time afterwards the climate was dog shit.
It's not like niggers and arabs who could fall asleep under a palm tree and eat dates.

As in regards to attractiveness need i link the data from beautifulpeople.com where Swedes dominate completely?

So much insane jealousy from shitskins towards the Nordic countries. "Much dark features is dom and manly" They're not and neither are an of you.
Dark features are desired. Meds are whites with highest sex appeal and perform better than nordics thats an undeniable fact
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: NT Master, Deleted member 22627 and sub5inchcel
You are racist

GERyouth4


Take this medicine, my child. It will cure you of your subhumanity and diseased mind.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17791
Many people believe not only that there is a master race but that northern Europeans are it. They have even come up with 0 IQ theories like Nordicism and claim that every civilization on Earth was initially started by blonde-haired blue-eyed White people. Nordicism is literally We Wuz Kangz in whiteface. In actuality, there is no master race. And if there was a master race, Northern Europeans certainly wouldn't be it because they are inferior to others both historically and aesthetically.


Historically speaking, Nordics have none before the Medieval Era. Almost every other group of people established a civilization before the Scandinavians did. Western Europeans had Rome, Southern Europeans had Greece, North Africans had Egypt, West Asians had Persia, South Asians had India, East Asians had China, Native Americans had Mayans and Incas, etc. If you count Ethiopians as Blacks, even negroes had a civilization before the Nordics did! The only other race more primitive civilization wise than Northern Europeans were the abos and arguably Central Asians. And what was the infamous civilization that Scandinavians established in the Middle Ages? That right is the Vikings. AKA, pirates and slavers that went around looting and killing monasteries and got blown the fuck out once they went against actual armies. The worship and adoration of Vikings in modern times is fucking ridiculous! When any other race acted like Vikings, they are seen as vile savages but when Northern Europeans do it, suddenly that is cool. Vikings were essentially the Taliban/ISIS without the Quran. Except at least ISIS kept women in check while Vikings were cucks to their local women by giving them child support and acting like they were valuable soldiers.

1386279453846.png


Starting in the Renaissance Era, Scandinavia starts to become a little bit more important because Sweden becomes a great power during the Thirty Years War. Denmark is still unremarkable however and by the Industrial Era, the whole region becomes unremarkable again. Finland got passed around between Sweden and Russia before finally establishing its own independence in WW1 and losing territory plus autonomy in WW2. Since then, Scandinavia is known for being the epicenter of everything wrong with western left-wingers.


Aesthetically speaking, there are far more attractive peoples than what you would find in Northern Europe. Northern European men have a failo in that light hair and light eyes aren't seen as ideal masculine features. Many blond men and even more red-haired men have improved their SMV by dying their hair black. Tall, dark (hair), and handsome is the ideal. The physical issue with Northern European women is that they have broad shoulders and mannish skulls; this makes them look slightly androgynous but it is great if the nordcucks want to trannymaxx. Many people don't realize that because they almost go crazy if they see a woman with natural light hair and eyes. Some people would even fuck an animal as long as said animal had blonde hair and blue eyes. Many white countries are moving away from pale Scandinavian chicks being the ideal. The media is mainly promoting dark-haired beauties like Megan Fox and Alexandra Daddario now. It has been a while since a woman who looked like Marilyn Monroe or even Pamela Anderson has been a sex symbol.

pFEz07iCpA7c1JLg


vs

Megan-Fox.jpg

So to conclude, Northern Europeans aren't all that great. There are many other types of Europeans and even non-Europeans who are superior to them in multiple categories. The one great thing Scandinavians have done is to make high-income countries with a generous welfare state. Even that is starting to change now that a lot of refugees are moving there and the Scandinavians are becoming more centrist. It is no surprise that there are only three main groups who adore the Nordic peoples anymore:
  1. Stormcels and neo-nazicucks who talk about the beauty of Scandinavia and promote Nordicism because Northern Europeans are the pinnacle of "whiteness". The alt-righters conveniently ignore the fact that Northern Europe is also the pinnacle of progressive liberalism along with everything else wrong with the West.
  2. Far leftists who praise Scandinavias because it is the most liberal region on Earth. They conveniently ignore the fact that until recently, Northern Europe was very ethnically homogeneous and everyone felt like one big family. Now that Scandinavia is diversifying, the welfare state and high outcomes are declining. Ironically, the ideal progressive society could only function in a White ethnostate.
  3. Self-hating shitskins who want to reproduce with the whitest and palest people on Earth because they hope that their offspring will be white-passing. All they're really going to do (assuming they succeed) is create mental basket cases with identity issues because one of their parents hates their own body. Case in point: r/hapas. Being White also isn't as valuable nowadays as it was 50 years ago due to China's rise and anti-white globohomo so they are really just hopping on a sinking ship.
Anybody that ever talks about the greatness of Northern Europeans gets slid right into my ignore list.
1662928082843395m
 
  • +1
Reactions: NT Master
Not really since most people in these areas do not worship them. Just a vocal minority.
Obviously it's not ad litteram worship or a sorta hysteric obsession on a massive scale, but to say that it's just a vocal minority is delusional and you know it yourself. White people are desirable in most of India because their castes are fair skinned, because of their money and because of their past as a colony. The entire internet is filled with examples of this principle, and it broadly manifests both in urban and rural environments.

China is the same thing, with the caveat that in China's case it's more about pragmatism rather than aesthetic idealization of white features. In China as a white man you can get approached and get a girlfriend literally in the first day you arrive there. Serpentza explains this extensively in his videos, he's a white expat that had lived there for a big chunk of his life
 
That doesn’t change anything the majority of people don’t have blonde hair

All you removed was England, Germany and the other lower countries
pashtuns and nuristanis have blonde hair and blue eyes
 
That doesn’t change anything the majority of people don’t have blonde hair

All you removed was England, Germany and the other lower countries
Feels good because I’ve got blonde hair
 
Dark features are desired. Meds are whites with highest sex appeal and perform better than nordics thats an undeniable fact

How many people from each country are approved to join beautifulpeople.com?​

MALE SUCCESS RATE (by nation)

1. Sweden - 60%

2. Brazil - 41%

3. Denmark - 40%

4. Italy - 37%

5. Portugal - 35%

6.Argentina - 32%

7. Norway - 27%

8. Spain - 25%

9. USA - 24%

10. Canada - 23%

11. Australia - 22%

12. France - 20%

12 =. Germany - 20%

14. Korea - 18%

15. China - 17%

16. Japan - 15%

17. India - 11%

18. United Kingdom - 9%

18 = Russia 9%

20. Poland - 7%

21. Ireland - 6%

That's from a FIVE MILLION user data set. Now do you have anything to support your own claim you comping deathnic @BigBootyBandit or are you just making shit up not to rope? Med people are short and brown.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: mug and ChadpreetMaxxer
It makes no sense to take the people, who are universally acclaimed as "most beautiful", for comparison, because there is invariably too much subjectivity in what one considers "most beautiful". In fact, Personally, I would NEVER consider Daddario beautiful: i just don't like her looks. She looks like an average chubby ALIEN to me. I can guarantee that i can meet more attractive women than her at a local joint in Scandinavia EVERY day of the week.

You NEED to compare AVERAGES. And NOW, the things become different. REMEMBER, BOTH in SCANDINAVIA and OTHER WORLD incl. rest of europe, AVERAGE MALE/FEMALE are INFINITELY UGLY. Both in Italy, in Spain, and in SCANDINAVIA, the average male is a freak.

But ONLY on the average level you notice TWO things about Scandinavians: they are VERY TALL, and THEY ALL HAVE HIGH CHEEKBONES.

Literally, THESE 2 THINGS BEAT every other nationality IN AVERAGES. The average Swedish/Norwegian/Danish/Finnish male is 181cm tall! This is A LOT. It automatically makes local males MORE attractive than any male abroad in EU, where the average height is <181cm outside of the Netherlands, and 3-4 other small countries.

Now CHEEKBONES. EVERYONE in SCANDI has them EVERYONE. And having HIGH PROMINENT CHEEKBONE, even on a subhuman is an INSANE HALO. Because while it does not erase the subhumanity of the average male/female, it produces INFINITELY more attractive faces ON THE AVERAGE. Thus, average Scandi male/females >> average world male/female.

So, it is NOT a myth. Scandinavians are indeed the most beautiful people on earth due to TWO things: HEIGHT + HIGH PROMINENT CHEEKBONES.

Otherwise blonde coloring is shit. But don't forget, many people still worship it, because it is unique. :feelsgood:

TL;DR: HEIGHT AND CHEEKBONES, SCANDI >> REST OF WORLD. :feelsokman:
Height is not particularly positive on women. I'm not sure if all Scandinavians have high cheekbones either.

If the average person in a nation is better looking, that would almost certainly lead to that nation having more high SMV people per capita. The thing is that isn't necessarily the case for Scandinavia.Of all the top 15 most famous and richest male models, only one of them have the blonde Nordic look, Fabio, and he ain't a great example either. The vast majority of the famous male models and celebrities have brown or black hair. Even most female celebrities in the West have a more Central European or even Southern European look than a Norwegian look. Being a pale person with bright blonde hair and blue eyes only makes you super beautiful in third world shitholes where the locals adore rich White foreigners.

People assume that because White people are seen as beautiful and powerful and everything else positive, that the Whitest people on Earth should therefore be the most beautiful and greatest and everything else. That just ain't the case, neither from a historical nor aesthetic perspective.


How many people from each country are approved to join beautifulpeople.com?​

MALE SUCCESS RATE (by nation)

1. Sweden - 60%

2. Brazil - 41%

3. Denmark - 40%

4. Italy - 37%

5. Portugal - 35%

6.Argentina - 32%

7. Norway - 27%

8. Spain - 25%

9. USA - 24%

10. Canada - 23%

11. Australia - 22%

12. France - 20%

12 =. Germany - 20%

14. Korea - 18%

15. China - 17%

16. Japan - 15%

17. India - 11%

18. United Kingdom - 9%

18 = Russia 9%

20. Poland - 7%

21. Ireland - 6%

That's from a FIVE MILLION user data set. Now do you have anything to support your own claim you comping deathnic @BigBootyBandit or are you just making shit up not to rope? Med people are short and brown.
Are you really going to act like some random website with God knows what criteria or userbase is somehow authoritative? So many countries are missing from that website as well. Show me how many Scandinavian folks win Sexiest Man Alive or beauty contests, then we'll talk.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Artemis
Height is not particularly positive on women. I'm not sure if all Scandinavians have high cheekbones either.

If the average person in a nation is better looking, that would almost certainly lead to that nation having more high SMV people per capita. The thing is that isn't necessarily the case for Scandinavia.Of all the top 15 most famous and richest male models, only one of them have the blonde Nordic look, Fabio, and he ain't a great example either. The vast majority of the famous male models and celebrities have brown or black hair. Even most female celebrities in the West have a more Central European or even Southern European look than a Norwegian look. Being a pale person with bright blonde hair and blue eyes only makes you super beautiful in third world shitholes where the locals adore rich White foreigners.

People assume that because White people are seen as beautiful and powerful and everything else positive, that the Whitest people on Earth should therefore be the most beautiful and greatest and everything else. That just ain't the case, neither from a historical nor aesthetic perspective.



Are you really going to act like some random website with God knows what criteria or userbase is somehow authoritative? So many countries are missing from that website as well. Show me how many Scandinavian folks win Sexiest Man Alive or beauty contests, then we'll talk.
5 have a nordic phenotype actually

And asides from the ethnics they are all northwestern European asides the 1 clear med
 
Height is not particularly positive on women. I'm not sure if all Scandinavians have high cheekbones either.

If the average person in a nation is better looking, that would almost certainly lead to that nation having more high SMV people per capita. The thing is that isn't necessarily the case for Scandinavia.Of all the top 15 most famous and richest male models, only one of them have the blonde Nordic look, Fabio, and he ain't a great example either. The vast majority of the famous male models and celebrities have brown or black hair. Even most female celebrities in the West have a more Central European or even Southern European look than a Norwegian look. Being a pale person with bright blonde hair and blue eyes only makes you super beautiful in third world shitholes where the locals adore rich White foreigners.

People assume that because White people are seen as beautiful and powerful and everything else positive, that the Whitest people on Earth should therefore be the most beautiful and greatest and everything else. That just ain't the case, neither from a historical nor aesthetic perspective.



Are you really going to act like some random website with God knows what criteria or userbase is somehow authoritative? So many countries are missing from that website as well. Show me how many Scandinavian folks win Sexiest Man Alive or beauty contests, then we'll talk.
You assume that Nordic people are all pale, with yellow hair. They're not. It's even reasonably rare. Most are dirty blond or light or dark brown haired. More so there aren't a whole lot of Nordic people to begin with but I'd argue we have a high percent of models/actors per capita. If we factor in how rare a blond phenotype is the number of men who made it as actors and models are probably really high.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Erik-Jón
Height is not particularly positive on women. I'm not sure if all Scandinavians have high cheekbones either.

If the average person in a nation is better looking, that would almost certainly lead to that nation having more high SMV people per capita. The thing is that isn't necessarily the case for Scandinavia.Of all the top 15 most famous and richest male models, only one of them have the blonde Nordic look, Fabio, and he ain't a great example either. The vast majority of the famous male models and celebrities have brown or black hair. Even most female celebrities in the West have a more Central European or even Southern European look than a Norwegian look. Being a pale person with bright blonde hair and blue eyes only makes you super beautiful in third world shitholes where the locals adore rich White foreigners.

People assume that because White people are seen as beautiful and powerful and everything else positive, that the Whitest people on Earth should therefore be the most beautiful and greatest and everything else. That just ain't the case, neither from a historical nor aesthetic perspective.



Are you really going to act like some random website with God knows what criteria or userbase is somehow authoritative? So many countries are missing from that website as well. Show me how many Scandinavian folks win Sexiest Man Alive or beauty contests, then we'll talk.
You clearly Don’t live in scandi also with the leaps in logic your making

And sometimes I think people forget about population

All the Nordic countries combined is like maybe 10 million people compare that to like United States or Nigeria obviously scandis are beating the odds

Why does Iceland a country with 300 000 people have more beauty contest wins then brazil(230million≈)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22627
You assume that Nordic people are all pale, with yellow hair. They're not. It's even reasonably rare. Most are dirty blond or light or dark brown haired more so than that there aren't a whole lot of Nordic people to begin with but I'd argue we have a high percent of models/actors per capita. If we factor in how rare a blond phenotype is the number of men who made it as actors and models are probably really high.
Exactly he obviously doesn’t live in scandi, I f he did he’s understand that majority of people have darker hair and such

All you need to do is look at models/actors per capita and population to see the truth
 
You assume that Nordic people are all pale, with yellow hair. They're not. It's even reasonably rare. Most are dirty blond or light or dark brown haired. More so there aren't a whole lot of Nordic people to begin with but I'd argue we have a high percent of models/actors per capita. If we factor in how rare a blond phenotype is the number of men who made it as actors and models are probably really high.
My family is pretty much 100% Scandinavian and not a single person has blonde hair and they all tan very dark, does this make them med no

Nordics can actually tan very dark things like the sun/location make it hard that’s why it’s a stereotype
 
  • +1
Reactions: mug and Deleted member 22627
Exactly he obviously doesn’t live in scandi, I f he did he’s understand that majority of people have darker hair and such

All you need to do is look at models/actors per capita and population to see the truth
Only about 2% of the world population is naturally blond. Furthermore babies who are born blonde don’t stay blonde the rest of their lives. Most blonde babies develop darker hair, ranging from black and brown hair, by age 10. So Yeah many Nordics get darker hair and it has nothing to do with racemixing.

Personally I think dirty blond hair mogs hard. It's rare and it looks HELLA good when you are tanned and the hair gets sun bleached.

Most people when they are asked "do you like blond men" they think of some guy with like strong yellow hair which I don't particularly like on men but It does look good on some men with surfer type hair.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Erik-Jón
Only about 2% of the world population is naturally blond. Furthermore babies who are born blonde don’t stay blonde the rest of their lives. Most blonde babies develop darker hair, ranging from black and brown hair, by age 10. So Yeah many Nordics get darker hair and it has nothing to do with racemixing.

Personally I think dirty blond hair mogs hard. It's rare and it looks HELLA good when you are tanned and the hair gets sun bleached.

Most people when they are asked "do you like blond men" they think of some guy with like strong yellow hair which I don't particularly like on men but It does look good on some men with surfer type hair.
At my school I’ve only seen 3 other people with blonde hair total 4 including myself

I have dirty blonde hair but even when I say this irl some people say nah you have light brown because they think blonde is only bright yellow and mine is dark
 
I can vouch that everyone in scandinavia has insane cheekbones compared to when i went to spain, italy and especially the UK. I hate it though, my cheekbones are nonexistent, fuck scandinavia
 
  • JFL
Reactions: mug and Erik-Jón
At my school I’ve only seen 3 other people with blonde hair total 4 including myself

I have dirty blonde hair but even when I say this irl some people say nah you have light brown because they think blonde is only bright yellow and mine is dark
I was platinum blond as a child now I have brown hair. I like the color better when it's sun bleached and gets blond highlights.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Erik-Jón
I can vouch that everyone in scandinavia has insane cheekbones compared to when i went to spain, italy and especially the UK. I hate it though, my cheekbones are nonexistent, fuck scandinavia
Pretty ironic that most scandis I know have model tier zygos

Brutal for untermenchs
 
I was platinum blond as a child now I have brown hair. I like the color better when it's sun bleached and gets blond highlights.
My hair never changed

I never had light blonde hair then it darkened it just stayed the same forever

My father had red hair when he was first born and now he has black jfl ethnics are so clueless
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22627
You clearly Don’t live in scandi also with the leaps in logic your making

And sometimes I think people forget about population

All the Nordic countries combined is like maybe 10 million people compare that to like United States or Nigeria obviously scandis are beating the odds

Why does Iceland a country with 300 000 people have more beauty contest wins then brazil(230million≈)
You have a source that Iceland has more beauty contest winners than Brazil does? South American countries tend to dominate beauty contests.

Also according to this map: most people in Sweden and Norway are blonde.

pw1hnf23tut21.png
 
You have a source that Iceland has more beauty contest winners than Brazil does? South American countries tend to dominate beauty contests.

Also according to this map: most people in Sweden and Norway are blonde.

pw1hnf23tut21.png
Not sure that is accurate but blond is more like this than the yellow people imagine in their heads. And most get darker as they age. Very high class.

1111ggtggg
 
  • +1
Reactions: Erik-Jón
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 22627

How many people from each country are approved to join beautifulpeople.com?​

MALE SUCCESS RATE (by nation)

1. Sweden - 60%

2. Brazil - 41%

3. Denmark - 40%

4. Italy - 37%

5. Portugal - 35%

6.Argentina - 32%

7. Norway - 27%

8. Spain - 25%

9. USA - 24%

10. Canada - 23%

11. Australia - 22%

12. France - 20%

12 =. Germany - 20%

14. Korea - 18%

15. China - 17%

16. Japan - 15%

17. India - 11%

18. United Kingdom - 9%

18 = Russia 9%

20. Poland - 7%

21. Ireland - 6%

That's from a FIVE MILLION user data set. Now do you have anything to support your own claim you comping deathnic @BigBootyBandit or are you just making shit up not to rope? Med people are short and brown.
how is indian more successfull than british and why is norwegian and swedish distinct when same people and pheno
 
Cope thread. Dark haired men and dark eyed men are seen as cucks, and Indian civilization was founded by Nordics.

Indians are only dark today because original Aryans mixed with Dravidian women, preferring them over their blonde cunts


]
zombie-thriller.gif


[/Over 90% of U.S. Presidents have been blue eyed:



"...in all of U.S. history, only five presidents had brown eyes – John Quincy Adams, Andrew Johnson, Chester A. Arthur, LBJ and Nixon. All the rest were clearly described with blue, grey, or hazel eyes. Two of our three presidents who faced serious impeachment proceedings (Andrew Johnson and Richard Nixon) were among our brown-eyed minority. The other three brownies (John Quincy Adams, Chester A. Arthur, and Lyndon Johnson) all hoped to win an additional term as president but failed to do, falling victim to bitter political critics and rivals."
 
  • +1
Reactions: Erik-Jón


American women choose blond sperm:




While some think pursuing the fantasy of a perfect child smacks of eugenics, Americans are finding ways to attempt to give birth to designer babies, whether through sperm from blond-haired, blue-eyed athletic Danes or by taking ads out in Ivy League college newspapers looking for an egg donor with high SAT scores and varsity-team records.

The freedom to choose the kind of child one wants, as opposed to a child who perhaps more closely resembles oneself, could create “consumer eugenics,” said Jonathan Moreno, an endowed professor of biomedical ethics at the University of Virginia. “We have cultural stereotypes. Blue eyes, light skin and height are valued. It would be a historic irony if we all ended up looking like that.”


Arnt is one of 50 men from Denmark whose sperm sits in one of three metal vats in Manhattan, waiting for a couple or a single mother desperate for a baby. In this case, a Viking baby. The company, Scandinavian Cryobank, has been in business in Denmark for almost 20 years. It takes credit for 10,000 babies worldwide. Two years ago, the company opened a New York office and began marketing Scandinavian sperm to infertility doctors and their patients with a sleek albeit controversial slogan: “Congratulations, it’s a Viking!”

Another advertisement shows a blond, blue-eyed baby and talks about his ancestors who beat Columbus to North America. “You’d better build a strong crib,” the ad boasts.


https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/blue-eyed-sperm-boom-sees-imports-rise-3000-s3z8v5lfj

“The vast majority of what we have and what we sell are the Caucasian blond-haired, blue-eyed donors,” Fredrik Andreasson, chief financial officer at the Seattle Sperm Bank, told The Wall Street Journal
 
how is indian more successfull than british and why is norwegian and swedish distinct when same people and pheno
Swedish men looksmax more.
 
Blue eyes are more common in men for a reason. Genetics has already decided what looks better in men.


When comparing similar eye colour genetic profiles, females tend, as a whole, to have darker eyes than males (and, conversely, males lighter than females).

These results are also corroborated by the revision and meta-analysis of data from previously published eye colour genetic studies in several Caucasian populations, which significantly support the fact that males are more likely to have blue eyes than females, while females tend to show higher frequencies of green and brown eyes than males.

This significant gender difference would suggest that there is an as yet unidentified gender-related factor contributing to human eye colour variation.
 
  • +1
Reactions: PubertyMaxxer
Differnt competions, also brazil only has 2 wins

And your comparing 300 000 to 230 million

If you compared all the Nordics and times it by 23 it would be equal

Just doing the math here

Even though the population difference is 1:23

The wins is 6:2 for that specific competition

Now I’m theory if you times Nordics population to equal brazils

You’d have 46:2 per ratio
 

How many people from each country are approved to join beautifulpeople.com?​

MALE SUCCESS RATE (by nation)

1. Sweden - 60%

2. Brazil - 41%

3. Denmark - 40%

4. Italy - 37%

5. Portugal - 35%

6.Argentina - 32%

7. Norway - 27%

8. Spain - 25%

9. USA - 24%

10. Canada - 23%

11. Australia - 22%

12. France - 20%

12 =. Germany - 20%

14. Korea - 18%

15. China - 17%

16. Japan - 15%

17. India - 11%

18. United Kingdom - 9%

18 = Russia 9%

20. Poland - 7%

21. Ireland - 6%

That's from a FIVE MILLION user data set. Now do you have anything to support your own claim you comping deathnic @BigBootyBandit or are you just making shit up not to rope? Med people are short and brown.
You can notice that Sweden - 60% while Norway - 27%. Unless you provide some evidence how Swedes genetically differ from Norwegians, I would regard this whole stat you mentioned as a scam tbh. Doesn't mean that you are necessarily wrong. But these percentages do not mean anything. :feelsokman:
 
  • +1
Reactions: NT Master
And your comparing 300 000 to 230 million
It's much more about aesthetics than population. Average Lebanese woman fogs the average South Asian Woman, despite it being 10 million vs 1B+
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane and Erik-Jón

Similar threads

NT Master
Replies
16
Views
517
Steins
S
VeryIndoEuropean
Replies
95
Views
1K
comingthrough
comingthrough
heightmaxxing
Replies
9
Views
530
OwenGwyther
OwenGwyther

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top