[NOT COPE] Bodypositivsm is kinda rationnal and not that bad

Blackpilled1027

Blackpilled1027

Zephir
Joined
Jun 22, 2021
Posts
1,774
Reputation
1,874
Allright hear me out, ofc being tall, big framed and with a big cock is CURRENTLY a superiority signs BUT...

If everyone was wide asf, tall asf and with a big dick, this would cause the extension of the human race because of the lack of diversity

If there's a starvation because of war, big skulls guys with alot of calories diet will be fucking obliterated by 5' subhuman

Same with wide frame, big frame is usefull for throw, that's why male have big frame, because they were hunter.

But wide frame are getting obliterated in alot of pull movement and even push mouvement like benchpress

The only thing that is hard to keep as a good evolutionnary trait is ugly faces, because you'll always have to take punches and resist to it
 
  • Woah
Reactions: incel194012940
I support body positivity because it means less competition.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 69862 and Informationcapitali
Body positivity is just for women
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sleeper and Acne Victim
This "if there will be hunger big guys will die first!" cope is just as retarded as those "deserted island scenarios" that masculinity copers love to make up
If you need to create some unlikely hyperspecific scenarios for your arguments to work then maybe they're just shit arguments lmao
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Danish_Retard and Blackpilled1027
This "if there will be hunger big guys will die first!" cope is just as retarded as those "deserted island scenarios" that masculinity copers love to make up
If you need to create some unlikely hyperspecific scenarios for your arguments to work then maybe they're just shit arguments lmao
bro this is a common scenario in human history, just look at all fucking centuries before us
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15302
Body positivity is incentivizing your brothers to leanmax and exercise.
 
This "if there will be hunger big guys will die first!" cope is just as retarded as those "deserted island scenarios" that masculinity copers love to make up
If you need to create some unlikely hyperspecific scenarios for your arguments to work then maybe they're just shit arguments lmao
yeah bro starvation is extremely unlikely. it has never happened before. at no point has anyone ever starved :feelshmm:
 
In general when resources are in abundance nature favors larger and stronger.

When resources are scarce nature favors smaller and nimble.

This causes a push and pull in both directions. But overtime the direction goes towards the former rather than latter unless a catastrophe happens, such as the ice age or meteor… or war.
 

Similar threads

Idonwannalivthatway
Replies
46
Views
3K
EthiopianMaxxer
EthiopianMaxxer
D
Replies
20
Views
7K
carlos72
carlos72
D
2 3 4 5
Replies
216
Views
6K
JustHereToLooksmax
J
D
Replies
27
Views
9K
dadfa
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top