nothing worse than a foid with low ipd

P

piec

Fuchsia
Joined
Jan 11, 2024
Posts
11,780
Reputation
17,581
nothing
 
  • So Sad
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 85236, thecel, Deleted member 114545 and 4 others
low pfl is worse, round eyes in a foid is over tier
 
  • WTF
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 110111 and Deleted member 118164
wide set eyes is worse than close set eyes
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Ryder, thecel, _Tigrim_ and 3 others
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: cosmopolitanlover, RecessedChinCel, WrothEnd and 4 others
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Ryder, _Tigrim_, valentine and 1 other person
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: cosmopolitanlover, Deleted member 86840, Deleted member 114545 and 3 others
  • +1
Reactions: WrothEnd, Deleted member 114545, Deleted member 56968 and 1 other person
not even in the deepest, darkest slums of mumbai
ur coping. they are both failos but wide set eyes are actually disgusting and noticeable in motion. whereas majority of close set eyes arent that noticeable
 
literally the opposite
now I just know youre some dolphin. both are ugly looking but wide set eyes looks weirder
 
yes, wide set eyes = looks like you have dow syndrome, close set eyes = something I slightly off with his face.
not how it works at all lmao
you prob just seen a recessed maxilla wide eyed girl so you assumed that
close set look masculine, and remind of chimps
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 125888 and Deleted member 56968
Close set eyes is a Down syndrome trait
yes, what I meant was someone with wide set eyes looks retarded, as if there is no thoughts going on in their head, especially if they have small eyes aswell
 
  • +1
Reactions: CookieGuy
not how it works at all lmao
you prob just seen a recessed maxilla wide eyed girl so you assumed that
close set look masculine, and remind of chimps
no
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: first snow
yes on men. closer set looks better on men
I agree, but I have never seen someone in real life where I thought "wow his eyes are close together" but I've seen guys where I thought I could fit a fist in between their eyes. wide set eyes are much more noticeable dont you think?
 
  • +1
Reactions: valentine
I agree, but I have never seen someone in real life where I thought "wow his eyes are close together" but I've seen guys where I thought I could fit a fist in between their eyes. wide set eyes are much more noticeable dont you think?
yes ur right. i lowkey hate my low ipd but id still rather have this than wide set eyes. just looks retarded
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 56968
literally the opposite
nah for a male wide set eyes are worse then close set.
Opposite for a female, except for a female close set eyes are almost a death sentence frequently.
 
now I just know youre some dolphin. both are ugly looking but wide set eyes looks weirder
ur coping. they are both failos but wide set eyes are actually disgusting and noticeable in motion. whereas majority of close set eyes arent that noticeable
ur actually retarded

1738875823433


this is the example of a foid with ridicoulously high esr, like .53-54, and she looks acceptable

imagine a foid with 0.38 esr. literally inhuman.

your logic of determining whats worse or not is probably 0.1 below = 0.4 above
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel, cosmopolitanlover, watah and 3 others
I agree, but I have never seen someone in real life where I thought "wow his eyes are close together" but I've seen guys where I thought I could fit a fist in between their eyes. wide set eyes are much more noticeable dont you think?
because most people are above not below. guess why? those subhumans die out, thats why low ipd is one of the biggest incel traits there are
 
  • +1
Reactions: first snow and Deleted member 56968
ur actually retarded

View attachment 3479350

this is the example of a foid with ridicoulously high esr, like .53-54, and she looks acceptable

imagine a foid with 0.38 esr. literally inhuman.

your logic of determining whats worse or not is probably 0.1 below = 0.4 above
having this wide set eyes is super rare and not what anybody means when they talk about wide set eyes. and nobody with close set eyes have eyes that are that close together besides maybe 1 in 1 million
 
because most people are above not below. guess why? those subhumans die out, thats why low ipd is one of the biggest incel traits there are
plenty of people have close set eyes, its just not noticeable
 
and nobody with close set eyes have eyes that are that close together besides maybe 1 in 1 million
plenty of people have close set eyes, its just not noticeable
u literally fucking indirectly contradicted yourself in the very next sentence



this is an example of a low ipd subhuman, id guess like 0.42 esr, which is equivalent to 0.50 which is not even that big of a failo

insanely unlikable, nobody would ever would want to be friends with that guy. very noticeably subhuman

as a reference look at the sharks, all in the ideal to above range, low ipd is much more rare and very disgusting and visible


your reasoning is that of a normie and you assume lower is better than high because "you dont notice it as much"
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel, watah, Deleted member 114545 and 1 other person
u literally fucking indirectly contradicted yourself in the very next sentence



this is an example of a low ipd subhuman, id guess like 0.42 esr, which is equivalent to 0.50 which is not even that big of a failo

insanely unlikable, nobody would ever would want to be friends with that guy. very noticeably subhuman

as a reference look at the sharks, all in the ideal to above range, low ipd is much more rare and very disgusting and visible

cope you are taking the extremes of close set eyes and comparing it to the average wide set eyes
 
  • +1
Reactions: anthony111553
cope you are taking the extremes of close set eyes and comparing it to the average wide set eyes
extreme = 0.42 :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:


and as an example of wide i show you 0.54, if your iq is atleast enough to be capable of doing the math i leave the rest to you to see how fucking braindead you are
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 56968
extreme = 0.42 :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
i have no idea what these numbers mean, as I am not a ipdcel who is obsessed with how close or wide my eyes are.
and as an example of wide i show you 0.54, if your iq is atleast enough to be capable of doing the math i leave the rest to you to see how fucking braindead you are
close set eyes look way better as it isn't as noticeable, wide set eyes are noticed no matter what, thats why some model firms only hire models with wide set eyes
 
  • +1
Reactions: anthony111553
extreme = 0.42 :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:


and as an example of wide i show you 0.54, if your iq is atleast enough to be capable of doing the math i leave the rest to you to see how fucking braindead you are
the foid you showed doesn't look acceptable
 
  • +1
Reactions: seanonigger
i have no idea what these numbers mean, as I am not a ipdcel who is obsessed with how close or wide my eyes are.

close set eyes look way better as it isn't as noticeable, wide set eyes are noticed no matter what, thats why some model firms only hire models with wide set eyes
esr is bad metric in general, johnny depp apearntly has a 0.43
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: seanonigger and Deleted member 56968
the point is she looks better than her equivalent of close set eyes
just use an ugly indian with shit features aside from the eye spacing theory
 
  • +1
Reactions: seanonigger
i have no idea what these numbers mean, as I am not a ipdcel who is obsessed with how close or wide my eyes are.

close set eyes look way better as it isn't as noticeable, wide set eyes are noticed no matter what, thats why some model firms only hire models with wide set eyes
you are such a fucking retard its actually insane, not only you have no real arguments, you are so fucking clueless that "you dont know what these numbers mean" and try to convince me of something without knowing the absolute basics

its like talking to a brick fucking wall
 
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: watah, first snow and Deleted member 56968
you are such a fucking retard its actually insane, not only you have no real arguments, you are so fucking clueless than "you dont know what these numbers mean" and try to convince me of something without knowing the absolute basics

its like talking to a brick fucking wall
you are quite literally the dumbest user on here
 
  • +1
Reactions: seanonigger and Deleted member 56968
Except if she like ties you up, and tells you "@piec!!!! WHAT TIME DO YOU CALL THIS??? I HAVE TO PUNISH YOU!!!"

... and then facesits you. Eww... yeah. IPD is less of a failo than this imo
 
  • JFL
Reactions: piec
you are such a fucking retard its actually insane, not only you have no real arguments, you are so fucking clueless that "you dont know what these numbers mean" and try to convince me of something without knowing the absolute basics

its like talking to a brick fucking wall
bro just accept noone will ever find your wide set eyes pretty
 
Except if she like ties you up, and tells you "@piec!!!! WHAT TIME DO YOU CALL THIS??? I HAVE TO PUNISH YOU!!!"

... and then facesits you. Eww... yeah. IPD is less of a failo than this imo
nigga what
 
  • +1
Reactions: seanonigger
not how it works at all lmao
you prob just seen a recessed maxilla wide eyed girl so you assumed that
close set look masculine, and remind of chimps
Maxilla seems to really make or break women.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lonenely sigma and first snow
bro just accept noone will ever find your wide set eyes pretty
besides your ad hominem argument, how am the one coping, i specifically said "foid"?

do you like fucking cyclopses?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 56968 and first snow
besides your ad hominem argument, how am the one coping, i specifically said "foid"?

do you like fucking cyclopses?
how are you not coping? your example of close set eyes is shit, as if this guy is ugly because of his close set eyes

Skrmbillede 2025 02 06 kl 223052

I mean I could also find a picture of chace Crawford and claim close set eyes dont look worse because he looks better than his equivalent of wide set eyes
 
I mean I could also find a picture of chace Crawford and claim close set eyes dont look worse because he looks better than his equivalent of wide set eyes
chace crawford is 0.45 :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: holy fuck i am talking to an actual fucking retard


your definition of close set eyes is literally ONE SINGLE FUCKING POINT BELOW IDEAL, and then you give your example of "being able to fit a fist between someones eyes" as being wide, which is probably like fucking 0.52 unless your fist is legit incel tier
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 56968
chace crawford is 0.45 :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: holy fuck i am talking to an actual fucking retard


your definition of close set eyes is literally ONE SINGLE FUCKING POINT BELOW IDEAL, and then you give your example of "being able to fit a fist between someones eyes" as being wide, which is probably like fucking 0.52 unless your fist is legit incel tier
hmm, maybe im coping. how do I measure esr? and isn't ipd a better measure?
 
Low IPD is lowest conciousness trait
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114545 and first snow
hmm, maybe im coping. how do I measure esr? and isn't ipd a better measure?
esr is more important but its obviously closely related to ipd

widest to widest point of the face (usually side zygos) to ipd
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 56968
@piec do you live in america
 
What about @The Grinch?
 

Similar threads

zygosmasher
Replies
23
Views
129
rexuyq
rexuyq
undereyerecession
Replies
2
Views
23
undereyerecession
undereyerecession
P
Replies
4
Views
35
failedthegenetics
failedthegenetics
Damon2005
Replies
14
Views
124
Damon2005
Damon2005
gymcelneverstress67
Replies
1
Views
23
Tttopgtoni
Tttopgtoni

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top