Nutrition science doesnt make sense anymore

D

Deleted member 44222

on to better things
Joined
Sep 11, 2023
Posts
8,198
Reputation
12,039
I achieved my lean goals back in the late summer this year. Despite that, I’ve been in perma calorie deficit mode all this time.

Why have I not lost my muscle mass? Has my body simply learned to spend less calories and maintain muscle despite the deficit?
 
depends how much protein you’re eating vs carbs/fats
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 44222
depends how much protein you’re eating vs carbs/fats
I eat good amount of proteins but the most calories from that probably goes to offset the deficit
 
I eat good amount of proteins but the most calories from that probably goes to offset the deficit
Metabolism slows down in a long term deficit.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 44222
I achieved my lean goals back in the late summer this year. Despite that, I’ve been in perma calorie deficit mode all this time.

Why have I not lost my muscle mass? Has my body simply learned to spend less calories and maintain muscle despite the deficit?
Muscle and fat require calories to maintain, so if you're at a lower weight you have a lower caloric maintenance.

Your body also adapts to expend less energy when you eat less.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 20890 and Deleted member 44222
Muscle and fat require calories to maintain, so if you're at a lower weight you have a lower caloric maintenance.

Your body also adapts to expend less energy when you eat less.
Muscles yes but why does fat require calories to be maintained. Shouldn’t it burn under deficit by common sense
 
Muscle and fat require calories to maintain, so if you're at a lower weight you have a lower caloric maintenance.

Your body also adapts to expend less energy when you eat less.
I’m still eating under my current maintenance, many days even below my current BMR
 
Muscles yes but why does fat require calories to be maintained. Shouldn’t it burn under deficit by common sense
If you're been lifting for a long time, and you lost weight, you definitely lost a good amount of muscle, even in a slow cut.

But fat is an organ that has a bunch of metabolic functions and requires energy to run.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 44222
If you're been lifting for a long time, and you lost weight, you definitely lost a good amount of muscle, even in a slow cut.

But fat is an organ that has a bunch of metabolic functions and requires energy to run.
I’m still not convinced. All these models are perma starve-maxxing but they still have some muscle definition (although dyel in clothes)
 
I’m still not convinced. All these models are perma starve-maxxing but they still have some muscle definition (although dyel in clothes)
You don't burn all of your muscle in a cut.

Also most models that don't look like skeletons are on a low dose of steroids.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 44222

Similar threads

Genetics
Replies
16
Views
97
Klassek
Klassek
assuming..
Replies
6
Views
75
eliasdickrider2237
eliasdickrider2237
lacedwgenius2.0
Replies
1
Views
26
Daddy Dick
Daddy Dick
vampzy
Replies
0
Views
13
vampzy
vampzy
Quatza33
Replies
5
Views
35
Quatza33
Quatza33

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top