FailedNormieManlet
NTmaxxed pajeet
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2021
- Posts
- 22,163
- Reputation
- 39,699
Women have this incredible ability to gaslight men and it's most apparent on that hellhole which we know as pinkpill. A lot of these women will go and complain about how no man wants them and how they only want a man who will only respect them. Which in all faireness is a very reasonable request.
But look beyond that initial demand and we soon to see the list of requirements men are made to tick. Things such as physical attraction while important, these women go overboard. It quickly becomes he must be white, 6ft, long slender fingers, thick hair, strong jaw, etc. Chad only (water right?).
But when asking these women what % of men fit these requirements, they will admit themselves that only a very small minority do fit this. So then if your standards are only a minority of men who are say the top 10%. Then your standards are high are they not? And thus you are asking for more than the bare minimum which contradicts the basis of the argument that you only want a man who respects you, you want a man in the top 10% who respects you.
Now while this all seems water, women/pinkpillers will gleefully respond with "there is nothing wrong with having standards moid". No one is complaining about the fact you have standards, your welcome to date whoever you want. But your framing of the situation is false, you have high standards and aren't finding people which fit them, it's not men who are failing you, you aren't the victim here. Just lower your standards and be realistic, if you aren't able to find a man who will commit to you and falls under your requirements then you simply aren't high value enough to date them.
Soon pinkpillers will come to that realisation that this prince does not exist and if he does exist, he is wanted by MULTIPLE women and thus he will have his free pick of women. Eventually they are forced to settle and the resentment kicks in.
For women life is easy, it's only their hypergamous brains which make dating harder than it needs to be. No one is telling you to date fat homeless dudes, but passing up on avg looking guys who can hold a steady job because they are too low value is just plain retarded.
But look beyond that initial demand and we soon to see the list of requirements men are made to tick. Things such as physical attraction while important, these women go overboard. It quickly becomes he must be white, 6ft, long slender fingers, thick hair, strong jaw, etc. Chad only (water right?).
But when asking these women what % of men fit these requirements, they will admit themselves that only a very small minority do fit this. So then if your standards are only a minority of men who are say the top 10%. Then your standards are high are they not? And thus you are asking for more than the bare minimum which contradicts the basis of the argument that you only want a man who respects you, you want a man in the top 10% who respects you.
Now while this all seems water, women/pinkpillers will gleefully respond with "there is nothing wrong with having standards moid". No one is complaining about the fact you have standards, your welcome to date whoever you want. But your framing of the situation is false, you have high standards and aren't finding people which fit them, it's not men who are failing you, you aren't the victim here. Just lower your standards and be realistic, if you aren't able to find a man who will commit to you and falls under your requirements then you simply aren't high value enough to date them.
Soon pinkpillers will come to that realisation that this prince does not exist and if he does exist, he is wanted by MULTIPLE women and thus he will have his free pick of women. Eventually they are forced to settle and the resentment kicks in.
For women life is easy, it's only their hypergamous brains which make dating harder than it needs to be. No one is telling you to date fat homeless dudes, but passing up on avg looking guys who can hold a steady job because they are too low value is just plain retarded.
