romanstock
36 yr old virgin
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2023
- Posts
- 14,545
- Reputation
- 21,655
Never has a mind like mine had such a great instrument for study, to observe their behavioural responses and conditions up close without impediment, so varying across so many subjects. I cannot help but notice that the normie is never completely comfortable socialising, they never appear natural. Every response of theirs is an artificial construction of how they believe they are supposed to respond. There is only one true enjoyment they gain from it: acceptance, and for them that is survival.
The normie changes its responses based on the settings of the instigator. For example, I may get a normie to respond seemingly naturally by probing it with unexpected stimuli; yet, while the normie may even gain enjoyment from the lack of pressure it perceives from my thus enabling it a reprieve for freedom, at the first possible opportunity it will either abandon or turn on me in exchange for mob acceptance. By exposing myself as a non-conformist, a non-normie, an alien if you will, I am a danger or a sickness which should be eliminated, and the enactment of such will gain the normie further acceptance.
Thus in the study of such beings commonly we have had to distance and limit ourselves from the subjects. The conclusion is that there is no assisting the normie, it may only be directed through detached means. The idea of one of my predecessors to stimulate the normie to brand itself with drawings i.e tattoos has proven an excellent method to quickly identify the beasts among the herd. Such should continue to be encouraged. My colleagues should be wise enough not to engage with the branded beasts. Artificial intelligence should become trained to identify non-conformist natural behaviour through these stories, and so a proper societal division can be introduced of the normie and the higher being. Thereafter the higher beings can finally enjoy natural socialising again.
The normie changes its responses based on the settings of the instigator. For example, I may get a normie to respond seemingly naturally by probing it with unexpected stimuli; yet, while the normie may even gain enjoyment from the lack of pressure it perceives from my thus enabling it a reprieve for freedom, at the first possible opportunity it will either abandon or turn on me in exchange for mob acceptance. By exposing myself as a non-conformist, a non-normie, an alien if you will, I am a danger or a sickness which should be eliminated, and the enactment of such will gain the normie further acceptance.
Thus in the study of such beings commonly we have had to distance and limit ourselves from the subjects. The conclusion is that there is no assisting the normie, it may only be directed through detached means. The idea of one of my predecessors to stimulate the normie to brand itself with drawings i.e tattoos has proven an excellent method to quickly identify the beasts among the herd. Such should continue to be encouraged. My colleagues should be wise enough not to engage with the branded beasts. Artificial intelligence should become trained to identify non-conformist natural behaviour through these stories, and so a proper societal division can be introduced of the normie and the higher being. Thereafter the higher beings can finally enjoy natural socialising again.
