NoHoesinOhio
Christ's tallest skulled soldier
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2025
- Posts
- 1,900
- Reputation
- 2,898
Of course that's your contention. You're a 2024 cel. You just got finished readin' some French existentialists-- Camus probably. You're gonna be convinced of that 'til next month when you get to Houllebecq, and then you're gonna be talkin' about how the free market intrusion into the dating scene paved the way for inceldom as a phenomenon.
That's gonna last until next year -- you're gonna be in here regurgitating Schopenhauer, talkin' about, you know, the blind Will and his aesthetic theory on the cessation of the Will .
Well, as a matter of fact, I won't, because Schopenhauer is wrong when he says that certain works of art..
Schopenhauer is wrong when he says that certain works of art serve pessimism. Tragedy does not teach "resignation"- To represent terrible and questionable things is in itself an instinct for power and magnificence in an artist: he does not fear them,there is no such thing as pessimistic art- Art affirms.
You got that from Nietzsche, 'The Will to Power,' section 821, right? Yeah, I read that too. Were you gonna plagiarize the whole thing for us? Or do you have any thoughts of your own on this matter?
That's gonna last until next year -- you're gonna be in here regurgitating Schopenhauer, talkin' about, you know, the blind Will and his aesthetic theory on the cessation of the Will .
Well, as a matter of fact, I won't, because Schopenhauer is wrong when he says that certain works of art..
Schopenhauer is wrong when he says that certain works of art serve pessimism. Tragedy does not teach "resignation"- To represent terrible and questionable things is in itself an instinct for power and magnificence in an artist: he does not fear them,there is no such thing as pessimistic art- Art affirms.
You got that from Nietzsche, 'The Will to Power,' section 821, right? Yeah, I read that too. Were you gonna plagiarize the whole thing for us? Or do you have any thoughts of your own on this matter?
