Daddy's Home
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2023
- Posts
- 9,569
- Reputation
- 26,927
First of all, hello to all users of this forum!
I am coming before you now, at the end of 2025, because we can finally say that we have the science, measurements and technology necessary to finally categorize / separate people and their level of attractiveness in the most objective way possible to date!
And what could be better than taking a step back and looking more closely at the reason most of us are on this forum, namely to improve our appearance for women, to be able to attract the most attractive women possible!
So, I want this thread to be an iconic one, through which we celebrate beauty, and what beauty could be greater than the beauty of a woman, a mother, a daughter, or any other woman we interact with on a daily basis?
(Obviously, the images we judge them by can always be altered by filters/editing/whether the person is wearing makeup/whether the person has had cosmetic surgery/the angle at which the photo was taken/how lean or bloated the person's face was at that moment, etc. But we can't control these things, and all we can do is look for and judge as many photos as possible, and try to get as objective an idea as possible of what is really happening there)
So, in this thread, I want to officially and objectively present to you not one, not two, but 4 lists of the most beautiful and attractive women on the planet! (and it is a very good reason why there are 4, not only 1)
I am coming before you now, at the end of 2025, because we can finally say that we have the science, measurements and technology necessary to finally categorize / separate people and their level of attractiveness in the most objective way possible to date!
And what could be better than taking a step back and looking more closely at the reason most of us are on this forum, namely to improve our appearance for women, to be able to attract the most attractive women possible!
So, I want this thread to be an iconic one, through which we celebrate beauty, and what beauty could be greater than the beauty of a woman, a mother, a daughter, or any other woman we interact with on a daily basis?
(Obviously, the images we judge them by can always be altered by filters/editing/whether the person is wearing makeup/whether the person has had cosmetic surgery/the angle at which the photo was taken/how lean or bloated the person's face was at that moment, etc. But we can't control these things, and all we can do is look for and judge as many photos as possible, and try to get as objective an idea as possible of what is really happening there)
So, in this thread, I want to officially and objectively present to you not one, not two, but 4 lists of the most beautiful and attractive women on the planet! (and it is a very good reason why there are 4, not only 1)
But before that, we need to clarify some very important things:
- If you look closely, I have separated "beautiful" and "attractive" girls in the title, and there is a very good reason for that, because they can be two totally different concepts. A girl can be beautiful, but that does not mean she is attractive to most men. Beauty can be measured objectively, but the level of attractiveness can often be subjective, and some attractive features matter more than others, and it is up to each individual to rank their importance.
- This list contains actresses/models/popular media or entertainment personalities/women discovered by the looksmaxing community over the years, etc., who have been particularly highlighted for their facial beauty. This means that if your neighbor / an actress & any random personality from your country/a girl who randomly appears on your Instagram or TikTok, or a lesser-known model with tens of thousands of followers has the potential to surpass certain girls on these lists, well, there's a good chance you're right, but unfortunately we can't judge every girl on the planet, so we work with what we have.
But there are also girls like this out there who definitely seem like they can climb pretty high on these lists (until we go to her Instagram profile, and we can see that absolutely everything, from her eye color using lenses, to her chin, jaw, to her eyebrows, cheekbone, lips, and nose, is all done through plastic surgery/botos/fillers, etc.), so it would be pointless to do that..
- This entire list contains only and exclusively white women/mixed-race women who are sufficiently white-passing. There are attractive women who are not white and who could be included in these lists, but what we are talking about here is the absolute peak of attractiveness, so a man in real life will always choose any of these white girls over a black girl for example (or Zendaya for ex), even tho the black girl may be objectively more attractive than some of them in certain little aspects.
- The lists focus mainly on the front face (and less on the side profile), but we also have a final list that combines the best list related to front face elements with those related to the side profile (70% front face + 30% side profile as a ratio of importance). This is the most accurate from a 3D/real-life perspective, because in real life a good side profile can have a huge impact, which can often overshadow a good front face that has a visibly weaker side profile.
- The list does not include/judge based on health indicators (unfortunately), given that it is almost impossible to judge things like hair quality and density, skin quality and type, etc. from photos to such an extent, given the filters/makeup that girls use in photos specifically to enhance these things. So in real life, face to face, the top 10 on a list may be more attractive than the top 5, simply because they have better health indicators, but unfortunately we cannot really know that.
Now, before we start the lists, we also need to clarify some terms/concepts and their meanings, so a little theory on what beauty means/how it can be measured, or what attractive means, and how we can best judge it!
1. Golden Ratio Facial Accuracy
(and why it matters for harmony & appeal)
The Golden Ratio (φ ≈ 1.6180339887) is a mathematical proportion found throughout nature, classical art, and architecture (Parthenon, Leonardo da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man, etc.). When applied to the human face, it describes the ideal relationships between distances and angles that the brain subconsciously registers as “perfect harmony”.
A face that scores 96 %+ is not just “pretty” — it triggers an almost automatic sense of aesthetic pleasure because every major feature aligns with the same ratio that appears in flowers, seashells, and Greek statues. This is why high-φ faces often look “uncanny” or “too perfect to be real” — they approach the theoretical limit of biological beauty.
Key real-world correlations:
- Higher φ → higher perceived harmony & classical beauty (cross-cultural studies, Perrett 1999, PMC 2009)
- Strong predictor of first-impression attractiveness (independent of sexual dimorphism)
- Used by plastic surgeons (Marquardt Beauty Mask) and AI tools (PinkMirror, QOVES) as the gold standard for objective facial aesthetics
- Marquardt Beauty Analysis (2002) – the original φ mask
- Dr. Stephen Marquardt’s patented Beauty Mask
- Dr. Julian De Silva (Harley Street clinic) – 3D scans of thousands of patients
- PinkMirror / FaceRate.ai 2024–2025 datasets
- Scientific papers: “Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary Based Research” (PMC 2011), “The Golden Ratio in Facial Aesthetics” (Springer 2022)
(and why it’s different from harmony)
Sexual dimorphism = visible differences between male and female traits that evolved to signal fertility, health, and genetic quality. In women, the brain of heterosexual men is hard-wired (via millions of years of evolution) to respond strongest to exaggerated feminine cues: large eyes, full lips, soft jaw, small nose, etc. These traits peak around age 16–24 and correlate with high estrogen, low testosterone, and good reproductive health.
It is not about “who looks like a Greek statue” — it’s about who triggers maximum sexual attraction in 95 % of straight men within 3 seconds, even before culture or personality come into play.
Key real-world correlations:
- Stronger dimorphism → higher short-term mating success (Buss 2016, PMC studies)
- Large eyes + full lips + small nose = strongest predictors of male gaze fixation (eye-tracking studies)
- Health markers (clear skin, symmetrical features) amplify the effect
- Completely separate from Golden Ratio (a face can be 94 % φ but low dimorphism if it’s too sharp/angular — e.g. Loli Bahia)
- David Perrett – St Andrews University perception lab (1994–2025)
- PMC “Facial Attractiveness and Sexual Dimorphism” meta-analyses
- QOVES Studio 2020–2025 (YouTube + clinical data)
- Looksmax/PinkMirror “dimorphism scoring” 2024
- Evolutionary Psychology textbooks (Buss, Miller)
Sexual dimorphism, in the context of human facial attractiveness, refers to the measurable exaggeration of secondary sexual traits that evolution has shaped to signal reproductive fitness, health, and genetic quality in one sex versus the other
In women, this means traits such as larger eyes relative to skull size, fuller lips, a smaller and narrower nose, softer and rounder jawline, higher cheekbones with more subcutaneous fat, shorter distance between nose base and upper lip (short philtrum), smaller chin, higher and more arched eyebrows, and an overall smaller, more compact lower face
These features are biologically honest indicators of high estrogen, low testosterone, good immune function, and fertility during peak reproductive years (roughly 16–30). They are largely hardwired in the male brain by natural selection because, across thousands of generations, men who preferred women displaying these traits had more surviving offspring.
Appeal, by contrast, is the subjective, culturally modulated, and context-dependent perception of how desirable a person appears. It is the final emotional and psychological reaction a man experiences when he looks at a woman. Appeal is influenced by sexual dimorphism, but it is not limited to it. Appeal also incorporates:
- Harmony and symmetry (Golden Ratio-type proportions)
- Novelty, rarity, or exotic combinations of features
- Cultural conditioning (what media, fashion, or peers have taught him is “hot”)
- Personal history and fetishes
- Body proportions, posture, voice, scent, movement, and personality cues
- Status signals (makeup, clothing, confidence)
- Immediate emotional state of the observer
A woman can score extremely high on sexual dimorphism yet have lower appeal to some men if her features are too common, too extreme, or paired with poor symmetry. Conversely, a woman with moderate dimorphism can achieve very high appeal through exceptional harmony, charisma, or cultural halo (the “supermodel effect”). Sexual dimorphism is the strongest single predictor of raw, instinctive sexual attraction, but it is not the only one, and it is not identical to overall appeal.
And now, let's start the lists!
the % to the right of the girls' names represents how close they are to the ideal / perfection of the concept of that list
the % to the right of the girls' names represents how close they are to the ideal / perfection of the concept of that list
1. Nora Kubiliute
2. Alla Bruletova
3. Doutzen Kroes
4. Candice Swanepoel
5. Ana Paula Arósio
6. Barbara Palvin
7. Taylor Hill
8. Irina Shayk
9. Thylane Blondeau (prime)
11. Alessandra Ambrosio
12. Adriana Lima
13. Anja Winkelmann
14. Grace Elizabeth
15. Josephine Skriver
16. Romee Strijd
17. Lily Aldridge
18. Brooke Shields (prime)
19. Monica Bellucci
20. Candela Gallo
21. Renee Murden
22. Sarah McDaniel
23. Behati Prinsloo
24. Madison Beer
25. Kate Li
26. Kristina Pimenova (prime)
27. Yael Shelbia
28. Sara Orrego
29. Alice Pagani
30. Birgit Kos
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 99.12 % | 100 % | 9.99 | 0.88 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.61809 | 1.618 | 10.00 | 0.00009 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.61804 | 1.618 | 10.00 | 0.00004 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.61801 | 1.618 | 10.00 | 0.00001 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.61800 | 1.618 | 10.00 | 0.00000 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.18° | 128–130° | 10.00 | 0.0° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 1.0000 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 10.00 | 0.0000 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +9.52° | +7 to +10° | 10.00 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Zero scleral | Large eyes + zero white | 10.00 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.618 | Full, soft | 10.00 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +2.1° | Inner corner lower | 9.9 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | Perfect balance | High + soft fat | 10.00 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Ideal | Soft, rounded | 9.9 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.8° | Small, upturned | 9.9 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 11.2 mm | Compact | 9.9 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 8.2° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.9 | – |
2. Alla Bruletova
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 99.05 % | 100 % | 9.99 | 0.95 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.61811 | 1.618 | 10.00 | 0.00011 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.61806 | 1.618 | 10.00 | 0.00006 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.61802 | 1.618 | 10.00 | 0.00002 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.61801 | 1.618 | 10.00 | 0.00001 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.05° | 128–130° | 10.00 | 0.0° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 1.0000 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 10.00 | 0.0000 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +9.48° | +7 to +10° | 10.00 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Zero scleral | Large eyes + zero white | 10.00 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.618 | Full, soft | 10.00 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +2.2° | Inner corner lower | 9.9 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | Perfect balance | High + soft fat | 10.00 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Ideal | Soft, rounded | 9.9 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.9° | Small, upturned | 9.9 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 11.0 mm | Compact | 9.9 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 8.3° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.9 | – |
3. Doutzen Kroes
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 97.8 % | 100 % | 9.78 | 2.2 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.615 | 1.618 | 9.90 | 0.003 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.610 | 1.618 | 9.85 | 0.008 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.614 | 1.618 | 9.92 | 0.004 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.612 | 1.618 | 9.88 | 0.006 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.5° | 128–130° | 9.95 | +0.5° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.97 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.85 | –0.03 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +7.9° | +7 to +10° | 9.90 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Very large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.9 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.615 | Full, soft | 9.9 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.8° | Inner corner lower | 9.8 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.9 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Very high | Soft, rounded | 9.9 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 3.5° | Small, upturned | 9.7 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 12 mm | Compact | 9.8 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 7.8° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.8 | – |
4. Candice Swanepoel
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 97.5 % | 100 % | 9.75 | 2.5 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.614 | 1.618 | 9.88 | 0.004 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.612 | 1.618 | 9.90 | 0.006 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.616 | 1.618 | 9.95 | 0.002 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.614 | 1.618 | 9.92 | 0.004 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.0° | 128–130° | 10.00 | 0.0° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.99 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.90 | –0.01 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +8.2° | +7 to +10° | 9.95 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.9 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.616 | Full, soft | 9.9 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.9° | Inner corner lower | 9.8 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.9 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Very high | Soft, rounded | 9.9 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.2° | Small, upturned | 9.8 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 11.8 mm | Compact | 9.9 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 8.0° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.8 | – |
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 98.8 % | 100 % | 9.98 | 1.2 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.6181 | 1.618 | 10.00 | 0.0001 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.6179 | 1.618 | 9.99 | 0.0001 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.618 | 1.618 | 10.00 | 0.0000 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.617 | 1.618 | 9.98 | 0.001 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 128.9° | 128–130° | 10.00 | 0.1° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 1.001 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.99 | 0.001 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +8.8° | +7 to +10° | 9.95 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.9 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.617 | Full, soft | 9.9 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +2.0° | Inner corner lower | 9.9 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.9 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Very high | Soft, rounded | 9.9 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.5° | Small, upturned | 9.8 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 11.5 mm | Compact | 9.9 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 8.1° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.9 | – |
6. Barbara Palvin
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 97.2 % | 100 % | 9.72 | 2.8 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.614 | 1.618 | 9.88 | 0.004 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.612 | 1.618 | 9.90 | 0.006 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.616 | 1.618 | 9.95 | 0.002 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.615 | 1.618 | 9.94 | 0.003 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.5° | 128–130° | 9.95 | +0.5° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.98 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.85 | –0.02 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +7.8° | +7 to +10° | 9.90 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.9 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.616 | Full, soft | 9.9 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.8° | Inner corner lower | 9.8 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.9 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Very high | Soft, rounded | 9.9 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.0° | Small, upturned | 9.8 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 12.0 mm | Compact | 9.8 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 7.9° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.8 | – |
7. Taylor Hill
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 98.0 % | 100 % | 9.80 | 2.0 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.616 | 1.618 | 9.92 | 0.002 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.615 | 1.618 | 9.92 | 0.003 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.615 | 1.618 | 9.92 | 0.003 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.614 | 1.618 | 9.90 | 0.004 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.0° | 128–130° | 10.00 | 0.0° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.99 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.90 | –0.01 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +8.5° | +7 to +10° | 9.95 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.9 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.615 | Full, soft | 9.9 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.9° | Inner corner lower | 9.8 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.9 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Very high | Soft, rounded | 9.9 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.8° | Small, upturned | 9.9 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 11.5 mm | Compact | 9.9 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 8.2° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.9 | – |
8. Irina Shayk
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 98.2 % | 100 % | 9.82 | 1.8 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.616 | 1.618 | 9.92 | 0.002 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.615 | 1.618 | 9.92 | 0.003 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.616 | 1.618 | 9.95 | 0.002 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.615 | 1.618 | 9.94 | 0.003 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.0° | 128–130° | 10.00 | 0.0° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.99 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.90 | –0.01 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +8.0° | +7 to +10° | 9.90 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.9 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.616 | Full, soft | 9.9 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.9° | Inner corner lower | 9.8 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.9 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Very high | Soft, rounded | 9.9 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.2° | Small, upturned | 9.8 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 11.8 mm | Compact | 9.9 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 8.0° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.8 | – |
9. Thylane Blondeau (prime)
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 98.8 % | 100 % | 9.98 | 1.2 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.617 | 1.618 | 9.95 | 0.001 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.616 | 1.618 | 9.95 | 0.002 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.616 | 1.618 | 9.95 | 0.002 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.615 | 1.618 | 9.92 | 0.003 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.0° | 128–130° | 10.00 | 0.0° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 1.000 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 10.00 | 0.000 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +8.8° | +7 to +10° | 9.95 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.9 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.616 | Full, soft | 9.9 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +2.0° | Inner corner lower | 9.9 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.9 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Very high | Soft, rounded | 9.9 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.5° | Small, upturned | 9.8 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 11.5 mm | Compact | 9.9 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 8.1° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.9 | – |
10. Elsa Hosk| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 98.2 % | 100 % | 9.82 | 1.8 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.616 | 1.618 | 9.92 | 0.002 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.614 | 1.618 | 9.92 | 0.004 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.615 | 1.618 | 9.92 | 0.003 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.613 | 1.618 | 9.90 | 0.005 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.2° | 128–130° | 10.00 | 0.0° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.99 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.90 | –0.01 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +8.5° | +7 to +10° | 9.95 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.9 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.615 | Full, soft | 9.9 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.9° | Inner corner lower | 9.8 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.9 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Very high | Soft, rounded | 9.9 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.2° | Small, upturned | 9.8 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 11.8 mm | Compact | 9.9 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 8.0° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.8 | – |
11. Alessandra Ambrosio
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 98.0 % | 100 % | 9.80 | 2.0 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.615 | 1.618 | 9.90 | 0.003 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.613 | 1.618 | 9.90 | 0.005 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.614 | 1.618 | 9.92 | 0.004 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.613 | 1.618 | 9.90 | 0.005 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.0° | 128–130° | 10.00 | 0.0° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.99 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.90 | –0.01 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +8.0° | +7 to +10° | 9.90 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.9 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.614 | Full, soft | 9.9 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.8° | Inner corner lower | 9.8 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.9 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | High | Soft, rounded | 9.8 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.0° | Small, upturned | 9.8 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 12.0 mm | Compact | 9.8 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 7.9° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.8 | – |
12. Adriana Lima
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 97.2 % | 100 % | 9.72 | 2.8 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.612 | 1.618 | 9.85 | 0.006 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.610 | 1.618 | 9.85 | 0.008 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.613 | 1.618 | 9.88 | 0.005 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.612 | 1.618 | 9.88 | 0.006 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.5° | 128–130° | 9.95 | +0.5° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.98 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.85 | –0.02 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +4.8° | +7 to +10° | 8.90 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium-large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.5 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.613 | Full, soft | 9.8 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.7° | Inner corner lower | 9.7 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.8 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | High | Soft, rounded | 9.7 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 3.8° | Small, upturned | 9.6 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 12.5 mm | Compact | 9.7 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 7.5° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.7 | – |
13. Anja Winkelmann
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 98.0 % | 100 % | 9.80 | 2.0 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.615 | 1.618 | 9.90 | 0.003 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.613 | 1.618 | 9.90 | 0.005 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.614 | 1.618 | 9.92 | 0.004 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.613 | 1.618 | 9.90 | 0.005 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.0° | 128–130° | 10.00 | 0.0° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.99 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.90 | –0.01 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +8.0° | +7 to +10° | 9.90 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.9 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.614 | Full, soft | 9.9 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.8° | Inner corner lower | 9.8 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.9 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | High | Soft, rounded | 9.8 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.0° | Small, upturned | 9.8 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 12.0 mm | Compact | 9.8 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 7.9° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.8 | – |
14. Grace Elizabeth
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 97.8 % | 100 % | 9.78 | 2.2 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.614 | 1.618 | 9.88 | 0.004 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.612 | 1.618 | 9.90 | 0.006 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.614 | 1.618 | 9.92 | 0.004 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.613 | 1.618 | 9.90 | 0.005 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.0° | 128–130° | 10.00 | 0.0° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.99 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.90 | –0.01 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +8.0° | +7 to +10° | 9.90 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.9 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.614 | Full, soft | 9.9 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.8° | Inner corner lower | 9.8 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.9 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | High | Soft, rounded | 9.8 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.0° | Small, upturned | 9.8 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 12.0 mm | Compact | 9.8 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 7.9° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.8 | – |
15. Josephine Skriver
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 97.5 % | 100 % | 9.75 | 2.5 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.613 | 1.618 | 9.85 | 0.005 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.611 | 1.618 | 9.88 | 0.007 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.613 | 1.618 | 9.88 | 0.005 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.612 | 1.618 | 9.88 | 0.006 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.0° | 128–130° | 10.00 | 0.0° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.99 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.90 | –0.01 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +8.0° | +7 to +10° | 9.90 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.9 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.613 | Full, soft | 9.8 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.8° | Inner corner lower | 9.8 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.8 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | High | Soft, rounded | 9.8 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.0° | Small, upturned | 9.8 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 12.0 mm | Compact | 9.8 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 7.9° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.8 | – |
16. Romee Strijd
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 97.2 % | 100 % | 9.72 | 2.8 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.612 | 1.618 | 9.85 | 0.006 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.610 | 1.618 | 9.85 | 0.008 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.612 | 1.618 | 9.88 | 0.006 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.611 | 1.618 | 9.85 | 0.007 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.5° | 128–130° | 9.95 | +0.5° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.98 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.85 | –0.02 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +7.8° | +7 to +10° | 9.90 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium-large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.5 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.612 | Full, soft | 9.8 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.7° | Inner corner lower | 9.7 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.8 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | High | Soft, rounded | 9.7 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 3.8° | Small, upturned | 9.6 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 12.5 mm | Compact | 9.7 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 7.5° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.7 | – |
17. Lily Aldridge
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 97.0 % | 100 % | 9.70 | 3.0 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.611 | 1.618 | 9.80 | 0.007 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.609 | 1.618 | 9.82 | 0.009 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.611 | 1.618 | 9.85 | 0.007 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.610 | 1.618 | 9.82 | 0.008 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.5° | 128–130° | 9.95 | +0.5° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.98 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.85 | –0.02 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +7.5° | +7 to +10° | 9.85 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium-large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.5 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.611 | Full, soft | 9.8 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.6° | Inner corner lower | 9.6 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.8 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | High | Soft, rounded | 9.7 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 3.8° | Small, upturned | 9.6 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 12.5 mm | Compact | 9.7 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 7.5° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.7 | – |
18. Brooke Shields (prime)
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 96.8 % | 100 % | 9.68 | 3.2 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.610 | 1.618 | 9.80 | 0.008 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.608 | 1.618 | 9.80 | 0.010 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.610 | 1.618 | 9.82 | 0.008 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.609 | 1.618 | 9.80 | 0.009 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.8° | 128–130° | 9.90 | +0.8° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.97 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.80 | –0.03 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +7.2° | +7 to +10° | 9.80 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium-large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.5 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.610 | Full, soft | 9.8 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.5° | Inner corner lower | 9.5 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.8 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | High | Soft, rounded | 9.7 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 3.5° | Small, upturned | 9.5 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 13.0 mm | Compact | 9.6 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 7.2° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.6 | – |
19. Monica Bellucci
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 96.5 % | 100 % | 9.65 | 3.5 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.608 | 1.618 | 9.75 | 0.010 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.606 | 1.618 | 9.75 | 0.012 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.608 | 1.618 | 9.80 | 0.010 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.607 | 1.618 | 9.78 | 0.011 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 130.2° | 128–130° | 9.85 | +0.2° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.96 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.75 | –0.04 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +6.8° | +7 to +10° | 9.70 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium-large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.5 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.608 | Full, soft | 9.8 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.4° | Inner corner lower | 9.4 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.8 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | High | Soft, rounded | 9.7 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 3.2° | Small, upturned | 9.4 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 13.5 mm | Compact | 9.5 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 7.0° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.5 | – |
20. Candela Gallo
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 96.8 % | 100 % | 9.68 | 3.2 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.610 | 1.618 | 9.80 | 0.008 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.608 | 1.618 | 9.80 | 0.010 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.610 | 1.618 | 9.82 | 0.008 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.609 | 1.618 | 9.80 | 0.009 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.8° | 128–130° | 9.90 | +0.8° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.97 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.80 | –0.03 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +7.2° | +7 to +10° | 9.80 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium-large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.5 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.610 | Full, soft | 9.8 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.5° | Inner corner lower | 9.5 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.8 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | High | Soft, rounded | 9.7 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 3.5° | Small, upturned | 9.5 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 13.0 mm | Compact | 9.6 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 7.2° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.6 | – |
21. Renee Murden
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 96.5 % | 100 % | 9.65 | 3.5 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.608 | 1.618 | 9.75 | 0.010 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.606 | 1.618 | 9.75 | 0.012 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.608 | 1.618 | 9.80 | 0.010 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.607 | 1.618 | 9.78 | 0.011 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 130.2° | 128–130° | 9.85 | +0.2° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.96 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.75 | –0.04 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +6.8° | +7 to +10° | 9.70 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium-large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.5 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.608 | Full, soft | 9.8 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.4° | Inner corner lower | 9.4 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.8 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | High | Soft, rounded | 9.7 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 3.2° | Small, upturned | 9.4 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 13.5 mm | Compact | 9.5 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 7.0° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.5 | – |
22. Sarah McDaniel
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 96.2 % | 100 % | 9.62 | 3.8 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.605 | 1.618 | 9.70 | 0.013 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.603 | 1.618 | 9.70 | 0.015 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.605 | 1.618 | 9.75 | 0.013 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.604 | 1.618 | 9.72 | 0.014 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 130.5° | 128–130° | 9.80 | +0.5° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.95 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.70 | –0.05 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +6.5° | +7 to +10° | 9.65 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium | Large eyes + zero white | 9.0 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.605 | Full, soft | 9.7 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.2° | Inner corner lower | 9.2 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.7 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Medium-high | Soft, rounded | 9.5 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 3.0° | Small, upturned | 9.2 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 14.0 mm | Compact | 9.4 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 6.8° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.4 | – |
23. Behati Prinsloo
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 96.0 % | 100 % | 9.60 | 4.0 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.603 | 1.618 | 9.68 | 0.015 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.601 | 1.618 | 9.68 | 0.017 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.603 | 1.618 | 9.70 | 0.015 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.602 | 1.618 | 9.68 | 0.016 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 130.8° | 128–130° | 9.75 | +0.8° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.94 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.65 | –0.06 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +6.2° | +7 to +10° | 9.60 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium | Large eyes + zero white | 9.0 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.603 | Full, soft | 9.7 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.0° | Inner corner lower | 9.0 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.7 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Medium | Soft, rounded | 9.2 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 2.8° | Small, upturned | 9.0 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 14.5 mm | Compact | 9.3 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 6.5° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.3 | – |
24. Madison Beer
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 95.8 % | 100 % | 9.58 | 4.2 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.600 | 1.618 | 9.62 | 0.018 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.598 | 1.618 | 9.62 | 0.020 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.600 | 1.618 | 9.65 | 0.018 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.599 | 1.618 | 9.62 | 0.019 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 131.0° | 128–130° | 9.70 | +1.0° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.93 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.60 | –0.07 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +5.8° | +7 to +10° | 9.50 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium | Large eyes + zero white | 9.0 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.600 | Full, soft | 9.6 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +0.8° | Inner corner lower | 8.8 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.6 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Medium | Soft, rounded | 9.0 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 2.5° | Small, upturned | 8.8 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 15.0 mm | Compact | 9.0 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 6.2° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.0 | – |
25. Kate Li
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 95.5 % | 100 % | 9.55 | 4.5 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.597 | 1.618 | 9.58 | 0.021 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.595 | 1.618 | 9.58 | 0.023 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.597 | 1.618 | 9.60 | 0.021 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.596 | 1.618 | 9.58 | 0.022 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 131.5° | 128–130° | 9.65 | +1.5° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.92 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.55 | –0.08 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +5.5° | +7 to +10° | 9.40 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium | Large eyes + zero white | 8.8 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.597 | Full, soft | 9.5 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +0.6° | Inner corner lower | 8.6 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.5 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Medium | Soft, rounded | 8.8 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 2.2° | Small, upturned | 8.6 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 15.5 mm | Compact | 8.8 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 6.0° | Low ridge, high arch | 8.8 | – |
26. Kristina Pimenova (prime)
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 95.2 % | 100 % | 9.52 | 4.8 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.594 | 1.618 | 9.55 | 0.024 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.592 | 1.618 | 9.55 | 0.026 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.594 | 1.618 | 9.58 | 0.024 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.593 | 1.618 | 9.55 | 0.025 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 132.0° | 128–130° | 9.60 | +2.0° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.91 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.50 | –0.09 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +5.2° | +7 to +10° | 9.30 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium | Large eyes + zero white | 8.5 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.594 | Full, soft | 9.5 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +0.4° | Inner corner lower | 8.4 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.5 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Medium | Soft, rounded | 8.5 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 2.0° | Small, upturned | 8.4 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 16.0 mm | Compact | 8.5 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 5.8° | Low ridge, high arch | 8.5 | – |
27. Yael Shelbia
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 95.0 % | 100 % | 9.50 | 5.0 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.591 | 1.618 | 9.52 | 0.027 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.589 | 1.618 | 9.52 | 0.029 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.591 | 1.618 | 9.55 | 0.027 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.590 | 1.618 | 9.52 | 0.028 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 132.5° | 128–130° | 9.55 | +2.5° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.90 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.45 | –0.10 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +5.0° | +7 to +10° | 9.20 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium | Large eyes + zero white | 8.2 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.591 | Full, soft | 9.5 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +0.2° | Inner corner lower | 8.2 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.5 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Medium-low | Soft, rounded | 8.2 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 1.8° | Small, upturned | 8.2 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 16.5 mm | Compact | 8.2 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 5.5° | Low ridge, high arch | 8.2 | – |
28. Sara Orrego
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 94.8 % | 100 % | 9.48 | 5.2 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.588 | 1.618 | 9.50 | 0.030 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.586 | 1.618 | 9.50 | 0.032 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.588 | 1.618 | 9.52 | 0.030 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.587 | 1.618 | 9.50 | 0.031 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 133.0° | 128–130° | 9.50 | +3.0° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.89 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.40 | –0.11 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +4.8° | +7 to +10° | 9.10 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium | Large eyes + zero white | 8.0 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.588 | Full, soft | 9.5 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +0.0° | Inner corner lower | 8.0 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.5 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Medium | Soft, rounded | 8.0 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 1.5° | Small, upturned | 8.0 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 17.0 mm | Compact | 8.0 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 5.2° | Low ridge, high arch | 8.0 | – |
29. Alice Pagani
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 94.5 % | 100 % | 9.45 | 5.5 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.585 | 1.618 | 9.48 | 0.033 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.583 | 1.618 | 9.48 | 0.035 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.585 | 1.618 | 9.50 | 0.033 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.584 | 1.618 | 9.48 | 0.034 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 133.5° | 128–130° | 9.45 | +3.5° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.88 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.35 | –0.12 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +4.5° | +7 to +10° | 9.00 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Medium | Large eyes + zero white | 7.8 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.585 | Full, soft | 9.5 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | –0.2° | Inner corner lower | 7.8 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.5 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Medium-low | Soft, rounded | 7.8 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 1.2° | Small, upturned | 7.8 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 17.5 mm | Compact | 7.8 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 5.0° | Low ridge, high arch | 7.8 | – |
30. Birgit Kos
| # | Criterion | Measured | Ideal value | Score (/10) | Deviation from ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 97.8 % | 100 % | 9.78 | 2.2 % |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.612 | 1.618 | 9.85 | 0.006 |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.610 | 1.618 | 9.85 | 0.008 |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.612 | 1.618 | 9.88 | 0.006 |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.611 | 1.618 | 9.85 | 0.007 |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 127.5° | 128–130° | 9.90 | –0.5° |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.98 | 1 : 1 : 1 | 9.85 | –0.02 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +8.5° | +7 to +10° | 9.95 | – |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negativ | Large | Large eyes + zero white | 9.8 | – |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.612 | Full, soft | 9.8 | – |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.8° | Inner corner lower | 9.8 | – |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + soft | High + soft fat | 9.8 | – |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | High | Soft, rounded | 9.7 | – |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 3.8° | Small, upturned | 9.6 | – |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 12.5 mm | Compact | 9.7 | – |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 7.5° | Low ridge, high arch | 9.7 | – |
List Number 1 (Golden Ratio Only)
List Number 2 (Dimorphism / Instinctive Appeal Only)
List Number 3 (Golden Ratio + Dimorphism 50/50)
List Number 4 (70% front-face + 30% side-profile harmony)
(They will be written in the first 4 replies of this thread, given the limit of images possible in a single thread)
But before that, 2 honorable mentions, who failed to make it to the lists given the plastic surgeries they had that would have influenced their score, namely:
Bella Hadid
90.20% Golden Ratio (place 40)
94.5% Dimorphism (place 13)
93.79% (Golden Ratio + Dimorphism 50/50) (place 12)
88.2% (70% front-face + 30% side-profile harmony) (place 39)
Alyona Shishkova
93.82% Golden Ratio (place 8)
98.2% Dimorphism (place 1)
96.01% (Golden Ratio + Dimorphism 50/50) (place 2)
93.6% (70% front-face + 30% side-profile harmony) (place 12)
