Official Whiteness Hierarchy (100% accurate non biased)

[forzp]

I've heard some white Brits look down on white Americans for being really red looking and not "proper white". but that and this whole thread is stupid if you ask me

americans are mixed mutts though

 

[Hess]

Aha i remember when i was younger i used to just have the general belief that everyone else in europe is white (even most people i know still have this mindset)

And then id visit spain or italy and wonder why many of the natives looked so arab

TBF northern italians are much more whiter, its mostly bcuz of the romans that we have such a mutted out italy

 

[forzp]

I'm Tyrone

non-whites cant have opinions on the european white hierarchy back to your cage tyrone

 

[klip11]

Why brahs gate keep being white jfl

 

[Hess]

americans are mixed mutts though

Not all of them but they are a shitty country with a dwindling white population

 

[forzp]

Why brahs gate keep being white jfl

 

[forzp]

Why brahs gate keep being white jfl

turks are not white dude

 

[klip11]

turks are not white dude

Indians are white!

 

[forzp]

Indians are white!

oh yeah maybe your right jfl

 

[klip11]

View attachment 5240413
oh yeah maybe your right jfl

Curries are aryan therefore white

 

[forzp]

Curries are aryan therefore white

yeah bro their nan bread is white so technically they are white aswell

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

@Gengar’s Ghost
View attachment 5240348

He’s not Indian but maybe he’s an Indian migrant to the country he’s in.

 

[forzp]

He’s not Indian but maybe he’s an Indian migrant to the country he’s in.

many such cases

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

many such cases

Indeed.

“Saar, moslems are plague!!” - posted by brown hands in New Orleans

 

[forzp]

He’s not Indian but maybe he’s an Indian migrant to the country he’s in.

im willing to bet he is though all richard ramierez pfp users are ethnic.

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

im willing to bet he is though all richard ramierez pfp users are ethnic.

Joever.

 

[forzp]

Indeed.

“Saar, moslems are plague!!” - posted by brown hands in New Orleans

you can kind of tell when its an ethnic/indian idk its just a gut feeling imo, like when a user is racist sometimes usually they are white but when they OBSESS over it and every post they make is about race then i start considering if they are brown

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

you can kind of tell when its an ethnic/indian idk its just a gut feeling imo, like when a user is racist sometimes usually they are white but when they OBSESS over it and every post they make then i start considering if they are brown

Indeed. They are usually a pajeet if they;

- Shit-talk Islam/Muslamic rayguns
- Shit-talk Pakistanis
- Shit-talk East Asians
- Talk about white replacement
- Copes about South Asian SMV not being the lowest

 

[forzp]

Indeed. They are usually a pajeet if they;

- Shit-talk Islam/Muslamic rayguns
- Shit-talk Pakistanis
- Shit-talk East Asians
- Talk about white replacement
- Copes about South Asian SMV not being the lowest

heavy on the last part, the other categories can be a wildcard though. I mean the occasional complaint about indians or other immigrants is pretty normal for the avg .org user but when they like obsess over it you can kind of tell.

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

heavy on the last part, the other categories can be a wildcard though. I mean the occasional complaint about indians or other immigrants is pretty normal for the avg .org user but when they like obsess over it you can kind of tell.

You can usually tell when it’s a poopjeet though, they got their own way of talking shit (probably as a consequences of bathing in it ).

 

[forzp]

You can usually tell when it’s a poopjeet though, they got their own way of talking shit (probably as a consequences of bathing in it ).

true true, its also when they consider italians or other racial groups as "white" usually means they dont understand the whiteness hierarchy, As a white man myself i can say for a fact that most ethnics group everyone into being white.

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

true true, its also when they consider italians or other racial groups as "white" usually means they dont understand the whiteness hierarchy, As a white man myself i can say for a fact that most ethnics group everyone into being white.

The reason they cope with that is because they deluded themselves into thinking they both look “med”, and that in turn makes them able to be “white-passing.” Even though 99.999% of jeets clearly aren’t med-passing.

 

[forzp]

The reason they cope with that is because they deluded themselves into thinking they both look “med”, and that in turn makes them able to be “white-passing.” Even though 99.999% of jeets clearly aren’t med-passing.

btw do you have discord?

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

btw do you have discord?

I do, it’s gengar1995.

 

[forzp]

I do, it’s gengar1995.

ok i will add you in a moment

 

[fraudster#1]

Highest tier of whites :
Germanics
Anglo saxons
Scandinavians
Celtics

gotta disagree, how tf is spaniards and italians bellow celtics?

 

[tarkdriad33]

white is white

niggers are the enemy not different types of whites

Nah, just cuz ur skin is whyte doesnt mean ur white

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

ok i will add you in a moment

OK, I shall accept you tomorrow because I am not opening discord until then.

 

[Hess]

gotta disagree, how tf is spaniards and italians bellow celtics?

Because celtics mog and have far more lighter complexions and more IE ancestry/less neolithic ancestry on average

 

[whiteegyptian]

Shit list except for the upper tier

 

[whiteegyptian]

TBF northern italians are much more whiter, its mostly bcuz of the romans that we have such a mutted out italy
View attachment 5240378
View attachment 5240379

retard, northern italians are much closer to romans genetically than southern italians are.

please leave it.

 

[D69mo]

Highest tier of whites :
Germanics
Anglo saxons
Scandinavians
Celtics

Fairly White
Northern french
Slavs with high amounts of germanic or anglo saxon dna
some northern italians

"depends on the case"
Slavs with no germanic or anglo saxon admixture can be considered white passing at times.
Meds with high germanic dna

Definitely not white
Finnish people
southern italians
spaniards
portugese
southern french
Slavs with high amounts of asian ancestry
Estonians and other baltics (basically finnish people) with high finnish dna

Brown tier
Albanians
turks
siccilians

So what are arabs and South Americans

 

[loseratgenes]

Highest tier of whites :
Germanics
Anglo saxons
Scandinavians
Celtics

Fairly White
Northern french
Slavs with high amounts of germanic or anglo saxon dna
some northern italians

"depends on the case"
Slavs with no germanic or anglo saxon admixture can be considered white passing at times.
Meds with high germanic dna

Definitely not white
Finnish people
southern italians
spaniards
portugese
southern french
Slavs with high amounts of asian ancestry
Estonians and other baltics (basically finnish people) with high finnish dna

Brown tier
Albanians
turks
siccilians

Somali larping being german kill yourself

 

[Hess]

retard, northern italians are much closer to romans genetically than southern italians are.

please leave it.

I don't expect you to respond to this because anytime I do discuss genetics with you , you stop responding whenever you cant refute me so pls sit tf down, its a fact that northern italians are on average more celtic and southern itslians were far more affected by rome and closer to them

Checking your browser - reCAPTCHA

 

[whiteegyptian]

I don't expect you to respond to this because anytime I do discuss genetics with you , you stop responding whenever you cant refute me so pls sit tf down, its a fact that northern italians are on average more celtic and southern itslians were far more affected by rome and closer to them

Checking your browser - reCAPTCHA

southern italians are not romans. they are a bunch of greeks and arab mutts, closest people to republic era romans, aka original romans, are central, and north italians, and spaniards JFL.

southern italians have nothing to do with the west med roman empire civilization.

 

[Hess]

southern italians are not romans. they are a bunch of greeks and arab mutts, closest people to republic era romans, aka original romans, are central, and north italians, and spaniards JFL.

southern italians have nothing to do with the west med roman empire civilization.

Lmfao you do realize the entire of roman history were them being arab mutts, def must of hit a soft spot considering youre defending them hard, and even then the closest popilation to them (republican wra romans which you brought up) are spainards, northern italians are just far more celtic on average and southern italians are on average closer to the romans genetically

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abi7673

 

[whiteegyptian]

Lmfao you do realize the entire of roman history were them being arab mutts, def must of hit a soft spot considering youre defending them hard, and even then the closest popilation to them (republican wra romans which you brought up) are spainards, northern italians are just far more celtic on average and southern italians are on average closer to the romans genetically

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abi7673

You lack self awareness, original Romans aka Republic Romans were much closer to Northern and Central Italians, and Spaniards. Southern Italians are Greek-Arabid mutts, who will never be Roman.

 

[81xa]

 

[Hess]

You lack self awareness, original Romans aka Republic Romans were much closer to Northern and Central Italians, and Spaniards. Southern Italians are Greek-Arabid mutts, who will never be Roman.

The entirety of roman identity was defined by the roman empire and its multi racial mutt state and was a far more bigger part in both their history and identity, the only thing that saved northern italians from retaining a closeness to republican era romans was celtic and germanic tribes mixing with them and actually retaining their steppe ancestry to pre empire times

 

[fortnitelover671]

Highest tier of whites :
Germanics
Anglo saxons
Scandinavians
Celtics

Fairly White
Northern french
Slavs with high amounts of germanic or anglo saxon dna
some northern italians

"depends on the case"
Slavs with no germanic or anglo saxon admixture can be considered white passing at times.
Meds with high germanic dna

Definitely not white
Finnish people
southern italians
spaniards
portugese
southern french
Slavs with high amounts of asian ancestry
Estonians and other baltics (basically finnish people) with high finnish dna

Brown tier
Albanians
turks
siccilians

Fire

 

[whiteegyptian]

The entirety of roman identity was defined by the roman empire and its multi racial mutt state and was a far more bigger part in both their history and identity, the only thing that saved northern italians from retaining a closeness to republican era romans was celtic and germanic tribes mixing with them and actually retaining their steppe ancestry to pre empire times

Anyways, never saw such a Nordicist like yourself that likes Slavs.

 

[Hess]

Anyways, never saw such a Nordicist like yourself that likes Slavs.

I don't consider myself a Nordicist and despite my leanings towards NS and Pan-Germancism I think their polemics on slavics were outdated, based on emotional resentments, or just used as pragmatic justifications to expand eastward like all Germanic states have been doing since the HRE (which I don't consider wrong, Europeans have been genociding and warring on each other for ages and I'm far more inclined to support germany in that regard compared to the slavic bloc), majority of anti slavicism today is either used as a way for meds and browns to shit on white states without getting shit on by nords who they seek approval from or just delusional nordicists who read surface level 19th century texts and LARP them while being buddy buddy with greeks despite the obvious hypocritical nature of it

 

[whiteegyptian]

I don't consider myself a Nordicist and despite my leanings towards NS and Pan-Germancism I think their polemics on slavics were outdated, based on emotional resentments, or just used as pragmatic justifications to expand eastward like all Germanic states have been doing since the HRE (which I don't consider wrong, Europeans have been genociding and warring on each other for ages and I'm far more inclined to support germany in that regard compared to the slavic bloc), majority of anti slavicism today is either used as a way for meds and browns to shit on white states without getting shit on by nords who they seek approval from or just delusional nordicists who read surface level 19th century texts and LARP them while being buddy buddy with greeks despite the obvious hypocritical nature of it

I'm not getting myself in this story about who wants to please who. a traditional Nordicist does not care about either Meds, or Slavs.

Oh, and Slavs are not an almost identical race to Germanics. they are mixed with Asiatics, and despite the false myth of them having the highest Steppe ancestry, they don't.

 

[Hess]

I'm not getting myself in this story about who wants to please who. a traditional Nordicist does not care about either Meds, or Slavs.

Oh, and Slavs are not an almost identical race to Germanics. they are mixed with Asiatics, and despite the false myth of them having the highest Steppe ancestry, they don't.

Again we have argued this point before and it is just blatantly not true and I am not interested in rehashing the same argument, and neither am I interested in what "Traditional Nordicists" think

 

[whiteegyptian]

Again we have argued this point before

Yeah, we have argued about it, until you denied objective genetic facts. you denied the fact that 40% of Russian males carry East Eurasian haplogroups.

 

[Hess]

Yeah, we have argued about it, until you denied objective genetic facts. you denied the fact that 40% of Russian males carry East Eurasian haplogroups.

Never denied it, just pointed out that its a blatantly misleading figure to apply to all russians when it only applies to the very far north which finno-urgics are located in, also even if we operate under this assumption that it is true for all russians it still does not change the fact that haplogroups only affect about 1-2 percent of total DNA and using them as a figure to debate a modern populations genetic make up is the most retarded thing you can do, also lets not forget every study done on eurasian admixture for slavics shows 0 to 1 percent autosomnal DNA for every group which you conveniently ignore for your retarded narratives https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18664146/

Again you have never actually addressed any of my points in a meaningful way

 

[whiteegyptian]

Never denied it, just pointed out that its a blatantly misleading figure to apply to all russians when it only applies to the very far north which finno-urgics are located in, also even if we operate under this assumption that it is true for all russians it still does not change the fact that haplogroups only affect about 1-2 percent of total DNA and using them as a figure to debate a modern populations genetic make up is the most retarded thing you can do, also lets not forget every study done on eurasian admixture for slavics shows 0 to 1 percent autosomnal DNA for every group which you conveniently ignore for your retarded narratives https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18664146/

Again you have never actually addressed any of my points in a meaningful way

For the haplogroups part, they are an ancestry marker, not the whole genome, sure, but they act like the barcodes for entire ancestral clusters, tracing back to thousands of years to specific populations, they correlate HEAVYILY with your autosomal DNA, that actually builds YOU up. if your haplogroup is R1b, or I1, it predicts lighter features, same goes for non White haplogroups. it tells you who you are, even if it's a small part.

The study you sent literally confirms that Slavs have East Eurasian traces, even West Slavs. so I don't know what's your point around here man.

 

[Hess]

For the haplogroups part, they are an ancestry marker, not the whole genome, sure, but they act like the barcodes for entire ancestral clusters, tracing back to thousands of years to specific populations, they correlate HEAVYILY with your autosomal DNA, that actually builds YOU up. if your haplogroup is R1b, or I1, it predicts lighter features, same goes for non White haplogroups. it tells you who you are, even if it's a small part.

The study you sent literally confirms that Slavs have East Eurasian traces, even West Slavs. so I don't know what's your point around here man.

"The frequency of eastern-Eurasian (Mongoloid) mtDNA lineages constituted 1.8%. The spread of eastern-Eurasian mtDNA lineages belonging to different ethnolinguistic groups in the populations of Europe was examined. Frequency variations of these DNA lineages in different Slavic groups was observed, with the range from 1.2 and 1.6% in Southern and Western Slavs, respectively, to 1.3 to 5.2% in Eastern Slavs, the Russian population of Eastern Europe. The highest frequency of Mongoloid component was detected in the mitochondrial gene pools of Russian populations from the Russian North and the Northwestern region of Russia. This finding can be explained in terms of assimilation of northern-European Finno--Ugric populations during the formation of the Russian population of these regions. The origin of Mongoloid component in the gene pools of different groups of Slavs is discussed."

Literally 5.2 percent max of mtdna lineages of east eurasians found in russians, and even then regarding autosomal DNA, sure it can correlate with haplogroups but again you ignore the fact that the tend to have extremely minimal east eurasian autosomal DNA and are overwhelmingly far more closer to western europeans with maybe northern russians having a small siberian/east eurasian component, you are twisting facts and bending talking points to fit your view

 

[italianltn]

WHAT DID I DO

You know what you did.

 

[InanimatePragmatist]

Highest tier of whites :
Germanics
Anglo saxons
Scandinavians
Celtics

Fairly White
Northern french
Slavs with high amounts of germanic or anglo saxon dna
some northern italians

"depends on the case"
Slavs with no germanic or anglo saxon admixture can be considered white passing at times.
Meds with high germanic dna

Definitely not white
Finnish people
southern italians
spaniards
portugese
southern french
Slavs with high amounts of asian ancestry
Estonians and other baltics (basically finnish people) with high finnish dna

Brown tier
Albanians
turks
siccilians

Germans will debate on who looks white enough or whatever whilst their borders remain open. Go on about superiority once you earn it back. I am not even sure if you are white yourself, all I know you could be a larper Indian or Pakistani, or some other race.