H
HealthBrahhh
Sri Lankan expat, aka Alexis
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2024
- Posts
- 355
- Reputation
- 300
Let’s consider that mainstream science and history might not be entirely trustworthy. Critics of grains like wheat argue that before the agricultural revolution, hunter-gatherers thrived on diverse diets, while agriculture led to health issues. You need to trust in mainstream history to believe in this civilization shift as the "agricultural revolution" tho. Maybe Chad's ate grains well before 10 000 bc. Maybe there was a demographic replacement? Maybe those same Chad's lived the same thing we are living right now, and their physiologies changed according to certain societal dynamics (current 1900's Chad's vs 2020's soy boys)?
Also, trusting some historical narratives reveals that cultures worldwide have cultivated and enjoyed grains for millennia. Many find grains comforting and delicious, suggesting they hold inherent value. So, while concerns about modern grain consumption exist, the deep-rooted connection between humans and grains cannot be overlooked.
Thoughts?
Also, trusting some historical narratives reveals that cultures worldwide have cultivated and enjoyed grains for millennia. Many find grains comforting and delicious, suggesting they hold inherent value. So, while concerns about modern grain consumption exist, the deep-rooted connection between humans and grains cannot be overlooked.
Thoughts?
Last edited:
