One in 5 british fathers unknowingly raises another man's child

[STAMPEDE]

This explains how Anglos genocided more than 90k Roman settlers since Roman DNA is non-existent in Isles.

This explains how Anglos genocided more than 20k Dane barbarians since Viking DNA is non-existent in Isles. The rest has left the island, never to return.
View attachment 4162973

This explains how Norman influence has faded by the 13th century and how rise of Anglos in 17-18th centuries has nothing to do with it.

This explains why Anglos beat France 2 times and made Pax Britannica to start.

This explains why Anglos destroyed Germany 2 times.

This explains how Anglos wiped all other NA possessions of Dutch, Swedish, French etc.

This explains how Anglos wiped all other East India companies in India and took full control

This explains why Anglos took most valuable lands in Africa

This explains how Anglos took control of major trade routes. Has the best logistics.

This explains how they destroyed Italian in WW2

This explains why Austria had the same fate of Krauts.

This explains how Anglos dominated other European navies (Dutch, Spanish etc.)

This explains how Anglos invented all sports

This explains why Anglos has best universities and institutions

This explains why Anglos has highest scientific and cultural output for last 300 years. (UK still has highest scientific output per capita in Europe. Only Swiss does better but they are 8 million small ass state. Cultural output wise difference is even greater.)

This explains how Anglos has most complex/big service network and markets

This explains why Anglos has/had invented the most. Has the most complex industry for 300 years. (US is by far winner in 2025 but UK still outmatches every other european nation. Invests computer science and AI most, invests aerospace most, has the most satellites, invest mil tech most, has the best high tech scene in Europe, defines industrial standards, defines profession standards etc.
b-b-but Germany produces cars? Its 20th century issue which is unimportant today. US, UK, Canada produced more and higher quality vehicles back then in early 20th century when it was more significant issue, Anglos were fully mechanized when horses was still a thing among German military. JFL. High-end F1 techs are mostly developed in Isles as well.)

This explains why Anglos and their former colonies are financial centers of the world. Two global alpha ++ cities (London and NYC)
Singapore, Hong Kong, Sydney etc.

This explains how Anglos have the most influential media. News to radios, blogposts to tv programmes

This explains why maritime/aviation, finance/trade, high education-profession standards, military/intelligence standards, engineering (telecomms to petrochemistry, computer science to machinery and automation etc.), construction/drilling standards, law, insurance, diplomacy, modern science, medicine, culture (music, tv, movies), consulting, are all domains of Anglos.
These apply for all Anglo nations.

For the last 150 years, even Canada and Australia combination is more important than any other continental european nation. From comms to mining, mechanization to medical industry etc. they contributed humanity more than any other continental european nation. (for last 150 years)

Once again Anglos didn't genocide romans or Vikings in Britain since there no romans or vikings to genocide Romans left the island way before and had no settlers in Britain, only some small number of soldiers. As for Vikings, they had small number of settlers, this is why we see Viking DNA in british people today, you got raped.

And it's ironic how you claim to be Anglo when you're not... you are literally flexing being a rapebaby product of your conquerors... English language is majority Latin, with Latin alphabet, English dna is 85% celtic and a bit of Viking dna from Viking bulls, you have literally nothing of your own and you have to flex your conqueror's stuff like they are your own... So pathetic to see.

As for economy and wars... I don't wanna even talk about it... Germany mogged Britain so hard even when they don't have an empire, British empire fell in less than 50 years and literally went bankrupt during WW2, the fastest time an empire has ever fallen. Turkey raped Britain so hard in WW1 and Japan conquered literally all of your colonies in less than 1 month in WW2, something that took Britain 200 years to do. This made you lose your empire quickly and go bankrupt. The fall of an empire that didn't even last 50 years and got mogged to death both in the battlefield and economically by countries that didn't even have an empire... Example Japan, Germany etc...

And no, once again you're lying and coping so hard, Britain(NOT Anglos like you're claiming) don't have majority of scientists or scientistfic achievements, it's NOT even close in the list...
Britain's vast majority of the wealth in their empire was from India, all of their other colonies were literally empty unhabitated lands, and even with this wealth and empire in their side(literally 90% came from India), they lost so badly and their empire fell in less than 50 years and went bankrupt in WW2.

And no, once again lying, Britain doesn't invent the most shit in Europe, and they definitely don't invent most tech in Europe, their tech industry is literally SHIT, it's so garbage. They're probably not even top 10 in the list. All of their cities, metros, infrastructure, train rails, roads, transportions are more 30-50 years old, they're not capable of building anything new or modern, they're stuck in the past, they're way behind most european and countries all around the world, all of their stuff is old. Britain is the sick old man and joke of Europe.

 

[Ghoulish]

They cope with muh Anglo because they can't accept their majority celtic briton ancestry and don't wanna admit they're the same people that got conquered by every European nation such as romans, normane, french or vikings.

They even made up this “great replacement” type theory that the Anglos had killed everyone and all the modern Brits were Anglo Saxon descendants

“WE WUZ VIKINGS AND GERMANICS SAAR BUT WE WUZ NOT CELTCUCK GAULS SAAR”

 

[prescient]

The British empire, founded by the elites greed for wealth. The elites in question?

The “white ethnic” Norwegians. Still remained the vast majority of the aristocracy through inheritment during the British empire.

Your royal family even…

Sub 70 iq retard. Normans has nothing to do with Anglo's rise in 17th century idiot. With this logic early mesopotamians are responsible of all european heritage. Norman influence faded in Isles by the 13th century which half a millenium ago of Anglo domination of Earth.

Who the fuck cares of European nobles idiot? They are all mixed with each other and success of Anglo's has nothing to do with royal family. Its due to Isles cultural heritage, capitalism, free markets and enterprise etc.

Germanic language btw, with Latin numerals.

Whataboutism #15725

Anglosaxons are Germanic and yea they are more significant, remarkable, important than any other northern european microstate or Krauts.

Latin numerals issue is the same with "mUHh whAT aBoUt NoRMans?" cope. No one gives a fuck about how an ancient local empire influenced them back then. Anglo-Celtic are the reason why Latin numerals are worldwide common, meanwhile all Latin languages are unimportant uncivilized local bullshits.

As i said Anglos took control of globe after 17th century. (There were many rivals at that time mostly in Europe and East Asia) Who tf cares of how Romans influenced others back in the day when they had no significant rival at all. All tribes and small microstates.

Also half those images are wrong lmao allies did NOT do half did NOT make only 4% of casualties

Yes they actually did more than half maybe like 80 percent. Anglos saved Soviets asses with aids and tech transfer as well.

During World War II, two-thirds of the explosives produced by the entire Soviet Armed Forces, including gunpowder, were manufactured thanks to hundreds of thousands of tons of TNT, nitroglycerin, toluene, and related materials provided by the US under the Lend-Lease program.

Allied aid compared to USSR production

55% of aviation fuel (higher octane as well)
108% of canned meat
66% of sugar
107% of penicillin and animal fats
56.5% of railroad tracks
240% of railcars
1020% of locomotives (I'm not kidding)
and 160% of motor vehicles (while the USSR produced 265,000 motor vehicles between 1939 and 1945, Lend-Lease provided 427,000).
76% of copper,
106% of aluminum,
223% of tin,
and all materials equivalent to 138% of cobalt were supplied to the USSR by the US through the Lend-Lease program.

In addition, thousands of aircraft radars and cockpit targeting systems were also provided. In fact, after World War II, the Soviets copied and used K-14 "computing" sights, which were provided through Lend-Lease, without a license in their MiG jets instead of the ASP-1N sights.

Furthermore, 260-ton giant forging machines were delivered to factories relocated to the Ural Mountains.

In 1924, there were 1,000 tractors in use in rural Russia, while in 1933 there were 200,000 tractors.

More than 85 percent of them came from the US.
American engineers and architects built 500 factories in the Soviet Union.
The tractor factory in Stalingrad, which was converted into a tank factory, was established under American supervision by Detroit companies and 380 American personnel who were transferred there.

The Allies supplied the Soviets with more

railroad tracks, aviation fuel, canned meat, penicillin and animal fats, copper, wagons, locomotives, trucks, aluminum, canvas, radio stations, wool, gunpowder, tin, cobalt, nitroglycerin, aircraft radar, boats, cargo transport machines, and TNT than the Soviets produced themselves.

"the UK sent £308 million in munitions (not including the cost of battleships, destroyers and submarines), and £120 million in other supplies, food and raw materials, roughly £30 billion in today’s money. This included 5,000 tanks and 7,000 aircraft, while public charitable donations provided approximately £5.3 million (roughly £490 million in today’s money) in medical stores."

"Alongside weapons and raw materials the UK also supplied key sensors, 293 sonar suites and almost 2,000 radar sets, enabling Soviet warships and aircraft to operate more effectively (and providing the basis for post-war Soviet technologies). Machine tools and electrical equipment were also sent in significant quantities, along with key raw materials which Britain could source globally – tin and rubber, coffee and tea being obvious – along with vital metals and ores from the Dominions and Commonwealth."

Soviet aids to Allies is negligible compared to vice versa.

Deep dive in WW2 history or stay retarded.

In Western front Anglos had less casualty even they were on the advancing/attacking side.

Left is UK, US, Canada
Right is Germany

The US is an Anglo-Celtic country founded by the British, has common law, uses imperial units, and has institutions, organizations, and a service sector most similar to other Anglophone countries. Culturally, it resembles other Anglophone countries such as Canada, Australia, and the UK.

From its universities and newspapers to its industrialization history and its legal system, it resembles other Anglophone countries in every way.

Those who brought the United States to its current status; its scientists, inventors, merchants, engineers, and politicians are overwhelmingly of British descent. The largest population in the US is British, with 110 million inhabitants (most demographers consider this a serious undercount, due to the points I will discuss shortly). There are also approximately 40-45 million Germans (inflated numbers, applies all non-Isles European heritage since they are minority).

The remaining Europeans are negligible compared to these two.

1) Percentage. %80 Brit %20 German guy counts both on paper but he is more of Brit. (Therefore inflated German heritage)

2) Exoticness. In US people tend to say even their %5 non-Isles heritage because being Isles descent is default among whites.
(Again inflated continental european heritage)

3) War of 1812 like events. Early anti-britain ideologies.

In the north east it is 65%. Throughout England the average is 80% with it being far higher in the south west.

Nope.
I have already read many papers, researches on this issue. They say 65 Celtic, 35 Anglosaxon across the England.

Raped cavemen the hardest yes

I have already explained above how they dominated other Euros above. Read it.

always needed many other equally or more powerful allies to aid you

In 100 percent of the cases Anglos are main characters on their side.
-Seven years wars,
-1815,
-WW1 (American and British combined but latecoming american forces changed the stagnant situation in west, Australians in middle east etc.)
-WW2 (American, British, Canadian and Australian)

Second World War was an embarrassing steamroll by the Germans during the battle of France.

It's such an early stage that Anglophones haven't even completed their recruitment, moron. You dont win the match when you score first. Simple logic.

US saved your asses with the planes and resources during the Battle of Britain.

Yea US helped but,

Britain was already doing better with mechanization/automation, sources, logistics, telecomms, radars, sonars, intelligence, medicine, artillery, control engineering, imaging/mapping/positioning/targeting/navigation systems etc. you ignorant.

(British planes was way more durable than German ones in each parameter, from engine durability to maintenance lol, British aircrafts had more complex, developed radars than German land based radars which is hilarious)

Main planes in battle of britain was british ones.

Germans accomplished nothing with air raids but wasted many sources, in later stages Britain outmatched Germany in each production parameter. They were already doing better in most parameters even from the start.

And im not British nor American. Im just telling what i observe and learn after all these reading, searching and stuff. I do not cope. You shouldnt either.

 

[VV62]

English people make Albanians their slaves, COPE.

Brit's biggest achievement is beating up american natives who fought with sticks btw

 

[prescient]

You britishcels always cope with muh "but you're speaking in english" don't you retarded britishcels realise that the English language is majority 60% Latin? You're literally flexing being a rapebaby product of Latins, Normans and Vikings who shaped your empire today...
View attachment 4163826
Majority of your language is Latin and yet you flex being a rapebaby, it's sad to see the cope of britishcels... Oh, not to mention that your alphabet is Latin too... you have nothing of your own and had to use things of your conqueror.
2. Oh, and Britishcels are not "Anglo" they're far from it. They cope with muh Anglo because they can't accept their majority celtic briton ancestry and don't wanna admit they're the same people that got conquered by every European nation such as romans, normane, french or vikings.

First im NOT british nor colonist/native speaker retard.

I have already replied above to @Ghoulish with "Latin" and "Anglo" issues.
Go read related part.

Modern Anglo term does NOT mean Anglo-Saxon tribes you ignorant retard.

It means post 16th century Anglophone heritage/influence which originated in England.

Both in Isles and former Isles dominant colonies.

I cant believe how you morons cant get simple logic.

Roman settlers, Viking raiders are either defeated/genocided and the rest are forced to leave island. This explains why Roman, Viking DNA is non-existent in Isles.

They are mostly Celtic with some Anglo which i already explained above.

Norman influence has faded by the 13th century you retard. What Normans and their nobles have to do with 17th century rise of Anglos?

All you retards know is whataboutism/logical fallacies.

 

[Luquier]

Sub 70 iq retard. Normans has nothing to do with Anglo's rise in 17th century idiot. With this logic early mesopotamians are responsible of all european heritage. Norman influence faded in Isles by the 13th century which half a millenium ago of Anglo domination of Earth.

Disagree, Norman kings were responsible for centralising power and favouring commoner bureacrats/soldiers and urban business owners over the nobility. Without them Britain would enter into modernity as some weak feudal shithole and get mogged

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

View attachment 4162550
Slavs are the ones that cuck Germanic cucks

Yeah through raping Slavic women

 

[high_ltn]

over for british brah if youre not david gandy

mirin pfp yet again

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Theyre not even Germanic lmao 80% celtic on average they were just raped by Germans (Anglo Saxons) so are part German

English are literally 60-80% Germanic on avg with only equal amounts in the north west (due to Irish and Welsh immigration to places like Manchester and Liverpool)


So the English are basically fully Germanic with some Brythonic admixture

And considering the south of England is literally 80%+ Germanic and genes and they are the ones that control the country the entirely of Britain is ruled by London yeah needless to say the English are Germanic

 

[STAMPEDE]

Yeah through raping Slavic women

Dude, Are you even reading the source? It literally says Germans have paternal ancesry, meaning Slavs raped German women, and Germans have Slavic paternal ancestry from Slavic fathers side.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

View attachment 4164235
Dude, Are you even reading the source? It literally says Germans have paternal ancesry, meaning Slavs raped German women, and Germans have Slavic paternal ancestry from Slavic fathers side.

or maybe or maybe…. Eastern Germany is greater SlavLand but the germanics cucked the Slavs and stole that land from bartosh.

Maybe jsut maybe that’s what really happened now. Still doesn’t matter Slavs are the only cumskins that will exist once the great replacement finishes

 

[MiserableMan]

Once again Anglos didn't genocide romans or Vikings in Britain since there no romans or vikings to genocide Romans left the island way before and had no settlers in Britain, only some small number of soldiers. As for Vikings, they had small number of settlers, this is why we see Viking DNA in british people today, you got raped.

And it's ironic how you claim to be Anglo when you're not... you are literally flexing being a rapebaby product of your conquerors... English language is majority Latin, with Latin alphabet, English dna is 85% celtic and a bit of Viking dna from Viking bulls, you have literally nothing of your own and you have to flex your conqueror's stuff like they are your own... So pathetic to see.

As for economy and wars... I don't wanna even talk about it... Germany mogged Britain so hard even when they don't have an empire, British empire fell in less than 50 years and literally went bankrupt during WW2, the fastest time an empire has ever fallen. Turkey raped Britain so hard in WW1 and Japan conquered literally all of your colonies in less than 1 month in WW2, something that took Britain 200 years to do. This made you lose your empire quickly and go bankrupt. The fall of an empire that didn't even last 50 years and got mogged to death both in the battlefield and economically by countries that didn't even have an empire... Example Japan, Germany etc...

And no, once again you're lying and coping so hard, Britain(NOT Anglos like you're claiming) don't have majority of scientists or scientistfic achievements, it's NOT even close in the list...
Britain's vast majority of the wealth in their empire was from India, all of their other colonies were literally empty unhabitated lands, and even with this wealth and empire in their side(literally 90% came from India), they lost so badly and their empire fell in less than 50 years and went bankrupt in WW2.

And no, once again lying, Britain doesn't invent the most shit in Europe, and they definitely don't invent most tech in Europe, their tech industry is literally SHIT, it's so garbage. They're probably not even top 10 in the list. All of their cities, metros, infrastructure, train rails, roads, transportions are more 30-50 years old, they're not capable of building anything new or modern, they're stuck in the past, they're way behind most european and countries all around the world, all of their stuff is old. Britain is the sick old man and joke of Europe.

Funny thing is they couldn't even conquer India with force either, these superior Anglo saxons lost 2 wars to a dying Maratha empire and had to relay on the sikhs and nepalis and Hadiar Ali to defeat them. "MUH WE WUz WARRIARZZZ SAAR" Brits have almost never won any land wars with someone of equal capabilities.

 

[STAMPEDE]

or maybe or maybe…. Eastern Germany is greater SlavLand but the germanics cucked the Slavs and stole that land from bartosh.

Maybe jsut maybe that’s what really happened now. Still doesn’t matter Slavs are the only cumskins that will exist once the great replacement finishes

It literally doesn't matter. Germans have Slavic paternal ancestry from Slavic males, meaning Germans are the ones who got cucked and raped by Slavic bulls.

 

[AustrianMogger]

Imagine if you are the chad and creampie 500 wives and let cucks raise them jfl.

But yes personally always demand dna test. if they dont deny everything before courte

 

[AustrianMogger]

It literally doesn't matter. Germans have Slavic paternal ancestry from Slavic males, meaning Germans are the ones who got cucked and raped by Slavic bulls.

water its from subhumans during ww2 that raped prussia and killed tje rightous men living their. Russians, the soviets or slavs. Whatever you call them are despicable creatures that need ro be put down.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

It literally doesn't matter. Germans have Slavic paternal ancestry from Slavic males, meaning Germans are the ones who got cucked and raped by Slavic bulls.

Or as I said they were jsut conquered Slavs in eastern Germany the same way Ethiopia has a large segment of Somalis in the south eastern region.

That’s what most likely happened. Eastern “Germans” aren’t Germans but are instead conquered Slavs who have been Germanised

 

[prescient]

Once again Anglos didn't genocide romans or Vikings in Britain since there no romans or vikings to genocide Romans left the island way before and had no settlers in Britain, only some small number of soldiers. As for Vikings, they had small number of settlers, this is why we see Viking DNA in british people today, you got raped.

Holy douchebaggery. You dont know shit about Britain history and yet dare to ramble about it.

British people today are mainly Anglo-Celtic mixtures. Viking DNA is no more than 2-3 percent nationwide thanks to genocide of more than 20.000 vikings.

@Ghoulish
Celtics overall are more significant in course of humanity than Germanics (Kraut, Scandicuck mainly, excluding Anglo)

There are 1627883 times more Celtic descent innovators, inventors, scientists in US, UK, Canada, Australia etc.

Meanwhile Scandicucks are worthless peasants. Only Germans contributed some but not all of them are Germanic as well, they are a gigamutt nation which sits in Central Europe.

Still they come far behind after US, UK, Canada+Australia, France in terms of scientific output, inventions, innovations etc.

And it's ironic how you claim to be Anglo when you're not... you are literally flexing being a rapebaby product of your conquerors... English language is majority Latin, with Latin alphabet, English dna is 85% celtic and a bit of Viking dna from Viking bulls, you have literally nothing of your own and you have to flex your conqueror's stuff like they are your own... So pathetic to see.

Already explained above. Read it.

Germany mogged Britain so hard even when they don't have an empire, British empire fell in less than 50 years and literally went bankrupt during WW2, the fastest time an empire has ever fallen. Turkey raped Britain so hard in WW1 and Japan conquered literally all of your colonies in less than 1 month in WW2, something that took Britain 200 years to do. This made you lose your empire quickly and go bankrupt. The fall of an empire that didn't even last 50 years and got mogged to death both in the battlefield and economically by countries that didn't even have an empire... Example Japan, Germany etc...

Complete opposite and explained in detail above. When war starts British were already superior in most parameters and in later stages they got better in ALL parameters from ammunitions to g-suits, artilleries to chemicals, mechanization/automation to aircraft engines (Jet designs were experimental during ww2 and poor krauts tried their chance and failed hard. British and Americans had examples at that time as well but they never mass produce since these were unreliable. Germans couldnt provide enough fuel and explosives to these jet aircrafts. Prime example of poor source management)

Main reason why British Empire dissolves is not the WW2 but "globalization". All other European empires lost their overseas lands in interwar and post war era. Its not a British specific thing. All European colonies eventually gained independence.

Still British created Canada, Australia, New Zealand which is "commonwealth" you know.

Turkey didnt rape anyone. They lost all fronts except Gallipoli. And in Gallipoli they were fighting 4 percent of all ww1 British forces with most of their potential. British commanders requested more aids/troops but Britain lost interest in Gallipoli over time mainly due to it wasnt as significant/important as other major routes/fronts of middle east. Still Turks fought better in Gallipoli than Brits expected.

Turks were barely providing sources, munitions and stuff to Gallipoli. And they got one of the worst defeats of 20th century in other middle east fronts since they couldnt provide logistics here.

Japan only conquered Malaysia and Myanmar. Its not such a surprise since England is thousands of miles away. Not rocket science but basic logistics and stuff you retard.

Japanese imperialism wasnt something like British imperialism retard. They do not invest and benefit here like British did. They mostly killed civilians and damaged these places. British imperialism and Japanese imperialism have nothing in common you retard.

You cant even get British and Japanese aims and say "Muhh it took British 200 years but japanese 1 year" Again you proved how ignorant you are. Moron really compares all out attack with soft power projecting.

Japan and Germany were empires at that time you ignorant and i have already explained before how US and UK was most developed in every aspect from medicine to control engineering, intelligence to petrochemistry, mining to maintenance, services to markets etc. Even Australia and Canada were doing better in most parameters than axis from telecomms to motorized vehicles, medical industry to logistics etc.

Its all whataboutism and logical fallacies here. I waste my time explaining all basic stuff here to you ignorant coping basement dwellers.

Do some further reading, searches etc. or stay ignorant forever.

And no, once again you're lying and coping so hard, Britain(NOT Anglos like you're claiming) don't have majority of scientists or scientistfic achievements, it's NOT even close in the list...
Britain's vast majority of the wealth in their empire was from India, all of their other colonies were literally empty unhabitated lands, and even with this wealth and empire in their side(literally 90% came from India), they lost so badly and their empire fell in less than 50 years and went bankrupt in WW2.

And no, once again lying, Britain doesn't invent the most shit in Europe, and they definitely don't invent most tech in Europe, their tech industry is literally SHIT, it's so garbage. They're probably not even top 10 in the list. All of their cities, metros, infrastructure, train rails, roads, transportions are more 30-50 years old, they're not capable of building anything new or modern, they're stuck in the past, they're way behind most european and countries all around the world, all of their stuff is old. Britain is the sick old man and joke of Europe.

Ignorance is bliss. Full of copes, cliches, shit retarded stuff.

Enough with your retarded opinions and stuff im tired of explaining shit. Either educate yourself or stay retarded forever.

Belgium, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark are even worse than US which has population of 330 million, let alone UK.

This explains why London metro ranked higher than Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Berlin etc. metro.

This explains why UK ranked more or less same with any other Western nation, infrastructure wise. UK does better than Norway, Sweden, Belgium, Italy, Finland etc. in most indexes.
Some stats say UK does better compared to Switzerland, France, South Korea, Sweden, Netherlands as well. So UK is not any worse than other developed nations.

These city indexes are mostly nonsense. Canada, Australia, Swiss dominates usually.
6 of 11 cities being Anglo is such irony here.

US, UK, Germany, France, Netherlands, Italy Spain, Belgium etc. never make top 10. You either need to be small ass Euro state or former Anglo colony to make it top 10.

"Most liveable cities" indexes do not depict reality and are bullshit in general. They miss actual important parameters like opportunities, services, universities/jobs etc.

UK railway quality is same with Netherlands, France. UK does better than Luxembourg, Spain, Norway, Belgium, Italy, Ireland etc.
Only Germany does better than UK and some 5 million populated microstates.

UK
-has best tech scene in europe,
-has most scientific output in europe,
-has by far the most cultural output in Europe (all the rest combined comes behind lol)
-has best universities and institutions in Europe
-invests most in 21st century issues like computer science, AI, aerospace etc. among all European nations
-has one of two financial centers in world
-defines profession standards, has most effective organizations in any field from medicine to construction, intelligence to sports, law to geography etc.
-most modern complex mega constructions are designed in London.

Thanks to curries, they shared their mining techs/abilities with England to them produce 16 times more coal in england than strongest rival France did in France. (1814-1815)

You retards never ask this question to yourself: "Why England is the one who conquered the most but not the others?" England was not powerful because of Indian wealth but vice versa. England was powerful because they wiped out others in imperialism race since England was best in all fields; ship designs to coal mining, naval artilleries/firearms to power plants. They beat all other Europeans in these fields and this way they took all wealth in India.

After the US, UK contributed most to humanity. There is no such country close to them.
Some Japanese scientific journal was saying that UK is responsible for 40 percent of all accomplishments of humanity.

And US is basically "British Empire v2" with more guns and no monarchy which is located across the ocean. They became hyperpower thanks to Isles industrial/scientific/cultural heritage and ideologies.

You guys hate both US and UK since they cucked you all. They destroyed your ancestors in each field. Still they own all your unimportant european microstates and ethnic lands. You all express your hate here in English. Hilarious.

 

[prescient]

Without them Britain would enter into modernity as some weak feudal shithole and get mogged

Wrong reasoning and assumptions.
"What if?" is not how you handle history. At this time Norway, Sweden etc. were not feudal shitholes even if they have never been in direct contact with other centralized powers.

Britain's rise in 17-18th century is more about cultural heritage, capitalism, free markets and enterprise.

There is a huge difference between 13th century England (when there were little to none Norman influence left) and 18th century England.

These are half millenium apart.