One of the most retarded things i've read on this site.

A disorder isn't a gene. It's not beside the point, as it is literally my point.
Stop blaming the abstract concept of ''genetics'' for being ugly. I know more than you it seems.

yes son. Genes is just something created by evil whitey. Everything is completely down to environment.

E86FE573 A036 4C48 AA70 C44FDF770E11
9B795260 82B9 4235 8173 F5839F0B5F0A


I’m sure if you raised these two in the exact same environment these men would look identical to eachother
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zercic
A disorder isn't a gene. It's not beside the point, as it is literally my point.
Did you really think it was meant to be an exact statement? Obviously I don't know if it's 40% on the dot. Also, what I'm saying is scientifically true. Stop blaming the abstract concept of ''genetics'' for being ugly. I know more than you it seems.
It wasn't about it being 40% on the dot but what the statement was.
Saying any % of looks are environment or genetics is dumb because looks are your genes expressed in a given environment
It's not like if you just have environment you will be 60% good looking, there will be no looks.
to have looks you need both genes and environment.

What you mean to say is that genetics account for 40% of the variance of attractiveness, so it's like okay what data set are we using here, if it's the west then you are undoubtedly wrong.

"Stop blaming the abstract concept of ''genetics'' for being ugly."
post your face and you can do a mog battle against this mouthbreathing subhuman
 
yes son. Genes is just something created by evil whitey. Everything is completely down to environment.

View attachment 493926View attachment 493927

I’m sure if you raised these two in the exact same environment these men would look identical to eachother
I like how you ignored me saying race is a part where genetics are everything, retard.

1593953749274

This abo guy mogs 90% of european men in sex appeal tbh btw
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Lynx and Aesthetics_III
It wasn't about it being 40% on the dot but what the statement was.
Saying any % of looks are environment or genetics is dumb because looks are your genes expressed in a given environment
It's not like if you just have environment you will be 60% good looking, there will be no looks.
to have looks you need both genes and environment.

What you mean to say is that genetics account for 40% of the variance of attractiveness, so it's like okay what data set are we using here, if it's the west then you are undoubtedly wrong.

"Stop blaming the abstract concept of ''genetics'' for being ugly."
post your face and you can do a mog battle against this mouthbreathing subhuman
When did I ever imply this is not the case? Environment clearly shapes how your genes are expressed, massively. There's no way to be ''60% good looking''.

That is just another way of saying what I was saying. Also, no I'm not wrong about the west.

No one should post their face in public here.
 
yes son. Race, which determines your bone structure, is completely down to genetics. But looks? Nah the heritability for that is 40%.
1593954092231

Race doesn't determine your bone structure.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Inscol
80% genetics 20 % enviroment
 
When did I ever imply this is not the case?
when you said that looks are 40% genetic.
That statement doesn't make sense, no matter what number you put in there.

we can do the mog battle in private with a set few trusted members, I haven't posted my face publicly either
 
Bones are %100 genetics. Its over.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 2157

Similar threads

g4rlic
Replies
7
Views
47
оrg
оrg
iamnotaracist
Replies
0
Views
11
iamnotaracist
iamnotaracist
tallcel
Replies
13
Views
108
rennick333
rennick333
Big Boss
Replies
14
Views
114
g4rlic
g4rlic
dragomog
Replies
3
Views
34
Ozchyn
Ozchyn

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top