one thing i truly learned about beauty standards

[Deleted member 23359]

is that they can't be changed

the same people telling you hooked noses are beatiful are the same one getting rhinos

 

[Deleted member 14693]

They changed over time

 

[Deleted member 21182]

They changed over time

An attractive face 500 years ago would be attractive today

Beauty standards don’t change

Ofc some things like hair and clothes do but girls have always liked lean muscular tan men

Ppl cope with muh in the 1700s it was better to be chubby and pale because it showed you were rich and attracted women but that was only because of stability

Women always would cheat of the tan lean muscular gardener

 

[Deleted member 23359]

They changed over time

how so

trends may come and go but the root has never changed, well developed bone structure and tall height and small noses were always what humans desired

 

[HumidVent]

Saying looks are subjective or beauty standard vary across time and culture is 100% bullshit.

Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review - PubMed

Common maxims about beauty suggest that attractiveness is not important in life. In contrast, both fitness-related evolutionary theory and socialization theory suggest that attractiveness influences development and interaction. In 11 meta-analyses, the authors evaluate these contradictory...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

"In 11 meta-analyses, the authors evaluate these contradictory claims, demonstrating that (a) raters agree about who is and is not attractive, both within and across cultures; (b) attractive children and adults are judged more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; (c) attractive children and adults are treated more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; and (d) attractive children and adults exhibit more positive behaviors and traits than unattractive children and adults. Results are used to evaluate social and fitness-related evolutionary theories and the veracity of maxims about beauty."

 

[Deleted member 14693]

An attractive face 500 years ago would be attractive today

Beauty standards don’t change

Ofc some things like hair and clothes do but girls have always liked lean muscular tan men

Ppl cope with muh in the 1700s it was better to be chubby and pale because it showed you were rich and attracted women but that was only because of stability

Women always would cheat of the tan lean muscular gardener

Whenever I look at the slayers of ancient time they look ugly as fuck

 

[whitepilled4life]

yes, they don't change. a cro magnon 10000 years ago is still what women consider attractive today.

 

[whitepilled4life]

robust skull, fair skin, dark brown/black hair, tall lanky with less/medium muscles and big shoulders.

 

[Deleted member 23558]

robust skull,light brown skin,dark brown/black hair, tall lanky with less/medium muscles and big shoulders.

 

[Pendejo]

Saying looks are subjective or beauty standard vary across time and culture is 100% bullshit.

Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review - PubMed

Common maxims about beauty suggest that attractiveness is not important in life. In contrast, both fitness-related evolutionary theory and socialization theory suggest that attractiveness influences development and interaction. In 11 meta-analyses, the authors evaluate these contradictory...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

"In 11 meta-analyses, the authors evaluate these contradictory claims, demonstrating that (a) raters agree about who is and is not attractive, both within and across cultures; (b) attractive children and adults are judged more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; (c) attractive children and adults are treated more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; and (d) attractive children and adults exhibit more positive behaviors and traits than unattractive children and adults. Results are used to evaluate social and fitness-related evolutionary theories and the veracity of maxims about beauty."

JFL at this incel cope, beauty is subjective, if I posted a cute black girl niggas here would be like “muh subhuman sheboon ape, 2/10” meanwhile I would find her good looking, and then they would post some mid panface gook and act like she is a goddess.

 

[Nick.Harte]

An attractive face 500 years ago would be attractive today

Beauty standards don’t change

Ofc some things like hair and clothes do but girls have always liked lean muscular tan men

Ppl cope with muh in the 1700s it was better to be chubby and pale because it showed you were rich and attracted women but that was only because of stability

Women always would cheat of the tan lean muscular gardener

This

 

[Seth Walsh]

Whenever I look at the slayers of ancient time they look ugly as fuck

Nope. Beauty standards have always been the same. Tall lean young good skin with fluffy hair. Style (baggy, nt, chains and rings)

Long limbs, v taper, veiny hands and arms, forward growth, good symmetry

TikTok only unveiled the truth I can go further back than 1501-1504 and find TikTok prettyboy evidence. Can go back to BC even.