Only 10% of people are MTN, You just don’t understand percentages

prolarper

prolarper

6’4 gymcel
Joined
Feb 16, 2025
Posts
3,743
Reputation
4,435
For reference 10% of people is 1 in 10, That isnt rare at all but on paper 10% sounds uncommon. MTN+ is only around 10% of the general population including all age ranges, just go outside and look, Most people are LTN- >MTN. 1 in 10 people is not rare at all. Also in this case there’s visibility bias, you are more likely to notice and remember attractive people also attractive people tend to group up together.



(Idk if the link is working, here’s the vid)
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: EthiopianMaxxer, D02, Luquier and 6 others
For reference 10% of people is 1 in 10, That isnt rare at all but on paper 10% sounds uncommon. MTN+ is only around 10% of the general population including all age ranges, just go outside and look, Most people are LTN- >MTN. 1 in 10 people is not rare at all. Also in this case there’s also visibility bias, you are more likely to notice and remember attractive people also attractive people tend to group up together.

some niggas genuinely think MTN is average
 
  • +1
Reactions: Luquier, davidlaidisme67, gioscottist and 6 others
some niggas genuinely think MTN is average
They’re still using some outdated graph which says that CL-chad is 2% of people😂😂 Its like they don’t go outside and see the average person it ltn
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Luquier, princeof316, NVM_Ignacio and 5 others
im a retarded greycel that doesnt understand anything so i just use percentile
 
  • +1
Reactions: primal_shitmuncher
DNR Booty
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: lucifer6969, ceasar3x, D02 and 6 others
I fucking hate this ranking system because it is so subjective, why did niggas ruin it and started using it as only a looks measuring tool, it was better off just being a very simple way to catalogue someones status+looks inside a school

PSL and 1 - 10 mog, or just normally saying deformed, ugly, avg looking, hot ugly, attractive and very attractive

I find it funny that because of how flawed this scale is you guys never seem to be able to settle things down, and are always debating on it :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
Reactions: EthiopianMaxxer, Divineincel, DarkAscender and 5 others
For reference 10% of people is 1 in 10, That isnt rare at all but on paper 10% sounds uncommon. MTN+ is only around 10% of the general population including all age ranges, just go outside and look, Most people are LTN- >MTN. 1 in 10 people is not rare at all. Also in this case there’s also visibility bias, you are more likely to notice and remember attractive people also attractive people tend to group up together.



(Idk if the link is working, here’s the vid)
View attachment 5221668

More common among younger people
 
  • +1
Reactions: primal_shitmuncher and prolarper
I fucking hate this ranking system because it is so subjective, why did niggas ruin it and started using it as only a looks measuring tool, it was better off just being a very simple way to catalogue someones status+looks inside a school

PSL and 1 - 10 mog, or just normally saying deformed, ugly, avg looking, hot ugly, attractive and very attractive

I find it funny that because of how flawed this scale is you guys never seem to be able to settle things down, and are always debating on it :forcedsmile:
Are you on ur period or something? Ur literally saying nothing of substance but complaints. Why the fuck would we include “status” in school environments for a face rating?
 
  • +1
Reactions: primal_shitmuncher
im a retarded greycel that doesnt understand anything so i just use percentile
This is what I mean when I say greys be submissive.

And ur blue technically
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: EthiopianMaxxer, pleasevanity, primal_shitmuncher and 1 other person
It stands for mid tier normie. You new niggas changed the definition
I agree people changed the definition but going off what “MTN” means now facially, it’s nowhere near average. Like some who gets rated MTN doesn’t have a face of 1 out of 2 people (50%), its much closer to a 1 out of 10 people face
 
  • +1
Reactions: primal_shitmuncher and HtnceI
Agreed should be water
 
  • +1
Reactions: primal_shitmuncher and prolarper
Are you on ur period or something? Ur literally saying nothing of substance but complaints. Why the fuck would we include “status” in school environments for a face rating?
Legit retard, "normie" "chad" "stacy" "becky", these were stereotypical ways to catalogue someones status which we know depended on looks in your school, chad being your archetypical jock and stacy being your avg hot white cheerleader slut, are you 12? or just that dumb

Again it is funny how yall will never come to an agreement on this "looks" measurement scale and by posting this you prove it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Divineincel
They’re still using some outdated graph which says that CL-chad is 2% of people😂😂 Its like they don’t go outside and see the average person it ltn
They fail to understand that 1/50 are not Cl, they have litteraly never seen a Cl in their entire lives
 
  • +1
Reactions: Luquier and primal_shitmuncher
'89% of people have a recessed maxilla'

Flight Wtf GIF
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: diditeverbegin and prolarper
Legit retard, "normie" "chad" "stacy" "becky", these were stereotypical ways to catalogue someones status which we know depended on looks in your school, chad being your archetypical jock and stacy being your avg hot white cheerleader slut, are you 12? or just that dumb

Again it is funny how yall will never come to an agreement on this "looks" measurement scale and by posting this you prove it
It’s obviously changed since then you old man, I’m talking about face ratings dumbass. Also I’m just sharing my view, obviously there will never be an agreement because there’s no objective scale. You just want to complain.
 
  • +1
Reactions: primal_shitmuncher
Mtn is avg
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: D02 and ICXCLuvr
For reference 10% of people is 1 in 10, That isnt rare at all but on paper 10% sounds uncommon. MTN+ is only around 10% of the general population including all age ranges, just go outside and look, Most people are LTN- >MTN. 1 in 10 people is not rare at all. Also in this case there’s also visibility bias, you are more likely to notice and remember attractive people also attractive people tend to group up together.



(Idk if the link is working, here’s the vid)
View attachment 5221668

This is true but your concept of ratings is wrong, not because about that rate u once gave me, I dont hold guts about it, but u sent me some guy telling me he was hhtn and that guy was just mtn.

For example Id say I never see nobody better looking than me just facially and truly Im like lhtn
 
  • +1
Reactions: prolarper
This is true but your concept of ratings is wrong, not because about that rate u once gave me, I dont hold guts about it, but u sent me some guy telling me he was hhtn and that guy was just mtn.

For example Id say I never see nobody better looking than me just facially and truly Im like lhtn
U not lhtn nigger
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: D02 and NVM_Ignacio
I agree people changed the definition but going off what “MTN” means now facially, it’s nowhere near average. Like some who gets rated MTN doesn’t have a face of 1 out of 2 people (50%), its much closer to a 1 out of 10 people face
Well I’m forever old school
 
  • +1
Reactions: prolarper
Average would mean you see an MTN in 1 of 2 faces. Just go outside and you’ll see it’s not the case, it’s closer to 1 out of 10 people.
I see mtns everywhere nig
 
This is true but your concept of ratings is wrong, not because about that rate u once gave me, I dont hold guts about it, but u sent me some guy telling me he was hhtn and that guy was just mtn.

For example Id say I never see nobody better looking than me just facially and truly Im like lhtn
Yh people do say I underrate a lot so I’ll take some accountability there, but i agree would see someone like you very rarely. I feel like people overrate how common these ratings are because they’re not noticing average people who are usually LTN
 
  • +1
Reactions: NVM_Ignacio
I see mtns everywhere nig
Again, 1 in 10 people is enough to see them a lot, also visibility bias, attractive people tend to stay in the same groups/environments and your brain is more likely to filter out average-below average people.
 
Again, 1 in 10 people is enough to see them a lot, also visibility bias, attractive people tend to stay in the same groups/environments and your brain is more likely to filter out average-below average people.
blah blah blah mtn is avg
 
Yh people do say I underrate a lot so I’ll take some accountability there, but i agree would see someone like you very rarely. I feel like people overrate how common these ratings are because they’re not noticing average people who are usually LTN
oh no I dont think u underrated me tho, I think hmtn is possible but I feel like Im lhtn to mhtn in the best pics or vids I got, so yeah lhtn seems like a good rating and u were around there.

But yeah its common to underrate or overrate, at the end of the day u can just put it in a scale like "below average-average-above average-really above average-chad"
Some shit like that:feelskek:
Id say Im between above average and really above average to where I live so that may influence on what I consider my rating is, also if we have in count Im like 7 inches taller than the average height here it also plays a big role
 
  • +1
Reactions: D02 and prolarper
It’s obviously changed since then you old man, I’m talking about face ratings dumbass. Also I’m just sharing my view, obviously there will never be an agreement because there’s no objective scale. You just want to complain.
If there is no objective way to scale looks then why even try to build a defined ranking? what does it serve you for?

you are more likely to notice and remember attractive people also attractive people tend to group up together.
Not only irl, social media blows up people with attractive faces, which in part explains why bitches think the average man is 6'2 WASP Jock who can slay any HTB in college, because that is what her fyp shows her.

MTN+ is only around 10% of the general population including all age ranges,
Based on what?

just go outside and look
Outside where, Connecticut? Sao Paulo? Madhubani?

Most people are LTN- >MTN
Based on what?

This is your experience, doesn't mean its wrong, for your POV it is as objective as it can get

I legit have never got a good answer regarding how does it help you, to know your position on the sub 5 -> chad ranking, or even in the PSL scale, just using normal terms is legit better, there is no fucking need to try and mathematically measure someones attractiveness, if you're ugly you get surgery, end of story, you join the forum, you study about dentofacial deformities and its correlations to facial aesthetics, you evaluate your case with a couple of surgeons, you get your money up, you save up, and you get shit done, people here do many mental gymnastics about this thing

Similar pathway should be followed by anyone neurodivergent or short but those are much less complicated and more straightforward about approach (nd not simple, but the pathway to combat its cons is with a psychiatrist or neurologist)
 
shit thread u dumb autist
 
  • JFL
Reactions: D02
some niggas genuinely think MTN is average
They’re still using some outdated graph which says that CL-chad is 2% of people😂😂 Its like they don’t go outside and see the average person it ltn
MTN is the average healthy prime age guy, not considering the obese balding boomers/uncs ofc

And yeah chad in PSL forums has a different meaning than originally. Back then chad was just "the hot guys in the school/campus", you didnt need to mog prime Pitt to be considered chad like in current BP forums
 
  • +1
Reactions: lucifer6969
If there is no objective way to scale looks then why even try to build a defined ranking? what does it serve you for?


Not only irl, social media blows up people with attractive faces, which in part explains why bitches think the average man is 6'2 WASP Jock who can slay any HTB in college, because that is what her fyp shows her.


Based on what?


Outside where, Connecticut? Sao Paulo? Madhubani?


Based on what?

This is your experience, doesn't mean its wrong, for your POV it is as objective as it can get

I legit have never got a good answer regarding how does it help you, to know your position on the sub 5 -> chad ranking, or even in the PSL scale, just using normal terms is legit better, there is no fucking need to try and mathematically measure someones attractiveness, if you're ugly you get surgery, end of story, you join the forum, you study about dentofacial deformities and its correlations to facial aesthetics, you evaluate your case with a couple of surgeons, you get your money up, you save up, and you get shit done, people here do many mental gymnastics about this thing

Similar pathway should be followed by anyone neurodivergent or short but those are much less complicated and more straightforward about approach (nd not simple, but the pathway to combat its cons is with a psychiatrist or neurologist)
Dnr, keep bumping my thread boy
 
more friends than u lonely autist indian with 3k posts in a few months
Says the 5’10, porn addict abused dog. “How do I find parties” you depressed fuck. Just kill yourself already
 
  • +1
Reactions: copedcel
Says the 5’10, porn addict abused dog. “How do I find parties” you depressed fuck. Just kill yourself already
not 5’10 not a porn addicted abused dog, ur an indian incel with autism and no slays
 
Dnr, keep bumping my thread boy
aka i am really dumb and can't acknowledge when i am wrong because my peepee is smol but my thread is getting bumped and some abused incels might give me some reps and think im cool :love:
 
not 5’10 not a porn addicted abused dog, ur an indian incel with autism and no slays
You literally admitted to everything I said, stop projecting😂😂
 
just 3yrs ago it was different

I'm 50%ile and in good pictures was getting rated mid-high mtn on average, now i get mid-high ltn on average

high high ltn- low low mtn should be what average is cuz that's what makes sense

imagine the same arguement with a normie "the average should be 5, nah look around all i see are 8s and 9s!!"

ur the same but the other way around

the rating system is in chambles

htn should be top10%, chadlite top1%, chad 1/10,000
 
  • JFL
Reactions: D02
Are you on ur period or something? Ur literally saying nothing of substance but complaints. Why the fuck would we include “status” in school environments for a face rating?
Because its fucking retarded
SMV scale is closer to what where seeing in reality

LMTN Athlete is getting more slay's than HTN finance bro n that a objective fact
 
just 3yrs ago it was different

I'm 50%ile and in good pictures was getting rated mid-high mtn on average, now i get mid-high ltn on average

high high ltn- low low mtn should be what average is cuz that's what makes sense

imagine the same arguement with a normie "the average should be 5, nah look around all i see are 8s and 9s!!"

ur the same but the other way around

the rating system is in chambles

htn should be top10%, chadlite top1%, chad 1/10,000
me for reference
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260611-200729.png
    Screenshot_20260611-200729.png
    555.8 KB · Views: 0

Similar threads

Rick_bozo
Replies
24
Views
74
Rick_bozo
Rick_bozo
MirinDaZygos
Replies
10
Views
52
tarkdriad33
tarkdriad33
thomasjiooo
Replies
0
Views
9
thomasjiooo
thomasjiooo
anondude
Replies
0
Views
13
anondude
anondude
crypsis
Replies
69
Views
267
crypsis
crypsis

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top