dreamcake1mo
Mistral
- Joined
- May 12, 2022
- Posts
- 2,178
- Reputation
- 3,209
One thing I'm tired about with NPCs is how they influence their view of human genetics to others. Mainly linear think.
I see too many of these NPCs try to prove their ethnicity to conveniently be the #1 superior stock. Especially the idiots who try to convince these points by framing their groups iq average, or, how "strong", original and resilient their genetic lineage are. Its almost as if they completely ignore the idea of equal pros and cons amongst all things. Their flaw is that they use linear think. This is a very low IQ trait, and is something only the most useless of people and NPCs do. Its like a guy dumping out his flour because he likes the taste of sugar better. In his empty space of a head, since sugar is his #1, flour is less important and "lost".
The world is filled with these types of wastes. These are the main people fueling all of the tensions and discrepancies you see today amongst ethnicities. See, all it takes is a little push to get them riled up. Some black kids looting a store, or a white cop killing a black guy is all it takes for these tribalists to show just how much of a stupid following moron they are. Tribalism turns to blind sighted racism which means less synergy amongst people, and homonzigation, which leads to massive problems. Flour vs sugar situation. Candy tastes good, but too much gives you a toothache. This type of impulsive, linear think is very inefficient for humanity, and is something that needs to be abolished if we want to advance any further.
Theres a lot of debate. A lot of tribalists crowds pointing figures at who's genetics are superior. But i think this is totally the wrong way to look at genetic differences, especially considering we have live examples right in front of us. Lets look at nature. The farmer does not see the watermelons bred for seeds any better than the one bred for juice. They are markets for both. The more people specify traits for breeding , the more homogenous the genetic pool within that population becomes. This comes at both a pro and a con. Overtime this causes problems. Infertility, and higher risk of total failure. For example, autism and other genetic disorders or other unwanted traits and other compounding bad genetic/behaviors. But at the same time, this eugenics is precisely why the ethnicity has survived and is used.
Theres watermelons that are specifically bred for seeds, some specifically bred for juice, and some specifically bred for size. The one bred for seeds will have different genetic prepositions as the one bred for juice. The melons bred for juice may be very weak to specific conditions or have a high prone to root rot, while the other may be naturally resilient to them. The original watermelon genetic may be famed after and have its uses, but people undoubtly will continue to breed desirable traits for their own uses, regardless of genetic vulnerability. Foe example, most European populations you see a tighter, and on average higher range of iq but also a higher prone to genetic disorder and compounding cons. While in a lot of African communities you see on average a lower, but more variance (extensive/broad) range of iq and behaviors, as well as genetic variation. Both have its own uses.
A simple concept and way of thinking, that goes over 90+% of people once they turn on the tv and their emotions run wild.
I see too many of these NPCs try to prove their ethnicity to conveniently be the #1 superior stock. Especially the idiots who try to convince these points by framing their groups iq average, or, how "strong", original and resilient their genetic lineage are. Its almost as if they completely ignore the idea of equal pros and cons amongst all things. Their flaw is that they use linear think. This is a very low IQ trait, and is something only the most useless of people and NPCs do. Its like a guy dumping out his flour because he likes the taste of sugar better. In his empty space of a head, since sugar is his #1, flour is less important and "lost".
The world is filled with these types of wastes. These are the main people fueling all of the tensions and discrepancies you see today amongst ethnicities. See, all it takes is a little push to get them riled up. Some black kids looting a store, or a white cop killing a black guy is all it takes for these tribalists to show just how much of a stupid following moron they are. Tribalism turns to blind sighted racism which means less synergy amongst people, and homonzigation, which leads to massive problems. Flour vs sugar situation. Candy tastes good, but too much gives you a toothache. This type of impulsive, linear think is very inefficient for humanity, and is something that needs to be abolished if we want to advance any further.
Theres a lot of debate. A lot of tribalists crowds pointing figures at who's genetics are superior. But i think this is totally the wrong way to look at genetic differences, especially considering we have live examples right in front of us. Lets look at nature. The farmer does not see the watermelons bred for seeds any better than the one bred for juice. They are markets for both. The more people specify traits for breeding , the more homogenous the genetic pool within that population becomes. This comes at both a pro and a con. Overtime this causes problems. Infertility, and higher risk of total failure. For example, autism and other genetic disorders or other unwanted traits and other compounding bad genetic/behaviors. But at the same time, this eugenics is precisely why the ethnicity has survived and is used.
Theres watermelons that are specifically bred for seeds, some specifically bred for juice, and some specifically bred for size. The one bred for seeds will have different genetic prepositions as the one bred for juice. The melons bred for juice may be very weak to specific conditions or have a high prone to root rot, while the other may be naturally resilient to them. The original watermelon genetic may be famed after and have its uses, but people undoubtly will continue to breed desirable traits for their own uses, regardless of genetic vulnerability. Foe example, most European populations you see a tighter, and on average higher range of iq but also a higher prone to genetic disorder and compounding cons. While in a lot of African communities you see on average a lower, but more variance (extensive/broad) range of iq and behaviors, as well as genetic variation. Both have its own uses.
A simple concept and way of thinking, that goes over 90+% of people once they turn on the tv and their emotions run wild.
