Only retards are obsessed with race

[asdvek]

@IronMike and @

@joao23
are exponentially worse

No not at all, Mike is literally a troll and I don't know who the other guy is

 

[joao23]

@IronMike and @joao23
are exponentially worse
Casanova posts normal threads atleast

Stop tag me on this lol

 

[Saint Casanova]

@Saint Casanova is the biggest racebaiter on here

If this guy died I wouldn't give a fuck and I would be happy actually

You are the one calling everyone shitskins jfl

Classic racebait

 

[joao23]

No not at all, Mike is literally a troll and I don't know who the other guy is

Brutal

 

[lemureater]

I'm talking about those retards whose arguments go on for pages and pages of threads

"OMG BRO MY RACE IS BETTER THAN U, I HATE ASIANS AND IF UR FROM THIS PART OF EUROPE THEN UR NOT WHITE"

"BROO NORTH EUORPE BROO"

Or whatever, I don't even know what they talk about.

But you have to be a fucking retarded loser for that.

Literally who cares about race?

"OMG BROO SOUTHERNS ARE BETTER THAN NORTHERNS"

Literally the most loser shit ever

Or those retards who "study races" like ??

first good take to come out of ur mouth

 

[asdvek]

You are the one calling everyone shitskins jfl

Classic racebait

All your threads are about muh "I hate slavs" "muh brown people are better" "muh I hate white people"

Kill yourself worthless cunt

 

[Saint Casanova]

All your threads are about muh "I hate slavs" "muh brown people are better" "muh I hate white people"

Kill yourself worthless cunt

Don’t bend down too much for whites as a DeathNIK mate.

 

[Galvatron]

Don’t you literally do this

 

[asdvek]

Don’t bend down too much for whites as a DeathNIK mate.

Another racebait

Go to twitter faggot

 

[asdvek]

Don’t you literally do this

Never made a thread on races before u retard

 

[Saint Casanova]

Another racebait

Go to twitter faggot

Seethe turk

 

[asdvek]

Seethe turk

Racebait once again

Can you make a post where you're not racebaiting? Stupid wageslave

 

[Galvatron]

Never made a thread on races before u retard

Calm bro

 

[Saint Casanova]

Racebait once again

Can you make a post where you're not racebaiting? Stupid wageslave

I can’t. Sorry

 

[asdvek]

I can’t. Sorry

Then go to Twitter or kill yourself worthless cuck

 

[stonecold trucel]

water as fuck bro
asdvek this why you the goat bro

 

[cometohaunted]

I'm talking about those retards whose arguments go on for pages and pages of threads

"OMG BRO MY RACE IS BETTER THAN U, I HATE ASIANS AND IF UR FROM THIS PART OF EUROPE THEN UR NOT WHITE"

"BROO NORTH EUORPE BROO"

Or whatever, I don't even know what they talk about.

But you have to be a fucking retarded loser for that.

Literally who cares about race?

"OMG BROO SOUTHERNS ARE BETTER THAN NORTHERNS"

Literally the most loser shit ever

Or those retards who "study races" like ??

Water

 

[Saint Casanova]

Then go to Twitter or kill yourself worthless cuck

Twitter is better than here

 

[dhusc]

From your username I can tell you're from some third world shithole

You're a low class shitskin

You'll never be a white man living in a first world country like me

Retard shitskin

thought you said race doesn't matter

 

[asdvek]

thought you said race doesn't matter

No, I said arguing about race and racebaiting is retarded.

 

[ashmeer]

No, I said arguing about race and racebaiting is retarded.

I agree

 

[lemureater]

why are you always swearing and moody as shit

 

[pfl]

@IronMike and @joao23
are exponentially worse
Casanova posts normal threads atleast

Joao doesn’t post bait because it’s true

 

[asdvek]

why are you always swearing and moody as shit

I'm not moody and I swear because I want to

 

[lemureater]

I'm not moody and I swear because I want to

you sound moody

 

[secretAscendAnon]

Once again my point is proven…

Hes right, if you are Christian u must be below 85 IQ

 

[asdvek]

you sound moody

Because of the swearing but I ain't really

 

[lemureater]

Hes right, if you are Christian u must be below 85 IQ

not entirley, there are plenty of smart people that claimed to believe in god. There is evidence for god like the physics argument or the starting life argument- its just whether you personally deem it to be convincing enough.

 

[secretAscendAnon]

not entirley, there are plenty of smart people that claimed to believe in god. There is evidence for god like the physics argument or the starting life argument- its just whether you personally deem it to be convincing enough.

What the fuck are u talking about, there is no "evidence" for god corny mf

 

[trump]

This reads like a retard wrote it

he's not white

 

[asdvek]

he's not white

One of the retards that I was talking about

Keep racebaiting cuck

 

[lemureater]

What the fuck are u talking about, there is no "evidence" for god corny mf

plenty of well read athiests like Richard Dawkins have stated that there is evidence for god, the same way there is evidence to suggest youre a retard. Its just whether the evidence is compelling or not, and his arguments are that they arent by countering with his own evidence that god doesnt exist. Its not black and white; god isnt a physical thing you can prove

 

[lemureater]

What the fuck are u talking about, there is no "evidence" for god corny mf

theres a Alex O'Connor video that explains my point far better on youtube- he's a very strong athiest if you want to educate yourself

 

[secretAscendAnon]

plenty of well read athiests like Richard Dawkins have stated that there is evidence for god, the same way there is evidence to suggest youre a retard. Its just whether the evidence is compelling or not, and his arguments are that they arent by countering with his own evidence that god doesnt exist. Its not black and white; god isnt a physical thing you can prove

Please just lay down one convincing argument, and stop saying "well known scientists in a time where they would be shamed by the public for standing against god believed in god". And Richard Dawkins is a scientific rationalist and is only a cultural christian since he was brought up with the christian culture/religion . Now please name a arguement in ur own words.

 

[lemureater]

Please just lay down one convincing argument, and stop saying "well known scientists in a time where they would be shamed by the public for standing against god believed in god". And Richard Dawkins is a scientific rationalist and is only a cultural christian since he was brought up with the christian culture/religion . Now please name a arguement in ur own words.

i am not religious. I have never claimed to be religious. I have already explained religious talking points in my first reply to you, Dawkins being a 'cultural christian' doesnt mean anything its just a buzzword he said in an interview to sound interesting however to say there isnt evidence for god is factually untrue- its just whether the evidence is compelling enough. I hope youre literate enough to understand what i just wrote out

 

[secretAscendAnon]

i am not religious. I have never claimed to be religious. I have already explained religious talking points in my first reply to you, Dawkins being a 'cultural christian' doesnt mean anything its just a buzzword he said in an interview to sound interesting however to say there isnt evidence for god is factually untrue- its just whether the evidence is compelling enough. I hope youre literate enough to understand what i just wrote out

i swear if u keep saying theres evidence without stating solid points and keep trying to sway the conversation into one where u dont have to argue is just lame my guy

 

[lemureater]

i swear if u keep saying theres evidence without stating solid points and keep trying to sway the conversation into one where u dont have to argue is just lame my guy

ive literally just repeated what ive said in my first reply- im not swaying the argument anywhere. IM NOT FUCKING RELIGOUS RETARD. I literally mentioned religous arguments in my first reply but i'll explain it more. The main one is the Origin of Life argument where all life has come from life- through evolution we can trace our way back to the earliest organisms, however logically there is a begining to life because of the Big Bang being the 'begining', therefore since life comes from life- the first living thing must have been created by something living 'like' god. Thats one argument- however the counter argument to that is just that we dont know enough about the begining of the universe and its conditions so we cant confidently say what created it or if there even was a begining. Once again to reiterate my point, there are arguments and evidence for god like this argument but whether or not you find it compelling enough to convince you is your own personal choice

 

[secretAscendAnon]

ive literally just repeated what ive said in my first reply- im not swaying the argument anywhere. IM NOT FUCKING RELIGOUS RETARD. I literally mentioned religous arguments in my first reply but i'll explain it more. The main one is the Origin of Life argument where all life has come from life- through evolution we can trace our way back to the earliest organisms, however logically there is a begining to life because of the Big Bang being the 'begining', therefore since life comes from life- the first living thing must have been created by something living 'like' god. Thats one argument- however the counter argument to that is just that we dont know enough about the begining of the universe and its conditions so we cant confidently say what created it or if there even was a begining. Once again to reiterate my point, there are arguments and evidence for god like this argument but whether or not you find it compelling enough to convince you is your own personal choice

Its not an argument cause the argument just states that something had to make the first thing. Theres no indication nor proof that it has to be a god. It could aswell be a big bang. So ur just using god as a way to explain something that cant be explained yet. The exact way religion has been used for since it was created by humans.

 

[secretAscendAnon]

ive literally just repeated what ive said in my first reply- im not swaying the argument anywhere. IM NOT FUCKING RELIGOUS RETARD. I literally mentioned religous arguments in my first reply but i'll explain it more. The main one is the Origin of Life argument where all life has come from life- through evolution we can trace our way back to the earliest organisms, however logically there is a begining to life because of the Big Bang being the 'begining', therefore since life comes from life- the first living thing must have been created by something living 'like' god. Thats one argument- however the counter argument to that is just that we dont know enough about the begining of the universe and its conditions so we cant confidently say what created it or if there even was a begining. Once again to reiterate my point, there are arguments and evidence for god like this argument but whether or not you find it compelling enough to convince you is your own personal choice

Not only that but even if it were the case, none of the religions we have fit this description cause they also give god other attributes like allmighty, forgiving and so on.

 

[lemureater]

Its not an argument cause the argument just states that something had to make the first thing. Theres no indication nor proof that it has to be a god. It could aswell be a big bang. So ur just using god as a way to explain something that cant be explained yet. The exact way religion has been used for since it was created by humans.

The Big Bang cannot of created life because life comes from life, this the current scientific understanding we have of organisms. But the point still stand. There is evidence or arguments for God — the real question is whether they’re strong or convincing enough to justify belief. Of course you dont find the Origin of Life argument to be enough reasoning because you believe in Evidentialism but not everyone subscribes to that belief system. I personally do NOT find these arguments like the Physics argument or the Origin of Life argument to be enough since i also believe in Evidentialism but the statement that 'there is no evidence/argument for god' just means ur unread on theist literature

 

[lemureater]

Not only that but even if it were the case, none of the religions we have fit this description cause they also give god other attributes like allmighty, forgiving and so on.

im not giving an argument for relgion but for god. There is a clear distinction, Agnosticism is different

 

[secretAscendAnon]

The Big Bang cannot of created life because life comes from life, this the current scientific understanding we have of organisms. But the point still stand. There is evidence or arguments for God — the real question is whether they’re strong or convincing enough to justify belief. Of course you dont find the Origin of Life argument to be enough reasoning because you believe in Evidentialism but not everyone subscribes to that belief system. I personally do NOT find these arguments like the Physics argument or the Origin of Life argument to be enough since i also believe in Evidentialism but the statement that 'there is no evidence/argument for god' just means ur unread on theist literature

Are u actually a retard ? If u have to weight if the proof is "convincing enough" for u, ITS NOT PROOF

 

[secretAscendAnon]

The Big Bang cannot of created life because life comes from life, this the current scientific understanding we have of organisms. But the point still stand. There is evidence or arguments for God — the real question is whether they’re strong or convincing enough to justify belief. Of course you dont find the Origin of Life argument to be enough reasoning because you believe in Evidentialism but not everyone subscribes to that belief system. I personally do NOT find these arguments like the Physics argument or the Origin of Life argument to be enough since i also believe in Evidentialism but the statement that 'there is no evidence/argument for god' just means ur unread on theist literature

In one sentence ur saying "well it cant be the big bang cause our current understanding is ..." and in the next sentence ur saying "well it has to be god cause it cant work with our current understanding". Ur logic is flawed

 

[lemureater]

Are u actually a retard ? If u have to weight if the proof is "convincing enough" for u, ITS NOT PROOF

'proof' and 'evidence' are not the same thing

proof is something logically conclusive like maths

evidence is something that supports a conclusion and can therefore be weak or strong.

Please learn the english language

 

[lemureater]

In one sentence ur saying "well it cant be the big bang cause our current understanding is ..." and in the next sentence ur saying "well it has to be god cause it cant work with our current understanding". Ur logic is flawed

YES I KNOW- THATS MY POINT. MY POINT IS THAT ITS NOT STRONG ENOUGH AND THEREFORE ITS NOT CONCLUSIVE FOR GOD TO EXIST. THATS MY ARGUMENT THAT EVIDENCE CAN EXIST BUT ITS NOT STRONG THEREFORE I AM NOT RELGIOUS

 

[pfl]

 

[lemureater]

In one sentence ur saying "well it cant be the big bang cause our current understanding is ..." and in the next sentence ur saying "well it has to be god cause it cant work with our current understanding". Ur logic is flawed

O'Conner explains this alot better since he's a far more well educated athiest than I am -

 

[secretAscendAnon]

'proof' and 'evidence' are not the same thing

proof is something logically conclusive like maths

evidence is something that supports a conclusion and can therefore be weak or strong.

Please learn the english language

Last time i checked evidence is what supports a claim, and when the evidence for the claim is undeniable its proof.

 

[_Nazareth_]

I'm talking about those retards whose arguments go on for pages and pages of threads

"OMG BRO MY RACE IS BETTER THAN U, I HATE ASIANS AND IF UR FROM THIS PART OF EUROPE THEN UR NOT WHITE"

"BROO NORTH EUORPE BROO"

Or whatever, I don't even know what they talk about.

But you have to be a fucking retarded loser for that.

Literally who cares about race?

"OMG BROO SOUTHERNS ARE BETTER THAN NORTHERNS"

Literally the most loser shit ever

Or those retards who "study races" like ??

I think it’s a cope mechanism

 

[secretAscendAnon]

YES I KNOW- THATS MY POINT. MY POINT IS THAT ITS NOT STRONG ENOUGH AND THEREFORE ITS NOT CONCLUSIVE FOR GOD TO EXIST. THATS MY ARGUMENT THAT EVIDENCE CAN EXIST BUT ITS NOT STRONG THEREFORE I AM NOT RELGIOUS

Yes and im saying that when ur believing in something that isnt proofed ur a dumbass bruv