Opinions on using aromasin 15

deaflty0323

deaflty0323

Iron
Joined
May 11, 2024
Posts
88
Reputation
29
Hi I'm 15 and half, 179cm.
I'm really considering aromasin.
I already have a source.
I'll start at a low dose like 6.25mg 3x a week.
Then soon into 12.5mg 3 week. (I suspect I have slightly high estrogen so this dose)
I'll aim for 15pgml in estradiol. (so dosing may change)
I want know if I should really use it or not? And how much it will help in height and other stuff.
Will it fuck up my puberty or better it?
Any opinions are appreciated.
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: King_Schnitzel, Zagro and MyDreamIsToBe183CM
Hi I'm 15 and half, 179cm.
I'm really considering aromasin.
I already have a source.
I'll start at a low dose like 6.25mg 3x a week.
Then soon into 12.5mg 3 week. (I suspect I have slightly high estrogen so this dose)
I'll aim for 15pgml in estradiol. (so dosing may change)
I want know if I should really use it or not? And how much it will help in height and other stuff.
Will it fuck up my puberty or better it?
Any opinions are appreciated.
with 179 at 15 ur absolutely fine

especially, dude, what the fuck is supposed to change to your last threads
1000088393
 
Idk guys don't answer my question and just call me stupid
Because they are. Ask one person that has knowledge via profile or DMs or ask ChatGPT.
You don't need 20 people to tell you.
You could also just google and get into the biology.
 
Yh but lifestyle won't be enough to delay growth plates
I'm talking about your symptoms.

Aromasin is gonna be very unhealthy for you. There are thousands of genes involved in determining your height. If you ran hgh from a very young age, you could have squeezed out a few extra cm.

Don't bother.
 
  • +1
Reactions: King_Schnitzel
Feel if its fat or tissue(gyno)
Idk. I've got a flat chest cus I don't go gym. But there is a very subtle bit of fat near my nipple. Maybe its gyno at the very very start. So hopefully aromasin stops this.
 
  • +1
Reactions: iraqi
Idk. I've got a flat chest cus I don't go gym. But there is a very subtle bit of fat near my nipple. Maybe its gyno at the very very start. So hopefully aromasin stops this.
i dont think it can remove it but can forsure stop more come in
 
  • +1
Reactions: deaflty0323
I'm talking about your symptoms.

Aromasin is gonna be very unhealthy for you. There are thousands of genes involved in determining your height. If you ran hgh from a very young age, you could have squeezed out a few extra cm.

Don't bother.
I reckon i could get an inch from aromasin and an inch from hgh
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: iraqi and IraniancelV2
where nigga

you didnt send me anything
I answered it in my hGH guide but i couldn’t tag you

“for growth local igf-1 is whats more important, and hgh use over months will cause receptor densensitization as well as blunting your natural growth pathways (which are very important for growth). also over time, high dose hgh advances bone age (mainly the reason why young children put on hgh at high doses grow 8-10 cm SHORTER).”

Yeah of course local igf-1 is better than having high gh levels systemically but we have to be realistic and do whatever’s possible, this doesn’t mean hGH is useless its still a pretty good compound.

You can avoid or at least minimise the receptor desensitisation so that isn’t really a concern as well, specify the natural growth pathways and well of course these are normal with exogenous growth hormone.

Bone age isn’t that important and why they end up shorter/prematurely ossify their plates is because they probably weren’t on any aromatase inhibitors as that is a need on high doses of hGH or at prolonged use, but it is true that it may and will age bone dependent on the dose and the length of the patients usage but its not important or detrimental if you’re on an aromatase inhibitor.

So these all mean absolutely nothing really

“and even hgh therapy becomes more useless as you get older, and even studies show small increments of height (a few cm over pah). none of that justify the widespread use of hgh for height maxxing”

It is true that it gets less beneficial (Not useless) as you get older because of many factors and i have agreed and stated that in previous posts of mine, but this still doesn’t justify that hGH is useless this essentially means that you must be eligible for its usage. Like someone who’s above a certain bone age before starting or someone who’s plates are on the brink of closing shouldn’t expect much.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: MyDreamIsToBe183CM
I answered it in my hGH guide but i couldn’t tag you

“for growth local igf-1 is whats more important, and hgh use over months will cause receptor densensitization as well as blunting your natural growth pathways (which are very important for growth). also over time, high dose hgh advances bone age (mainly the reason why young children put on hgh at high doses grow 8-10 cm SHORTER).”

Yeah of course local igf-1 is better than having high gh levels systemically but we have to be realistic and do whatever’s possible, this doesn’t mean hGH is useless its still a pretty good compound.

You can avoid or at least minimise the receptor desensitisation so that isn’t really a concern as well, specify the natural growth pathways and well of course these are normal with exogenous growth hormone.

Bone age isn’t that important and why they end up shorter/prematurely ossify their plates is because they probably weren’t on any aromatase inhibitors as that is a need on high doses of hGH or at prolonged use, but it is true that it may and will age bone dependent on the dose and the length of the patients usage but its not important or detrimental if you’re on an aromatase inhibitor.

So these all mean absolutely nothing really

“and even hgh therapy becomes more useless as you get older, and even studies show small increments of height (a few cm over pah). none of that justify the widespread use of hgh for height maxxing”

It is true that it gets less beneficial (Not useless) as you get older because of many factors and i have agreed and stated that in previous posts of mine, but this still doesn’t justify that hGH is useless this essentially means that you must be eligible for its usage. Like someone who’s above a certain bone age before starting or someone who’s plates are on the brink of closing shouldn’t expect much.
Can you elaborate more about “local igf-1”?
 
I answered it in my hGH guide but i couldn’t tag you

“for growth local igf-1 is whats more important, and hgh use over months will cause receptor densensitization as well as blunting your natural growth pathways (which are very important for growth). also over time, high dose hgh advances bone age (mainly the reason why young children put on hgh at high doses grow 8-10 cm SHORTER).”

Yeah of course local igf-1 is better than having high gh levels systemically but we have to be realistic and do whatever’s possible, this doesn’t mean hGH is useless its still a pretty good compound.

You can avoid or at least minimise the receptor desensitisation so that isn’t really a concern as well, specify the natural growth pathways and well of course these are normal with exogenous growth hormone.

Bone age isn’t that important and why they end up shorter/prematurely ossify their plates is because they probably weren’t on any aromatase inhibitors as that is a need on high doses of hGH or at prolonged use.

So these all mean absolutely nothing really
low effort reply for now, will make a better one later, you can compile all your criticisms.

local igf-1 is better, yes and many things achieve it better than hgh. peptides (ghrp 2 + cjc no dac most effective at targeting local igf-1 although you could get downregulation over time), lsjl, and literally jumping lol.

you cannot avoid receptor desensitization unless you are gonna cycle on and off and i remember desensitization happens within 3 month? honestly if thats true, its not the worst but il need to refer back to the study for good info.

bone age is extremely important and the sole reason they didnt grow to their expect heights. no amount of aromatase inhibitor in tanner stage 4 (or even earlier could have saved them because the loss of height was 8-10 cm) + can meaningfully stop fusion because once the process of fusion is far enough, nothing can reverse it. in fact in late tannger stage 4 boys, AI literally was unable to stop fusion and even caused an upwards trend in estrogen.


also the easiest argument against hgh is that in studies done on older children (14-16), the gains on avg are quite laughable (a few cm at best). which doesnt jusitfy the cost and side affects. spinal height is easier to gain and arguably 10x cheaper. even smashing your heels is better (free inch lol chinese nigga who was way past puberty grew a far bigger heel)
 

Similar threads

deaflty0323
Replies
8
Views
105
pingu
pingu
deaflty0323
Replies
13
Views
166
thetrue_rater
thetrue_rater
deaflty0323
Replies
30
Views
370
deaflty0323
deaflty0323
deaflty0323
Replies
28
Views
269
deaflty0323
deaflty0323
deaflty0323
Replies
6
Views
116
deaflty0323
deaflty0323

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top