Orbital Vector Basics and Importance

[greycel]

There is a lot of confusion about orbital vector. So, I will try to explain it here using this image:

they switched the order for this (it doesn't take a genius to find out which one is for what):

....okay, so we get the gist, let's see some examples.

Negative Orbital Vector with Good fat pads:

Negative Orbital Vector with Bad fat pads:
Look in the mirror greycels jfl

...jk

(don't be fooled by the line, this is a NOV)

Positive Orbital Vector with Bad fat pads:

Positive Orbital Vector with Good fat pads:

what can we conclude: orbital vector doesn't matter that much compared to undereye fat pads. If you want a good undereye, devoid of dark circles or hollowness, you will need fat/filler.

The greatest birdcel model can get away with it, why can't you!

 

[Deleted member 23558]

What is mine I’m also fat as shit so when my midface hollows out my ov can appear more positive?

 

[greycel]

What is mine I’m also fat as shit so when my midface hollows out my ov can appear more positive?

View attachment 2431730

Looks like positive orbital vector with good fat pads, I can't really tell about when it hollows out. Depends on your genetics tbh

 

[Aspiemogger]

There is a lot of confusion about orbital vector. So, I will try to explain it here using this image:

View attachment 2431644
they switched the order for this (it doesn't take a genius to find out which one is for what):
View attachment 2431670

....okay, so we get the gist, let's see some examples.

Negative Orbital Vector with Good fat pads:
View attachment 2431646

Negative Orbital Vector with Bad fat pads:
Look in the mirror greycels jfl

...jk
View attachment 2431713 (don't be fooled by the line, this is a NOV)

Positive Orbital Vector with Bad fat pads:
View attachment 2431662
Positive Orbital Vector with Good fat pads:
View attachment 2431665

what can we conclude: orbital vector doesn't matter that much compared to undereye fat pads. If you want a good undereye, devoid of dark circles or hollowness, you will need fat/filler.

The greatest birdcel model can get away with it, why can't you!

What's my orbital vector angle?
Slightly negative?

 

[Akatlyn]

That's what I thought. So I have positive vector with bad fats pads

 

[greycel]

That's what I thought. So I have positive vector with bad fats pads

But they can also be recessed, causing the hollow undereye, for which you will need a fat grafting or you can fill it with implant and do fat grafting

 

[greycel]

What's my orbital vector angle?
Slightly negative?




View attachment 2435831

I think so yeah, but you dont have bad fat pads (depends how they look from front too) and you look low HTN already

 

[Aspiemogger]

I think so yeah, but you dont have bad fat pads (depends how they look from front too) and you look low HTN already

Squinting pretty hard in this because back camera and flash

 

[greycel]

View attachment 2436313
Squinting pretty hard in this because back camera and flash

Good fat pads, u got no dark circles

 

[NZb6Air]

what can we conclude: orbital vector doesn't matter that much compared to undereye fat pads

that's not what it means, bone is under all muscle and skin, it's what supports and projects it, if u add fat or filler to a retruded infraorb rim you will just get sagging, not projection

and Gandy (saws) doesnt have a fucking NOV

 

[Deleted member 98009]

There is a lot of confusion about orbital vector. So, I will try to explain it here using this image:

View attachment 2431644
they switched the order for this (it doesn't take a genius to find out which one is for what):
View attachment 2431670

....okay, so we get the gist, let's see some examples.

Negative Orbital Vector with Good fat pads:
View attachment 2431646

Negative Orbital Vector with Bad fat pads:
Look in the mirror greycels jfl

...jk
View attachment 2431713 (don't be fooled by the line, this is a NOV)

Positive Orbital Vector with Bad fat pads:
View attachment 2431662
Positive Orbital Vector with Good fat pads:
View attachment 2431665

what can we conclude: orbital vector doesn't matter that much compared to undereye fat pads. If you want a good undereye, devoid of dark circles or hollowness, you will need fat/filler.

The greatest birdcel model can get away with it, why can't you!

looks like I have decent orbital vector

 

[ijustwannalookgood]

There is a lot of confusion about orbital vector. So, I will try to explain it here using this image:

View attachment 2431644
they switched the order for this (it doesn't take a genius to find out which one is for what):
View attachment 2431670

....okay, so we get the gist, let's see some examples.

Negative Orbital Vector with Good fat pads:
View attachment 2431646

Negative Orbital Vector with Bad fat pads:
Look in the mirror greycels jfl

...jk
View attachment 2431713 (don't be fooled by the line, this is a NOV)

Positive Orbital Vector with Bad fat pads:
View attachment 2431662
Positive Orbital Vector with Good fat pads:
View attachment 2431665

what can we conclude: orbital vector doesn't matter that much compared to undereye fat pads. If you want a good undereye, devoid of dark circles or hollowness, you will need fat/filler.

The greatest birdcel model can get away with it, why can't you!

So i can just get fatpads and it wont look that bad

 

[ziyadap]

There is a lot of confusion about orbital vector. So, I will try to explain it here using this image:

View attachment 2431644
they switched the order for this (it doesn't take a genius to find out which one is for what):
View attachment 2431670

....okay, so we get the gist, let's see some examples.

Negative Orbital Vector with Good fat pads:
View attachment 2431646

Negative Orbital Vector with Bad fat pads:
Look in the mirror greycels jfl

...jk
View attachment 2431713 (don't be fooled by the line, this is a NOV)

Positive Orbital Vector with Bad fat pads:
View attachment 2431662
Positive Orbital Vector with Good fat pads:
View attachment 2431665

what can we conclude: orbital vector doesn't matter that much compared to undereye fat pads. If you want a good undereye, devoid of dark circles or hollowness, you will need fat/filler.

The greatest birdcel model can get away with it, why can't you!

 

[copnlarp]

There is a lot of confusion about orbital vector. So, I will try to explain it here using this image:

View attachment 2431644
they switched the order for this (it doesn't take a genius to find out which one is for what):
View attachment 2431670

....okay, so we get the gist, let's see some examples.

Negative Orbital Vector with Good fat pads:
View attachment 2431646

Negative Orbital Vector with Bad fat pads:
Look in the mirror greycels jfl

...jk
View attachment 2431713 (don't be fooled by the line, this is a NOV)

Positive Orbital Vector with Bad fat pads:
View attachment 2431662
Positive Orbital Vector with Good fat pads:
View attachment 2431665

what can we conclude: orbital vector doesn't matter that much compared to undereye fat pads. If you want a good undereye, devoid of dark circles or hollowness, you will need fat/filler.

The greatest birdcel model can get away with it, why can't you!

could you tell me what mine is i’m so confused

 

[chadpreetinthemakin]

could you tell me what mine is i’m so confused View attachment 4659739

Put a proper picture from exactly the side

 

[copnlarp]

Put a proper picture from exactly the side