Org Standards?

[PSL65]

See most people on here get LTN. And less get MTN. Would high MTN be considered above average for org standards? I’ve received the range of highMTN -midHTN.

 

[0ogrpostcel]

See most people on here get LTN. And less get MTN. Would high MTN be considered above average for org standards? I’ve received the range of highMTN -midHTN.

I mean yea that's basically it. Mtn just means average on normie tier so anything above mtn is above average

 

[borntokill]

Stfu

 

[PSL65]

I mean yea that's basically it. Mtn just means average on normie tier so anything above mtn is above average

So then.. even mid MTN would be considered above average. Just from observation. I see most people get rated LTN or flat MTN.

 

[Clqs]

Htn here is MTN in real life

 

[PSL65]

Htn here is MTN in real life

You mean MTN here is HTN in real life?

 

[Clqs]

You mean MTN here is HTN in real life?

No

 

[PSL65]

No

That doesn’t even make sense. You wouldn’t be worse in real life than in one of the strictest forums.

 

[trvechud]

By women standards, you're either, sub5, htn, or chad. No ltn or mtn

 

[PSL65]

By women standards, you're either, sub5, htn, or chad. No ltn or mtn

Where do I stand then.

 

[Clqs]

That doesn’t even make sense. You wouldn’t be worse in real life than in one of the strictest forums.

Le forum is not strict at all

 

[0ogrpostcel]

So then.. even mid MTN would be considered above average. Just from observation. I see most people get rated LTN or flat MTN.

People shouldnt rate just MTN it makes no sense. If they were even half serious about ratings they would specify with Low-Mid-High tier normie.

 

[anthony111553]

some people are too strict and others are too generous

 

[PSL65]

People shouldnt rate just MTN it makes no sense. If they were even half serious about ratings they would specify with Low-Mid-High tier normie.

I agree