org user iq?

[reccesedmtn]

what yall think the average iq for a .org user is? personally i have 140iq

 

[Basin]

i dont know

 

[reccesedmtn]

Good to know

 

[htbslayeer]

If we include greys rotting in rating section quite low, offtopic and looksmaxxing are definitely above average compared to normies imo

 

[reccesedmtn]

If we include greys rotting in rating section quite low, offtopic and looksmaxxing are definitely above average compared to normies imo

Good take

 

[NeedUndereyeSupport]

what yall think the average iq for a .org user is? personally i have 140iq

A solid 94 IQ points. Everyone thinks they’re smarter than they are, they literally can’t comprehend otherwise… Dunning-Kruger effect.

 

[koalaboy999]

what yall think the average iq for a .org user is? personally i have 140iq

70

 

[reccesedmtn]

70

Holy shit

 

[reccesedmtn]

A solid 94 IQ points. Everyone thinks they’re smarter than they are, they literally can’t comprehend otherwise… Dunning-Kruger effect.

Fairs that's kinda real

 

[reccesedmtn]

Bump

 

[Prøphet]

Unironically like 115

 

[lowltn222]

what yall think the average iq for a .org user is? personally i have 140iq

my dog is also pablo picasso btw

 

[RedDragonSlayer67]

Clav has more bozo

 

[estrogen consumer]

what yall think the average iq for a .org user is? personally i have 140iq

I have 142
In all seriousness though I think the average org user is smarter than the average non org user by a decent margin

 

[Mess]

Unironically like 115

The extreme male brain theory.

 

[reccesedmtn]

I have 142
In all seriousness though I think the average org user is smarter than the average non org user by a decent margin

Expect the normies begging for ratings

 

[reccesedmtn]

Unironically like 115

Word?

 

[topology]

A solid 94 IQ points. Everyone thinks they’re smarter than they are, they literally can’t comprehend otherwise… Dunning-Kruger effect.

Stating the Dunning-Kruger effect as the reason is a surface level explanation. Only shows how little knowledge you have if anything.

 

[estrogen consumer]

Expect the normies begging for ratings

Holy fuck it’s every other post I fucking hate it I hate it I hate it I hate it

 

[reccesedmtn]

Clav has more bozo

Nga what

 

[AryanFoidJester]

90 just because theres many non whites/east asians whose average is already significantly below 100 also many young kids now

 

[reccesedmtn]

90 just because theres many non whites/east asians whose average is already significantly below 100 also many young kids now

Right

 

[lowltn222]

in reality its like 83 for like a good 70% of these ppl tbh, anyone who has made a thread about wanting to be laid is part of that

 

[reccesedmtn]

in reality its like 83 for like a good 70% of these ppl tbh, anyone who has made a thread about wanting to be laid is part of that

Ngas be asking on advice how to get laid

 

[NeedUndereyeSupport]

Stating the Dunning-Kruger effect as the reason is a surface level explanation. Only shows how little knowledge you have if anything.

If it’s surface-level, feel free to explain what’s missing. The Dunning–Kruger effect is literally about people overestimating their competence seems directly relevant unless you’ve got a better explanation… usually the most simple answer is the correct one boyo

 

[lowltn222]

Ngas be asking on advice how to get laid

anyone who has made a thread like that probably deserves a good dosage of chemical castration tbh

 

[EthiopianMaxxer]

Tales faggot

 

[topology]

The Dunning–Kruger effect is literally about people overestimating their competence

And why is that exactly..? That's what my point was.. You use such a surface level term and idea that it's just boring.

usually the most simple answer is the correct one boyo

There lies more behind it.

 

[NeedUndereyeSupport]

And why is that exactly..? That's what my point was.. You use such a surface level term and idea that it's just boring.


There lies more behind it.

You keep saying it’s surface-level but haven’t added a single deeper point. If there’s ‘more behind it,’ say it…otherwise you’re just repeating yourself🫩

 

[topology]

You keep saying it’s surface-level but haven’t added a single deeper point. If there’s ‘more behind it,’ say it…otherwise you’re just repeating yourself🫩

Not worth entertaining you.

 

[NeedUndereyeSupport]

Not worth entertaining you.

Is that why you keep responding?

 

[Societal Reject]

Probably mid 90s

 

[topology]

Is that why you keep responding?

Keep projecting.

 

[Surrender]

Below average

 

[IronMike]

I never met a socially adjusted person think or concern themselves with their IQ

 

[NeedUndereyeSupport]

Keep projecting.

What is there to project?

 

[topology]

What is there to project? View attachment 4831110

Your IQ, it's low to say the least.

 

[NeedUndereyeSupport]

Your IQ, it's low to say the least.

So I project my IQ as low? Do you even realize what you’re even saying?

 

[Algernon]

what yall think the average iq for a .org user is? personally i have 140iq

if you made a distribution, 40% of users are probably 80iq, 20% of users of average 100iq, then the other 40% are 130iq

so on average, .org users have an iq of 105

 

[topology]

So I project my IQ as low? Do you even realize what you’re even saying?

You didn't even catch the incorrect usage of "your," you're clearly a moron. I set the trap and you fell right into it.

 

[Algernon]

Keep projecting.

your right but low iq response

this is what a redditor would say

 

[got.daim]

what yall think the average iq for a .org user is? personally i have 140iq

150 approx,
But IQ doesn't matter if you don't do anything with it

Alleles and SNPs relating to other fields are more brutal than IQ imo, just be blessed with both, and you will succeed

 

[NeedUndereyeSupport]

You didn't even catch the incorrect usage of "your," you're clearly a moron. I set the trap and you fell right into it.

So let me get this right, you set a trap, and I didn’t correct you so my reasoning and logical capabilities are low? I like how everything you’ve said contributed literally nothing to what I originally said besides ‘it’s deeper.’, genuinely must be mentally deficient.

 

[NeedUndereyeSupport]

your right but low iq response

this is what a redditor would say

what is he right about?

 

[Algernon]

what is he right about?

u js said dunning kruger to sound smart because it fit the scenario

it is like if i said our conversation is superfluous

im js saying it so sound smart even if it fits the scenario, shows you have low understanding, may as well write it out and explain it

 

[topology]

So let me get this right, you set a trap, and I didn’t correct you so my reasoning and logical capabilities are low? I like how everything you’ve said contributed literally nothing to what I originally said besides ‘it’s deeper.’, genuinely must be mentally deficient.

Right, go ahead with the insults now, you've already lost, massive yikes.

 

[NeedUndereyeSupport]

u js said dunning kruger to sound smart because it fit the scenario

it is like if i said our conversation is superfluous

im js saying it so sound smart even if it fits the scenario, shows you have low understanding, may as well write it out and explain it

I brought up the Dunning Kruger effect because it describes how people with lower intelligence or expertise can overestimate their understanding. I’m not trying to sound smart, just explaining why I think a lot of people online overrate their own knowledge. You see it in threads where people claim high IQ or insight without much evidence. It’s less about everyone being ‘below average’ and more about people misjudging their own ability, which is something people with below average intelligence do a whole lot more than those who have high intelligence.

 

[Algernon]

I brought up the Dunning Kruger effect because it describes how people with lower intelligence or expertise can overestimate their understanding. I’m not trying to sound smart, just explaining why I think a lot of people online overrate their own knowledge. You see it in threads where people claim high IQ or insight without much evidence. It’s less about everyone being ‘below average’ and more about people misjudging their own ability, which is something people with below average intelligence do a whole lot more than those who have high intelligence.

explaining better what i origibally meant

it wasn't the average of what people rate themselves but the average iq on the forum

dunning-kruger doesn't relate sinxe its individual to themself, not individual to community

u can say since they we use this forum we overrate people on this forum but thats not what dunning-kruger is about

guessing the average iq of people on a forum you use is entirely unsupported by dunning-kruger and using it ti evidence your claim of 95 iq average is js using it because it is slightly related to the topic

 

[NeedUndereyeSupport]

Right, go ahead with the insults now, you've already lost, massive yikes.

Yeah, I did throw out an insult. It's like you're some little troll trying to bait me. You've said nothing of substance. 'Stating the Dunning-Kruger effect as the reason is a surface level explanation. Only shows how little knowledge you have if anything.', this in itself is an insult. The only thing that you yourself has said that has any value whatsoever is that the Dunning Kruger effect is a 'surface level explanation', and how its deeper than that, which I never denied, but once again you show no proof, or don't elaborate on it further. Stop replying if you're gonna keep baiting.

 

[topology]

Yeah, I did throw out an insult. It's like you're some little troll trying to bait me. You've said nothing of substance. 'Stating the Dunning-Kruger effect as the reason is a surface level explanation. Only shows how little knowledge you have if anything.', this in itself is an insult. The only thing that you yourself has said that has any value whatsoever is that the Dunning Kruger effect is a 'surface level explanation', and how its deeper than that, which I never denied, but once again you show no proof, or don't elaborate on it further. Stop replying if you're gonna keep baiting.

I'm "baiting" yet you reply..? Do you ever think for yourself..? Claude or GPT can answer your questions, toodles!