Over for 7ft manlets

Jhon Smith

Jhon Smith

Apricot
Joined
Mar 28, 2022
Posts
4,033
Reputation
3,668
This zoomer is 7’5
 
  • +1
Reactions: bloomercel and try2beme
Blud can see the sunrise 3 hours before everyone else 💀
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: 7zyzz7, Deleted member 4444, nope and 3 others
the only point where too tall is a problem is when you have to live in crouch-mode like that dude inside buildings
 
the only point where too tall is a problem is when you have to live in crouch-mode like that dude inside buildings
I would rather be 7’5 than 5’3
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4444, Sprinkles, bloomercel and 3 others
I would rather be 7’5 than 5’3
Obviously since short is also a disability just like gigantism is. But I'd rather be 7 foot or around there where I have to duck under doors but can walk normally otherwise. This guy seems to be in constant back pain
 
Obviously since short is also a disability just like gigantism is. But I'd rather be 7 foot or around there where I have to duck under doors but can walk normally otherwise. This guy seems to be in constant back pain
But at least you live a moggable life and rich. Who cares if you got back pain or die early better than living as a manlet incel
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4444, bloomercel and NotoriousLoser
I would rather be 7’5 than 5’3
Why is it always black or white with people on here? No shit being abnormally tall is better than manletism, beyond water. But it does not make it so being 7'5 is ideal. Ideally being 6'5" is the best height for many reasons. Appeal, longevity, proportions.
 
Why is it always black or white with people on here? No shit being abnormally tall is better than manletism, beyond water. But it does not make it so being 7'5 is ideal. Ideally being 6'5" is the best height for many reasons. Appeal, longevity, proportions.
Longevity at 6'5? LOL, no. Maybe 6'2 or 6'3 at the most.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 4444 and Jhon Smith
looks like a stick

1685813495251
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4444, nope and Jhon Smith
Longevity at 6'5? LOL, no. Maybe 6'2 or 6'3 at the most.
6'5 as opposed to 7'5, of course shorter stature provides better longevity but at 6'5 you get the perfect blend of still decent but not shit longevity as well as height halo, good proportions and potential for frame.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4444
6'2-6'4 is the ideal height for this century. things will change in the year 2100 and up, then i think 6'5 will be the new minimum height if u wanna be a mogger.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Jhon Smith
6'2-6'4 is the ideal height for this century. things will change in the year 2100 and up, then i think 6'5 will be the new minimum height if u wanna be a mogger.
What makes you think the height requirement will go up bro? You realize humans have been the same height since the Stone Age. we clearly have trouble functioning past a certain amount above average
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4444
Manlet in Pandora
 

Similar threads

Z
Replies
4
Views
53
cuckycuckcuck
cuckycuckcuck
Regret
Replies
48
Views
549
highcheekbones
highcheekbones
arkzy7
Replies
14
Views
127
newgenlm
newgenlm
arkzy7
Replies
25
Views
154
arkzy7
arkzy7
DysgenicArtery
Replies
5
Views
64
6’7whitechad
6

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top