"Pair-bonding affects men and women differently~! It's much worse for women if they have a sexual past!"

Gengar

Gengar

male gaze victim
Staff
Joined
Oct 25, 2018
Posts
118,792
Reputation
160,649
Even if women release 3x more certain brain chemicals than men (need a source for this claim), who's to say you need 3x that amount to have impaired pair-bonding abilities? Having 3x less that amount (once again, assuming that claim is even true) would be sufficient enough to produce the same results..

Just look at kings and emperors of the past who had a favorite wife or a favorite concubine. This is exactly what impaired pair-bonding means. In Islam, you can have up to four wives. But there's no way in hell you will be able to divide your love equally to these four women. You're going to have a favorite. No ifs and buts.

Therefore...

Pair-bonding ability affects women and men equally.

Men here just want to justify their degeneracy while at the same time looking down on their female degenerate counterparts to pretend they have some moral high ground when they clearly don't have that, since they're degenerates.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • Hmm...
Reactions: HTN_Mentalcel, Sens, TsarTsar444 and 14 others
dnr + virgin cope
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: 5'7 zoomer, Corleone, horizontallytall and 7 others
Male bodycount does not affect statistical longevity of marriage. Female bodycount does.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HTN_Mentalcel, BasedPsychiatrist, FailedNormieManlet and 15 others
I’m not knowledgeable on kebab sacred texts, but having multiple wives was primarily to display a sign of wealth and status, to show others that you can afford maintaining multiple families. So i wouldn’t be that surprised if a guy only genuinely loved his 1st wife and just took care of the other 2.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6128, Deleted member 19453, Chadeep and 1 other person
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Krakowski, Sub0, Deleted member 33514 and 7 others
so Chico’s marriage will soon be over
 
Male bodycount does not affect statistical longevity of marriage. Female bodycount does.
Cope. Women who have had two sexual partners have a shorter "longevity of marriage" than women with three sexual partners. Lower body count, yet higher divorce rates.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: LampPostPrime, Chadeep and aspiringexcel
Male bodycount does not affect statistical longevity of marriage. Female bodycount does.
Those women were a mess before they had the body count

They were hoes in waiting
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZaC
What do u mean by degeneracy
 
Cope. Women who have had two sexual partners have a shorter "longevity of marriage" than women with three sexual partners. Lower body count, yet higher divorce rates.
No. Virgin is 90% chance of sustainability, after 6 bodies it's 20%. Everything between falls between and anything past is fucking over.
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: HTN_Mentalcel, TsarTsar444 and LampPostPrime
Male bodycount does not affect statistical longevity of marriage. Female bodycount does.
The ultimate biological proof of this is that the female reproductive organ severely deteriorates with use and time, while its male counterpart barely does.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Chadeep, Debetro and HarrierDuBois
I’m not knowledgeable on kebab sacred texts, but having multiple wives was primarily to display a sign of wealth and status, to show others that you can afford maintaining certain families. So i wouldn’t be that surprised if a guy only genuinely loved his 1st wife and just took care of the other 2.
Having multiple wives is not as justifiable in today's world as it used to be. Back then, during times of war, there would be a shortage of men, so it made sense for a man to multiple women as these women clearly wanted to be married and start families. Nowadays, men taking up multiple wives would create an incel problem. But that's not the point.. my point is that you're always going to have a favorite, no matter the reason. And it's not always the first.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, SurgeryEnjoyer and aspiringexcel
The ultimate biological proof of this is that the female reproductive organ severly deteriorates with use and time, while its male counterpart barely does.
Ultimate biological proof is everyone knows who the father is if it’s one guy five girls but no one knows who the father is if it’s one girl five guys.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444 and LampPostPrime
The ultimate biological proof of this is that the female reproductive organ severely deteriorates with use and time, while its male counterpart barely does.
Proof?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Lmao
Let's be real, it doesnt matter if it affects both genders equally, I mean, men don't even have many options these days so most ltrs dying is the fault of the women bodycount.
 
No. Virgin is 90% chance of sustainability, after 6 bodies it's 20%. Everything between falls between and anything past is fucking over.
Your body count argument falls apart when a lesser body count accounts for a less successful marriage.
 
No. Virgin is 90% chance of sustainability, after 6 bodies it's 20%. Everything between falls between and anything past is fucking over.
I wonder what was the sample of the study, if anything a girl with lower body count would be more likely to cheat than one with let's say 15 bodies, at least by my logic
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: LampPostPrime
The ultimate biological proof of this is that the female reproductive organ severely deteriorates with use and time, while its male counterpart barely does.
That is only proof that there's a biological clock for women. It isn't proof for the idea that pair-bonding affects men and women unequally.
 
I wonder what was the sample of the study, if anything a girl with lower body count would be more likely to cheat than one with let's say 15 bodies, at least by my logic
No, because a girl with low bodycount has high bonding. A girl with high bodycount has low bonding.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime
That is only proof that there's a biological clock for women. It isn't proof for the idea that pair-bonding affects men and women unequally.
I was responding to what harrier said, not your argument in particular which i mostly agree with.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
Nigga you really wrote a whole essay of nothing and got eviscerated by this
Male bodycount does not affect statistical longevity of marriage. Female bodycount does.
 
I think he is talking about the fact that men can conceive at any age, even in their senior years whereas women cannot do this. A good example is Al Pacino who is in his 70s or 80s and his wife/partner is in her 20s and she gave birth to his kid.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SurgeryEnjoyer
Disgusting, what would that prove anyway? As far as I know my mother has only been with my father.
Just take pornstars for example, most 40 y.o. women have their genitalia in disgusting conditions as a result of having been railed by hundreds of dudes and aging. Take most successful male pornstars in their like 40s or even 50s, theirs looks basically unchanged from a young adult’s one.
 
I think he is talking about the fact that men can conceive an age at any age, even in their senior years whereas women cannot do this. A good example is Al Pacino who is in his 70s or 80s and his wife/partner is in her 20s and she gave birth to his kid.
Also that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
Just take pornstars for example, most 40 y.o. women have their genitalia in disgusting conditions as a result of having been railed by hundreds of dudes and aging. Take most successful male pornstars in their like 40s or even 50s, theirs looks basically unchanged from a young adult’s one.
I heard women in porn undergo plastic surgery to make their genitals look more appealing to us men.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SurgeryEnjoyer
I think he is talking about the fact that men can conceive an age at any age, even in their senior years whereas women cannot do this. A good example is Al Pacino who is in his 70s or 80s and his wife/partner is in her 20s and she gave birth to his kid.
But he said female reproductive organs deteriorate with use, and what you mentioned is cuz of age.
 
But he said female reproductive organs reproductive organs deteriorate with use, and what you mentioned is cuz of age.
I just scrolled up. He said "use and time." I'm only focusing on "time." Never heard anything about use in relation to reproduction.
 
But he said female reproductive organs deteriorate with use, and what you mentioned is cuz of age.
I said use AND AGE. Men’s does too, just at a way slower rate.
 
Let's be real, it doesnt matter if it affects both genders equally, I mean, men don't even have many options these days so most ltrs dying is the fault of the women bodycount.
It matters since men want to pretend they're not as bad as women for having a body count.
 
You cannot prove use affects it.
Never said it affects the reproduction capabilities, only the aspect. A car still can have broken windows and work. Time is the real issue here.
 
Both men and women with high body count are mentally ill. Both have their dopamine receptors fried and having sex is a way of coping with it. Look at Amnesia. He’s going mentally insane
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: HTN_Mentalcel, It'snotover, williamper and 3 others
Both men and women with high body count are mentally ill. Both have their dopamine receptors fried and having sex is a way of coping with it. Look at Amnesia. He’s going mentally insane
He is also proof of the fact that slayers eventually want LTRs. I'm not sure about mentally ill though, he seems very sane. I've interacted with him in private on multiple occasions.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime and Chadeep
It matters since men want to pretend they're not as bad as women for having a body count.
I'm really getting behind the conspiracy that you're not the old TRU_CEL as this theory is very low iq ngl

How many successful ltrs have you seen in which a man has many women vs a women having many men? The former heavily outweighs the latter and its not because muh misogyny or sexism, the simply never works because both genders don't work the same way.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444, stamaster21 and LampPostPrime
He is also proof of the fact that slayers eventually want LTRs. I'm not sure about mentally ill though, he seems very sane. I've interacted with him in private on multiple occasions.
He definitely has some unsolved trauma normal people stay in LTR for very long some 4 years +. Not hopping on Tinder and trying to fuck any other person. Even Gays. Same with Unstable women with daddy issues.
 
This is such a low iq take. You clearly don’t understand basic biology. It’s got nothing to do with how much hormones are being released. Women’s brains are completely different because their survival and their children’s survival (who they are supposed to feed and take care of) depends on the man.
 
I'm really getting behind the conspiracy that you're not the old TRU_CEL as this theory is very low iq ngl

How many successful ltrs have you seen in which a man has many women vs a women having many men? The former heavily outweighs the latter and its not because muh misogyny or sexism, the simply never works because both genders don't work the same way.
It's not low IQ. Low IQ would be saying "Female degenerates bad! Male degenerates good!"

In reality, it's "Degeneracy is bad." Regardless of gender.

Of course, women and men are different on many levels but that does not translate into women having worse pair-bonding abilities than men.

That's just jumping to conclusions that aren't true.
 
This is such a low iq take. You clearly don’t understand basic biology. It’s got nothing to do with how much hormones are being released. Women’s brains are completely different because their survival and their children’s survival (who they are supposed to feed and take care of) depends on the man.
Funny how you claim it's a low IQ take and then you go at it from a completely irrelevant angle (and an outdated one, mind you -- women no longer need men for their children's survival thanks to the modern society we live in). This has nothing to do with "not understanding biology," it's about degenerate men coping about how it's not as bad for them as it is for women.
 
He definitely has some unsolved trauma normal people stay in LTR for very long some 4 years +. Not hopping on Tinder and trying to fuck any other person. Even Gays. Same with Unstable women with daddy issues.
I think many people have unresolved traumas. Unresolved traumas go beyond dating. Also, there are people who cheat even if they're in a long LTR.
 
It's not low IQ. Low IQ would be saying "Female degenerates bad! Male degenerates good!"

In reality, it's "Degeneracy is bad." Regardless of gender.

Of course, women and men are different on many levels but that does not translate into women having worse pair-bonding abilities than men.

That's just jumping to conclusions that aren't true.
So this was a morality topic all along? Jfl
 
Imagine claiming to be Islamic and trying to make fun of my being a virgin. :feelskek: Sandnigger IQ.
:soy: mirin sentience thinking i am islamic for liking its aesthetic

>sandnigger
>is disgustinf shitskin himself
 
Male bodycount does not affect statistical longevity of marriage. Female bodycount does.
female bodycount doesnt affect longevity of marriage too jfl jsut cuz u marry a hoe doesnt mean run through romantic angels wont stay with u till death parts u away
 
female bodycount doesnt affect longevity of marriage too jfl jsut cuz u marry a hoe doesnt mean run through romantic angels wont stay with u till death parts u away
Virgin has a 90% chance of sustainability. 6 bodies has a 20% chance of sustainability. At 2-3 bodies it's already 50/50 if she will divorce you. Just fucking laugh if you get a girl with 6+ bodies.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444

Similar threads

D
Replies
16
Views
412
aryan mogger
A
Edgarpill
Replies
21
Views
1K
IncelJihadist
IncelJihadist
D
Replies
20
Views
6K
carlos72
carlos72
D
Replies
24
Views
6K
subcel45
subcel45

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top