Paki Pride has been insulted

For me any system is fine as long as it creates a working country that is not progressive and focuses on creating advancements. I do not hate the fact that the fascists like their past a lot but they liked way too much to focus on the future of what they will be.
Fascists were idiots who pushed to hard towards nationalism, plus the chances of a uncapable person taking the mantle are a bit too high in a fascist system. Constitutional monarchy would obviously have some flaws as well, but in that system a capable men is more likely to take the helm. As long as the council of ministers isn't to corrupt.
 
  • +1
Reactions: InanimatePragmatist and unstable
Germans were scums who could not stop larping, they went from mien brudarzzz we is romanzzz and shiet to we izzz Aryanzz and shiet" Fascism had it's own flaws as well, in my opinion constitutional monarchy is the best. Similar to the ancient Roman empire but with some modifications.
there is a reason why britain was the only country which didn't have fascism during the war.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
there is a reason why britain was the only country which didn't have fascism during the war.
Brits got lucky, they would have been ragdolled by the Germans too if USA did not interfare. Those cunt's have always been damn lucky.
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable
Brits got lucky, they would have been ragdolled by the Germans too if USA did not interfare. Those cunt's have always been damn lucky.
i don't think germans could have tbh. britain maybe has the best geography in europe.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
i don't think germans could have tbh. britain maybe has the best geography in europe.
Brits lose a lot of land wars jfl, it's their navy which is a problem once you get past that it becomes far easier to crush them. That's how they have lost in the past.
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable
Brits lose a lot of land wars jfl, it's their navy which is a problem once you get past that it becomes far easier to crush them. That's how they have lost in the past.
german wasted too much money on u boats and missiles both of which ended up being countered by royal navy, navy is their biggest strength they were defeating combined navy of europe during napoleonic times germans were nothing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
View attachment 4375872



Org survey considers indians and paki to be the same race:forcedsmile:
we should prevent this harmful stereotype against indians also south asia is not a real place.

@Gengar @vernier @unkownincel @MiserableMan @L1mbal
Nigga they also grouped the whole of africa + Caribbean and USA and brazil and all that shit as just one race, black

This is why the "black" label is harmful it groups a diverse race as one due to pheno
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable
stalin was the smartest ww2 leader by far he effectively controlled the most rebellious subjects in entire europe and pulled victories at the same time, he purposefully created a redundant competitive command chain which gave him the best view of situations.

progressive is not a real term it is the label of jews:feelshah:
You never lived in a ex communist or communist country have you? It is. The Jews are big fans of progressive ideals.
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable
You never lived in a ex communist or communist country have you? It is. The Jews are big fans of progressive ideals.
what does progressive mean? economic progressivism?
 
I am from uk and we class all south Asians as pakis
 
  • WTF
  • +1
Reactions: InanimatePragmatist and unstable
what does progressive mean? economic progressivism?
Social Progressivism. Acceptance of alien races, destruction of tradition, degenerates not being punished.
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable

Similar threads

Nodesbitch
Replies
30
Views
2K
aabb123
aabb123
hopecel
Replies
29
Views
1K
hopecel
hopecel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top