willysucker
stimmaxxer
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2025
- Posts
- 329
- Reputation
- 509
what you said doesn't really contradict what i said, there is ofc a higher chance of the child being more attractive if the parents had similar morphologies, but i said "could", so yes what you said was right, but what i meant is that there isn't a higher chance of the kid being """more""" attractive.This is not true, this usually is applicable if the parents have similar morphologies and/or genetics, otherwise, the more genetically and morphologically distant the two parents are regardless, if they are good looking the more variance you have in the outcomes of the physical attractiveness of the child.
granted my original statement was kind of vague






(some dude in college said this lmfao)