pakistanis are just indians that moved up north?

when did i say this then you retarded pajeet?
why are u so fucking butthurt lmfao? literally nothing i said was meant to insult u or pakistanis, yet u fill ur posts with racebait flings jfl. i have a fuckton of paki/muslim friends irl and enjoy partaking in the culture. ive talked abt this stuff w them before and find it interesting, so i discuss on this site too.

i wasnt arguing with u at all, it was a simple response lol

btw im not the 24 yo khhv truecel boyo, watch ur cortisol...u dont want a heart attack the next time u get rejected by a hooker :forcedsmile:

youre the one coping dude, with my high t beard they can immediately tell im pakistani despite my shitskin and jew nose. theyd never mistake me for you.
good for u, i couldnt care less lol.
are you retarded son? kalash are directly descended from alexander and science has proven this. i know more about my people than you do, pajeet. dont forget. only a pajeet and an afghandu like @sytyl would argue science :lul:
thats bc of it being the generally held belief for so long, theres alternate hypotheses on their ancestry. ive spent years working in scientific fields lol, u dont know shit abt me.

read for urself if u can detach ur emotional bias: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570283/

kalash have very very low gene flow occurring too, so whatever their origin was, it didnt spread to the rest of their surrounding groups

its a gene mutation means it could happen to any group of people.
that was my whole point...that it happens to anyone w the same genetic components.

i didnt disagree with what u said, take that stick out of ur ass
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 2100, sytyl and Gengar
well the other 85% are still ethnically punjabi wiich is like north indian

but afghan/iranic pakis are probably slaying the most
not 85% but still a little bit over 55% account for indic. id say biggest slayers are indeed iranic pakistanis as well as atypical indic pakistanis. you can see on wikipedia how much of the population is indic (punjabi, sindhi and muhajir)
why are u so fucking butthurt lmfao? literally nothing i said was meant to insult u or pakistanis, yet u fill ur posts with racebait flings jfl. i have a fuckton of paki/muslim friends irl and enjoy partaking in the culture. ive talked abt this stuff w them before and find it interesting, so i discuss on this site too.

i wasnt arguing with u at all, it was a simple response lol

btw im not the 24 yo khhv truecel boyo, watch ur cortisol...u dont want a heart attack the next time u get rejected by a hooker :forcedsmile:


good for u, i couldnt care less lol.

thats bc of it being the generally held belief for so long, theres alternate hypotheses on their ancestry. ive spent years working in scientific fields lol, u dont know shit abt me.

read for urself if u can detach ur emotional bias: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570283/

kalash have very very low gene flow occurring too, so whatever their origin was, it didnt spread to the rest of their surrounding groups


that was my whole point...that it happens to anyone w the same genetic components.

i didnt disagree with what u said, take that stick out of ur ass
im butthurt, youre not yet youre writing an essay for me. and by making certain claims you come across as disagreeing with me so maybe you should phrase things better?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3702
im butthurt, youre not yet youre writing an essay for me. and by making certain claims you come across as disagreeing with me so maybe you should phrase things better?
responding = writing an essay?

i disagreed on some aspects and agreed on the others, nothing hard to understand abt that. maybe ur the low iq one here jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2100, AbandonShip and sytyl
responding = writing an essay?

i disagreed on some aspects and agreed on the others, nothing hard to understand abt that. maybe ur the low iq one here jfl
you seriously think im gonna write peoples essays on here? jfl at your iq, why not only argue the points you disagree with rather than lumping it all together, yknow, like normal ppl do?
 
@TRUE_CEL bro what's with the self hate ngl, embrace and be proud of your desi indian heritage like me
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 2100, Copeful, Gengar and 1 other person
You have submitted to science.Or should i say, to some approach of metascience.
bhai u back? jfl im very happy rn almost breaking down
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 756, sytyl, Deleted member 3043 and 1 other person
@TRUE_CEL bro what's with the self hate ngl, embrace and be proud of your desi indian heritage like me
im not indian, im selfloving cuz i identify as pakistani
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 3043
  • JFL
  • Woah
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 2100, sloopnoob and Zygos4Life
im not indian, im selfloving cuz i identify as pakistani
Pakistan = muslim state of india though

We were literally the same before 1947
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 756, sytyl, sloopnoob and 2 others
BOTH SUBHUMAN SHITSKINS DOSENT FUCKING MATTER IF THEY LOOK THE SAME
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7192
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3043 and Deleted member 7192
We were literally the same before 1947
this part is true but the other is common misconception, india never existed as a country before 1947. if you were truly a desi you'd know we referred to the country (along with bangladesh) as hindustan and not india. today's india =/= past's hindustan
 
jfl asked a question and got a 60 reply thread
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 2100, Deleted member 7580, sytyl and 1 other person
you seriously think im gonna write peoples essays on here? jfl at your iq, why not only argue the points you disagree with rather than lumping it all together, yknow, like normal ppl do?
what are u even on abt jfl?? u understoof the distinction, just became ridiculously emotional
im not indian, im selfloving cuz i identify as pakistani
self loving = taking pride in the slight chance that ur neighbors got raped and conquered by greeks?
Bro ily ngl, indeed you missed me fucking much :heart:
u should join chadistan on disc again tbh, just rot less jfl
 
  • JFL
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: AbandonShip, JizzFarmer, Deleted member 3043 and 1 other person
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 7192
this part is true but the other is common misconception, india never existed as a country before 1947. if you were truly a desi you'd know we referred to the country (along with bangladesh) as hindustan and not india. today's india =/= past's hindustan
It actually was called india tho

The British Raj (/rɑːdʒ/; from rāj, literally, "rule" in Sanskrit and Hindustani)[2] was the rule by the British Crown on the Indian subcontinent from 1858 to 1947.[3][4][5][6] The rule is also called Crown rule in India,[7] or direct rule in India.[8] The region under British control was commonly called India in contemporaneous usage
 
what are u even on abt jfl?? u understoof the distinction, just became ridiculously emotional

self loving = taking pride in the slight chance that ur neighbors got raped and conquered by greeks?

u should join chadistan on disc again tbh, just rot less jfl
jfl if you think im being ridiculously emotional just because im using more adjectives than you. get used to my writing style, retard. and no, self-loving means taking pride in my pakistani heritage, some shitskin retard on here was denying science like a low iq faggot and im already in chadistan but those faggots keep posting gay shit.
 
i don't even understand the issue and I don't care enough to ngl
thats why you created a thread about it right, you contradictory faggot. your iq must be negative.
 
thats why you created a thread about it right, you contradictory faggot. your iq must be negative.
yeah seems too complicated and i lost interest

it's just ethnics against ethnics who cares
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Copeful
It actually was called india tho

The British Raj (/rɑːdʒ/; from rāj, literally, "rule" in Sanskrit and Hindustani)[2] was the rule by the British Crown on the Indian subcontinent from 1858 to 1947.[3][4][5][6] The rule is also called Crown rule in India,[7] or direct rule in India.[8] The region under British control was commonly called India in contemporaneous usage
learn to read dude, i said *we* never referred to it as india. only foreigners did. india formally existed since 1947. hell, even today among the desi population its referred to as 'bharat'
 
yeah seems too complicated and i lost interest

it's just ethnics against ethnics who cares
ethnics are uncivilized beasts
 
jfl at you buddy. you can stay arguing in my thread if you want to tho
as long as there will be barking pajeets and afghandus then yes i will be here, just sit back and enjoy
 
jfl if you think im being ridiculously emotional just because im using more adjectives than you. get used to my writing style, retard. and no, self-loving means taking pride in my pakistani heritage, some shitskin retard on here was denying science like a low iq faggot and im already in chadistan but those faggots keep posting gay shit.

jfl at calling that denying science, he's complete right, u just prefer the outcome where ur kalash buddies took miles of greek dick so that u can claim ur countrymen to be 4% white. "self loving" = desperate to deep throat cumskins. didnt ask u to join lol, u can continue rotting on .co until killing urself as a 30 yo khhv.
 
  • +1
Reactions: sytyl
jfl at calling that denying science, he's complete right, u just prefer the outcome where ur kalash buddies took miles of greek dick so that u can claim ur countrymen to be 4% white. "self loving" = desperate to deep throat cumskins. didnt ask u to join lol, u can continue rotting on .co until killing urself as a 30 yo khhv.
hes not right you utter retard, the kalash claim has been verified scientifically after they maintained it for centuries. jfl at thinking the afghandu is right. and holy fuck you are one coping pajeet, where am i deepthroating cumskins you delusional faggot? keep crying for me like pajeets and afghandus usually do :lul:
 
I honestly can’t even tell difference between Indians and middle easterns unless middle easterns are descendants of crusaders (usually christians )
@Golang
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 756, Golang and Gengar
I honestly can’t even tell difference between Indians and middle easterns unless middle easterns are descendants of crusaders (usually christians )
@Golang
how can you tell em apart? christian arabs look the same to me.
 
how can you tell em apart? christian arabs look the same to me.
Christians are more european looking, many look Greek
@Copemaxxing is Christian Iraqi and look white
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 756 and Golang
hes not right you utter retard, the kalash claim has been verified scientifically after they maintained it for centuries. jfl at thinking the afghandu is right. and holy fuck you are one coping pajeet, where am i deepthroating cumskins you delusional faggot?
read for urself if u can detach ur emotional bias: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570283/
no basis on which to maintain that claim other than just tradition. u dont know jackshit lmfao.

keep crying for me like pajeets and afghandus usually do :lul:
1603826303684
1603826308787

the average pajeet and afghandu both mog tf out of u. keep barking
 
  • JFL
Reactions: sytyl
hes not right you utter retard, the kalash claim has been verified scientifically after they maintained it for centuries
read every word, here I'll make it easy for you:

Previous Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA markers provided no support for their claimed Greek descent following Alexander III of Macedon's invasion of this region, and analysis of autosomal loci provided evidence of a strong genetic bottleneck.

Even if they do have greek/macedonian input, it's very negligible and light eyes/features come from ANI.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zygos4Life and curryslayerordeath
Christians are more european looking, many look Greek
@Copemaxxing is Christian Iraqi and look white
you'd probably think he was revert irl because he refers to God as Allah as well. doesnt make em islamic, its just that christians use the same terms as well since they speak arabic.
 
pajeets and mohamads look the same
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 756, Golang, curryslayerordeath and 1 other person
the average pajeet and afghandu both mog tf out of u. keep barking
jfl at this unholy alliance of pajeet shitskins and afghandu shitskins, cucked beyond belief. but dont worry pakistan will still win :)
 
no basis on which to maintain that claim other than just tradition. u dont know jackshit lmfao.
not tradition, retard. scientifically verified. now go cry for kalash together with the afghandu who got raped by greeks jfl
 
not tradition, retard. scientifically verified. now go cry for kalash together with the afghandu who got raped by greeks jfl

-"scientifically verified"
-ignores a paper published in 2015 which says the exact opposite

Previous Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA markers provided no support for their claimed Greek descent following Alexander III of Macedon's invasion of this region, and analysis of autosomal loci provided evidence of a strong genetic bottleneck.

Since the split from other South Asian populations, the Kalash have maintained a low long-term effective population size (2,319–2,603) and experienced no detectable gene flow from their geographic neighbors in Pakistan or from other extant Eurasian populations .... thus they represent present-day descendants of some of the earliest migrants into the Indian sub-continent from West Asia.


truecel looks and incredibly low iq, must be a very brutal combo ngl

cba to continue this so im not replying anymore lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: sytyl
imran isn't the average paki lol, he's pashtun.

point is IK's phenotype isn't uncommon, pashtuns account for 20% of the population. significant minority in a country of 200 million.

1603825488906
1603825505719
1603825513309
1603826103517
1603826120905
1603826132089


Shahid Afridi in his prime

1603826808009
1603826827743
1603826844898

Vs now
1603826866502
1603826888255


Jfl his daughter literally has light blonde hair and looks nordic.

Name one Indian cricket player with similar phenotype. It doesn't exist. Point being Pakistan has a shit load of Iranic/Pashtun chads whereas in India you wont find this level of ethnic diversity anywhere
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8019 and Deleted member 3702
-"scientifically verified"
-ignores a paper published in 2015 which says the exact opposite

Previous Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA markers provided no support for their claimed Greek descent following Alexander III of Macedon's invasion of this region, and analysis of autosomal loci provided evidence of a strong genetic bottleneck.

Since the split from other South Asian populations, the Kalash have maintained a low long-term effective population size (2,319–2,603) and experienced no detectable gene flow from their geographic neighbors in Pakistan or from other extant Eurasian populations .... thus they represent present-day descendants of some of the earliest migrants into the Indian sub-continent from West Asia.


truecel looks and incredibly low iq, must be a very brutal combo ngl

cba to continue this so im not replying anymore lol
and i cba to prove you wrong cuz youre a coping pajeet
 
read every word, here I'll make it easy for you:



Even if they do have greek/macedonian input, it's very negligible and light eyes/features come from ANI.
if i care enough to find the scientific finding that shows the opposite of what you and your pajeet are saying i will post it.
 
point is IK's phenotype isn't uncommon, pashtuns account for 20% of the population. significant minority in a country of 200 million.

View attachment 764139View attachment 764141View attachment 764143View attachment 764173View attachment 764175View attachment 764176

Shahid Afridi in his prime

View attachment 764199View attachment 764200View attachment 764202
Vs now
View attachment 764204View attachment 764205

Jfl his daughter literally has light blonde hair and looks nordic.

Name one Indian cricket player with similar phenotype. It doesn't exist. Point being Pakistan has a shit load of Iranic/Pashtun chads whereas in India you wont find this level of ethnic diversity anywhere
basicallt india but without dravidians and shit ton of afghans and persians
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 756 and Golang
It's was under the pressure of hindu nationalist like @AbandonShip, unironically.
noooooooo it was coz of the british who couldn't see their previous colony being better off so they decided to spark a conflict and split them so that both end up with loss of humans, wealth and resources. Also before the Britishers came, the muslims were ruling India so hindu nationalism didn't even exist. they were living together before aswell and there's as many muslims in India today as there are in Pakistan, unironically .
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: sytyl and Deleted member 3043
if i care enough to find the scientific finding that shows the opposite of what you and your pajeet are saying i will post it.
new studies take precedence over old studies, any greek/macedonian input in the area accounts for less than 0.1% of ydna
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 756 and Deleted member 3702
new studies take precedence over old studies, any greek/macedonian input in the area accounts for less than 0.1% of ydna
read what i last said and if im wrong i will admit it. but for now im uninterested in kalash.
 
noooooooo it was coz of the british who couldn't see their previous colony being better off so they decided to spark a conflict and split them so that both end up with loss of humans, wealth and resources. Also before the Britishers came, the muslims were ruling India so hindu nationalism didn't even exist. they were living together before aswell and there's as many muslims in India today as there are in Pakistan, unironically .
Actually you'r right, but, thing is that's what we were told in history classes in the West. I miss these times, where unironically we lived more in peace than in so called democracy.Not only that, but India was the 1st power and this in an unironical way.
 
  • +1
Reactions: sloopnoob
basicallt india but without dravidians and shit ton of afghans and persians
Pakistan is extremely diverse. we come in all sizes and colors.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 756, GymcelDoomer and Deleted member 3702

Similar threads

whiteegyptian
Replies
18
Views
449
alpomer7
alpomer7
Nectar
Replies
11
Views
265
iblamexyz
iblamexyz
H
Replies
3
Views
121
BlueScree
BlueScree
iblamenarrowface
Replies
14
Views
198
The Grinch
The Grinch
J
Replies
1
Views
195
CFW432
CFW432

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top