Pakistanis are usually more handsome than Indians being honest.

[reptiles]

Pakistan and India are still technically the same race but the phenos are very different most Of south India's phenos are indo melanids this is a very bad phenotype the others are the other very Aboringal phenos.

Most of Pakistan's phenotypes are Indids, nord indid, mountain indid the non curry phenos are Iranians and they look quite handsome usually being objective here Pakistan is more handsome Than India and no there not the same exactly there the exact same race bar the Iranian ones however the pakistani/northern Indian ones clearly have decent workable phenos.

 

[Deleted member 8583]

Pakistan and India are still technically the same race but the phenos are very different most Of south India's phenos are indo melanids this is a very bad phenotype the others are the other very Aboringal phenos.

Most of Pakistan's phenotypes are Indids, nord indid, mountain indid the non curry phenos are Iranians and they look quite handsome usually being objective here Pakistan is more handsome Than India and no there not the same exactly there the exact same race bar the Iranian ones however the pakistani/northern Indian ones clearly have decent workable phenos.

agree but qatari mog both

 

[reptiles]

agree but qatari mog both

Don't pakistanis look like quataris ?

 

[Deleted member 8583]

Don't pakistanis look like quataris ?

tbh

 

[reptiles]

tbh

South Indians don't but many pakis look arab or non typical Indian

 

[Deleted member 8583]

South Indians don't but many pakis look arab or non typical Indian

just dont be dravidian bull theorem @PrestonYnot

 

[reptiles]

just dont be dravidian bull theorem @PrestonYnot

He looks better know tbqh before it was over tier

 

[Deleted member 8583]

He looks better know tbqh before it was over tier

in west is over

 

[reptiles]

in west is over

These are the good phenos

These are workable phenotypes there is mountain indid but i can't get a good resolution the nord indid is the more iranic and arab phenotype tbqh it's more common in higher castes

 

[Deleted member 14455]

can't they just bomb each other already

 

[Deleted member 8583]

These are the good phenos

View attachment 1212404

View attachment 1212405


View attachment 1212406


View attachment 1212407



These are workable phenotypes there is mountain indid but i can't get a good resolution the nord indid is the more iranic and arab phenotype tbqh it's more common in higher castes

Which one of those am I

 

[reptiles]

can't they just bomb each other already

Why would they do that ?

 

[reptiles]

Which one of those am I

I think neither your phenotype looks a bit more arab tbqh which makes sense your literally arab

 

[Deleted member 14455]

Why would they do that ?

since when you need reason for war? their history aside

 

[curryslayerordeath]

imagine not being North Indid Brahmin masterrace

 

[reptiles]

imagine not being North Indid Brahmin masterrace

North indid oringated from the indo europeans they are a good pheno

 

[Gengar]

both pakistanis and indians are populated by different ethnic groups. some overlap but to say that pakistanis and indians are "still technically the same" is wrong and ignorant.

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Pakistan and India are still technically the same race but the phenos are very different most Of south India's phenos are indo melanids this is a very bad phenotype the others are the other very Aboringal phenos.

Most of Pakistan's phenotypes are Indids, nord indid, mountain indid the non curry phenos are Iranians and they look quite handsome usually being objective here Pakistan is more handsome Than India and no there not the same exactly there the exact same race bar the Iranian ones however the pakistani/northern Indian ones clearly have decent workable phenos.

@Ryan
@TRUE_CEL

Toughts ???

 

[Deleted member 10987]

both pakistanis and indians are populated by different ethnic groups. some overlap but to say that pakistanis and indians are "still technically the same" is wrong and ignorant.

Not the same but are very similar

 

[Gengar]

Not the same but are very similar

depends which groups you are comparing, punjabis and sindhis are similar, but punjabis and nagas are completely different or whatever. i can often tell when a guy is indian or pakistani just by looking at him lol. so can my other pakistani friends.

 

[reptiles]

depends which groups you are comparing, punjabis and sindhis are similar, but punjabis and nagas are completely different or whatever. i can often tell when a guy is indian or pakistani just by looking at him lol. so can my other pakistani friends.

Looking pakistani usually means looking less indo melanid

 

[Deleted member 10987]

depends which groups you are comparing, punjabis and sindhis are similar, but punjabis and nagas are completely different or whatever. i can often tell when a guy is indian or pakistani just by looking at him lol. so can my other pakistani friends.

Of course
But talking about those close to pakistan border

 

[reptiles]

depends which groups you are comparing, punjabis and sindhis are similar, but punjabis and nagas are completely different or whatever. i can often tell when a guy is indian or pakistani just by looking at him lol. so can my other pakistani friends.

Nagas are curry but with mostly gook dna there pheno is majority mongoloid with slight indic

 

[Gengar]

Looking pakistani usually means looking less indo melanid

its not just skin color alone. dont forget, pakistan is a country that is home to many ethnic groups

these are all pakistanis, you will be able to find the first ethnic group in india as well but you wont find the other two in india at all. so like i told @Maesthetic, it really depends on which groups you are talking about.. we have ethnic groups that do not exist in india and to claim that we are all the same people is laughable to say the least and untrue.

 

[reptiles]

its not just skin color alone. dont forget, pakistan is a country that is home to many ethnic groups

these are all pakistanis, you will be able to find the first ethnic group in india as well but you wont find the other two in india at all. so like i told @Maesthetic, it really depends on which groups you are talking about.. we have ethnic groups that do not exist in india and to claim that we are all the same people is laughable to say the least and untrue.

I'm not talking about the out siders though i'm talking about the indics they very clearly are indian or the very least south Asian the fact the 2 cline says a lot siddis are just migrant niggas hazaras as mixed gooks and the kalash are literally an isolated population that hasn't interbred with any other population it's stupid to call them of ''pakistani'' ancestry though INDO nordic does have indic influnce

 

[Deleted member 10987]

its not just skin color alone. dont forget, pakistan is a country that is home to many ethnic groups

these are all pakistanis, you will be able to find the first ethnic group in india as well but you wont find the other two in india at all. so like i told @Maesthetic, it really depends on which groups you are talking about.. we have ethnic groups that do not exist in india and to claim that we are all the same people is laughable to say the least and untrue.

Hazaras ?

 

[reptiles]

Hazaras ?

Basically there mixed race Eurasians like hapas basically although they have been an endemic population for a long time where know they are there own race

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Basically there mixed race Eurasians like hapas basically although they have been an endemic population for a long time where know they are there own race

Im talking the guys @TRUE_CEL posted
Hazaras are either a genetic mystery or mongols who settled afghanistan

 

[reptiles]

Im talking the guys @TRUE_CEL posted
Hazaras are either a genetic mystery or mongols who settled afghanistan

Either way there not indic and are an invasive species no offense indic= north indid gracile indid mountain indid indo nordic is a mixture of indo european and indic so there like a hybrid race there still south asian or central asian but they certainly are not indian

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Either way there not indic and are an invasive species no offense indic= north indid gracile indid mountain indid indo nordic is a mixture of indo european and indic so there like a hybrid race there still south asian or central asian but they certainly are not indian

I know they not indic

 

[curryslayerordeath]

its not just skin color alone. dont forget, pakistan is a country that is home to many ethnic groups

these are all pakistanis, you will be able to find the first ethnic group in india as well but you wont find the other two in india at all. so like i told @Maesthetic, it really depends on which groups you are talking about.. we have ethnic groups that do not exist in india and to claim that we are all the same people is laughable to say the least and untrue.

Siddis are a tiny minority, slave descent group; they aren't even native Asians. Hazaras almost barely exist in Pakistan, they're a minority even in their most prominent location of Afghanistan. Kalash people aren't necessarily Pakistani & are an extraordinarily small tribe - they're primitive pagans who don't really follow a country.

The vast majority of Pakistanis are genetically completely Indic & most of the ones that aren't belong to pretty irrelevant minority groups.

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Either way there not indic and are an invasive species no offense indic= north indid gracile indid mountain indid indo nordic is a mixture of indo european and indic so there like a hybrid race there still south asian or central asian but they certainly are not indian

Btw
I seen your pics
You look a bit mongolo
Where do you think it come ?

 

[reptiles]

Btw
I seen your pics
You look a bit mongolo
Where do you think it come ?

Your right i hate my ancestors for there disgusting mixing with those things

 

[reptiles]

Siddis are a tiny minority, slave descent group; they aren't even native Asians. Hazaras almost barely exist in Pakistan, they're a minority even in their most prominent location of Afghanistan. Kalash people aren't necessarily Pakistani & are an extraordinarily small tribe - they're primitive pagans who don't really follow a country.

The vast majority of Pakistanis are genetically completely Indic & most of the ones that aren't belong to pretty irrelevant minority groups.

Exactly I couldn't have said it better myself

 

[volcelfatcel]

Indian state affair threads

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Your right i hate my ancestors for there disgusting mixing with those things

Mughals ?

 

[volcelfatcel]

@goat2x mulatto passing Pakistani is the ultimate combo

 

[reptiles]

@goat2x mulatto passing Pakistani is the ultimate combo

That is awesome some siddis mixed with indics can pass it off

 

[volcelfatcel]

Mughals ?

We wuz mughals n shit nigga
We wuz royalty

 

[reptiles]

Mughals ?

I don't know my mom looked like your typical north indid mixed with keralid both very non gook pheno and my dad was indo melanid I think both of these are very non gook I think i just got a bad hand of the genetic dice because bengali's are like 20 percent gook so sometimes it slightly shows

 

[SubhumanCurrycel]

Average pure Brahmin

 

[Genny]

To be honest I can't tell the difference. Neither can she

 

[Gengar]

Hazaras ?

yes hazaras, there are 1 million hazaras in pakistan

I'm not talking about the out siders though i'm talking about the indics they very clearly are indian or the very least south Asian the fact the 2 cline says a lot siddis are just migrant niggas hazaras as mixed gooks and the kalash are literally an isolated population that hasn't interbred with any other population it's stupid to call them of ''pakistani'' ancestry though INDO nordic does have indic influnce

what do you mean "outsiders"?? they are all pakistanis. and thats what you were comparing, thats why i said dont generalize all pakistanis (or indians) as one. but yes indic pakistanis will generally look similar, but i can still differentiate irl between indians and pakistanis. its not stupid to call them pakistani, its stupid to call them "outsiders" when theyve been living there for centuries ffs.

Siddis are a tiny minority, slave descent group; they aren't even native Asians. Hazaras almost barely exist in Pakistan, they're a minority even in their most prominent location of Afghanistan. Kalash people aren't necessarily Pakistani & are an extraordinarily small tribe - they're primitive pagans who don't really follow a country.

The vast majority of Pakistanis are genetically completely Indic & most of the ones that aren't belong to pretty irrelevant minority groups.

1 million hazaras but they are still pakistanis. india has zero hazaras. wtf is this dumb bullshit, of course kalash people are also pakistanis. whats this "they dont follow a country" or "they are irrelevant" cope. by your logic, indian punjabis are also irrelevant since they are 33 million in a country of 1.5 billion.

 

[volcelfatcel]

Average pure Brahmin
View attachment 1212512

BBC big brahmin cock
Med mogs me as well
Tonemogs me

 

[reptiles]

yes hazaras, there are 1 million hazaras in pakistan

what do you mean "outsiders"?? they are all pakistanis. and thats what you were comparing, thats why i said dont generalize all pakistanis (or indians) as one. but yes indic pakistanis will generally look similar, but i can still differentiate irl between indians and pakistanis. its not stupid to call them pakistani, its stupid to call them "outsiders" when theyve been living there for centuries ffs.

1 million hazaras but they are still pakistanis. india has zero hazaras. wtf is this dumb bullshit, of course kalash people are also pakistanis. whats this "they dont follow a country" or "they are irrelevant" cope. by your logic, indian punjabis are also irrelevant since they are 33 million in a country of 1.5 billion.

yes hazaras, there are 1 million hazaras in pakistan

what do you mean "outsiders"?? they are all pakistanis. and thats what you were comparing, thats why i said dont generalize all pakistanis (or indians) as one. but yes indic pakistanis will generally look similar, but i can still differentiate irl between indians and pakistanis. its not stupid to call them pakistani, its stupid to call them "outsiders" when theyve been living there for centuries ffs.

1 million hazaras but they are still pakistanis. india has zero hazaras. wtf is this dumb bullshit, of course kalash people are also pakistanis. whats this "they dont follow a country" or "they are irrelevant" cope. by your logic, indian punjabis are also irrelevant since they are 33 million in a country of 1.5 billion.

 

[curryslayerordeath]

@goat2x mulatto passing Pakistani is the ultimate combo

I wonder if Siddis are running BBC halo game on unsuspecting Pathan girls ngl

1 million hazaras but they are still pakistanis. india has zero hazaras. wtf is this dumb bullshit, of course kalash people are also pakistanis. whats this "they dont follow a country" or "they are irrelevant" cope. by your logic, indian punjabis are also irrelevant since they are 33 million in a country of 1.5 billion.

Because its overly pedantic lol, every country has phenotypical diversity, the examples you gave are literally nothing special. Probabilistically, the only Pakistanis people will ever see would be Punjabi, Sindhi, or sometimes Pathan; using other almost-tribal groups as examples of diversity is the same shit those sjw twitter users do lmao (calling Hazaras Pakistani is analogous to calling generational Turk migrants Germans).

Its just so weird to post something along those lines when Pakistan is a very homogenous country.

 

[Gengar]

I wonder if Siddis are running BBC halo game on unsuspecting Pathan girls ngl

Because its overly pedantic lol, every country has phenotypical diversity, the examples you gave are literally nothing special. Probabilistically, the only Pakistanis people will ever see would be Punjabi, Sindhi, or sometimes Pathan; using other almost-tribal groups as examples of diversity is the same shit those sjw twitter users do lmao (calling Hazaras Pakistani is analogous to calling generational Turk migrants Germans).

Its just so weird to post something along those lines when Pakistan is a very homogenous country.

of course they are special to pakistan, since they dont live in india. thats why i said its stupid to compare pakistan and india as a whole to each other when we both have ethnic groups that are native to our own countries. i know indians like you will cope and always argue against pakistan but you are not making sense here. pakistan is a diverse country. even i am indic and never have i been mistaken for being indian. 9 out of 10 times its always a different nationality im mistaken for. even in pakistan i was mistaken for being a different nationality jfl.

 

[curryslayerordeath]

of course they are special to pakistan, since they dont live in india. thats why i said its stupid to compare pakistan and india as a whole to each other when we both have ethnic groups that are native to our own countries. i know indians like you will cope and always argue against pakistan but you are not making sense here. pakistan is a diverse country. even i am indic and never have i been mistaken for being indian. 9 out of 10 times its always a different nationality im mistaken for. even in pakistan i was mistaken for being a different nationality jfl.

Why do you take everything as antagonizing JFL, saying Pakistan is homogenous isn't even remotely bad, most would take it as a positive.

Average Pakistani phenotype does look better, I was saying your comment is fallacious bullshit lmao (look at us we have some niggers & chinks we're so special xD).

 

[Gengar]

Why do you take everything as antagonizing JFL, saying Pakistan is homogenous isn't even remotely bad, most would take it as a positive.

Average Pakistani phenotype does look better, I was saying your comment is fallacious bullshit lmao (look at us we have some niggers & chinks we're so special xD).

no but its often indians that ive seen online trying to tell people online "indians and pakistanis are the same" when thats not true. we hjave our differences, you should just accept that. for instance we dont have bengalis but you do. my comment is not "fallacious bullshit" its informative. even i didnt know these things and im pakistani myself. i admit that a lot of pakistanis look like indians but these are only indic pakistanis, NOT other types of pakistanis such as balochs, pashtuns, hazaras, sheedis, etc. the only pakistanis that can look like indians are punjabis and sindhis. im punjabi myself. my brother often gets mistaken for being indian though. i often get mistaken for being middle eastern/north african. which i am not a fan of since im a proud pakistani. though some pakistanis in the west will cope by larping as arabs/turks etc.

 

[reptiles]

no but its often indians that ive seen online trying to tell people online "indians and pakistanis are the same" when thats not true. we hjave our differences, you should just accept that. for instance we dont have bengalis but you do. my comment is not "fallacious bullshit" its informative. even i didnt know these things and im pakistani myself. i admit that a lot of pakistanis look like indians but these are only indic pakistanis, NOT other types of pakistanis such as balochs, pashtuns, hazaras, sheedis, etc. the only pakistanis that can look like indians are punjabis and sindhis. im punjabi myself. my brother often gets mistaken for being indian though. i often get mistaken for being middle eastern/north african. which i am not a fan of since im a proud pakistani. though some pakistanis in the west will cope by larping as arabs/turks etc.

The west asians make up 22 percent of the population the hazaras are less than than 1 percent around 78 percent is indic meaning while there is a significant minority of western eurasian in pakistan they are not ''pakistani'' in the ethnic sense cause that term is an ethnic word they are pakistani is a nationalistic sense