@paladincel

[registerfasterusing]

can you estimate my iq @paladincel_

 

[registerfasterusing]

I can give a writing sample

 

[Deleted member 77644]

I can give a writing sample

Already prepared? Give it.

 

[registerfasterusing]

Already prepared? Give it.

Alr I’ll give a few give me a couple minutes

 

[registerfasterusing]

Already prepared? Give it.

https://looksmax.org/threads/my-opinion-on-culture.1618619/

https://looksmax.org/threads/school-essays.1618644/#post-23065036

 

[Deleted member 77644]

https://looksmax.org/threads/my-opinion-on-culture.1618619/

https://looksmax.org/threads/school-essays.1618644/#post-23065036

Read every word.

Second essay is super generic and uses needless verbiage since that's just expected for school essays. No offense but there's no real value there besides pointing out how Nazis held different standards for themselves and for the ethnic minorities, which just serves an example of misunderstanding. Yes they are wrong to delude themselves theft and disloyalty are wrong as a result of their delusions, but their delusions themselves take place outside of logic and are themselves consistent. "I am fundamentally better, all traits equalized." is a delusion echoing Nietzsche, who simply says the superior are superior because they are, never pointing out traits AKA arguments for why. This also sounds somewhat AI-inspired.

Based on this, I would say average.

First essay is obviously inspired by Baudrillard, Anti-Oedipus, Hegel, Nietzsche.

I detect no true coherence, albeit some parts are good and indicate truth. But just from being able to write it I would say probably gifted. (Which means heavily above average in intelligence).

 

[registerfasterusing]

Read every word.

Second essay is super generic and uses needless verbiage since that's just expected for school essays. No offense but there's no real value there besides pointing out how Nazis held different standards for themselves and for the ethnic minorities, which just serves an example of misunderstanding. Yes they are wrong to delude themselves theft and disloyalty are wrong as a result of their delusions, but their delusions themselves take place outside of logic and are themselves consistent. "I am fundamentally better, all traits equalized." is a delusion echoing Nietzsche, who simply says the superior are superior because they are, never pointing out traits AKA arguments for why. This also sounds somewhat AI-inspired.

Based on this, I would say average.

First essay is obviously inspired by Baudrillard, Anti-Oedipus, Hegel, Nietzsche.

I detect no true coherence, albeit some parts are good and indicate truth. But just from being able to write it I would say probably gifted. (Which means heavily above average in intelligence).

Alr thanks, do you mind reading this one too? Its an in class sample from last spring, wondering your opinion cuz this got me a rly good score for AP


Handwriting should be taught in contemporary education systems; however, its emphasis should reflect its value within social and economic environments.

In an era where technology becomes increasingly potent, questions regarding the significance of handwriting in modern education systems have emerged. The arguments presented that approve of or deny the continuation of handwriting instruction revolve around its symbolic, practical, and cognitive value, or lack thereof. It is true that with the exponential growth of communication through technological means, the worth of handwriting as a fundamental skill in educational or economic atmospheres has sharply declined. In this respect, the transition away from handwriting and toward typing reflects the socioeconomic evolution of society in the last century. Regarding the change in handwriting styles that took place in the mid-19th century, Anne Trubek points out, “It was also believed …. industrious” (Source C). A similar shift is developing in the 21st century, in which communication through technological platforms represents the development of a post-industrial society. This demonstrates how contemporary society places greater emphasis on individuality and self-governance, as opposed to universalized standards. Trubek describes the historical purpose of cursive handwriting, “Mastering it was …. standardized model” (Source C). In the industrial era, individuals were taught to operate in factory conditions. Each individual was meant to accomplish a task methodically and without deviation, so as to preserve the uniformity of their creation.

Contrastively, post-industrial society relies upon heterogeneity and diversity, in which multiple variations distinguish themselves from and complement each other. Rather than defending a single arrangement of production, numerous configurations compete with each other, promoting innovation and a multitude of alternatives. These alternatives, in turn, reinforce individuality as they present individuals with the opportunity to express their subjectivity through choice. As Trubek states, “Our 19th and 20th-century …. onto squiggles and loops” (Source C). Although the gradual devaluation of handwriting in contemporary society may reflect a socioeconomic transition to post-industrialism, the existence of a debate in which its protection is argued demonstrates the already individualized environment of the modern day. For there to be a variety of opinions and options to, or not to, implement various proposals suggests the diversity of choice and the pervasion of individuality throughout society. Justin Pot, reflecting upon not using cursive despite having learned it in school, states, “It’s a staggering waste …. to use paper” (Source E). Although Pot employs his example of never using cursive to take notes during college lectures, this does not mean he did not have the opportunity to do so. It was ultimately his choice whether or not to employ his cursive skills. This is what education should offer, not the standardized model that it once did, but an atmosphere in which individuals are presented with the means to engage with society entirely. And, in a society in which there exists a multitude of choices, students should be instructed to equip themselves with the ability to access all of these opportunities in whichever way they, individually, see fit. Education should not be limited to a single, standardized mode of communication, rather, it should provide students with the opportunity to access multiple modes of communication. Society no longer operates according to a permanent, universal model. Rather, it incorporates a variety of opinions in a diverse collection of individual thoughts and experiences. David Kysilko states, “those who favor handwriting instruction …. defining characteristic of our species” (Source D). It is evident through the very existence of this position that some individuals believe in the perpetual practicality of handwriting, whereas others, such as Justin Pot, deny its use almost entirely. This exhibits how the value, or non-value, of handwriting varies from individual to individual. Therefore, it would be reductive to implement a standard in which all individuals must follow a universal metric.

 

[acm]

Read every word.

Second essay is super generic and uses needless verbiage since that's just expected for school essays. No offense but there's no real value there besides pointing out how Nazis held different standards for themselves and for the ethnic minorities, which just serves an example of misunderstanding. Yes they are wrong to delude themselves theft and disloyalty are wrong as a result of their delusions, but their delusions themselves take place outside of logic and are themselves consistent. "I am fundamentally better, all traits equalized." is a delusion echoing Nietzsche, who simply says the superior are superior because they are, never pointing out traits AKA arguments for why. This also sounds somewhat AI-inspired.

Based on this, I would say average.

First essay is obviously inspired by Baudrillard, Anti-Oedipus, Hegel, Nietzsche.

I detect no true coherence, albeit some parts are good and indicate truth. But just from being able to write it I would say probably gifted. (Which means heavily above average in intelligence).

do u do this shit

can I send in a guide i wrote

 

[registerfasterusing]

do u do this shit

can I send in a guide i wrote

Wait until hes done w mine bru

 

[Deleted member 77644]

do u do this shit

can I send in a guide i wrote

Of course not, he's asking me just because some other guy asked me because I got tagged in a million MVP threads.

You can definitely send it but I won't be reading anything.

 

[Deleted member 77644]

Wait until hes done w mine bru

I''ll read it later.

 

[acm]

Wait until hes done w mine bru

he won't do the favour

 

[registerfasterusing]

can you estimate my iq @paladincel_

@_MVP_ im curious as to what u think too

 

[_MVP_]

@_MVP_ im curious as to what u think too

I think that everyone is Low IQ and only i am high IQ

Other than that, If i compare you to the average dude, u are significantly better

 

[Eskorbutin]

First essay is obviously inspired by Baudrillard, Anti-Oedipus, Hegel, Nietzsche.

Have you read anti edipus and Hegel op?

 

[registerfasterusing]

I think that everyone is Low IQ and only i am high IQ

Other than that, If i compare you to the average dude, u are significantly better

Agreed

 

[registerfasterusing]

Have you read anti edipus and Hegel op?

No but I have a very basic understanding of their ideas

 

[Eskorbutin]

No but I have a very basic understanding of their ideas

Cool I was just curious!!