People be underrating

[aspiringltc]

First of all I feel like everyone seems to have their own definition of what looks level each rating indicates. Most people consider average to be hltn which is blatantly stupid. Average should be mmtn and should be an average looking man between the ages of 18-35. My best example would be Miles Teller. He is a guy you wouldn’t look twice at if he was a regular dude. And not directly repulsive either.

The ratings should be honest, not a place too project your insecurities onto other people. Granted if you can’t take criticism you shouldn’t post yourself. But there are too many trolls on this forum that it’s hard for users too gauge their lookslevel. Guys who would be one of the best looking guys in a classroom are constantly being rated ltn.

I feel like if everyone dropped their egos and made an effort to be honest and helpful it would really benefit everyone to become more successful IRL

Is the rating forum pointless? Or does it just need to be more centralised and regulated? Do people even care? Cause I do

 

[Knight]

Most people consider average to be hltn which is blatantly stupid. Average should be mmtn

 

[Knight]

View attachment 5001450

average is hltn-lmtn

 

[Gonzalol]

First of all I feel like everyone seems to have their own definition of what looks level each rating indicates. Most people consider average to be hltn which is blatantly stupid. Average should be mmtn and should be an average looking man between the ages of 18-35. My best example would be Miles Teller. He is a guy you wouldn’t look twice at if he was a regular dude. And not directly repulsive either.

The ratings should be honest, not a place too project your insecurities onto other people. Granted if you can’t take criticism you shouldn’t post yourself. But there are too many trolls on this forum that it’s hard for users too gauge their lookslevel. Guys who would be one of the best looking guys in a classroom are constantly being rated ltn.

I feel like if everyone dropped their egos and made an effort to be honest and helpful it would really benefit everyone to become more successful IRL

Is the rating forum pointless? Or does it just need to be more centralised and regulated? Do people even care? Cause I do

MMTN meanign at the MID from The MID doesnt mean all people is there. In an exam the Mid is a 5, but it doesnt mean that the average is a 5. Could be more or less

 

[aspiringltc]

average is hltn-lmtn

Truecel isn’t a rating

 

[aspiringltc]

MMTN meanign at the MID from The MID doesnt mean all people is there. In an exam the Mid is a 5, but it doesnt mean that the average is a 5. Could be more or less

I had a stroke trying to read that

 

[Gonzalol]

I had a stroke trying to read that

Im not english so im not fluent. But I mean that being MID MTN doesnt mean to be average practically, it could be just theorical.

 

[aspiringltc]

average is hltn-lmtn

In that case they should change the names of the ratings, because mid tier normie being above average is very unintuitive.
Attractiveness level is relative to other people, therefore it doesn’t make sense calling someone that’s average low tier, they should obviously be mid tier.

 

[Gonzalol]

In that case they should change the names of the ratings, because mid tier normie being above average is very unintuitive.
Attractiveness level is relative to other people, therefore it doesn’t make sense calling someone that’s average low tier, they should obviously be mid tier.

LTN Its just a subtier from Normie, not that deep bro...

 

[Knight]

Truecel isn’t a rating

i grabbed this graph from an old thread on here btw from like 2020-2021 so im sure it is a rating

 

[Knight]

In that case they should change the names of the ratings, because mid tier normie being above average is very unintuitive.
Attractiveness level is relative to other people, therefore it doesn’t make sense calling someone that’s average low tier, they should obviously be mid tier.

a midtier normie on a decile scale is a 5/10 btw so it works out in that sense