People who stand with "Pro-Immigration" are low iq

[copemaxingll]

IQ is based on a person's logical thinking, pattern recognition, problem-solving, verbal comprehension, and memory.

When you look at a demographic map and murder, rape, and crime. You would notice the places that have the most are usually the underdeveloped ones and mostly where the immigrants come from in Europe or other countries.

So when the rise of crime rate started in Europe, you would also notice the demographic shifted from a widely white-dominated to a more "diverse" society.

You guys seeing the pattern? Now if you mention that to a pro-migrant, they will call you racist because they lack the ability of logical thinking and pattern recognition. But if you ask them, why are these immigrants violent? They will say white people colonized them, and now they are fighting back, which means they lack problem-solving.

So being pro-migration means you lack 3/5 of the comprehensive data that is used to measure IQ.

 

[copemaxingll]

bump!!!!!! Give me my praise

 

[astatin]

There's alot of benefits of immigration

 

[copemaxingll]

There's alot of benefits of immigration

besides cheaper labor, give me one

 

[sonic55555]

now that is indeed absolute water

 

[astatin]

bump!!!!!! Give me my praise

It's a shitty stance, doesn't make any sense

 

[7nclave]

b

IQ is based on a person's logical thinking, pattern recognition, problem-solving, verbal comprehension, and memory.

When you look at a demographic map and murder, rape, and crime. You would notice the places that have the most are usually the underdeveloped ones and mostly where the immigrants come from in Europe or other countries.

So when the rise of crime rate started in Europe, you would also notice the demographic shifted from a widely white-dominated to a more "diverse" society.

You guys seeing the pattern? Now if you mention that to a pro-migrant, they will call you racist because they lack the ability of logical thinking and pattern recognition. But if you ask them, why are these immigrants violent? They will say white people colonized them, and now they are fighting back, which means they lack problem-solving.

So being pro-migration means you lack 3/5 of the comprehensive data that is used to measure IQ.

britain was built on immigration

 

[copemaxingll]

now that is indeed absolute water

no it is not, no one here talks about it

 

[copemaxingll]

b

britain was built on immigration

how

 

[basedyeagerist]

IQ is based on a person's logical thinking, pattern recognition, problem-solving, verbal comprehension, and memory.

When you look at a demographic map and murder, rape, and crime. You would notice the places that have the most are usually the underdeveloped ones and mostly where the immigrants come from in Europe or other countries.

So when the rise of crime rate started in Europe, you would also notice the demographic shifted from a widely white-dominated to a more "diverse" society.

You guys seeing the pattern? Now if you mention that to a pro-migrant, they will call you racist because they lack the ability of logical thinking and pattern recognition. But if you ask them, why are these immigrants violent? They will say white people colonized them, and now they are fighting back, which means they lack problem-solving.

So being pro-migration means you lack 3/5 of the comprehensive data that is used to measure IQ.

yt inkwells should be pro immigration because if more and more ppl are ethnics it will make jbw even more powerful thus giving them more smv and that would also allow them to get gooks or any other race of foids much easier simply because theyd be rarer

 

[copemaxingll]

It's a shitty stance, doesn't make any sense

Is it, though? Immigration causes diversity; diversity kills society.

So much wrong with illegal immigration

 

[astatin]

besides cheaper labor, give me one

You gsve a nice one

But they contribute to the economy

Work jobs that white people don't want to

They also bring diversity wich i lowk find cool

Higher gdp

Theres also more, but you get the point

 

[Emolifta]

besides cheaper labor, give me one

Economical growth

 

[astatin]

Is it, though? Immigration causes diversity; diversity kills society.

So much wrong with illegal immigration

now we're talking, illegal immigration does suck, i thought you we're talking about the legal ones

 

[copemaxingll]

Economical growth

just no

 

[Emolifta]

just no

State your reasoning

 

[lucifer88]

IQ is based on a person's logical thinking, pattern recognition, problem-solving, verbal comprehension, and memory.

When you look at a demographic map and murder, rape, and crime. You would notice the places that have the most are usually the underdeveloped ones and mostly where the immigrants come from in Europe or other countries.

So when the rise of crime rate started in Europe, you would also notice the demographic shifted from a widely white-dominated to a more "diverse" society.

You guys seeing the pattern? Now if you mention that to a pro-migrant, they will call you racist because they lack the ability of logical thinking and pattern recognition. But if you ask them, why are these immigrants violent? They will say white people colonized them, and now they are fighting back, which means they lack problem-solving.

So being pro-migration means you lack 3/5 of the comprehensive data that is used to measure IQ.

honestly very good take i have nothing to disagree with here im kinda mad i dont because i love debating people even when i agree with them to improve my dialogue skills but you did good kid not bad not bad

edit: i might have look into the subject though just so that i can knowledge mog you

 

[copemaxingll]

now we're talking, illegal immigration does suck, i thought you we're talking about the legal ones

forgot to mention illegal I deleted my original scentence cause it was to long but I inlucded illegal immigration in it

 

[lucifer88]

Economical growth

how?

 

[lucifer88]

yt inkwells should be pro immigration because if more and more ppl are ethnics it will make jbw even more powerful thus giving them more smv and that would also allow them to get gooks or any other race of foids much easier simply because theyd be rarer

wish it was about that, is either you're good looking or you're not in the us whites are already a minority and jbw pill isn't really powerful

 

[7nclave]

how

Let’s start with the Viking migration in 790 AD,Vikings came in due to the wealth Britain had with gold and how fertile the land was.They developed the villages and reproduced with the Saxons who were there.

Romans also migrated in beforehand and developed towns and roads,building castles like penvensey and making britain overall better

The Normans had a huge impact,for starters England had about 6 earls which were riddled with fighting and corruption.The towns were little and not profitable.The Normans came in through the Roman castle built on Penvensey and siezed through
The benefits of the Normans are
-Centralised Religion
-Huge economic boost due to more towns being developed with guilds introduced and just expansions
-Bigger trade partners and larger empire
-Better quality of life and less enslavement
-Better education

Now let’s get into the more minor benefits of immigration which came afterwards
The Huegenouts developed the arms manufacturers and were skilled craftsman
The Highlanders are very well known for developing all of modern day railway
The Ulsters were great for agriculture
The Windrush generation worked the jobs the ‘british’ didnt want,which were low pay high wages jobs such as transport like bus drivers.There jobs were very important for the economy.They also introduced the Notting Hill carnival which is the biggest carnival in europe and brings in insane revenue which greatly improves the economy of England as a whole
Yes crime rates have increased but that is due to the poverty these minorities have been put in and the harsh conditions they faced.If they had not been treated like scum and had the same chance as whites this wouldn’t have happened

So yes,Migration is very important for a country to develop and flourish And britain is the best example on why ,especially because of their empire.

 

[boneridden]

IQ is based on a person's logical thinking, pattern recognition, problem-solving, verbal comprehension, and memory.

When you look at a demographic map and murder, rape, and crime. You would notice the places that have the most are usually the underdeveloped ones and mostly where the immigrants come from in Europe or other countries.

So when the rise of crime rate started in Europe, you would also notice the demographic shifted from a widely white-dominated to a more "diverse" society.

You guys seeing the pattern? Now if you mention that to a pro-migrant, they will call you racist because they lack the ability of logical thinking and pattern recognition. But if you ask them, why are these immigrants violent? They will say white people colonized them, and now they are fighting back, which means they lack problem-solving.

So being pro-migration means you lack 3/5 of the comprehensive data that is used to measure IQ.

i stand with immigration so when the race war starts there will be more to kill

 

[Euron]

Water

 

[Hess]

Let’s start with the Viking migration in 790 AD,Vikings came in due to the wealth Britain had with gold and how fertile the land was.They developed the villages and reproduced with the Saxons who were there.

Romans also migrated in beforehand and developed towns and roads,building castles like penvensey and making britain overall better

The Normans had a huge impact,for starters England had about 6 earls which were riddled with fighting and corruption.The towns were little and not profitable.The Normans came in through the Roman castle built on Penvensey and siezed through
The benefits of the Normans are
-Centralised Religion
-Huge economic boost due to more towns being developed with guilds introduced and just expansions
-Bigger trade partners and larger empire
-Better quality of life and less enslavement
-Better education

Now let’s get into the more minor benefits of immigration which came afterwards
The Huegenouts developed the arms manufacturers and were skilled craftsman
The Highlanders are very well known for developing all of modern day railway
The Ulsters were great for agriculture
The Windrush generation worked the jobs the ‘british’ didnt want,which were low pay high wages jobs such as transport like bus drivers.There jobs were very important for the economy.They also introduced the Notting Hill carnival which is the biggest carnival in europe and brings in insane revenue which greatly improves the economy of England as a whole
Yes crime rates have increased but that is due to the poverty these minorities have been put in and the harsh conditions they faced.If they had not been treated like scum and had the same chance as whites this wouldn’t have happened

So yes,Migration is very important for a country to develop and flourish And britain is the best example on why ,especially because of their empire.

The romans and normans left almost zero genetic impact on britain and were literally invaders conquering them, all of the immigrant examples you listed as well never made an impact on the demographics more than 1 percent

 

[lucifer88]

Let’s start with the Viking migration in 790 AD,Vikings came in due to the wealth Britain had with gold and how fertile the land was.They developed the villages and reproduced with the Saxons who were there.

Romans also migrated in beforehand and developed towns and roads,building castles like penvensey and making britain overall better

The Normans had a huge impact,for starters England had about 6 earls which were riddled with fighting and corruption.The towns were little and not profitable.The Normans came in through the Roman castle built on Penvensey and siezed through
The benefits of the Normans are
-Centralised Religion
-Huge economic boost due to more towns being developed with guilds introduced and just expansions
-Bigger trade partners and larger empire
-Better quality of life and less enslavement
-Better education

Now let’s get into the more minor benefits of immigration which came afterwards
The Huegenouts developed the arms manufacturers and were skilled craftsman
The Highlanders are very well known for developing all of modern day railway
The Ulsters were great for agriculture
The Windrush generation worked the jobs the ‘british’ didnt want,which were low pay high wages jobs such as transport like bus drivers.There jobs were very important for the economy.They also introduced the Notting Hill carnival which is the biggest carnival in europe and brings in insane revenue which greatly improves the economy of England as a whole
Yes crime rates have increased but that is due to the poverty these minorities have been put in and the harsh conditions they faced.If they had not been treated like scum and had the same chance as whites this wouldn’t have happened

So yes,Migration is very important for a country to develop and flourish And britain is the best example on why ,especially because of their empire.

use today's examples of immigration being useful you're mainly referring to things that helped develop land not already formed governments like the ones we have today

"yea bro a million years ago before christ blah blah and people from all places tried immigrating to this country and thats why it formed" i mean no shit bro? is todays society what the main idea is based on

 

[Hess]

The romans and normans left almost zero genetic impact on britain and were literally invaders conquering them, all of the immigrant examples you listed as well never made an impact on the demographics more than 1 percent

Also the vikings consistently raped and killed anglo saxon priests what the fuck are you talking about, @7nclave

 

[7nclave]

The romans and normans left almost zero genetic impact on britain and were literally invaders conquering them, all of the immigrant examples you listed as well never made an impact on the demographics more than 1 percent

yes they may have not made much of a genetic impact,but they still left a very large physical impact with even some roman infastructure still being present today.This was very important in connecting villages to eachother and even building castles were very important even till the Norman landing on penvensey.
Genetic impact is minor in the grand scheme of things
Even though the Norman’s didn’t make much of a genetic impact why are you downplaying it to genetics?The Norman’s changed EVERYTHING and made the biggest positive impact on England,even though they were outnumbered 10,000 to 2 million

 

[Hess]

Also the vikings consistently raped and killed anglo saxon priests what the fuck are you talking about, @7nclave

Also please do tell how ulster scots invading ireland was actually good to any irish person @7nclave

 

[Hess]

yes they may have not made much of a genetic impact,but they still left a very large physical impact with even some roman infastructure still being present today.This was very important in connecting villages to eachother and even building castles were very important even till the Norman landing on penvensey.
Genetic impact is minor in the grand scheme of things
Even though the Norman’s didn’t make much of a genetic impact why are you downplaying it to genetics?The Norman’s changed EVERYTHING and made the biggest positive impact on England,even though they were outnumbered 10,000 to 2 million

Because the point is that they werent some mass immigration event it was a caste of rulers taking over a country and then implementing their gov, whether it was good or bad, why do you think the anglo saxons fought them?

 

[7nclave]

use today's examples of immigration being useful you're mainly referring to things that helped develop land not already formed governments like the ones we have today

"yea bro a million years ago before christ blah blah and people from all places tried immigrating to this country and thats why it formed" i mean no shit bro? is todays society what the main idea is based on

low iq’d reply,in order to learn for the future we must learn the past.
As I said,yes immigrated areas are crime ridden but that is due to the situations they’ve been forced into.As they’re new to the country they’re forced into low paying jobs with long hours which makes it long to work.Todays society based on immigration,without immigration we wouldn’t be where we are today,we wouldn’t be as developed.
Immigration is extremely useful as it brings in skilled workers which developed society.
Though many of these aren’t skilled as of right now those who are employed still do the jobs that no other wants to do.So i don’t see a problem with immigration in moderation but it is stupid to completely halt immigration

 

[7nclave]

Also please do tell how ulster scots invading ireland was actually good to any irish person @7nclave

The ulster scots did not invade ireland
King James I brought the Ulster Scots which were highlanders in so he could try to get closer to the Catholics and be friendly with them,the highlanders were displaced due to English farmers taking their land and forcing them to pay to live there and they were nomadic so they had no money.
Yes that was not good for Ireland and the effects are still rippled today but it wasn’t an invasion,it was simply migration in order to get closer to the catholics which caused a huge uproar.

 

[lucifer88]

low iq’d reply,in order to learn for the future we must learn the past.
As I said,yes immigrated areas are crime ridden but that is due to the situations they’ve been forced into.As they’re new to the country they’re forced into low paying jobs with long hours which makes it long to work.Todays society based on immigration,without immigration we wouldn’t be where we are today,we wouldn’t be as developed.
Immigration is extremely useful as it brings in skilled workers which developed society.
Though many of these aren’t skilled as of right now those who are employed still do the jobs that no other wants to do.So i don’t see a problem with immigration in moderation but it is stupid to completely halt immigration

use today examples

 

[L'Enfoiré]

besides cheaper labor, give me one

developed IQ shredder countries

 

[7nclave]

Because the point is that they werent some mass immigration event it was a caste of rulers taking over a country and then implementing their gov, whether it was good or bad, why do you think the anglo saxons fought them?

the saxons only fought them because they’re foreign invaders,like you’re points..They only didn’t like them because they were foreign and didn’t speak their language as seen in the Magna Carta.Humans fear what they don’t know and that’s why people don’t like immigration.Not all the Saxons fought the Normans as well.
Harold’s army consisted of primarily farmers who were just called to arms and got paid for fighting,90% of his army disbanded due to poor leadership,being tired and for the harvest.
Once the Normans took control there were very minor rebellions with small minorities actually having big enough problems to fight.
The only notable rebellion being the Harrying of the North which sent a message to all the Saxons

 

[Hess]

The ulster scots did not invade ireland
King James I brought the Ulster Scots which were highlanders in so he could try to get closer to the Catholics and be friendly with them,the highlanders were displaced due to English farmers taking their land and forcing them to pay to live there and they were nomadic so they had no money.
Yes that was not good for Ireland and the effects are still rippled today but it wasn’t an invasion,it was simply migration in order to get closer to the catholics which caused a huge uproar.

"it was not good for ireland" there is your answer it literally does not matter, all the examples your brought up were other ethnic groups establishing dominance over the other and impacting them negatively, a nation isnt some economic ground that you need to constantly replace the people with, its an actual race and people who have established control over their lands and want to further their interests

 

[L'Enfoiré]

Is it, though? Immigration causes diversity; diversity kills society.

So much wrong with illegal immigration

it does not kill society

 

[Hess]

the saxons only fought them because they’re foreign invaders,like you’re points..They only didn’t like them because they were foreign and didn’t speak their language as seen in the Magna Carta.Humans fear what they don’t know and that’s why people don’t like immigration.Not all the Saxons fought the Normans as well.
Harold’s army consisted of primarily farmers who were just called to arms and got paid for fighting,90% of his army disbanded due to poor leadership,being tired and for the harvest.
Once the Normans took control there were very minor rebellions with small minorities actually having big enough problems to fight.
The only notable rebellion being the Harrying of the North which sent a message to all the Saxons

Eitherway the norman invasion is not equivalent at all to mass immigration you are reaching extremely hard

 

[7nclave]

"it was not good for ireland" there is your answer it literally does not matter, all the examples your brought up were other ethnic groups establishing dominance over the other and impacting them negatively, a nation isnt some economic ground that you need to constantly replace the people with, its an actual race and people who have established control over their lands and want to further their interests

did you read my post properly?Like I said the ripples for Ireland were felt today but the Highlanders were forcibly displaced by King James I to place protestants into a Catholic area.They simply fought over their religions which i think is low IQ and that’s why i’m not really religious as it causes conflict.
King James I did not want to establish control over Ireland but it was more for appeasement and try to establish good links and an alliance with Ireland.Thus why he planted protestants there so he could be liked more

 

[7nclave]

Eitherway the norman invasion is not equivalent at all to mass immigration you are reaching extremely hard

I’m just using Britain in general as it is the best example of how diversity can make a country great

 

[L'Enfoiré]

i stand with immigration so when the race war starts there will be more to kill

 

[boneridden]

View attachment 5298908

my idol

 

[L'Enfoiré]

The romans and normans left almost zero genetic impact on britain and were literally invaders conquering them, all of the immigrant examples you listed as well never made an impact on the demographics more than 1 percent

Do you realize that the demographics of the USA are not white

 

[lucifer88]

low iq’d reply,in order to learn for the future we must learn the past.
As I said,yes immigrated areas are crime ridden but that is due to the situations they’ve been forced into.As they’re new to the country they’re forced into low paying jobs with long hours which makes it long to work.Todays society based on immigration,without immigration we wouldn’t be where we are today,we wouldn’t be as developed.
Immigration is extremely useful as it brings in skilled workers which developed society.
Though many of these aren’t skilled as of right now those who are employed still do the jobs that no other wants to do.So i don’t see a problem with immigration in moderation but it is stupid to completely halt immigration

you're arguing against a position i never took. nobody said immigration should be completely stopped. there's a massive difference between immigration and mass immigration.

yes immigration helped build nations in the past. i don't disagree with that. but using what happened centuries ago to justify current immigration policy makes no sense because the conditions aren't the same. developing sparsely populated land and managing an already established modern country are two completely different situations.

and saying "we have to learn from the past" doesn't mean blindly applying the past to completely different circumstances. history gives context, not automatic justification.

i also agree that some immigrants take jobs others don't want and that skilled immigration can benefit a country. that's why i never argued for zero immigration. the issue is scale. if immigration reaches a level where housing, infrastructure, wages, public services, and integration can't keep up, then it stops being beneficial regardless of whether immigration itself can be useful.

so you're responding to an argument i never made. i'm criticizing mass immigration, not immigration as a concept. those are two different discussions.

you're just pulling shit out of your ass because you're not understanding your argument falls apart when you try applying it to society today, is stupid

 

[Hess]

did you read my post properly?Like I said the ripples for Ireland were felt today but the Highlanders were forcibly displaced by King James I to place protestants into a Catholic area.They simply fought over their religions which i think is low IQ and that’s why i’m not really religious as it causes conflict.
King James I did not want to establish control over Ireland but it was more for appeasement and try to establish good links and an alliance with Ireland.Thus why he planted protestants there so he could be liked more

If you honestly think the troubles is solely based on religion you are retarded, it plays a part but only because said religions are intertwined with their national identities,

 

[Hess]

Do you realize that the demographics of the USA are not white

And its descending into a shithole of different ethnic groups fighting for their interests, your point?

 

[7nclave]

you're arguing against a position i never took. nobody said immigration should be completely stopped. there's a massive difference between immigration and mass immigration.

yes immigration helped build nations in the past. i don't disagree with that. but using what happened centuries ago to justify current immigration policy makes no sense because the conditions aren't the same. developing sparsely populated land and managing an already established modern country are two completely different situations.

and saying "we have to learn from the past" doesn't mean blindly applying the past to completely different circumstances. history gives context, not automatic justification.

i also agree that some immigrants take jobs others don't want and that skilled immigration can benefit a country. that's why i never argued for zero immigration. the issue is scale. if immigration reaches a level where housing, infrastructure, wages, public services, and integration can't keep up, then it stops being beneficial regardless of whether immigration itself can be useful.

so you're responding to an argument i never made. i'm criticizing mass immigration, not immigration as a concept. those are two different discussions.

you're just pulling shit out of your ass because you're not understanding your argument falls apart when you try applying it to society today, is stupid

i completely agree with you on how mass immigration affects a nation.
In today’s Britain,though it benefited greatly from immigration and developed it to be what it is today due to immigration in moderation.The argument the poster given was immigration in general.
Mass immigration is something else,at the moment in London it’s insane.You go down a street and I think it’s India.
I do agree with your arguments on how mass immigration is bad because you literally can’t argue about the displacement of culture(though Britains multidiverse)immigration in masses are terrible.

 

[Hess]

you're arguing against a position i never took. nobody said immigration should be completely stopped. there's a massive difference between immigration and mass immigration.

yes immigration helped build nations in the past. i don't disagree with that. but using what happened centuries ago to justify current immigration policy makes no sense because the conditions aren't the same. developing sparsely populated land and managing an already established modern country are two completely different situations.

and saying "we have to learn from the past" doesn't mean blindly applying the past to completely different circumstances. history gives context, not automatic justification.

i also agree that some immigrants take jobs others don't want and that skilled immigration can benefit a country. that's why i never argued for zero immigration. the issue is scale. if immigration reaches a level where housing, infrastructure, wages, public services, and integration can't keep up, then it stops being beneficial regardless of whether immigration itself can be useful.

so you're responding to an argument i never made. i'm criticizing mass immigration, not immigration as a concept. those are two different discussions.

you're just pulling shit out of your ass because you're not understanding your argument falls apart when you try applying it to society today, is stupid

Extremely minor immigration impacts on populations are all he brings up, immigration at times is useful yes but pretending its beneficial to just replace the entire native population is stupid

 

[Hess]

i completely agree with you on how mass immigration affects a nation.
In today’s Britain,though it benefited greatly from immigration and developed it to be what it is today due to immigration in moderation.The argument the poster given was immigration in general.
Mass immigration is something else,at the moment in London it’s insane.You go down a street and I think it’s India.
I do agree with your arguments on how mass immigration is bad because you literally can’t argue about the displacement of culture(though Britains multidiverse)immigration in masses are terrible.

Its not nearly as economically needed though, its normal to have immigration to a degree and I agree with that but britain at the peak of its empire was 99 percent white british and didnt import all of their empire inside their country, and even china does not do this while it grows significantly

 

[lucifer88]

Extremely minor immigration impacts on populations are all he brings up, immigration at times is useful yes but pretending its beneficial to just replace the entire native population is stupid

i completely agree with you on how mass immigration affects a nation.
In today’s Britain,though it benefited greatly from immigration and developed it to be what it is today due to immigration in moderation.The argument the poster given was immigration in general.
Mass immigration is something else,at the moment in London it’s insane.You go down a street and I think it’s India.
I do agree with your arguments on how mass immigration is bad because you literally can’t argue about the displacement of culture(though Britains multidiverse)immigration in masses are terrible.

love you both niggas i love discussions

 

[Centurion Hunter]

IQ is based on a person's logical thinking, pattern recognition, problem-solving, verbal comprehension, and memory.

When you look at a demographic map and murder, rape, and crime. You would notice the places that have the most are usually the underdeveloped ones and mostly where the immigrants come from in Europe or other countries.

So when the rise of crime rate started in Europe, you would also notice the demographic shifted from a widely white-dominated to a more "diverse" society.

You guys seeing the pattern? Now if you mention that to a pro-migrant, they will call you racist because they lack the ability of logical thinking and pattern recognition. But if you ask them, why are these immigrants violent? They will say white people colonized them, and now they are fighting back, which means they lack problem-solving.

So being pro-migration means you lack 3/5 of the comprehensive data that is used to measure IQ.

Allow the hot foids in