People will empathize will Kirk solely because of the video of his death

[YourTrueCaptain]

People will empathize will Kirk solely because of the video of his death.

I will bet 1000 dollars that if you told the public that Kirk was shot and killed, without any video released to the public, 70% or more of the people that sympathize with him will either rejoice, or not care altogether.

Normies need to realize the body is nothing more than a vessel. He was shot and killed, just like how thousands are on the news headlines that were also shot and killed. He simply died.

Hundreds of thousands of people die everyday. There’s no “pretty” way to die unless you get euthanized in your sleep in Germany. This is normal and this is how death looks like.

When people read books or stories, fiction or nonfiction, I guarantee you they aren’t envisioning the death of someone when it’s being described/told. They subconsciously think “Ah, he was stabbed. Ouch” They don’t envision the blood, the cries pleading for mercy, the aftermath, the struggle. Most of us don’t.

 

[Node]

Dnrd

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

disappointedDnrd

Not even a rep?

 

[Node]

Not even a rep?

 

[Deleted member 110192]

People will empathize will Kirk solely because of the video of his death.

I will bet 1000 dollars that if you told the public that Kirk was shot and killed, without any video released to the public, 70% or more of the people that sympathize with him will either rejoice, or not care altogether.

Normies need to realize the body is nothing more than a vessel. He was shot and killed, just like how thousands are on the news headlines that were also shot and killed. He simply died.

Hundreds of thousands of people die everyday. There’s no “pretty” way to die unless you get euthanized in your sleep in Germany. This is normal and this is how death looks like.

When people read books or stories, fiction or nonfiction, I guarantee you they aren’t envisioning the death of someone when it’s being described/told. They subconsciously think “Ah, he was stabbed. Ouch” They don’t envision the blood, the cries pleading for mercy, the aftermath, the struggle. Most of us don’t.

Not me

I was seeing videos of him daily and liked the guy since a year ago

R.I.P

 

[TheAncientMacedonia]

bad way to die
like that

 

[nobodylovesme]

Psychological distance is all there is to it. In war when you starve an entire city, it doesn't feel so bad. But when you're slaughtering in close, it's somehow much worse, even when the death toll is much smaller.

Same with the video evidence, people will be more drawn into it (bcs they saw it, they were there). It's just how humanity works.

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

Psychological distance is all there is to it. In war when you starve an entire city, it doesn't feel so bad. But when you're slaughtering in close, it's somehow much worse, even when the death toll is much smaller.

Same with the video evidence, people will be more drawn into it (bcs they saw it, they were there). It's just how humanity works.

High iq, thank you for the detailed explanation, you’re the first to do so

 

[barambo]

Not me

I was seeing videos of him daily and liked the guy since a year ago

R.I.P

love your work

 

[Aladin]

No I think being shot for free speech is wrong.

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

No I think being shot for free speech is wrong.

Objectively speaking, yes

 

[kasrkin]

another white guy dead boohoo, got his blood gushing all over.

 

[trvechud]

No I think being shot for free speech is wrong.

Free speech should only apply to those i agree with.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

People will empathize will Kirk solely because of the video of his death.

I will bet 1000 dollars that if you told the public that Kirk was shot and killed, without any video released to the public, 70% or more of the people that sympathize with him will either rejoice, or not care altogether.

Normies need to realize the body is nothing more than a vessel. He was shot and killed, just like how thousands are on the news headlines that were also shot and killed. He simply died.

Hundreds of thousands of people die everyday. There’s no “pretty” way to die unless you get euthanized in your sleep in Germany. This is normal and this is how death looks like.

When people read books or stories, fiction or nonfiction, I guarantee you they aren’t envisioning the death of someone when it’s being described/told. They subconsciously think “Ah, he was stabbed. Ouch” They don’t envision the blood, the cries pleading for mercy, the aftermath, the struggle. Most of us don’t.

Unlike you he was a Christian so he’s probably going to GOD if he repented recently and Jesus was merciful on him

Unlike you an GAYthiest who will go to hell

 

[Noesis]

Unlike you he was a Christian so he’s probably going to GOD if he repented recently and Jesus was merciful on him

Unlike you an GAYthiest who will go to hell

Can you explain to me how come Christians decide who goes to heaven and who to hell

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

Unlike you he was a Christian so he’s probably going to GOD if he repented recently and Jesus was merciful on him

Unlike you an GAYthiest who will go to hell

Low iq subhuman

 

[Corleone]

Objectively speaking, yes

Objectively speaking, he was either shot for building his entire career based on treason, or by his very masters for starting to see the light in the last years.

 

[unon]

People will empathize will Kirk solely because of the video of his death.

I will bet 1000 dollars that if you told the public that Kirk was shot and killed, without any video released to the public, 70% or more of the people that sympathize with him will either rejoice, or not care altogether.

Normies need to realize the body is nothing more than a vessel. He was shot and killed, just like how thousands are on the news headlines that were also shot and killed. He simply died.

Hundreds of thousands of people die everyday. There’s no “pretty” way to die unless you get euthanized in your sleep in Germany. This is normal and this is how death looks like.

When people read books or stories, fiction or nonfiction, I guarantee you they aren’t envisioning the death of someone when it’s being described/told. They subconsciously think “Ah, he was stabbed. Ouch” They don’t envision the blood, the cries pleading for mercy, the aftermath, the struggle. Most of us don’t.

I would care because I wouldn't see him ragebating trannies and LGBT niggers

 

[Corleone]

Unlike you he was a Christian so he’s probably going to GOD if he repented recently and Jesus was merciful on him

Unlike you an GAYthiest who will go to hell

he was "Christian" from some gay American fake mega church, which abandoned everything for the worship of jews. Since he wasn't a roman catholic, he'll burn anyway.

 

[FiendFiend]

People will empathize will Kirk solely because of the video of his death.

I will bet 1000 dollars that if you told the public that Kirk was shot and killed, without any video released to the public, 70% or more of the people that sympathize with him will either rejoice, or not care altogether.

Normies need to realize the body is nothing more than a vessel. He was shot and killed, just like how thousands are on the news headlines that were also shot and killed. He simply died.

Hundreds of thousands of people die everyday. There’s no “pretty” way to die unless you get euthanized in your sleep in Germany. This is normal and this is how death looks like.

When people read books or stories, fiction or nonfiction, I guarantee you they aren’t envisioning the death of someone when it’s being described/told. They subconsciously think “Ah, he was stabbed. Ouch” They don’t envision the blood, the cries pleading for mercy, the aftermath, the struggle. Most of us don’t.

WAIT REALLYL?!?!?!?

People feel bad for kirk because they saw him get grusomely killed in front of thousands of people live in HD quality and they saw how ugly and disgusting death is? Really?

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

WAIT REALLYL?!?!?!?

People feel bad for kirk because they saw him get grusomely killed in front of thousands of people live in HD quality and they saw how ugly and disgusting death is? Really?

Replace Hitler or Stalin with kirk and let them get executed. People will still feel bad despite Hitler and Stalin objectively being evil.

 

[FiendFiend]

People will empathize will Kirk solely because of the video of his death.

I will bet 1000 dollars that if you told the public that Kirk was shot and killed, without any video released to the public, 70% or more of the people that sympathize with him will either rejoice, or not care altogether.

Normies need to realize the body is nothing more than a vessel. He was shot and killed, just like how thousands are on the news headlines that were also shot and killed. He simply died.

Hundreds of thousands of people die everyday. There’s no “pretty” way to die unless you get euthanized in your sleep in Germany. This is normal and this is how death looks like.

When people read books or stories, fiction or nonfiction, I guarantee you they aren’t envisioning the death of someone when it’s being described/told. They subconsciously think “Ah, he was stabbed. Ouch” They don’t envision the blood, the cries pleading for mercy, the aftermath, the struggle. Most of us don’t.

No shit. We saw a guy we are so used to being lively, full of life, debating, being outgoing, someone we have a parasocial relationship whether left or right wing, hes always been a guy whos existed, whether its through youtube, tiktok.

To see that shit just turn south is horrifying. Its like a horror movie when the character starts staring back at the camera its very unnerving. Your mistaking it with the other way round.

"no one would care if there was no video so it doesnt matter and u shouldnt be sad over it" no... the video and modern technology has shown how brutal and disgusting death is. Death is never glorious or beautiful. Maybe through art, paintings people thought death was glorious, its actually very grusome and sad and chaotic and makes u feel horrible in ur chest if you have any sort of soul.

 

[FiendFiend]

Replace Hitler or Stalin with kirk and let them get executed. People will still feel bad despite Hitler and Stalin objectively being evil.

Your comparing a guy who had civil poltiical debates, kids, a family, ran youth programs with dictators who arguebly killed millions? Are you fucking okay? genually LOL?!

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

No shit. We saw a guy we are so used to being lively, full of life, debating, being outgoing, someone we have a parasocial relationship whether left or right wing, hes always been a guy whos existed, whether its through youtube, tiktok.

To see that shit just turn south is horrifying. Its like a horror movie when the character starts staring back at the camera its very unnerving. Your mistaking it with the other way round.

"no one would care if there was no video so it doesnt matter and u shouldnt be sad over it" no... the video and modern technology has shown how brutal and disgusting death is. Death is never glorious or beautiful. Maybe through art, paintings people thought death was glorious, its actually very grusome and sad and chaotic and makes u feel horrible in ur chest if you have any sort of soul.

That’s my point, i’m 99% sure I made a post stating almost exactly what you said.

 

[FiendFiend]

Replace Hitler or Stalin with kirk and let them get executed. People will still feel bad despite Hitler and Stalin objectively being evil.

Your making me really question your IQ OP

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

Your comparing a guy who had civil poltiical debates, kids, a family, ran youth programs with dictators who arguebly killed millions? Are you fucking okay? genually LOL?!

He was objectively immoral and, let me say this again, indirectly encouraged and directly supported the starvation and killing of children halfway across the world lmao.

 

[FiendFiend]

That’s my point, i’m 99% sure I made a post stating almost exactly what you said.

Ok but you clearly dont get my point cuz u say the exact opposite... and the conclusion you clearly got was that his death doesnt matter what so ever because if it wasnt filmed no one would care.

No, if anything it should make you care MORE. because we were able to see in full quality and sound in front of thousands how death and an assasination really is. This isnt like a blurry video of luigi killing the CEO. its real shit thats hard to watch, thats what death is.

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

Your making me really question your IQ OP

Ok but you clearly dont get my point cuz u say the exact opposite... and the conclusion you clearly got was that his death doesnt matter what so ever because if it wasnt filmed no one would care.

No, if anything it should make you care MORE. because we were able to see in full quality and sound in front of thousands how death and an assasination really is. This isnt like a blurry video of luigi killing the CEO. it’s real shit thats hard to watch, thats what death is.

First off i’ve never claimed if his death wasn’t filmed nobody would care. Reread my message. I said, a lot of people only empathize with him because they saw the video and how he died. Had they not seen/known the video existed, a lot of people would be pleased/not empathize with Kirk all together

 

[FiendFiend]

He was objectively immoral and, let me say this again, indirectly encouraged and directly supported the starvation and killing of children halfway across the world lmao.

He wasnt objectively "immoral", he made arguments. We can by the way make the same argument for any politician in congress, or anywhere in the world who made arguments supporting a certain side in a war.

By your logic we should kill everyone in such a grusome way, because we have all been on a dinner table, and one of our parents has either supported ukraine or russia, or spoke about it. Both countries have civilian blood on their hands. So should you be subjugated to being murdered? Should your dad be subjugated to an execution?

 

[FiendFiend]

First off i’ve never claimed if his death wasn’t filmed nobody would care. Reread my message. I said, a lot of people only empathize with him because they saw the video and how he died. Had they not seen/known the video existed, a lot of people would be pleased/not empathize with Kirk all together

Thats ltierally bar for bar the same thing. Your clearly not very smart man. Your like 12 max

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

He wasnt objectively "immoral", he made arguments. We can by the way make the same argument for any politician in congress, or anywhere in the world who made arguments supporting a certain side in a war.

By your logic we should kill everyone in such a grusome way, because we have all been on a dinner table, and one of our parents has either supported ukraine or russia, or spoke about it. Both countries have civilian blood on their hands. So should you be subjugated to being murdered? Should your dad be subjugated to an execution?

Right so the denial of starving children and the support of bombing hundreds of thousands of non combatants-civilians isn’t immoral?

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

Thats ltierally bar for bar the same thing. Your clearly not very smart man. Your like 12 max

I never claimed nobody would care you retard. I said people wouldn’t be so inclined to empathize with him. Holy shit you’re actually single digit IQ

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

People will empathize will Kirk solely because of the video of his death.

I will bet 1000 dollars that if you told the public that Kirk was shot and killed, without any video released to the public, 70% or more of the people that sympathize with him will either rejoice, or not care altogether.

Normies need to realize the body is nothing more than a vessel. He was shot and killed, just like how thousands are on the news headlines that were also shot and killed. He simply died.

Hundreds of thousands of people die everyday. There’s no “pretty” way to die unless you get euthanized in your sleep in Germany. This is normal and this is how death looks like.

When people read books or stories, fiction or nonfiction, I guarantee you they aren’t envisioning the death of someone when it’s being described/told. They subconsciously think “Ah, he was stabbed. Ouch” They don’t envision the blood, the cries pleading for mercy, the aftermath, the struggle. Most of us don’t.

Wrong

Plenty of people have 0 sympathy either way

Every liberal is happy about this, but they are virtuesignalling and pretending to take the moral highground

 

[FiendFiend]

Right so the denial of starving children and the support of bombing hundreds of thousands of non combatants-civilians isn’t immoral?

Your dodging so hard. Your asking me to anwser your questions you want anwser mine. Have none of your parents ever had a family disucssion about a certain warzone and what side they support? Right? So if your family at a dinner table said "we should overthrow saddam!" and the US military goes in and iraqi civilians die, should the dad at the dinner table who didnt like saddam be held to a public execution like that?

You can vocally support a war, by the way im not for israel its fucking disgusting what they are doing, and even kirk had basic decency out his heart to say they are ethnically cleansing gaza despite his previous support for israel.

Your the retard whos saying someone who talks about or argues foreign policy should be shot dead? are you fucking stupid. By your definition like every households dad or mom who discussed politics supporting a certain war or some shit should be killed? your fucking stupid?

This is the logic israelis use to wipe gaza "well they had it coming? they were immoral for celebrating deaths of jews at october 7". Your line of argument is subhuman.

 

[FiendFiend]

I never claimed nobody would care you retard. I said people wouldn’t be so inclined to empathize with him. Holy shit you’re actually single digit IQ

Yes I know your a retard and dont know what a hyperbole is, Im exaggerating when I said "nobody would care" of course a few would care but way less. So basically bar for bar what I said. Thanks

 

[looksmaxxed]

empathy doesn't exist the way normies think it does, it's only triggered when someone bites it who you don't think deserves it.

because i don't care if some third worlder gets obliterated. i honestly can't bring myself to care about the gazans. you could show me a million pictures of destroyed gazan children, all i can picture in my mind is screaming low iq brown immigrants who want to rape my family

i might care if some israeli gets killed, but only if they're white looking. this despite my being an antisemite.

i think empathy is biological byproduct of racial consciousness and solidarity(ie you have empathy for people who are like you) that has been hijacked and bastardized by judeochristians to extend to everything including space rocks. this kind of empathy really makes no sense and is maladaptive. it's the kind of empathy responsible for telescopic philanthropy, ie aid to africa while your own people starve, caring about dead gazans while your own people are getting raped and killed by foreign hordes.

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

.

Your the retard whos saying someone who talks about or argues foreign policy should be shot dead?

I beg you to show me where I said this.

 

[FiendFiend]

Right so the denial of starving children and the support of bombing hundreds of thousands of non combatants-civilians isn’t immoral?

By the way if you live in a western nation and pay taxes argueably you are funding a genocide. Should every US citizen be shot like kirk? Anwser the question.

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

Yes I know your a retard and dont know what a hyperbole is, Im exaggerating when I said "nobody would care" of course a few would care but way less. So basically bar for bar what I said. Thanks

So you essentially goofed like the dumbass you are by exaggerating and youre angry I…took what you said?

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

By the way if you live in a western nation and pay taxes argueably you are funding a genocide. Should every US citizen be shot like kirk? Anwser the question.

If you actually listened to the things I’ve said regarding this argument you would know that the death of someone simply for voicing an opinion is objectively bad and objectively immoral. That being said, do I empathize with him? That’s the real question.

 

[FiendFiend]

I beg you to show me where I said this.

Nope because you are insinuating we shouldnt feel bad for Kirk because he said words in supporting a genocide. OP you realsie western tax payer money does way more than just "words" it is literally directly responsible for deaths in gaza.

So by your logic if any US or UK citizen was randomly killed by an extremist, would it be just? I mean by your logic yes? Because if your funding a genocide your supporting a genocide and starvation, like you said, you should be killed?

 

[FiendFiend]

If you actually listened to the things I’ve said regarding this argument you would know that the death of someone simply for voicing an opinion is objectively bad and objectively immoral. That being said, do I empathize with him? That’s the real question.

Alright wait wait wait. But you sent memes of charlie kirks death? So your just being a hypocrite now "the death of someone simply for voicing an opinion is objectively bad and objectively immoral".

Right... so kirk did that and got publically executed brutally. And your laughing at his death and said he deserved it. You dont practice what you preach.

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

Nope because you are insinuating we shouldnt feel bad for Kirk because he said words in supporting a genocide. OP you realsie western tax payer money does way more than just "words" it is literally directly responsible for deaths in gaza.

So by your logic if any US or UK citizen was randomly killed by an extremist, would it be just? I mean by your logic yes? Because if your funding a genocide your supporting a genocide and starvation, like you said, you should be killed?

In this case those who are paying taxes genuinely have no choice (except moving out of the country) but to pay. Now, choosing to give Israel a voice on your platform and advocate for them and spread their propaganda wide and far? That’s a different thing.

 

[FiendFiend]

If you actually listened to the things I’ve said regarding this argument you would know that the death of someone simply for voicing an opinion is objectively bad and objectively immoral. That being said, do I empathize with him? That’s the real question.

Biggest flip flopper in the world. Your silenced like a good fucking goyim

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

View attachment 4107998
Biggest flip flopper in the world. Your silenced like a good fucking goyim

Once again, I would never call for the killing of Kirk nor others who have controversial opinions especially regarding Gaza. The question is: will I feel empathy for them or not?

 

[FiendFiend]

In this case those who are paying taxes genuinely have no choice (except moving out of the country) but to pay. Now, choosing to give Israel a voice on your platform and advocate for them and spread their propaganda wide and far? That’s a different thing.

But you said even if someone voicing an opinion shouldnt be killed? But yet you support kirk being killed for voicing a public opinion?

So tell me. If some retarded grandpa says and debates on the streets for sending weapons to ukraine , and those weapons kill a kid in donbass or belgorod. Or vice versa a guy does the same in belarus or china for russia. Then should they be publically executed like kirk?

 

[FiendFiend]

Once again, I would never call for the killing of Kirk nor others who have controversial opinions especially regarding Gaza. The question is: will I feel empathy for them or not?

Yes u did its right here dumb ass for the world to see. You said its better off he left this earth for what he said about gaza.

 

[looksmaxxed]

the charlie kirk situation is the same situation as the girl on the train. one is nigger fatigue, the other is leftist extremist fatigue. both are the result of our institutions of culture and politics being hijacked by marxist activists, making any effective legal or political solution to the nigger and crazy leftist problem impossible. all marxist activism is funded by jews. it all goes back to the jews

 

[YourTrueCaptain]

Alright wait wait wait. But you sent memes of charlie kirks death? So your just being a hypocrite now "the death of someone simply for voicing an opinion is objectively bad and objectively immoral".

Right... so kirk did that and got publically executed brutally. And your laughing at his death and said he deserved it. You dont practice what you preach.

But you said even if someone voicing an opinion shouldnt be killed? But yet you support kirk being killed for voicing a public opinion?

So tell me. If some retarded grandpa says and debates on the streets for sending weapons to ukraine , and those weapons kill a kid in donbass or belgorod. Or vice versa a guy does the same in belarus or china for russia. Then should they be publically executed like kirk?

Once again, If I hadn’t made it painfully clear, it is objectively wrong for someone to die for practicing their free speech. No matter what they may say.

 

[FiendFiend]

Once again, I would never call for the killing of Kirk nor others who have controversial opinions especially regarding Gaza. The question is: will I feel empathy for them or not?

You see how hard you back pedal? You dont even know what you believe in retard One day "hes better off leaving the earth" for what he said about gaza, then the next "No no i would never say that!!"