Peptide Grifters are now claiming GHK-Cu can prevent hair loss better then 5AR Inhibitors

[TajManzoor]

This company,

Is claiming that GHK-Cu or “Copper Peptides” as they prefer to call it can reactivate dead follicles and grow them back in 3 months and have claimed they are better than 5AR Inhibitors…

Just to put this into perspective 5AR Inhibitors are the gold standard from a very small pot of hair loss treatments and even they can take 6-12 months to start seeing meaningful results if used in conjunction with other hair growth methods… Yet this company is claiming that a peptide used mainly to increase collagen production and has no hormonal effects whatsoever smashes 5AR Inhibitors out of the park.

I have no idea how they can get away with this, it’s beyond false advertising it’s straight up lying and grifting? Making people to believe something completely false.

 

[sonic55555]

Sorry I have to bump, im curious
Might just buy ghk-cu injectable if it stops hair shedding

 

[sonic55555]

 

[Jerryterry129]

Bump

 

[Lord Vader]

Sorry I have to bump, im curious
Might just buy ghk-cu injectable if it stops hair shedding

it wont. i used ghk cu at 2-5mg for nearly a year and it barely did anything. you need to address hair loss at its root cause with a 5ari for any meaningful regrowth

 

[Lord Vader]

This company,
View attachment 4941102
Is claiming that GHK-Cu or “Copper Peptides” as they prefer to call it can reactivate dead follicles and grow them back in 3 months and have claimed they are better than 5AR Inhibitors…

Just to put this into perspective 5AR Inhibitors are the gold standard from a very small pot of hair loss treatments and even they can take 6-12 months to start seeing meaningful results if used in conjunction with other hair growth methods… Yet this company is claiming that a peptide used mainly to increase collagen production and has no hormonal effects whatsoever smashes 5AR Inhibitors out of the park.

I have no idea how they can get away with this, it’s beyond false advertising it’s straight up lying and grifting? Making people to believe something completely false.

dogshit peptide, massively overrated. the only peptides worth taking are glps or hgh. anything else is utterly redundant

 

[sonic55555]

dogshit peptide, massively overrated. the only peptides worth taking are glps or hgh. anything else is utterly redundant

So you got nothing from ghk? no improvement in skin, glow, no nothing ?

 

[Lord Vader]

So you got nothing from ghk? no improvement in skin, glow, no nothing ?

mild improvements to my skin, but absolutely nothing for hair growth. even just 5mg of isotret would be infinitely better for your skin than ghk cu

 

[sonic55555]

mild improvements to my skin, but absolutely nothing for hair growth. even just 5mg of isotret would be infinitely better for your skin than ghk cu

what the heck does ghk even do then?

 

[Lord Vader]

what the heck does ghk even do then?

like i said, mild skin benefits. that said, it should be reconstituted with phosphate buffered saline rather than bac water, since bac can render the cu molecule ineffective due to its ph. it may be marginally more effective when prepared properly, so take my anecdote with a grain of salt. im quite certain that the ghk does most of the heavy lifting for hair than the copper, though

 

[sonic55555]

like i said, mild skin benefits. that said, it should be reconstituted with phosphate buffered saline rather than bac water, since bac can render the cu molecule ineffective due to its ph. it may be marginally more effective when prepared properly, so take my anecdote with a grain of salt. im quite certain that the ghk does most of the heavy lifting for hair than the copper, though

so you def wouldnt recommend it for hair?

 

[Lord Vader]

so you def wouldnt recommend it for hair?

no, definitely not. all youll ever need for hair is dutasteride alongside ru58841 assuming youre roiding (which you should be)

 

[sonic55555]

assuming youre roiding (which you should be)

truly a man after my own taste

 

[sonic55555]

no, definitely not. all youll ever need for hair is dutasteride alongside ru58841 assuming youre roiding (which you should be)

does dutasteride do anything tho when roiding, except for test converting to dht. I assume it doesnt do anything to stop lets say an anadrol from affecting your hair, right?

 

[Lord Vader]

does dutasteride do anything tho when roiding, except for test converting to dht. I assume it doesnt do anything to stop lets say an anadrol from affecting your hair, right?

no, it only protects against testosterone, or possibly some of boldenones hair damaging metabolites that act through the 5ar enzyme. im not entirely sure on the latter. testosterone is all you should be relying on anyway

 

[sonic55555]

no, it only protects against testosterone, or possibly some of boldenones hair damaging metabolites that act through the 5ar enzyme. im not entirely sure on the latter. testosterone is all you should be relying on anyway

if it protects against boldenone , then id start taking dut. because EQ is a main stable for me

interesting

 

[Lord Vader]

if it protects against boldenone , then id start taking dut. because EQ is a main stable for me

interesting

testosterone should be your primary driver, with eq at roughly half your test dose to manage e2 and let you tolerate higher test doses for more growth. dosing your bold too high can actually be counterproductive for building muscle since you risk nuking your estrogen

 

[sonic55555]

testosterone should be your primary driver, with eq at roughly half your test dose to manage e2 and let you tolerate higher test doses for more growth. dosing your bold too high can actually be counterproductive for building muscle since you risk nuking your estrogen

yeah bold nukes my e2. but together its a nice combo
with a lil oral ontop its even better